By Paul Joseph Watson May 2, 2010 In a speech before the elitist Council On Foreign Relations organization in New York earlier this week, President of the European Central Bank Jean-Claude Trichet called for the imposition of global governance to be bossed by the G20 and the corrupt Bank of International Settlements in the name of safeguarding the global economy. In an address entitled “Global Governance Today,” Trichet proclaims how the elite need to impose Section one of Trichet’s speech is entitled, “Why we need global governance,” and from then on he constantly invokes the economic downturn as a justification for empowering secretive, undemocratic and corrupt global institutions with the power to rule the world. Highlights of Trichet’s speech can be viewed below via the official Council on Foreign Relations You Tube channel. Full transcript of the speech was also carried by the Bank for International Settlements, an international organization of central banks that has constantly lobbied for a centralized global currency to replace that of nation states. Trichet praises the BIS as being “ahead of the curve” in dealing with the financial crisis during the speech. The primary outfit that will boss the institutions of global governance, according to Trichet, is the Global Economy Meeting (GEM), which regularly meets at the BIS headquarters in Basel. This group, states Trichet, “has become the prime group for global governance among central banks”. The GEM is basically a policy steering committee under the umbrella of the Bank for International Settlements. The BIS is a branch of the of the Bretton-Woods International Financial architecture and closely allied with the Bilderberg Group. It is controlled by an inner elite that represents all the world’s major central banking institutions. John Maynard Keynes, perhaps the most influential economist of all time, wanted it closed down as it was used to launder money for the Nazis during World War II. Financial website Investors Insight describe the BIS as “the most powerful bank you’ve never heard of,” labeling it “the most powerful financial institution on earth”. The bank wields power through its control of vast amounts of global currencies. The BIS controls no less than 7% of the world’s available foreign exchange funds, as well as owning 712 tons of gold bullion. “By controlling foreign exchange currency, plus gold, the BIS can go a long way toward determining the economic conditions in any given country,” writes Doug Casey. “Remember that the next time Ben Bernanke or European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet announces an interest rate hike. You can bet it didn’t happen without the concurrence of the BIS Board.” The BIS is basically a huge slush fund for global government through which secret transfers of wealth from citizens are surreptitiously handed to the IMF.
Of course the bankers/money changers of the many centuries are all over this one. The fact that Trichet unveiled this new approach in the march towards global governance before an audience of CFR insiders is fully appropriate. The Council On Foreign Relations comprises of influential elitists and powerbrokers from all sectors of government, business, academia and the media. It is the public face of the more secretive Bilderberg Group. The CFR only recruits members sympathetic to its agenda for global government and the elimination of U.S. sovereignty. The scope of the CFR’s mission was best encapsulated by former Deputy Secretary of State under Clinton and CFR luminary Strobe Talbott, who told Time Magazine in July 1992, “In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.” As we have emphasized, the global elite have already announced the birth of world government and who will run it. People expecting the UN to be at the helm have been distracted as the G20, alongside the BIS, was being empowered with the tools through which global governance is being coordinated. In his speech, Trichet acknowledges the role of the G20 in using the financial crisis to mandate developing countries’ “full integration into the institutions of global governance.” “The G20 has been effective in addressing the global crisis. We are now at the stage where this forum is making the transition from acting in a crisis resolution mode to contributing to crisis prevention,” said Trichet. In other words, the elite exploited the financial crisis in order to allow the G20 to pose as saviors and consequently empower itself to impose global governance regulations on nation states in the name of avoiding another economic crisis. As EU President Herman Van Rompuy stated during his speech in Brussels, 2009 marked the first official year of world government powers being directly exercised to control the economies of nation states. “2009 is also the first year of global governance, with the establishment of the G20 in the middle of the financial crisis. The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the global management of our planet,” said Van Rompuy. | |
Paul Joseph Watson is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Global Research Articles by Paul Joseph Watson |
http://pesn.com/2010/05/02/9501643_Mother_of_all_gushers_could_kill_Earths_oceans/#Paul%20Noel
ReplyDeleteMother of all gushers could kill Earth's oceans
Imagine a pipe 5 feet wide spewing crude oil like a fire hose from what could be the planets' largest, high-pressure oil and gas reserve. With the best technology available to man, the Deepwater Horizon rig popped a hole into that reserve and was overwhelmed. If this isn't contained, it could poison all the oceans of the world.
"Well if you say the fire hose has a 70,000 psi pump on the other end yes! No comparison here. The volume out rises geometrically with pressure. Its a squares function. Two times the pressure is 4 times the push. The Alaska pipeline is 4 feet in diameter and pushes with a lot less pressure. This situation in the Gulf of Mexico is stunning dangerous." --Paul Noel (May 2, 2010)
"When the rig sank it flipped over and landed on top of the drill hole some 5,000 feet under the ocean.
Now they've got a hole in the ocean floor, 5,000 feet down with a wrecked oil drilling rig sitting on top of is spewing 200,000 barrels of oil a day into the ocean. Take a moment and consider that, will you!
First they have to get the oil rig off the hole to get at it in order to try to cap it. Do you know the level of effort it will take to move that wrecked oil rig, sitting under 5,000 feet of water? That operation alone would take years and hundreds of millions to accomplish. Then, how do you cap that hole in the muddy ocean floor? There just is no way. No way.
The only piece of human technology that might address this is a nuclear bomb. I'm not kidding. If they put a nuke down there in the right spot it might seal up the hole. Nothing short of that will work. [See Paul Noel's ideas above.]
If we can't cap that hole that oil is going to destroy the oceans of the world. It only takes one quart of motor oil to make 250,000 gallons of ocean water toxic to wildlife. Are you starting to get the magnitude of this?
We're so used to our politicians creating false crises to forward their criminal agendas that we aren't recognizing that we're staring straight into possibly the greatest disaster mankind will ever see. Imagine what happens if that oil keeps flowing until it destroys all life in the oceans of this planet. Who knows how big of a reservoir of oil is down there.
Not to mention that the oceans are critical to maintaining the proper oxygen level in the atmosphere for human life.
We're humped. Unless God steps in and fixes this. No human can. You can be sure of that."
It only takes one quart of motor oil to make 250,000 gallons of ocean water toxic to wildlife. Are you starting to get the magnitude of this?"
ReplyDeleteI saw this already on another site. There it says 200,000 gallons a day leaking into the ocean.
At that rate (if it were true what they say) it would only take something over 2 million years to do all the world's ocean waters. That is how big the oceans are - 139,434,000 square miles - then times 5,280 squared (5,280 x 5,280) and then times the average depth in feet (abyssal plains are on the order of 1,500 feet) and then times 7.48 gallons per cubic foot. Divide that by 250,000 and then by 200,000 and then by 365.25 and you get your result. Furthermore, that is assuming their flow estimate is correct. At that place it is actual 'velocity of efflux' and not some theoretical value. Also, what motor oil does to politically correct assumptions of toxicity has NOTHING to do with crude oil poisoning water in actuality. Crude oil leaks into the oceans and fresh water aquifers ALL the time, naturally. It always has. Crude oil does not behave the same as refined oil on wildlife. Yes, when the birds get drenched in it - but we are not talking about that.
YOU DO NOT WANT TO use a nuclear device and take the chance of cracking the earth's crust. NO, NO, NO.
Let them work on it without hysteria.
Noor
ReplyDeleteI am not sure my emails ever get through to you.
Things don't look to good right now.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBfjU3_XOaA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smnGFfMHaIk
I just ordered a new gibson acoustic guitar. I may have to brush up on one of my favorites. Bad moon rising.
Hey Mick. Mel Gibson makes guitars now? LOL. I dunno I just listened to the radio earlier today and yes I know... but I was driving and it was Amy Goodman from Democracy Now, and yes I know she is a gateway for another organization however she had some people on who were quoting very similar numbers for the mess down in the Gulf in terms of depths and how different drilling is now compared to even 15 years ago.
ReplyDeleteInteresting to know that BP is very under the gun for bad practices and Halliburton MUST furnish complete records for inspection like tomorrow I think. Both are known as companies who operate on the cheap. The cap would have cost only $500 grand a small investment in our safety considering how much they drain from the planet. Apparently the US is the only country who does not them, Norway and Brazil, major oil countries has them mandatory.
They are also discussing making the CEO's of these companies responsible in PERSONAL terms (ie jail) for these things. A fine seems to be just the cost of doing business.