BP oil spill ~ gushing oil reveals rabbit hole
In a recent article, this reporter expressed some doubts as to the accidental nature of the BP Oil Spill, now herald as the largest environmental disaster the earth has ever seen. One could argue that The Great Flood still holds that particular title, but that would lead us two-by-two down an entirely different rabbit trail of debates. While rabbit trails do not interest us today, rabbit holes are of a different matter. That being said, let’s dive down a few, shall we?
First, let’s establish a few facts:
1.) Obama received large campaign contributions from BP.
2.) Obama received large campaign contributions from Goldman Sachs (Second only to The University of California in total campaign contributions).
3.) These companies, along with a slew of others, have been said to be holdings of the Rothschild Banking Family of England, as reported by the AmericaFreePress.net:
“Goldman Sachs is obviously an arm of their empire,
whereas BP is among
a host of companies in [the] Rothschild’s portfolio.”
Now that we’re here, let’s explore a bit further…
Goldman Sachs owns at least 10 percent of Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX), a huge benefactor should ‘cap and trade’ be passed into law.
CCX was founded by the Joyce Foundation, an organization who’s board members included John Ayers (brother of William Ayers) and our very own, Barak Obama when he was a Illinois Senator.
Needless to say, ‘cap and trade’ would amount to trillions of dollars in profit for CCX and its holders, not to mention a little more campaign moola and additional financial perks for Mr. Obama.
Enter the cooling on global warming
Unfortunately, ‘cap and trade’ ironically hit a proverbial iceberg.
The New York Times recently reporteddoubts and evidence against the idea of global warming began to solidify like the ice on the Arctic shelf. That the ‘cap and trade’ bill was virtually dead and sinking in the water with little to no support to be found on Capitol Hill, or any other hill for that matter.
The bill lost steam due to opponents of the bill successfully re-christening it “cap and tax” and pointing out its blatant overhaul of private property rights. Not to mention, no one wanted to touch it as the growing doubts and evidence against the idea of global warming began to solidify like the ice on the Arctic shelf.
Despite the growing evidence against it, the theory of global warming has been the reason for large international summits in recent years, namely one that was just held in Copenhagen late last December.
Proclaimed for months as the summit to finally yield the granddaddy of all environmental treaties, talks during the Copenhagen summit severely broke down and no binding treaty was reached due to the doubts surrounding GW.
The rewarding side of that breakdown was due to BLOGGERS. A group hacked e-mail messages from a British university that suggested a conspiracy by some of the world's leading global warming alarmists. Considering who how and why "global warming" was created was enough for most of us. However that was not enough proof for most of the population trained to regard alternate reporters and conspiracy writers and revisionists as crazy folk ~ pathetic and laughable. Until they come true!
This was another time when alternative media changed history much to the chagrin of the "leaders" of nations. It is also the reason people like Jay Rockefeller and many of the elite are doing their darndest to take over the Internet and quash any form of freedom of speech ~ alas with too much success.
During this summit, David Rothschild, “adventurer environmentalist” and an heir apparent to the Rothschild financial empire, in an interview with Bloomberg (see video below) made the admission ~ through a series of stuttering verbal bumbles ~ that the talks in Copenhagen were actually about “global governance” rather than global warming.
Why is David Rothschild discussing a treaty about global warming on a financial channel? Wouldn’t it be more likely that this “environmentalist adventurer” would be found on National Geographic or the Discovery Channel? Global govern…uh, er… global warming rather, must be big business. Like the old adage says, “Where there’s smoke, there’s fire”. Maybe a new one could be coined that says, “Where there’s a Rothschild, there’s money to be made.”
"Give me control of a nation's money supply and I care not who makes the laws." Through several families, the Rothschilds own and control the Federal Reserve.1876: Otto von Bismarck states,
Curiouser and curiouser…"The division of the United States into two federations of equal force was decided long before the civil war by the high financial power of Europe. These bankers were afraid that the United States, if they remained in one block and as one nation, would attain economical and financial independence, which would upset their financial domination over the world.
The voice of the Rothschilds predominated. They foresaw the tremendous booty if they could substitute two feeble democracies, indebted to the financiers, to the vigorous Republic, confident and self-providing.
Therefore they started their emissaries in order to exploit the question of slavery and thus dig an abyss between the two parts of the Republic."
This being said, is it not within the realm of possibility that the powerful family who holds BP is using it, and our government, as a “fall guy” creating an environmental crisis to fill the void left by the waning theory of global warming?
What does a multi-billion dollar company matter when trillions are at stake, right?
BP is merely a financial chess piece
sacrificed as means to a much more lucrative end
~ checkmate: environmental law
and treaties designed to take away
individual property rights away forever
and secure global governance ~
and trillions of dollars of global cash flow ~
for the richest family this world has ever seen.
And we thought Alice in Wonderland was twisted.
David Rothschild admits that Copenhagen Summit was about global governance
wow..great video..Blackwater on the rig before it blew up..Europe v USA..Venezuela involved..a false flag no doubt here..i am certain..
The article below it is a great wrap as well touching on the tentacles of power and where they lie and how they will use this to push global governance through climate change.D avid “plastics Jesus” Rothschild admits it ~ climate change is about global governance ~ nothing more.
“Goldman Sachs owns at least 10 percent of Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX), a huge benefactor should ‘cap and trade’ be passed into law. CCX was founded by the Joyce Foundation, an organization who’s board members included John Ayers (brother of William Ayers) and our very own, Barak Obama when he was a Illinois Senator. Needless to say, ‘cap and trade’ would amount to trillions of dollars in profit for CCX and its holders, not to mention a little more campaign moola and additional financial perks for Mr. Obama.”
uh huh.
"capitalism, A love story" done by Micheal Moore really talks about what Goldman Sachs is responsible for.
ReplyDelete