August 31, 2010FACTS NOT FAIRIES
As I have already mentioned, there is a big difference between a conspiracy theorist and a witness. The difference is that a conspiracy theorist claims what he thinks/guesses/concludes, while a witness states what he knows. They also enjoy a very different legal status. The testimony of a conspiracy theorist is not admissible in legal proceedings. While the testimony of a witness is not only admissible in the court-room, but it is the primary evidence which is technically far more valuable than any documentary evidence.
There is a very big difference in approach to the claims of a conspiracy theorist and to those of an eyewitness, which many people unfamiliar with law seem not to comprehend. The difference is this. While a conspiracy theorist could be “right” or “wrong” in what he claims, a witness could not be “right” or “wrong”.
A witness could only be a truthful witness, who says the truth, or a false witness who intentionally lies. In the first case he performs his citizen’s duties. In the second case he commits a crime punishable with the imprisonment. Hope now, at last, you understood what the difference is and from now on you will no longer call this book a “conspiracy theory”?
Mr. Dimitri A. Khalezov
The difference between the humble author of these lines and other people who advanced their claims in regard to 9/11 like Prof. David Ray Griffin, Prof. Steven E. Jones, Prof. James H. Fetzer, Prof. Morgan Reynolds, Dr. Judy Wood, so-called “Anonymous Physicist”, and other well-known and less-known 9/11 scholars is that not even one of them could testify under oath that he knows the truth and promises to say the truth, the only truth and nothing by the truth, primarily because they do not know the truth and are only guessing, while the humble author of these lines could testify under oath, because he knows the truth and does not need to guess.
Since many people attempted to claim that my video presentation (that first appeared on the Internet in March, 2010) and, consecutively, my book, were allegedly a new, although a “very plausible” 9/11 “conspiracy theory”, I am obliged to disprove this dangerous accusation in an official manner.
My version is not a “conspiracy theory”, dear accusers, because by calling it a “conspiracy theory” you intentionally, again, intentionally, try to diminish my legal status from being an important 9/11 witness, whose testimony is admissible in the court of law ~ to being a meager 9/11 conspiracy theorist, whose suggestions have no legal value.
But, please, be informed, dear accusers, that this kind of cheap trick does not work with the humble author of these lines. I am not a conspiracy theorist; I am a witness, who testifies as follows:
I, Mr. Dimitri A. Khalezov, swear to The God Almighty that I say the truth, the only truth, and nothing but the truth and if I lie let The God punish me in This World and in the World to Come, and testify as follows:
As I have already mentioned, there is a big difference between a conspiracy theorist and a witness. The difference is that a conspiracy theorist claims what he thinks/guesses/concludes, while a witness states what he knows. They also enjoy a very different legal status. The testimony of a conspiracy theorist is not admissible in legal proceedings. While the testimony of a witness is not only admissible in the court-room, but it is the primary evidence which is technically far more valuable than any documentary evidence.
There is a very big difference in approach to the claims of a conspiracy theorist and to those of an eyewitness, which many people unfamiliar with law seem not to comprehend. The difference is this. While a conspiracy theorist could be “right” or “wrong” in what he claims, a witness could not be “right” or “wrong”.
A witness could only be a truthful witness, who says the truth, or a false witness who intentionally lies. In the first case he performs his citizen’s duties. In the second case he commits a crime punishable with the imprisonment. Hope now, at last, you understood what the difference is and from now on you will no longer call this book a “conspiracy theory”?
Mr. Dimitri A. KhalezovThe difference between the humble author of these lines and other people who advanced their claims in regard to 9/11 like Prof. David Ray Griffin, Prof. Steven E. Jones, Prof. James H. Fetzer, Prof. Morgan Reynolds, Dr. Judy Wood, so-called “Anonymous Physicist”, and other well-known and less-known 9/11 scholars is that not even one of them could testify under oath that he knows the truth and promises to say the truth, the only truth and nothing by the truth, primarily because they do not know the truth and are only guessing, while the humble author of these lines could testify under oath, because he knows the truth and does not need to guess.
Since many people attempted to claim that my video presentation (that first appeared on the Internet in March, 2010) and, consecutively, my book, were allegedly a new, although a “very plausible” 9/11 “conspiracy theory”, I am obliged to disprove this dangerous accusation in an official manner.
My version is not a “conspiracy theory”, dear accusers, because by calling it a “conspiracy theory” you intentionally, again, intentionally, try to diminish my legal status from being an important 9/11 witness, whose testimony is admissible in the court of law ~ to being a meager 9/11 conspiracy theorist, whose suggestions have no legal value.
But, please, be informed, dear accusers, that this kind of cheap trick does not work with the humble author of these lines. I am not a conspiracy theorist; I am a witness, who testifies as follows:
I, Mr. Dimitri A. Khalezov, swear to The God Almighty that I say the truth, the only truth, and nothing but the truth and if I lie let The God punish me in This World and in the World to Come, and testify as follows:
1) I indeed used to serve as a commissioned officer in the Soviet military unit 46179, which was the codename of the Soviet Special Control Service ~ an organization primarily responsible for detecting nuclear explosions (underground or otherwise) everywhere in the world.
2) I indeed knew from the time of my former military service mentioned above about the existence of a so-called “emergency nuclear demolition scheme” of the World Trade Centre in the city of New York, in the United States of America; and I knew about the existence of this so-called “emergency nuclear demolition scheme” of the World Trade Center in New York City during not less than ten years prior to the eleventh day of September, year 2001 AD.
3) I indeed used to know personally a very high-ranking and the very-well known official from the Israeli secret service who was using a bogus Arabic identity and a diplomatic cover for setting up various bogus Muslim terrorist networks in South East Asia and elsewhere and for organizing various false-flag terror actions, including those directly connected to the 9/11 perpetration and to the 2002 Bali bombing, at least. A photograph of this person appears below:
His name is withheld here but revealed in the book.
4) I was indeed invited by the above mentioned Israeli intelligence official to his celebratory breakfast early morning, 12 of September, 2001, Bangkok time (still evening of 11 of September in the United States). This celebratory breakfast took place in his diplomatic residence at: 15A, Bangkapi Mansion, 89, Soi 12, Sukhumvit Road, Bangkok, Thailand. And I indeed discussed with this Israeli intelligence official various proceeds of the 9/11 perpetration during this breakfast which was indeed the celebratory one.
5) I indeed honestly informed the US authorities at the US Embassy in Bangkok, Thailand, of all of the above-mentioned facts providing them in a form of a detailed testimony and I could confirm that the US authorities definitely know about all the four above-mentioned facts at least from my testimony.
(See videos)
6) I could confirm that the US authorities knew about terrorism-related activities of the above-mentioned high-ranking Israeli intelligence official, as well as about my and his close relationship, even without me informing them as mentioned in the clause 5) above, and they US officials indeed attempted to prosecute him. However, they abandoned all prosecution attempts against the above-mentioned Israeli intelligence official and let him escape the prosecution by using another bogus identity. This particular fact that the US officials knowingly let the above-mentioned person escape the justice is duly documented in several Thai law courts and I know the corresponding criminal cases’ numbers and could provide them if necessary.
Anyone could use the text of the above-mentioned testimony of mine in any legal proceedings, without modifying any word of mine and without taking any word of mine out of the entire context of the said. I could repeat the above testimony of mine in front of the court of law of any country.
Dimitri A. Khalezov,
the witness
No comments:
Post a Comment
If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.