There really is nothing to say or add to this news article. The facts speak for themselves. But place in the "Just When You Think You Have Heard It All!" folder.
America and Canada have gone crazy with this crap. In Canada a few weeks ago a very senior lady traveling 300 miles within the country was forced to endure an invasive body search!
Despite the hoax of the Underpantie Bomber being public knowledge, still they go on regardless with this absolute idiocy. People will eventually revolt as this BS spreads. It is up to us Bloggers to make sure that the word is put out so that people learn what is going on.
February 16, 2010
By Daniel Rubin
Just when I thought I was out of the Transportation Security Administration business for a few columns, they pull me back in.
Did you hear about the Camden cop whose disabled son wasn't allowed to pass through airport security unless he took off his leg braces?
Unfortunately, it's no joke. This happened to Bob Thomas, a 53-year-old officer in Camden's emergency crime suppression team, who was flying to Orlando in March with his wife, Leona, and their son, Ryan.
Ryan was taking his first flight, to Walt Disney World, for his fourth birthday.
The boy is developmentally delayed, one of the effects of being born 16 weeks prematurely. His ankles are malformed and his legs have low muscle tone. In March he was just starting to walk.
Mid-morning on March 19, his parents wheeled his stroller to the TSA security point, a couple of hours before their Southwest Airlines flight was to depart.
The boy's father broke down the stroller and put it on the conveyor belt as Leona Thomas walked Ryan through the metal detector.
The alarm went off.
The screener told them to take off the boy's braces.
The Thomases were dumbfounded. "I told them he can't walk without them on his own," Bob Thomas said.
"He said, 'He'll need to take them off.' "
Ryan's mother offered to walk him through the detector after they removed the braces, which are custom-made of metal and hardened plastic.
No, the screener replied.
The boy had to walk on his own.
Leona Thomas said she was calm. Bob Thomas said he was starting to burn.
They complied, and Leona went first, followed by Ryan, followed by Bob, so the boy wouldn't be hurt if he fell. Ryan made it through.
By then, Bob Thomas was furious. He demanded to see a supervisor. The supervisor asked what was wrong.
"I told him, 'This is overkill. He's 4 years old. I don't think he's a terrorist.' "
The supervisor replied, "You know why we're doing this," Thomas said.
No why, super?
Tell us all why such idiocy happens.
Make it BELIEVABLE.
Why is a child having to be proven innocent?
Enforcing the fear factor younger and younger, hmm?
Not only is this a child but his father is a COP!
Thomas said he told the supervisor he was going to file a report, and at that point the man turned and walked away.
A Philadelphia police officer approached and asked what the problem was. Thomas said he identified himself and said he was a Camden officer. The Philadelphia officer suggested he calm down and enjoy his vacation.
Back home in Glassboro a week later, Bob Thomas called the airport manager and left her what he calls a terse message.
He was still angry enough last week to call me after I'd written a couple of columns about travelers' complaints of mistreatment by screeners at the airport.
"This was just stupid," he told me.
At the very least, it was not standard procedure.
On Friday, TSA spokeswoman Ann Davis said the boy never should have been told to remove his braces.
TSA policy should have allowed the parents to help the boy to a private screening area where he could have been swabbed for traces of explosive materials.
HOLY HELL!
EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS!
4 YEARS OLD!
FATHER IN LAW ENFORCEMENT!
BEAM ME UP SCOTTY!
She said she wished Thomas had reported the matter to TSA immediately. "If screening is not properly done, we need to go back to that officer and offer retraining so it's corrected."
Davis also said TSA's security director at the airport, Bob Ellis, called Thomas last week to apologize. He gave Thomas the name of the agency's customer service representative, in case he has a problem at the airport in the future.
Afterward, Thomas said he appreciated Ellis' call. He said he had no interest in pursuing the matter further or in filing a lawsuit.
"I'm just looking for things to be done right," he said. "And I just want to make sure this isn't done to anyone else. Just abide by your standard operating procedures."
Apologies if I seemed to be in rant mode, but I was. Once you are out of the matrix these embarrassing ploys are so clear and obvious. Personally, I think people, all of us if possible, declared a "no fly" day and followed through on it. 24 hours of no flight. That might give them a small message. We refuse to be treated as slaves and they need to get the message.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.