By Arnold Leese
Author of “My Irrelevant Defence: Jewish Ritual Murder.”
This book is dedicated, with permission, to H. H. BEAMISH, the
pioneer, who set my feet upon the way.
“If I am killing a rat with a stick and have him in a
corner, I am not indignant if he tries to bite me and squeals and gibbers with
rage. My job is, not to get angry, but to keep cool, to attend to my footwork
and to keep on hitting him where it will do the most good.” ~ A. S. Leese
speaking at Reception, 17th Feb., 1937, on his return from prison where he was
consigned for writing the truth about Jews.
CONTENTS [by original
pages]
Chapter. Page
INTRODUCTION - - - -
HISTORICAL LANDMARKS - - - -
WORKS FREQUENTLY REFERRED TO IN THE TEXT - ---
A ROTHSCHILD STUD-BOOK - - - -
1. THE
FRANKFORT HOUSE - - - - 9
2. THE LONDON HOUSE - - - - 15
3. THE PARIS HOUSE - - - - 26
4. THE VIENNA HOUSE - - - - 31
5. THE NAPLES HOUSE - - - - 36
6. THE AMERICAN HOUSE - - - - 37
7. THE ROTHSCHILD GRIP IN OTHER LANDS -- - - 41
8. THE ROTHSCHILDS AND BRITISH ROYALTY - -- - 42
9. GENTILE INTERMARRIAGES WITH THE ROTHSCHILDS - -- - 45
10. GENTILE FRIENDS OF THE ROTHSCHILDS -- - - 47
11. ROTHSCHILD FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS WITH OTHER JEWS ---- 53
12. ROTHSCHILDS AND PRESS CONTROL - - - - 55
13. ROTHSCHILD CONTROL OF RAW MATERIALS - - - - 56
14. DIAMONDS AND GOLD - -- - 61
15. ROTHSCHILDS AND ZIONISM - - - - 63
16. OTHER ROTHSCHILDS - - - - 63
17. THE MORAL OF IT ALL - - - - 64
INDEX - - - -
CORRECTIONS.
P. 4. Date
of Leipzig battle was 1813, not 1812. 1864. Item refers to Seven Weeks’ War, not Seven Years’ War.
P. 8. Leopold
Rothschild had three sons, not two sons and a daughter as stated. The son not
mentioned was Evelyn A. Rothschild, died 1917.
P. 10. 13th
line from bottom: Date of Battle of Leipzig was 1813, not 1812.
P.p. 13 and 14. “Tugenbund”
should be “Tugendbund.”
P. 17. Line
9. Omit “companies, particularly.” Also delete the sentence beginning on line
10 with “Now” and ending “(see p. 25).”
P. 25. Line
1. “First Sea Lord” should be “Prime Minister.”
P. 25. In
the 3rd para., the references to “Lloyds” refer to Lloyds Bank, not the
Insurance organization.
P. 47. 10th
line from bottom: “Censored” should be “Censured.”
ADDENDA.
P. 18. In
1848, Lionel Rothschild offered Thomas Carlyle any sum he cared to name if he
would write in support of Jewish emancipation; Carlyle indignantly refused.
(Froude’s Carlyle’s Life in London).
P. 61. First
para. G. W. Smalley in Anglo-American
Memories states that Lord Randolph Churchill borrowed £5,000 from Lord
Rothschild on his South African trip, and invested it in gold mines, making an
enormous profit; also that the expert engineer accompanying him was sent by
Rothschild.
PREFACE.
THIS little book has been produced with the
object of filling a vacancy which the author considers has too long existed.
Works on the Rothschilds are many, but nearly all these are either purposefully inaccurate or, like Count Corti’s masterpiece, long and rather dry. This book of mine contains no padding and needs to be read slowly.
Works on the Rothschilds are many, but nearly all these are either purposefully inaccurate or, like Count Corti’s masterpiece, long and rather dry. This book of mine contains no padding and needs to be read slowly.
I am not concerned with anecdotes about the Rothschilds, nor with registering their “wise-cracks,” nor with their “charity.” I take no interest in the Rothschilds as men or robots, but only as Jews; this book, which has been condensed so as to be within the reach of any working-man or woman, deals with the principal aspects of control over the Gentile by sheer weight of money-power, a control used for purposes not Gentile.
Dealing, as it does, with the last 150 years
which have been so full of world-shaking events, it has been no easy task to
squeeze what I have to say within the compass of a one-shilling publication. To
enable those who have either forgotten their history or (let us be honest)
never learned it, to follow the narrative more easily, a calendar of some of
the principal historical events of the period follows this preface, and I would
advise the reader to have within reach, when reading the book, an ordinary
school history-book for occasional reference.
On the page following the Calendar, the reader will find a
list of the principal works from which quotations, etc., have been taken,
together with the letters of the alphabet used as references to them. Thus, for
example, the sign (B, Vol. IV. p. 272) refers to that volume and page in the Jewish Encyclopædia.
In attempting my task, I know that I am only
able to expose a small fraction of the total evil done by certain members of
this Jewish family in the past; but, like a geologist who tells the story of
the earth by his observations upon outcrops of rock, I tell the story of
Rothschild control over the Gentiles from the evidence which has happened to
come to light, so that my readers may judge for themselves what still lies
underground.
Trusting that this book may enable others to dispense knowledge of the subject, I now drop this spanner into the wobbling, squeaking, overheated machinery of an outworn democracy, hoping for the best. I ask my readers to get busy, for the time is short.
Trusting that this book may enable others to dispense knowledge of the subject, I now drop this spanner into the wobbling, squeaking, overheated machinery of an outworn democracy, hoping for the best. I ask my readers to get busy, for the time is short.
ARNOLD LEESE.
White House,
Pewley Hill,
Guildford.
Pewley Hill,
Guildford.
28th February, 1940.
A FEW HISTORICAL LANDMARKS FOR THE READER’S GUIDANCE.
1789. French Revolution.
1793. Louis XVI. beheaded.
1804. Bonaparte made Emperor Napoleon 1st.
1806. Napoleon shattered Prussia at Battle of Jena.
1808-13. Peninsular War.
1812. Napoleon’s Retreat from Moscow.
Napoleon defeated at Leipzig and abdicated, being exiled to
Elba.
1814-15.Vienna Congress to settle the affairs of Europe.
1815. Napoleon returns, the “hundred days,” Battle of Waterloo.
Return of Bourbon Kings.
1830. Second French Revolution. Charles X. expelled. Louis
Phillippe, Duke of Orleans, became King of France.
1836. Don Carlos claimed Spanish throne; war ended in his defeat.
1848.Third French Revolution, Louis Philippe
dethroned; Republic proclaimed. Similar disturbances in other European States.
1851. Louis Napoleon voted President of French Republic.
1852. Louis Napoleon becomes Emperor as Napoleon III.
1854-6. Crimean War.
1860. Italy united by Garibaldi.
1861. Civil War in America between North and South over Slavery. [Sic! ~ JR, Ed.] It continued until 1865.
1864. Outbreak of Seven Years’ War between
Prussia and Austria.
1870. Franco-Prussian War. Napoleon III. abdicated, and France
became a Republic.
1871. Communist insurrection in Paris. On restoration of order,
Thiers elected President of French Republic.
1877. Russo-Turkish War.
1878. Treaty of
Berlin, settling affairs of Turkey.
1881. Death of Disraeli (Lord Beaconsfield), principal Rothschild
agent in England.
Transvaal wins self-government under British suzerainty.
1888. De Beers Diamond monopoly formed.
1895. Jameson Raid.
1899-1902. Boer War ending in defeat of President Kruger.
1901. Death of Queen Victoria.
1910. Death of King Edward VII.
1914-18. Great World War, followed by Versailles Conference.
1915. Sir H. McMahon promises Palestine to the Arabs.
1917. “Liberal” Revolution in Russia quickly followed by
Bolshevik revolution.
Lord Balfour promises Palestine to the Jews.
1939. Beginning of the Jewish War of revenge against Hitler.
WORKS FREQUENTLY REFERRED
TO IN THE TEXT.
A. The Rise and the Reign of the
House of Rothschild,
by Count Corti, in 2 volumes, 1928. This is a work of independent historical
research of great value, completely documented, but naturally a little long and
dry for ordinary readers.
B. Jewish Encyclopædia, Vols. I to XII. Published between 1903
and 1906, an authoritative reference book by Jews, representing their own
interpretation of Jewish and other activities.
C. The Riddle
of the Jews’ Success, by
F. Roderick-Stoltheim, translated by C. Pownall. Hammer Verlag publication,
1927.
D. Letters and
Friendships of Sir Cecil Spring Rice, 2 vols. 1929. Edited by S. Gwynn.
E. L’Anti-semitisme, by the Jew Bernard Lazare, 1894.
F. Occult Theocrasy, by
Lady Queenborough, published posthumously, for private circulation only, 2
vols.
G. Life and
Memoirs of Count Mole, edited
by Marquis of Noailles, 2 vols., 1923.
H. Essays in Jewish History, by the Jew L. Wolf, 1934.
J. The Financiers
and the Nation, by T. Johnston, 1934.
K. Greville Diary, edited by P. W. Wilson, 1927. Chas.
Greville was Clerk to the Privy Council for many years. The references given
are the dates of the entries cited.
L. The Magnificent Rothschilds, by the Jew C. Roth, 1939.
M. Lady Rothschild and her Daughters, by L. Cohen, 1935.
N. The Life of Lord Beaconsfield, by T. P. O’Connor, M.P.
O. Aus meinem Leben und aus meiner
Zeit, by Duke Ernst II of
Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, Berlin, 1883, 2 Vols.
P. Diary of Lord Bertie, 1914-18, edited by Lady Algernon G.
Lennox, 1924. Lord Bertie was our Paris Ambassador, 1905-18.
Q. World Hoax, by E. F. Elmhurst, 1938, U S.A.
R. Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th edition.
S. The Life of
Lord George Bentinck, by
the Jew Disraeli. There are many editions of this book, so all references are
to Chapters.
T. History of the Jews in Vienna, by the Jew M. Grunwald, 1936, Jewish
Publication Society of America.
U. My Irrelevant Defence; Jewish
Ritual Murder, by
A. S. Leese, 1937.
V. Grey Wolf, by H. C. Armstrong, a study of Mustafa Kemal.
V. Grey Wolf, by H. C. Armstrong, a study of Mustafa Kemal.
W. Reminiscences, by the Jewess Lady Battersea, 1922. She
was a Rothschild.
X. Letters of Charles Greville and
Henry Reeve, edited
by A. H. Johnson, 1924.
Y. My
Autobiography, by
Margot Asquith.
Z. Merchants of Death, by H. C. Engelbrecht and F. C.
Hanighen, 1934.
Z.1 The Oil War, by A. Mohr, 1926.
Z.2 The Secret War for
Oil, by F. C. Hanighen and A. Zischka, 1935. This book was published by
Geo. Routledge & Sons but withdrawn from circulation about one week later.
Z.3 Fifty Years in
Wall Street, by H. Clews, 1908, Irving Publishing Co., New York. Clews
was himself a Wall Street man, genuinely ignorant of the Jew menace.
Z.4 Dictionary of
American Biography, edited by A. Johnson, 1929. In many volumes.
Z.5 Money Powers of
Europe in the 19th and 20th Century,
by the Jew Paul H. Emden, 1939.
A COMPANION VOLUME TO
THIS WORK IS “My Irrelevant
Defence: Jewish Ritual Murder.” by A. S. Leese.
A ROTHSCHILD STUD-BOOK
FIRST GENERATION: ~
Mayer Amschel, 1743-1812. He had 5 sons and 5 daughters.SECOND AND THIRD GENERATIONS~
These are the 5 sons
of Amschel Mayer and their children.
1. Amschel Mayer, Frankfort, 1773-1885. He had no children.2. Solomon, Vienna, 1774-1885, had 1 son and 1 daughter. The son was Anselm Solomon, 1803-74.3. Nathan Mayer, London, 1777-1836, had 4 sons and 3 daughters. The 4 sons were: ~Lionel Nathan, 1808-79.Anthony, 1810-76, Baronet.Nathaniel, 1812-70.Mayer Amschel, 1818-1874.4. Karl Mayer, Naples, 1788-1855, had 3 sons and 2 daughters. The 3 sons were: ~Mayer Karl, 1820-86.Wilhelm Karl, 1828-1901.Adolf, 1823-1900. He had no children.5. James, Paris, 1792-1868. Had 4 sons and 1 daughter. The 4 sons were: ~Alphonse, 1827-1905.Solomon, 1835-64.Gustav, 1829.Edmond, 1845-1917.
4TH GENERATION:~
Anselm, had 3 sons and 4 daughters. The sons were: ~
Ferdinand, 1839-1898. He had no children.Nathaniel, 1830-1905. Ditto.Albert Solomon, 1844-1911.Lionel Nathan, had 3 sons and 2 daughters. The sons were: ~Nathaniel, 1840-1915 (1st “English” Baron).Alfred, 1842-1918. Had no legitimate children.Leopold, 1845-1917.Anthony, Sir, Bart., had 2 daughters.Nathaniel, had 3 sons and 1 daughter. The sons were: ~Jas. Edward, 1844-84.Albert, 1846-50.Arthur, 1851-1903.Mayer Amschel (son of Nathan Mayer) had a daughter, Hannah.Mayer Karl, had 7 daughters, no sons.Wilhelm Karl, had 2 daughters, no sons.Alphonse, had 1 son and 2 daughters. The son was:~Edouard Alphonse Jas., b. 1868.Solomon (son of Jas.), had 1 daughter.Gustav, had 2 sons and 3 daughters. The sons were: ~Andre, b. 1874.Robert Philippe, b. 1880.Edmond, had 2 sons and 1 daughter. The sons were: ~Jas. Edmond, b. 1878.Maurice Edmond, b. 1881.
5TH GENERATION:~
Albert Solomon (son of Anselm), had 3 sons and 1 daughter. The sons were: ~George, b. 1877, died, no children.Alfons, b. 1878.Louis, b. 1882.Eugene, b. 1884.Nathaniel (son of Lionel Nathan), had 2 sons and 1 daughter. The sons were: ~Lionel Walter, 2nd “English” Baron, 1868-1937. Did not marry.Nathaniel Chas., 1877-1923.Leopold, had 2 sons and 1 daughter. The sons were: ~Lionel Nathan, b. 1882.Anthony Gustav, b. 1887.Jas. Edward (son of Nathaniel), had a son and a daughter. The son was: ~Henri, b. 1872.Edouard Alphonse (son of Alphonse), had a son: ~Guy, b. 1909.
6TH GENERATION:~
Alfons (son of Albert), had 1 son and 2 daughters. The son was: ~Albert, b. 1922.Nathaniel Chas. (son of Nathaniel, and grandson of Lionel Nathan), had a son and 3 daughters. The son was: ~Nathaniel Mayer Victor, 3rd “English” Baron, b. 1913.Lionel Nathan (son of Leopold), had 2 sons and 2 daughters. The sons were: ~Edmund Leopold, b. 1916.Leopold David, b. 1927.Anthony Gustav, had 1 son and 2 daughters. The son was: ~Evelyn Robert, b. 1931.Henri, had 2 sons and 1 daughter. The sons were: ~Jas. Nathaniel, b. 1896.Philippe, b. 1902.
7TH GENERATION:~
Nathaniel Mayer Victor Rothschild has a son,
Nathaniel Charles Jacob, b. 1936.
NOTE:
Among the earlier Rothschilds (that is, the three generations following the founder of the House, Amschel Mayer), marriage was generally a business affair, and it was a common practice for males to marry other Rothschilds and for superfluous females to marry where more business might be expected as a result. And so we get this staggering fact from the Jewish Encyclopædia (B, Vol. X, p. 497):
Among the earlier Rothschilds (that is, the three generations following the founder of the House, Amschel Mayer), marriage was generally a business affair, and it was a common practice for males to marry other Rothschilds and for superfluous females to marry where more business might be expected as a result. And so we get this staggering fact from the Jewish Encyclopædia (B, Vol. X, p. 497):
“Of 58 marriages contracted by the descendants of Mayer Amschel Rothschild, to date (1905) no less than 29, or exactly one-half, have been between first cousins.”
Betty Rothschild, daughter of Solomon, actually
married her uncle, Baron James of Paris, whilst Anselm Rothschild married his
niece, the daughter of Nathaniel.
GENTILE FOLLY: THE ROTHSCHILDS: PART TWO
GENTILE FOLLY:
THE
ROTHSCHILDS
CHAPTER I.
THE FRANKFORT HOUSE.
THE founder of the Rothschild financial power
was Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812), born in the Frankfort ghetto; his
father (Moses Amschel Bauer)
was a banker and sent his son to study for the
rabbinate, but the latter was more attracted by the handling of money, and took
a post in Oppenheim’s bank at Hanover.
In 1760, he started business for himself at
Frankfort when only 17 years of age. It is interesting to note that the house
in which he lived, which was divided into two parts, was owned, until Amschel
purchased it, by the forebears of Jacob Schiff, the Jew who became head of the
New York firm of Jew bankers Kuhn Loeb & Co. In fact, Jacob Schiff’s father
was broker to the Rothschilds.
At that period, the Landgrave of Hesse-Cassel,
Frederick II., was one of the richest men in Europe, having made immense sums
by hiring out his subjects as mercenaries to serve in the armies of other
nations, particularly Britain. These mercenaries were the “Hessian troops” we
heard so much about at school.
But as Amschel Rothschild never contacted
Frederick II. in business matters, he had nothing to do with the
arrangements made for the hiring of the Hessians, drunken and useless as they
were, to attempt to subdue the Americans in their revolt known as the War of
Independence, 1773-83.
It is necessary to emphasize this, as the
contrary is often stated in anti-Jewish books. It was the firm of Van der
Notten in England that handled the financing of that business. But Frederick’s
son and heir, William, took an interest in coin-collecting, which Amschel
Rothschild cunningly served and so gradually obtained some sort of notice from
William.
This was the beginning of the association of the
Rothschilds with the house of Hesse-Cassel which laid the foundation of the
Rothschild Money Power. Worming his way into William’s favour by means of
supplying him with rare coins for the latter’s collection, Amschel began to
gain William’s interest, although not yet his confidence.
In 1769 when he was only 25 years old, Amschel
secured from William the designation of Crown regent to Hesse-Hanau, but this
was a mere title without official status, so Amschel found it necessary to
cultivate the favour of William’s treasurer Buderus to assist him gradually to
overcome the suspicion with which William naturally regarded him. Apart from
bill-discounting for William who had succeeded his father as Landgrave of
Hesse-Cassel in 1795, a business which had to be shared with many others, no
big business for William came into Rothschild’s hands until 1800. William of
Hesse-Cassel was now enormously rich by inheritance.
But Amschel had many other irons in the fire,
connected with financing and trading in the war-necessities of the countries
engaged in the struggle with Napoleon, and by 1800, he was, chiefly through
such work, the tenth richest Jew in Frankfort. By this time he had worked
himself into the Landgrave’s favour, and in 1803 (during which year William was
promoted to the title and powers of Elector) Rothschild acted as middleman in
secret for the loan of the Elector’s money to Denmark, and from that time
frequently invested large sums for William with handsome commissions and
perquisites.
Rothschild had a large family to support, of
which his five sons were Amschel (whom I shall call Amschel II.), Solomon,
Nathan, Karl and James. As is well-known, these five sons ultimately managed
branches of the Rothschild business in the principal financial centres of
Europe, Amschel II succeeding his father in Frankfort, Solomon settling in
Vienna, Nathan in London, Karl in Naples and James in Paris. At the period with
which we are now dealing, the only son to leave the Frankfort ghetto was the
most cunning of them all, Nathan, who came to England where he did some very
sharp practice connected with monopolizing raw material for Manchester’s
manufactures, and this when he was only 21 years old. After that, in 1804, he
set up business in London and we shall follow his fortunes in Chapter II.
In 1806, Napoleon shattered the Prussians at Jena, and
Elector William had to seek safety in flight, leaving his business affairs and
treasures to his trusted agents: There is a romantic tale, which must now be
“de-bunked,” that before leaving he entrusted everything to Amschel Rothschild;
a Jew artist of Frankfort, Moritz Oppenheim, has endeavoured to perpetuate the
romance by painting a picture showing the Elector patting Amschel on the
shoulder whilst lackeys carry boxes of specie into the latter’s house.
Actually, the Rothschilds were only entrusted with four boxes of securities and
papers, the bulk of the Elector’s treasure being distributed for hiding
elsewhere (A, Vol. I., p. 66).
Buderus, the Elector’s treasurer, was still unable to imbue
his master with much faith in Rothschild, although eventually the latter was
able to give full satisfaction to his exalted client when William returned to
Hesse-Cassel in 1812 after Napoleon’s defeat at Leipzig. Rothschild’s success
in farming the Elector’s credit under the accommodating eye of Buderus was due
to the fact that he was favouring both sides, for he had also wormed his way into
the high favour of Napoleon’s representative, Carl von Dalberg, who had been
made
Prince-Primate of the Confederation of the Rhine and later Grand Duke of Frankfort. “There would appear to have been financial reasons for this relationship, and it no doubt originated in loans granted by Rothschild” (A, Vol. I., p. 69).
For example, one such loan was made to Dalberg by Amschel in
1811 to enable him to travel to Paris on the occasion of the baptism of the son
of Napoleon and Marie Louise. No wonder,
then, that the Jewish Encyclopædia (B, Vol. IV., p. 413) records that
Dalberg favoured the complete emancipation of the
Jews and actually obtained it for them in return for a cash consideration of
440,000 florins!
Rothschild did not rely merely upon the favour of
one of Napoleon’s men; he was also very friendly with Dalberg’s Police
Commissioner, a Jew called von Itzstein.
In 1810, Rothschild was powerful enough to make
a huge loan of his own money to Denmark.
In 1812, Amschel Rothschild died. It is to be
noted that only two of his five sons at this time were settled abroad, namely,
Nathan in England, and James who had gone in 1811 to Paris where we shall meet
him again in Chapter III.
Amschel II. took over his father’s office at
Frankfort. He sent his brother Solomon to open offices in Vienna in 1816, and
his brother Karl to Naples in 1821. He negotiated immense loans to Austria,
Prussia and to France (under Louis XVIII.) and secured for himself and all his
brothers titles of Austrian nobility, a development culminating in 1822 in them
all becoming Barons of the Austrian Empire. The only brother who did not assume
the title was Nathan in England.
It was late in Amschel II.’s life when he became
acquainted with Bismarck. In 1851 Amschel II persistently curried Bismarck’s
favour when the latter came to Frankfort as Prussia’s representative. At first
these servile overtures were regarded by Bismarck with some amusement, but
nevertheless we find him in the same year accepting the use of a residence from
Rothschild (A, Vol. II., p. 317) and in 1853 the Rothschilds became Court
Bankers to Prussia. From about 1852, the Rothschilds were high in Bismarck’s
favour.
This registers the usual change of view by Gentile politicians coming under the pernicious influence of Jewish favours and money power.
In 1847 Bismarck had declared he was not in
favour of allowing Jews to occupy official positions in a Christian State, the
function of which was the realization of Christian teaching. Yet in 1869 it was
under his Chancellorship that Jews were completely emancipated. How much this
was due to the Rothschilds and how much to other Jews’ influence can only be
guessed. Bismarck’s most familiar Jew was Baron Gerson von Bleichroder who
founded a banking syndicate with the Rothschilds after 1866 and represented
that firm in Berlin and Prussia generally.
Amschel II. died in 1855, and the Rothschild
firm in Frankfort was taken over by Mayer Karl Rothschild, his nephew, son of
Karl of Naples, assisted by his brother William. The latter took over on Mayer
Carl’s death in 1886 but under him the firm did not prosper and closed in 1901
on William’s decease, the Disconto Gesellschaft taking over the local
connection.
In the years between, Bleichroder in Berlin and Alphonse Rothschild (James’s son) in Paris were the secret purveyors of news to Bismarck and Napoleon III., being in constant communication.
They were thus able to tell Bismarck what they thought he ought to know about Napoleon III and Napoleon what they thought he ought to know about Bismarck.
During the Franco-Prussian War it was in
Alphonse Rothschild’s castle at Ferrieres that Bismarck made his headquarters
when besieging Paris. The same two Jews, Bleichroder for Prussia and Alphonse
Rothschild for France, made the arrangements for the satisfactory payment of
the indemnity by the vanquished, which reminds one of the similar situation at
Versailles after the Great War when the Jewish bankers Warburg had a member of
the family as financial adviser on each side, one for America, one for Germany.
A curious occurrence took place at a protest
meeting against Hitler’s treatment of the Jews, at the Pavilion Theatre,
Whitechapel Road, on 10th December, 1934. An excited Jew speaker, M. Soman,
claimed Bismarck as a Jew.
That Bismarck might have had some Jewish blood
is not such an absurd proposition after all. Frightened Jews sometimes blurt
out the unaccustomed truth. Bismarck’s mother was born a Mencken, a common
Jewish name, whilst there is some doubt as to Bismarck’s actual paternity, one author,
not remarkable for his general accuracy, believing that Marshal Soult was his
real father, Soult being identified as a Jew by Disraeli in Coningsby.
Certainly, Bismarck’s son Herbert had none of the healthy Aryan’s repugnance to
Jews as he actually proposed to the half-Jewish daughter of Duke Ludwig of
Bavaria (My Past, by Countess Larisch, Chapter II.)
C. Spring Rice in a letter written when he was
Second Secretary to our Embassy at Berlin in 1897 said that Rothschild’s agent
was admitted into the German Foreign Office before the Ambassadors of the
Powers (D, letter dated 7th November, 1897). The press, he also said, was
almost entirely in Jewish hands.
In 1878, the Jew banker Max von Goldschmidt of
Frankfort married William Rothschild’s daughter and changed his name to
Goldschmidt-Rothschild.
* * * * * *
During the period of Europe’s history in which the first
Amschel Rothschild was established at Frankfort, the French Revolution stands
out as by far the most important political event; it is now established that it
came about under the influence of Freemasonry and the subversive society behind
Masonry, known as the Illuminati.
Seeing that the Jews obtained emancipation in France only two years after the Revolution, and that the new social order imposed by the Revolution summed up in the catch-cry “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity” was based upon false destructive principles typically Jewish, it is necessary to see what relationship the Rothschilds of the period may have had with regard to the outbreak.
Illuminism penetrated into all the Lodges of
Grand Orient Freemasonry in France, being backed by organized cabbalistic Jews.
(E.) According to F, Vol. I., p. 184, the Jewish financiers behind the 1789
Revolution were as follows (their dates, places of abode and some other details
have been added): ~
Daniel Itzig, 1722-1799, Berlin, Court Jew to Frederick William II.
David Friedlander, 1750-1834, Berlin, his son-in-law.
Herz Cerfbeer, 1730-1793, Alsace.
Benjamin Goldsmid, 1755-1808, London, William Pitt’s (the younger) financier.
Abraham Goldsmid, 1756-1810, London, his brother.
Moses Mocatta, 1768-1857, London, partner of a brother of the two Goldsmids, and uncle of Sir Moses Montefiore.
Lady Queenborough’s list also includes V. H.
Ephraim, Court Jew to Frederick William I., and to Frederick the Great; but his
work was preparatory to the Revolution, and he died 14 years before it came
about.
There is absolutely no evidence that I have
found to connect the first Amschel Rothschild directly with the 1789 Revolution.
He most emphatically was not the alter ego of Frederick,
Landgrave of Hesse-Cassel, as has been stated by a certain author, and never
had anything to do with that potentate, at whose palace in Wilhelmsbad the
notorious Masonic Congress was held in which Illuminism definitely allied
itself to Freemasonry, the Landgrave himself being Grand Master of Bavarian
Masonry. This was in 1782, and the headquarters of Illuminized Masonry was set
up in Frankfort in the same year. But at that time, Amschel Rothschild had no
considerable influence even with Frederick’s son, and none at all with the
Landgrave himself.
There was, however, an organization formed at
Berlin called the League of Virtue or Tugenbund, which was, in the words
of the Special Commissioner of Police at Mayence “so identified with the
Illuminati that no line of demarcation was seen between them” (1814, Archives
Nationales F 7/6563).
The headquarters of the Tugenbund were at the
house of a Jewish member of the Illuminati, Herz, friend and pupil of Moses
Mendelssohn, the Jewish “intellectual” revolutionary; Herz’s wife, Henrietta,
usually presided at the gatherings. Among its adherents were two of
Mendelssohn’s daughters, who had two brothers married to members of the family
of the Jew Daniel Itzig; Mirabeau, who according to Graetz’s History of the
Jews, Vol. V., was more often in Mrs. Herz’s company than her husband, and
who introduced Illuminism into France and initiated the Duke of Orleans and
Talleyrand into the order (F, Vol. I., p. 374); Fanny von Arnstein, daughter of
Daniel Itzig, who ran a similar salon in Vienna; William von Humboldt, who
later became Prussian Ambassador in London, and his brother, the explorer
Alexander von Humboldt who learned Hebrew from Mrs. Herz.
But the most prominent member of the Tugenbund
was Frederick von Gentz, a crypto-Jew “intellectual” quite unburdened by any
morals, who later became secretary to Prince Metternich, Chancellor of Austria.
We have it on the authority of the Jewish
Chronicle, 1st Sept., 1922, that Mrs. Herz herself said that the Tugenbund
Jews were ardent supporters of the French Revolution.
Now, although Amschel the first cannot be incriminated as
supporting the Illuminati, it is a striking fact that members of his family had
the closest relations with some of the above mentioned members of the
Tugenbund.
It was von Gentz to whom the Rothschilds owed
their later position with Prince Metternich of Austria (A, Vol. II., p. 619),
although the first meeting between one of Amschel’s sons and von Gentz did not
take place until 1818. It is noteworthy that William von Humboldt’s estates
were managed by Amschel Rothschild II in 1830, whilst as early as 1818
Alexander von Humboldt was, with his brother, in intimate social relationship
with Nathan Rothschild in London (A, Vol. I., p. 215).
It is simply impossible to believe that the five Rothschild sons were not secretly supporting the Revolutionary cause in France through the first half of the nineteenth century.
Fortunately, however, we have a decisive piece
of evidence which puts the matter beyond dispute. It will be noted that Solomon
Rothschild was not sent permanently to Vienna until 1816, when he was 42 years
of age. Before that, he was assisting his father at Frankfort. Here, at a date
not known but previous to 1814 and probably in his father’s lifetime, although
that is uncertain, he became a member of a Grand Orient Lodge of Freemasons
called L’Aurore Naissante; this is shown in a report of the Director of
Police at Graetz. (Reference Les Dessous du Congres de Vienna, by
Commandant M. H. Weil, published by Libraire Payot in 1917, which, in turn
obtained its data from original documents of the Ministry of Interior, Vienna,
the reference being p.p. 419 and 420, Vienna, 6th Nov., 1814, F, 34468 and
3565).
This Lodge was later taken over by the United
Grand Lodge of England, a curious fact, but one which does not concern us here,
since the transfer did not take place until 1817 (History of Freemasonry,
by R. F. Gould, Vol. III., p.p. 236/7).
It is also to be noted that the Montefiore
family, which is so closely intermarried with the Rothschilds, is also
connected by marriage with the Goldsmids whose forebears Benjamin and Abraham
are mentioned above as Jew financiers of the French Revolution, and that the
sister of another of these, Moses Mocatta, was mother of Sir Moses Montefiore
who became jackal to the London Rothschild House.
In 1807, another Tugenbund was formed,
apparently with the genuine political object of uniting Germany against
Napoleon; Amschel Rothschild had very close relations with it and “the
Rothschilds appear to have become members” (A, Vol. I., p. 81). William of
Hesse-Cassel was an important member and the Rothschilds acted as go-betweens
for his correspondence concerning it and made payments in favour of the
Tugenbund.
GENTILE FOLLY: THE ROTHSCHILDS: PART TWO
One of the great texts, Noor!
ReplyDeleteHere are a few more works by the great Arnold Leese:
Arnold S. Leese, et al. - Jewish Ritual Murder resources: books by Leese, Battersby, Schramm, Cecil Roth, pamphlets from Joyce and Leese, etc. + references + Eisenmenger extract - http://jrbooksonline.com/leese.htm
Pamphlets by Leese - www.vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres9/Leesepamphlets.pdf
Thank you Noor for helping to increase awareness of the writing of Arnold Leese who was badly persecuted for trying to warn people about the truth.
ReplyDeleteJewish Ritual Murder = HISTORICAL FACT.
Carol A. Valentine