By Nile Bowie
March
23, 2012
Since the time of the British Empire and the manifesto of Cecil Rhodes, the pursuit of treasures on the hopeless continent has demonstrated the expendability of human life.
Despite
decades of apathy among the primary resource consumers, the increasing
reach of social media propaganda has ignited public interest in
Africa’s long overlooked social issues. In the wake of celebrity
endorsed pro-intervention publicity stunts, public opinion in the United States
is now being mobilized in favor of a greater military presence on the African
continent.
Following
the deployment of one hundred US military personnel to Uganda in 2011, a new bill
has been introduced to the Congress calling for the further expansion of
regional military forces in pursuit of the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA), an
ailing rebel group allegedly responsible for recruiting child soldiers and
conducting crimes against humanity.
As the Obama administration claims to welcome the peaceful rise of China on the world stage, recent policy shifts toward an American Pacific Century indicate a desire to maintain the capacity to project military force toward the emerging superpower.
In
addition to maintaining a permanent military presence in Northern Australia,
the construction of an expansive military base on South Korea’s Jeju Island has
indicated growing antagonism towards Beijing. The base maintains the capacity
to host up to twenty
American and South Korean warships, including submarines, aircraft carriers and
destroyers once
completed in 2014 ~ in addition to the presence of Aegis
anti-ballistic systems.
In response, Chinese leadership has referred to the increasing militarization in the region as an open provocation.
On
the economic front, China has been excluded from the proposed Trans-Pacific
Partnership Agreement (TPPA), a trade agreement intended to
administer US-designed international trading regulations throughout Asia, to the
benefit of American corporations.
As
further fundamental policy divisions emerge subsequent to China and
Russia’s UNSC veto mandating intervention in Syria, the Obama
administration has begun utilizing alternative measures to exert new economic
pressure towards Beijing.
The United States, along with the EU and Japan have called on the World Trade Organization to block Chinese-funded mining projects in the US, in addition to a freeze on World Bank financing for China’s extensive mining projects.
In
a move to counteract Chinese economic ascendancy, Washington is crusading
against China's export restrictions on minerals that are crucial components in
the production of consumer electronics such as flat-screen televisions, smart
phones, laptop batteries, and a host of other products.
In
a 2010 white paper entitled “Critical
Raw Materials for the EU,” the European Commission cites the immediate need for
reserve supplies of tantalum, cobalt, niobium, and tungsten among others; the
US Department of Energy 2010 white paper “Critical
Mineral Strategy”
also acknowledged the strategic importance of these key components. Coincidentally , the US military is now attempting to increase its presence in
what is widely
considered the world’s most resource rich nation, the Democratic
Republic of the Congo.
The
DRC has suffered immensely during its history of foreign plunder and colonial
occupation; it maintains the second lowest GDP per capita despite having an
estimated $24
trillion in untapped raw minerals deposits. During the Congo Wars of the 1996 to
2003, the United States provided training and arms to Rwandan and Ugandan
militias who later invaded the eastern provinces of the DRC in proxy.
In
addition to benefiting various multinational corporations, the regimes of Paul
Kagame
in Rwanda and Yoweri Museveni in Uganda both profited immensely from the
plunder of Congolese conflict minerals such as cassiterite, wolframite,
coltan (from which niobium and tantalum are derived) and gold. The DRC holds
more than 30% of the
world's diamond reserves and 80% of the world's coltan, the majority of
which is exported
to China for processing into electronic-grade tantalum powder and wiring.
China’s
unprecedented economic transformation has relied not only on consumer markets
in the United States, Australia and the EU ` but also on Africa, as a source
for a vast array of raw materials. As Chinese economic and cultural influence
in Africa expands exponentially with the symbolic construction of the new $200
million African Union headquarters funded solely by Beijing, the
ailing United States and its leadership have expressed dissatisfaction toward
its diminishing role in the region.funded solely by Beijing,
During a diplomatic tour of Africa in 2011, US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton herself has irresponsibly insinuated China’s guilt in perpetuating a creeping “new colonialism.”At a time when China holds an estimated $1.5 trillion in American government debt, Clinton’s comments remain dangerously provocative.
As
China, backed by the world’s largest foreign
currency reserves,
begins to offer
loans to its BRICS counterparts in RMB, the prospect of emerging nations
resisting the New American Century
appear to be increasingly assured.
Chinese propaganda poster from 1975 depicting Chinese agricultural aid
to Africa Chinese engagements in the Congo Basin and on the African
continent in general proliferated in the 1960s and 1970s. Many early
development assistance projects from China were agricultural projects,
such as the one featured in this 1975 propaganda poster, captioned
‘Revolutionary friendship is as deep as the ocean’. Source: Collection
International Institute of Social History, Amsterdam. Designer: Guo
Hongwu. Publisher: Shanghai Renmin Chubanshe, 1975.
While
the success of Anglo-American imperialism relies on its capacity to militarily
drive target nations into submission, today’s African leaders are not obliged
to do business with China ~ although doing so may be to their benefit. China
annually invests an
estimated $5.5 billion in Africa, with only 29 percent of direct
investment in the mining sector in 2009 ~ while more than half was directed
toward domestic manufacturing, finance, and construction industries, which
largely benefit Africans themselves ~ despite reports of worker mistreatment.
China
has further committed $10
billion in concessional loans to Africa between 2009 and 2012 and made significant
investments in manufacturing zones in non-resource-rich economies such as
Zambia and Tanzania. As Africa’s largest trading partner, China
imports 1.5 million barrels of oil from Africa per day,
approximately accounting for 30 percent of its total imports.
Over the past decade, 750,000
Chinese nationals have settled in Africa, while Chinese state-funded cultural
centers in rural parts of the continent conduct language classes in Mandarin
and Cantonese.
As China is predicted to formally emerge as the world’s largest economy in 2016, the recent materialization of plans for a BRICS Bank have the potential to restructure the global financial climate and directly challenge the hegemonic conduct of the International Monetary Fund in Africa’s strategic emerging economies.
China’s deepening economic engagement
in Africa and its crucial role in developing the mineral sector,
telecommunications industry and much needed infrastructural projects is creating
"deep nervousness" in the
West,
according to David Shinn, the former US ambassador to Burkina Faso and
Ethiopia.
In a 2011 Department of Defense
whitepaper entitled “Military
and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China”, the US acknowledges
the maturity of China’s modern hardware and military technology, and the
likelihood of Beijing finding hostility with further military alliances between
the United States and Taiwan. The document further indicates that “China’s rise as a major international actor
is likely to stand out as a defining feature of the strategic landscape of the
early 21st century.” Furthermore, the Department of Defense concedes to the
uncertainty of how China’s growing capabilities will be administered on the
world stage.
Although a US military presence in Africa (under the guise of fighting terrorism and protecting human rights) specifically to counter Chinese regional economic authority may not incite tension in the same way that a US presence in North Korea or Taiwan would, the potential for brinksmanship exists and will persist.
China maintains the largest standing
army in the world with 2,285,000 personnel and is working to challenge the
regional military hegemony of America’s
Pacific Century with its expanding naval and conventional
capabilities,
including an effort to develop the world’s first
anti-ship ballistic missile.
Furthermore, China has moved to begin
testing advanced
anti-satellite (ASAT) and Anti Ballistic Missile (ABM) weapons systems in an effort to
bring the US-China rivalry into Space warfare.
The concept of US intervention into the Democratic Republic of the Congo, South Sudan, Central African Republic and Uganda under the pretext of disarming the Lord’s Resistance Army is an ultimately fraudulent purpose.The LRA has been in operation for over two decades, and presently remains at an extremely weakened state, with approximately 400 soldiers.According to the LRA Crisis Tracker, a digital crisis mapping software launched by the Invisible Children group, not a single case of LRA activity has been reported in Uganda since 2006.
The
vast majority of reported attacks are presently taking place in the
northeastern Bangadi region of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, located on
the foot of a tri-border expanse between the Central African Republic and South
Sudan.
The
existence of the Lord’s Resistance
Army should rightfully be disputed, as the cases of LRA activity reported by US State
Department-supported Invisible Children rely on unconfirmed reports ~ cases
where LRA activity is presumed and suspected.
Given
the extreme instability in the northern DRC after decades of foreign invasion
and countless rebel insurgencies, the lack of adequate investigative
infrastructure needed to sufficiently examine and confirm the LRA’s presence is
simply not in place. The villainous branding of Joseph Kony may well be deserved;
however it cannot be overstated that the LRA threat is wholly misrepresented in
recent pro-intervention
US legislation.
An increasing US presence in the region exists only to curtail the increasing economic presence of China in one of the world’s most resource and mineral rich regions.
The
Lord’s Resistance Army was originally formed in 1987 in northwestern Uganda by
members of the Acholi ethnic group, who were historically exploited for forced
labor by the British colonialists and later marginalized by the nation’s
dominant Bantu ethic groups following independence.
The
Lord’s Resistance Army originally aimed to overthrow the government of current
Ugandan President, Yoweri Museveni ~ due to a campaign of genocide waged
against the Acholi people. The northern Ugandan Acholi and Langi ethnic
groups have been historically targeted and ostracized by successive
Anglo-American backed administrations.
In
1971, Israeli and British intelligence agencies engineered a coup against
Uganda’s socialist President Milton Obote, which gave rise to the disastrous
regime of Idi Amin.
Prior
to declaring himself head of state after deposing Obote, Amin was a member of
the British colonial regiment, charged with managing concentration
camps in Kenya during the Mau Mau rebellion beginning in 1952. Amin conducted
genocide against the Acholi people on the suspicion of loyalty toward the
former Obote leadership, who later reclaimed power in 1979 after Amin attempted
to annex the neighboring Kagera province of Tanzania.
Another American friend/client who is still active and violent, yet somehow the focus is on Kony who has been inactive pretty well since 2007.
Museveni founded the Front for National Salvation, which helped topple Obote with US support in 1986, despite the fact that his army exploited the use of child soldiers. Museveni formally took power and was subsequently accused of genocide for driving the Acholi people into detainment camps in an attempt to usurp fertile land in northern Uganda.
The
Museveni regime has displaced approximately 1.5 million Acholi and killed at
least three
hundred thousand people when taking power in 1986 according to the Red Cross. In addition to
accusations of using rape as weapon and overseeing the deaths of thousands in
squalid detainment camps, Museveni has been accused of exerting a campaign of
state-sponsored terror onto the Acholi people in a 1992
Amnesty International report.
During
an
interview with Joseph Kony in 2006, the LRA commander denies allegations
of mutilation and torture and further accuses Museveni’s forces of committing
such actions as propaganda against the Lord’s Resistance Army.
“During the 22-year war, Museveni’s army killed, maimed and mutilated thousands of civilians, while blaming it on rebels. In northern Uganda, instead of defending and protecting civilians against rebel attacks, Museveni’s army would masquerade as rebels and commit gross atrocities, including maiming and mutilation, only to return and pretend to be saviors of the affected people.”
Despite
such compelling evidence of brutality, Museveni has been a staunch US ally
since the Reagan administration and received
$45 million dollars in military aid from the Obama administration for
Ugandan participation in the fight against Somalia’s al Shabaab militia. Since
the abhorrent failure of the 1993 US intervention in Somalia, the US has relied
on the militaries of Rwanda, Uganda and Ethiopia to carry out US interests in
proxy.
Since
colonial times, the West has historically exploited ethnic differences in
Africa for political gain. In Rwanda, the Belgian colonial administration
exacerbated tension between the Hutu, who were subjugated as a workforce ~ and
the Tutsi, seen as extenders of Belgian rule. From the start of the Rwandan
civil war in 1990, the US sought to overthrow the 20-year reign of Hutu
President Juvénal Habyarimana by installing a Tutsi proxy government in Rwanda,
a region historically under the influence of France and Belgium. At that time
prior to the outbreak of the Rwandan civil war, the Tutsi Rwandan Patriotic
Army (RPA) led by current Rwandan President Paul Kagame, was part of Museveni’s
United People's Defense Forces (UPDF).
Ugandan forces invaded Rwanda in 1990
under the pretext of Tutsi liberation, despite the fact that Museveni refused
to grant citizenship to Tutsi-Rwandan refugees living in Uganda at the time, a
move that further offset the 1994 Rwandan genocide. Kagame himself was trained
at the U.S. Army Command and Staff College (CGSC) in Leavenworth, Kansas prior
to returning to the region to oversee the 1990 invasion of Rwanda as commander
of the RPA, which received supplies from US-funded UPDF military bases inside
Uganda. The invasion of Rwanda had the full
support of the US and Britain, who provided training by US Special Forces
in collaboration with US mercenary outfit, Military Professional Resources
Incorporated (MPRI).
A report
issued in 2000
by Canadian Professor Michel Chossudovsky and Belgian economist Pierre Galand
concluded that western financial institutions such as the International
Monetary Fund and the World Bank financed both sides of the Rwandan civil war,
through a process of financing military expenditure from the external debt of
both the regimes of Habyarimana and Museveni.
In Uganda, the World Bank imposed
austerity measures solely on civilian expenditures while overseeing the
diversion of State revenue go toward funding the UPDF, on behalf of Washington.
In Rwanda, the influx of development loans from the World Bank's affiliates
such as the International Development Association (IDA), the African
Development Fund (AFD), and the European Development Fund (EDF) were diverted into
funding the Hutu extremist Interhamwe militia, the main protagonists of the
Rwandan genocide.
Perhaps most disturbingly, the World
Bank oversaw huge arms purchases that were recorded as bona fide government
expenditures, a stark violation of agreements signed between the Rwandan
government and donor institutions. Under the watch of the World Bank, the
Habyarimana regime imported approximately one million machetes through various
Interhamwe linked organizations, under the pretext of importing civilian
commodities. To ensure their reimbursement, a multilateral trust fund of $55.2
million dollars was designated toward postwar reconstruction efforts, although
the money was not allocated to Rwanda ~ but to the World Bank, to service the
debts used to finance the massacres.
Furthermore,
Paul Kagame was pressured by Washington upon coming to power to recognize the
legitimacy of the debt incurred by the previous genocidal Habyarimana regime.
The swap of old loans for new debts (under the banner of post-war
reconstruction) was conditional upon the acceptance of a new wave of IMF-World
Bank reforms, which similarly diverted outside funds into military expenditure
prior to the Kagame-led invasion of the Congo, then referred to as Zaire.
As
present day Washington legislators attempt to increase US military presence in
the DRC under the pretext of humanitarian concern, the highly documented
conduct of lawless western intelligence agencies and defense contractors in the
Congo since its independence sheds further light on the exploitative nature of
western intervention.
Martyr Patrice Lumumba, Liberator of the Congo, (1925-1961)
In
1961, the Congo’s first legally elected Prime Minister; Patrice Lumumba was
assassinated with support from Belgian intelligence and the CIA, paving the way
for the thirty-two year reign of Mobutu Sese Seko. As part of an attempt to
purge the Congo of all colonial cultural influence, Mobutu renamed the country
Zaire and led an authoritarian regime closely allied to France, Belgium and the
US.
Mobutu
was regarded as a staunch US ally during the Cold War due to his strong stance
against communism; the regime received billions in international aid, most from
the United States. His administration allowed national infrastructure to
deteriorate while the Zairian kleptocracy embezzled international aid and
loans; Mobutu himself reportedly held $4 billion
USD
in a personal Swiss bank account.
Relations
between the US and Zaire thawed at the end of the Cold War, when Mobutu was no
longer needed as an ally; Washington would later use Rwandan and Ugandan troops
to invade the Congo to topple Mobutu and install a new proxy regime.
Following
the conflict in Rwanda, 1.2 million Hutu civilians (many of whom who took part
in the genocide) crossed into the Kivu province of eastern Zaire fearing
prosecution from Paul Kagame’s Tutsi RPA. US Special
Forces trained Rwandan and Ugandan troops at Fort Bragg in the United States
and supported Congolese rebels under future President, Laurent Kabila. Under
the pretext of safeguarding Rwandan national security against the threat of
displaced Hutu militias, troops from Rwanda, Uganda and Burundi invaded the
Congo and ripped through Hutu refugee camps, slaughtering thousands of Rwandan
and Congolese Hutu civilians, many of who were women and children.
Reports
of brutality and mass killing in the Congo were rarely addressed in the West,
as the International Community was sympathetic to Kagame and the Rwandan Tutsi
victims of genocide.
Both
Halliburton and Bechtel (military contractors that profited immensely from the
Iraq war) were involved
in military training and reconnaissance operations in an attempt to
overthrow Mobutu and bring Kabila to power. After deposing Mobutu and seizing
control in Kinshasa, Laurent Kabila was quickly regarded as an equally despotic
leader after eradicating all opposition to his rule; he turned away from his
Rwandan backers and called on Congolese civilians to violently purge the nation
of Rwandans, prompting Rwandan forces to regroup in Goma, in an attempt to
capture resource rich territory in eastern Congo.
Prior
to becoming President in 1997, Kabila sent representatives to Toronto to
discuss mining opportunities with American Mineral Fields (AMF) and Canada’s
Barrick Gold Corporation; AMF had direct ties to US President Bill Clinton and
was given exclusive exploration rights to zinc, copper, and cobalt mines in the
area.
The
Congolese
Wars perpetrated by Rwanda and Uganda killed at least six million people, making it the
largest case of genocide since the Jewish holocaust. (ED:
Only in the case of the Congolese holocaust, there is plenty of proof that it
took place!) The successful perpetration of the conflict relied on
western military and financial support, and was fought primarily to usurp the
extensive mining resources of eastern and southern Congo; the US defense
industry relies on high quality metallic alloys indigenous to the region, used
primarily in the construction of high-performance jet engines.
In
1980, Pentagon
documents acknowledged shortages of cobalt, titanium, chromium, tantalum,
beryllium, and nickel; US participation in the Congolese conflict was largely
an effort to obtain these needed resources. The sole piece of legislation
authored by President Obama during his time as a Senator was S.B. 2125,
the Democratic
Republic of the Congo Relief, Security, and Democracy Promotion Act of 2006.
In the legislation, Obama acknowledges the Congo as a long-term interest to the United States and further alludes to the threat of Hutu militias as an apparent pretext for continued interference in the region; Section 201(6) of the bill specifically calls for the protection of natural resources in the eastern DRC.
The
Congressional Budget Office’s 1982 report “Cobalt:
Policy Options for a Strategic Mineral” notes that cobalt alloys are critical
to the aerospace and weapons industries and that 64% of the world’s cobalt
reserves lay in the Katanga Copper Belt, running from southeastern Congo into
northern Zambia.
For this reason, the future perpetration of the military industrial complex largely depends on the control of strategic resources in the eastern DRC.
In
2001, Laurent Kabila was assassinated by a member of his security staff, paving
the way for his son Joseph Kabila to dynastically usurp the presidency. The
younger Kabila derives his legitimacy solely from the support of foreign heads
of state and the international business community, due to his ability to comply
with foreign plunder.
During
the Congo’s general elections in November 2011, the international community and
the UN remained predictably silent regarding the mass
irregularities observed by the electoral committee. The United Nations
Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
(MONUSCO) has faced frequent allegations of corruption, prompting opposition
leader Étienne Tshisikedi to call for the UN mission to end its deliberate
efforts to maintain the system of international plundering and to appoint
someone “less corrupt and more credible” to head UN
operations. MONUSCO has been plagued with frequent cases of peacekeeping troops
caught smuggling
minerals such as cassiterite and dealing weapons to militia groups.
Under
the younger Joseph Kabila, Chinese commercial activities in the DRC have
significantly increased not only in the mining sector, but also considerably in
the telecommunications field.
In
2000, the Chinese ZTE Corporation finalized a $12.6
million deal with the Congolese government to establish the
first Sino-Congolese telecommunications company; furthermore, the DRC exported
$1.4 billion worth of cobalt between 2007 and 2008. The majority of
Congolese raw materials like cobalt, copper ore and a variety of hard woods are
exported to China for further processing and 90% of the
processing plants in resource rich southeastern Katanga province are owned by Chinese
nationals. In 2008, a consortium of Chinese companies were granted the rights
to mining operations in Katanga in exchange for US$6 billion in infrastructure investments, including the
construction of two hospitals, four universities and a hydroelectric power
project.
The
framework of the deal allocated an additional $3 million to develop cobalt and
copper mining operations in Katanga. In 2009, the International Monetary Fund
(IMF) demanded renegotiation of the deal, arguing that the agreement between
China and the DRC violated the foreign debt relief program for so-called HIPC
(Highly Indebted Poor Countries) nations.
The
vast majority of the DRC’s $11 billion foreign debt owed to the Paris Club was embezzled
by the previous regime of Mobuto Sesi Seko. The IMF
successfully blocked the deal in May 2009, calling for a more
feasibility study of the DRCs mineral concessions.
The
United States is currently mobilizing public opinion in favor of a greater US
presence in Africa, under the pretext of capturing Joseph Kony, quelling
Islamist terrorism and putting an end to long-standing humanitarian issues.
As well-meaning Americans are successively coerced by highly emotional social media campaigns promoting an American response to atrocities, few realize the role of the United States and western financial institutions in fomenting the very tragedies they are now poised to resolve.
While
many genuinely concerned individuals naively support forms of pro-war brand
activism, the mobilization of ground forces in Central Africa will likely
employ the use of predator drones and targeted missile strikes that have been
notoriously responsible for civilian causalities en masse.
The
further consolidation of US presence in the region is part of a larger program
to expand AFRICOM, the United States Africa Command through a proposed
archipelago of military bases in the region. In 2007, US State
Department advisor Dr. J. Peter Pham offered the following on AFRICOM and its strategic
objectives of
"protecting access to hydrocarbons and other strategic resources which Africa has in abundance, a task which includes ensuring against the vulnerability of those natural riches and ensuring that no other interested third parties, such as China, India, Japan, or Russia, obtain monopolies or preferential treatment."
Additionally,
during an AFRICOM Conference held at Fort McNair on February 18, 2008, Vice
Admiral Robert T. Moeller openly
declared AFRICOM’s guiding principle of protecting “the free flow of natural
resources from Africa to the global market,” before citing the increasing
presence of China as a major challenge to US interests in the region.
The
increased US presence in Central Africa is not simply a measure to secure
monopolies on Uganda’s
recently discovered oil reserves; Museveni’s legitimacy depends solely
on foreign backers and their extensive military aid contributions ~ US ground
forces are not required to obtain valuable oil contracts from Kampala.
The push into Africa has more to do with destabilizing the deeply troubled Democratic Republic of the Congo and capturing its strategic reserves of cobalt, tantalum, gold and diamonds.More accurately, the US is poised to employ a scorched-earth policy by creating dangerous war-like conditions in the Congo, prompting the mass exodus of Chinese investors.
Similarly
to the Libyan conflict, the Chinese returned after the fall of Gaddafi to find
a proxy government only willing to do business with the western nations who
helped it into power.
As
the US uses its influence to nurture
the emergence of breakaway states like South Sudan, the activities of
Somalia’s al Shabaab, Nigeria’s Boko Haram and larger factions of AQIM in North
Africa offer a concrete pretext for further US involvement in regional affairs.
The
ostensible role of the first African-American US President is to export the
theatresque War on Terror directly to the African continent, in a campaign to
exploit established tensions along tribal, ethnic and religious lines.
As US policy theoreticians such as Dr. Henry Kissinger, willingly proclaim, "Depopulation should be the highest priority of US foreign policy towards the Third World,” the vast expanse of desert and jungles in northern and central Africa will undoubtedly serve as the venue for the next decade of resource wars.
Nile Bowie is an independent writer and photojournalist based in Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia; he regularly contributes to Tony Cartalucci's Land Destroyer Report and Professor
Michel Chossudovsky's Global
Research Twitter: @NileBowie
No comments:
Post a Comment
If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.