THE CIVIL WAR
The Civil War was the most tragic blood-letting of
the people of Shem in recorded history. This people, religious refugees from
Canaanite oppressors and massacres in Europe, succeeded in establishing in the
United States the most productive society in the world. Their Constitution had
unleashed the great talents of this people to do God's work on this earth.
Of course, Satan’s people, the Canaanites, were livid with hatred and envy. If there is one passion which America has always excited in the world, it is the passion of envy.
The United States was the most admired nation in
the world, because its Constitution guaranteed to its legal citizens the
unfettered right of personal liberty, something which no other nation could
offer to its people.
In the States of the South, the people of Shem had
carved from the wilderness productive plantations and impressive manor houses,
built in the tradition of Greek Neo-Classicism, and expressing their conviction
that this was the only way that they wished to live on this earth. Like the
ancient Greeks, the people of Shem had slaves to attend to their daily needs,
the descendants of Canaan, on whom the Curse of Canaan had been pronounced, and
which committed them to that status.
Despite the efforts of the people of Shem to
maintain their slaves in a healthy and comfortable environment (from an
economic standpoint alone, this was an absolute requirement, because the bulk
of their operating capital was invested in them), the existence of these slaves
became their Achilles heel, which the Canaanites cleverly used as the weapon
with which to mount an attack against them.
There were many contemporaneous records attesting
to the kindly treatment of the slaves, such as the observations of Samuel
Phillips Day, special correspondent for the London Morning Herald, who wrote,
"On Sunday, June 8, 1861, in Asheville, Kentucky, I took a drive with some friends. Judge of my surprise, reader, when I found almost the entire Negro population abroad; some parading thoroughfares, and others riding about in carriages! They were dressed so showily and so finely, and appeared so happy and contented, that I was virtually forced to exclaim, 'Surely these people are not slaves!' The response was, 'Certainly they are.'
Some of the women wore lace shawls and gold watches
and looked (only for their colour) like London duchesses going to a ball. The
men too were well attired. I reflected for a moment on the condition of British
labourers and London needlewomen. The contrast was too painful to dwell upon.
The thought flashed across my mind that there was nothing so very wicked in
slavery after all ~ that it possessed a bright side as well as a dark
side."
Samuel Phillips Day's comments were well-taken; it
is doubtful if any Southern plantation owner would have treated his slaves as
badly as the average British workingman was treated by his brutal black
nobility landowners and factory operators.
It was no accident that world Communism, Fabianism, and other desperate remedies were born, not in the slave quarters of the South, but in the working class districts of London and Manchester.
However, the daily life of the slaves in the South,
as observed by many travelers, was obscured for all time by the relentless
promotion of a single book, Harriet Beecher Stowe's "Uncle Tom's
Cabin." Even today, any black who dares to say that perhaps we are not as
badly off as our brethren in the jungles of Africa is hooted down as an “Uncle
Tom."
Only warfare to the death is recommended by the
militant Masonic activists; propaganda, invasion, and civil war-these are the
only accepted remedies for the "injustices" visited upon the blacks.
It was no accident that Harriet Beecher Stowe's book became the greatest
bestseller of its time ~ it was tirelessly promoted throughout the entire
nation, in the most successful book promotion campaign in our history. The
force which promoted "Uncle Tom's
Cabin" was the same force which, as early as 1799, sought the
dissolution of our Constitutional Republic, which had continued its efforts in
the Essex Junto, and which found its final fruition in the Civil War.
Despite repeated provocations from the Canaanites in the North, the Southern States proved remarkably tractable, freely making concessions to demands which were intended only to force them into war.
The
Missouri Compromise, written in 1820, was accepted even though it prohibited
slavery in the new state. It did restrict voting privileges to "free white
male citizens," thus excluding women, slaves, and Indians from exercising
the ballot. In 1849, the people of California adopted a constitution which
prohibited slavery. The Compromise of 1850 provided that the prohibition of
slavery should be left up to the individual States, thus thwarting the
Canaanites in their attempts to make this problem an excuse for federal
intervention and a cause of war between the States.
It is a matter of historical record that the Civil War was precipitated by the action against Fort Sumter in South Carolina, across the bay from Charleston. This opening of hostilities can be traced directly to the power of the Scottish Rite in Charleston, which is known officially as "the Mother Lodge of the World."
It was founded by Moses Lindo as the King Solomon Lodge. Lindo had a monopoly on the
indigo trade, a much-needed dye similar to the "Phoenicia" or purple
dye which had been the principal monopoly of his Canaanite ancestors, and who
changed their name from “Canaanite" to "Phoenicians" because of
this monopoly.
ED Noor: Historical trivia. The term
“royal purple” comes from the fact that this violet-purple dye
was used by the Greek elite to color garments. In fact, the word Phoenician
derives from the ancient Greek word phoĆnios meaning "purple." Tyrian purple was so very costly that only the wealthy could afford it.
According to the Encyclopaedia Judaica, other
founders of the King Solomon Lodge included Isaac and Abraham da Costa (da
Costa was one of the leading names among the Maranos). In 1793, the cornerstone
of a new synagogue, Beth Elohim, was laid in Charleston according to the Rite
of Freemasons.
Charleston is also known as the cradle of Reform Judaism in America.We have previously noted that this movement originated in Frankfort-on-Main with the Rothschilds, and that it has culminated in the successes of World Zionism. The Charleston cemetery dates from 1764.
Other organizers of the Charleston Lodge included:
~ Stephen Morin, 25th degree, Inspector for North America, who had been initiated into the Rite of Perfection in Paris in 1761;~ Henry A. Francken, deputy inspector general for North America, 25th degree, initiated in Jamaica in 1762;~ Augustine Prevost (later commander of British forces in North America during the Revolutionary War), 25thdegree, initiated in Jamaica in 1774;~ Moses Michael Hays, 25th degree, initiated in Boston in 1767as deputy inspector general for North America;~ John Mitchell, 25th degree, initiated in Charleston, named deputy for South Carolina;~ B. Spitzer, deputy for Georgia;~ Moses Cohen, 25th degree, initiated in Philadelphia in 1781;~ F. A. de Grasse Tilly, 25th degree, initiated in Charleston 1796.
John
Mitchell had been residing in Philadelphia during the
Revolutionary War; through his Masonic connections, he had himself named as
Deputy Quartermaster General of the American Army, although, he remained in
Philadelphia throughout the British occupation!
He and
his co-worker, Benedict Arnold, were later tried on charges of corruption,
stemming from their illegal diversions of Army supplies, but
here again, because of their powerful Masonic defenders, they were acquitted. Mitchell later moved to South Carolina.
Count
Alexander de Grasse (Tilly) was the son of the French Admiral who
aided George Washington in the defeat of the British forces at Yorktown. The
opposing forces then sat down for a cordial Masonic banquet. De Grasse later
set up Scottish Rite Supreme Councils throughout Europe; he was later named
Supreme Commander of France. He played the crucial role in promoting
insurrectionary activity in South Carolina, which culminated in the firing on
Fort Sumter.
Another member of the Charleston Lodge, James Moultrie, was the principal
figure behind the Nullification Crisis
in South Carolina during the 1820s and 1830s. He was named Grand Secretary
General of the Scottish Rite for all of the Southern states.
During the nineteenth century, Masonic agitators
traveled about the world, inflaming the populaces with passionate cries for "liberation," and "the
Rights of Man."
Unfortunately for those who were deceived by these manipulations, the only rights they were pursuing were the rights of Masonic Canaanites to battle and exterminate the people of Shem.Every other consideration was subordinated to this primary goal. As a result, every nation which was lured into the "Rights of Man" trap became an absolute dictatorship whose officials used their powers to destroy the people of Shem, their demonic goal, and part of their Satanic rebellion against God.
As Grand Master, Lafayette directed the Juarez
revolution in Mexico; in South America, Bernardo
O'Higgins and Simon Bolivar, both of whom were Masons, led the
revolutionary forces against Spain in country after country.
Since the Spanish governments in these countries were also Catholic, these revolutions proved to be an integral part of Masonry's openly declared war against the Catholic Church.
Kossuth
In 1845, Mazzini originated the Young America
movement in the United States. Although primarily active in rural areas as a
farmer's movement, it was directed by Mazzini to play an active role in the
growing abolitionist movement, which he also directed. His friend, William Lloyd Garrison, who later wrote
the Introduction to Mazzini's authorized biography, became the most
inflammatory of the abolitionist propagandists. He called his newspaper
"The Liberator." Garrison started this paper in 1831.
From the outset, it was liberally financed by
unnamed backers, who saw to it that free subscriptions to "the
Liberator" were distributed throughout the Southern states. The State of
Georgia was moved to offer $500 reward for Garrison's arrest or for the
detention of any member of his American Anti-Slavery Society. Garrison
frequently went to London for conferences with Mazzini on the strategy of the
abolitionist movement. They usually met at the offices of the well-known London
solicitor, William Ashurst.
The sardonic Mazzini, top Mason and organizer of the world plan with Albert Pike.
Few
Southerners have ever heard the name of Mazzini, and even fewer know that this
fiery Masonic revolutionary was the actual instigator of the Civil War. He is
privately known among the cognoscenti (or Gnostics) as the godfather of the
anti-slavery campaign in the United States
This abolitionist propaganda caused widespread
resentment throughout the South. On December 16, 1835, the State of South
Carolina issued a formal resolution on the matter:
"Resolved, that the formation of the abolitionist societies and the acts and doings of certain fanatics calling themselves abolitionists in the non-slaveholding states of this confederacy, are in direct violation of the obligations of the compact of the union, dissocial, and incendiary in the extreme."
Note that in 1835, South Carolina used the term
common until after the outcome of the Civil War, a confederacy of states
associated under the provisions of a compact, the Constitution of the United
States. The abolitionist propaganda did constitute a direct invasion of the Southern
States and as such was an undeclared state of war; it was also, as the South
Carolina Resolution pointed out, a direct violation of the terms of the
compact. Nevertheless, this invasion by propaganda continued, until it was at
last followed by the direct military invasion of the Civil War.
Despite the fact that slavery existed in the
Southern States under the direct authority of the Biblical Curse of Canaan, the
war against the people of Shem was conducted without mercy by the invading
Canaanites, who faithfully followed the precepts of their founder in the Will
of Canaan, "hate your masters, and never tell the truth."
The ideological successor to the Edwardean
Conspiracy and the Essex Junto in the New England states was a curious,
pseudo-religious cult, often called "the New England religion," but
also known as Unitarianism and Transcendentalism. It was a direct spawn of the demonic cult of Baal, as adapted through the
centuries by such "liberalizing" and "humane” influences as
Pythagoreanism, Neo-Platonism, and secular humanism (which had been bought and
paid for by the banking family, the de Medicis).
The "New England religion," quite simply
was the latest modern heresy preached against the people of Shem. The cult was
directed by Rev. William Channing;
one of his principal assistants was a teacher named John Brown, the son of the infamous
revolutionary who was to die on the gallows for the insurrection at Harper's
Ferry.
This cult survives today principally in the
preachings of some who call themselves "Fundamentalists." These
renegades preach the doctrine of the Will of Canaan, and they work avidly for
the final defeat and extermination of the people of Shem.
These "Transcendentalists" did not bother to conceal the fact that they took the basics of their "religious" doctrines directly from the Cabala, preaching that each person has an oversoul,
and that there is no final authority in any
religious matter, thus invalidating the entire Bible and the pronouncements of
God. Their true leaning was always dominated by Oriental despotism, and their
doctrines originated in the Far East.
Consequently, their first line of attack was the
overthrowing of the Constitution of the United States, the principal safeguard
of the people of Shem; their campaign resulted in the adoption of
"amendments" which totally invalidated the original intent of this
Constitution. This is the basis of decisions of federal judges in federal
courts today, always against the people of Shem, always strengthening the
stranglehold of Oriental despotism over our captive people.
At one point, the leader of the abolitionists,
William Garrison, publicly burned a copy of the Constitution, calling it
"a Covenant with Hell"! The abolitionists repeatedly denied that
there was any authority for slavery in the Bible, thus ignoring the Curse of
Canaan (Genesis 9:25) and many other commandments.
They also worked desperately to forestall the
peaceful emancipation movement in the South; the gradual freeing of the'
slaves, which had been led by Thomas Jefferson, had received widespread
approbation among the plantation owners.
They welcomed emancipation because they had come
face to face, with the economic reality which has made a shambles of the
Communist empire, that without incentives
and the promise of ultimate gain, few people were willing to do more than the
absolute minimum of labour to survive.
Economic growth was impossible in this situation.
Emancipation was not merely a humanitarian measure; it was welcomed by the
plantation owners because they faced ruin due to the daily demands of
maintaining their increasing slave populations.
Thomas
Jefferson was an outstanding example; despite his brilliant
career, he died bankrupt. He tried crop after crop in desperate attempts to make
Monticello a profitable enterprise; in every case, he was defeated by the
mounting expenses of caring for his slaves.
The "religious" assault on the Constitution
of the United States, the compact which had been drafted by the people of Shem
in order to protect their religious freedom, now took a more ominous turn.
.
Please enlarge. Wedding of Leonora and Alphonse Rothschild.
.
In1857, the financial leaders of the Canaanite
powers, the House of Rothschild,
assembled to celebrate the wedding of Lionel's daughter, Leonora, to her
cousin, Alphonse, son of James de Rothschild of Paris. At this gathering,
Disraeli said, "Under this roof are the heads of the family of Rothschild-a name famous in every capital of Europe and every division of the globe. If you like, we shall divide the United States into two parts, one for you, James, and one for you, Lionel. Napoleon shall do exactly and all that I shall advise him"(p. 228, "The Rothschilds," by John Reeves).
The tragic Civil War which the Canaanites planned
and executed against the people of Shem in the Southern states actually began
in 1859, with the invasion of the South by the homicidal maniac, John Brown. The abolitionists had already spent
millions of dollars to promote slave rebellions in the South, but this
expensive propaganda had very little effect.
John Brown looking very Biblical and patriarchal. Note Greek lettering in the open book.
As Day and other observers had reported, the slaves were leading very comfortable lives. After this tactic failed, it became obvious to the conspirators that an actual military invasion was the only solution to their campaign. The merchant bankers of New England, who were directly controlled by the Rothschilds, were now instructed to finance a military attack against the South.
As Day and other observers had reported, the slaves were leading very comfortable lives. After this tactic failed, it became obvious to the conspirators that an actual military invasion was the only solution to their campaign. The merchant bankers of New England, who were directly controlled by the Rothschilds, were now instructed to finance a military attack against the South.
Their instrumentality was the already well-known
terrorist, John Brown. He was financed by a group famed as "the Secret Six," which was
composed of:
"Thomas Wentworth Higginson,· Rev. Theodore Parker,· Dr. Samuel Gridley Howe(married to Julia Ward, from a wealthy banking family who later wrote "Battle Hymn of the Republic"),· Franklin Benjamin Sanborn,· George Luther Stearns,· and Gerrit Smith.
Smith had been John Brown's first financial angel.
He was the son of the business partner of John Jacob Astor (East India Company,
the opium trade, and British Intelligence). His mother was a Livingston; he was
related to the Masonic leaders, Edward and Robert Livingston. Smith was the
largest landowner in the State of New York, holding a million acres, which
included land he had given to John Brown in1848. Smith's total contribution to
John Brown's military raids and other radical causes came to more than eight
million dollars, a tremendous' sum in those days.
Rev.
Theodore Parker typified the “religious" inspiration of the
abolitionist movement; his mother was a Stearns, and he married into the Cabot
family. He was educated at the Harvard Divinity School, and he became a leading
Transcendentalist and Congregationalist minister. He was always an
"activist" in the Masonic tradition. In 1854, he had been indicted by
a grand jury for inciting an attack on a courthouse where a runaway slave was
being detained. He was an active member of the Vigilance Committee, and he was
the principal organizer of the Secret Six to finance John Brown's raid. He
later became an expatriate, living in Europe. He died in Florence (birthplace
of secular humanism).
Thomas
Wentworth Higginson, of the leading New England banking family, was from
Newburyport, Massachusetts, the birthplace of Albert Pike, who became the
national leader of American Masonry. Higginson actively assisted Rev. Parker in
the attack on the courthouse and engaged in many other illegal and nefarious
activities. His cousin married Theodore Roosevelt.
Samuel
Gridley Howe and his wife, Julia, founded and edited a
fiery anti-slavery newspaper, "The Commonwealth." Like so many of the
Canaanite agitators in the United States, Gridley was descended from Calvinist
revolutionaries; his ancestor was an officer in Cromwell's army, John Ward of
Gloucester, who later fled to the United States to avoid punishment for the
atrocities he committed under the banner of Cromwell.
Franklin
Benjamin Sanborn was a leading disciple of Rev. Parker and Ralph
Waldo Emerson.
The Senate ordered his arrest in 1860. He had been
the principal agent for John Brown in New York since 1857. George Luther Stearns married into the Train family. He was the leader
of the Free Soilers, the anti-slavery agitators in the state of Kansas; their
depredations gave rise to the term “Bloody Kansas." He donated large sums
to John Brown and bought a farm for the terrorist and his family.
The chief agent for Stearns in Kansas was Martin Conway. Originally from Baltimore,
Conway was sent to Kansas to lead the Free State forces there; he later became
the first Congressman from Kansas. On October 11, 1873, he fired three shots at
Senator Pomeroy, wounding him. Conway was taken to St. Elizabeth's Hospital,
where he was judged hopelessly insane. He later died there.
Other leading New Englanders deeply involved in the
planning of uprisings in the South included Samuel Cabot; he paid for $4000 worth of rifles which were sent to
John Brown's forces in Kansas. The guns were used to massacre entire families
during John Brown's orgy of terrorism. The Cabot Bank later provided $57,000
for John Brown's military expenses. There is no record that it was ever repaid,
or that any attempt was made to collect it. It was a donation to the cause of
terrorism, a familiar technique of bankers. Other financial supporters of John
Brown included John Murray Forbes, a wealthy railroad builder (his mother was a
Perkins), who served on the Republican National Committee.
Between 1827 and 1843, the plans of the conspirators received a temporary setback with the emergence of the Anti Masonic Party as a national force. This political movement threatened to expose the entire conspiracy as a Masonic operation. From its outset, the Anti-Masonic Party was handicapped by its inability to penetrate the shroud of secrecy which veiled every act of the conspirators.
Without direct evidence of this conspiracy which
could be presented in court or laid before the people, they soon lost their
popular support. In fact, they were soon infiltrated by the very conspirators
whom they sought to expose, and they were rendered impotent!
Albert Pike later boasted that "The
Anti-Masonic Party actually was of great assistance to us." After its dissolution,
Freemasonry never again faced any organized opposition in the entire United
States. Those who mention this subject are quickly discredited as "poor
overwrought fools" and paranoid "Know-Nothings" who see Masons
behind every tree. In most cases, they are quickly consigned to the nearest
lunatic asylum, a la Soviet Communism's handling of its "dissidents.”
For some years prior to the outbreak of the Civil
War, the Young American Masonic conspiracy had been active in the Southern
states, laying the groundwork for the approaching Civil War. A native New
Yorker, John A. Quitman, moved to Mississippi and married into a wealthy
Southern family. He was given the warrant to form a Scottish Rite organization
in Mississippi.
On February 1, 1848, the Freemason magazine of
Boston carried the notice that Brother John Quitman, who was now a Major
General in the United States Army, had been inaugurated as Sovereign Grand Inspector
General of the 33rd degree. All Southern Lodges were now ordered to obey him.
Quitman had also become one of the most outspoken leaders of the secessionist
movement in the South; this movement was sponsored a plan to annex Mexico, and
financed an invasion of Cuba by mercenaries. He had been elected Governor of
Mississippi, when he was indicted in New Orleans for his part in the planned
Cuban invasion, and he was forced to resign from that office.
Here again was the deep involvement of a leader of the Scottish Rite, the revolutionary arm of Freemasonry, in planning wars and revolutions throughout the world.
The ideological leader of the Cuban invasion was
one Jane McManus, who had last been heard from as the girl friend of the
revolutionist, Aaron Burr.
In order to build popular support for his
Presidential campaign, Senator Stephen Douglas, Lincoln’s opponent, hired one
George Sanders, 'a Young America agent, to edit the Democratic Party Review.
Sanders is identified in Who's Who by profession as a
"revolutionist." The American political agent of the Hudson Bay
Company, he had worked for the Bank of England, and as United States Consul in
London, he had worked closely with Mazzini. London was at that time the world
headquarters of Masonic revolutionary movements. Sanders soon devoted the pages
of The Democratic Party Review to lauding the efforts of Mazzini and other
Masonic agitators.
In 1853, Killian H. van Rensselaer, one of the New
York "patroons," or hereditary landlords, opened the Western
Headquarters of the Scottish Rite in Cincinnati, Ohio.
At the same time, another secret organization, the
Knights of the Golden Circle, began its operations in Cincinnati. The organization,
which, as usual, was well-financed, soon enlisted and trained some 100,000
members in paramilitary tactics. These members spread throughout the Southern
States; they formed the nucleus of what would become the Confederate Army
during the Civil War. Most Southerners neither envisioned nor prepared for an
armed struggle with the North.
The "Southern" cause was always directed and promoted by "Northern" infiltrators. The stage was now set for the Civil War.
The nation was further polarized by the Dred Scott case. Scott, an elderly and infirm Negro who was financially supported by his owners, was pushed into a direct legal confrontation, amply financed from New England merchant bankers’ funds. The case went to the Supreme Court. Listed in the court records as "Dred Scott v. Sanford, 19 Howard 393,"the matter was decided in an opinion by Chief Justice Taney dated March 6, 1857.
"The question is simply this; can a negro, whose ancestors were imported into this country, and sold as slaves, become a member of the political community formed and brought into existence by the Constitution of the United States, and as such become entitled to all the rights and privileges, and immunities, guaranteed by that instrument to the citizen? The words 'people of the United States' and 'citizens' are synonymous terms, and mean the same thing ... 'the sovereign people' .... The question before us is, whether the class of persons described in the plea in abatement comprise a portion of this people and are constituent members of this sovereignty? We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word 'citizens' in the Constitution, and can, therefore, claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States. On the contrary, they were at that time considered as a subordinate and inferior class of beings, who had been subjugated by the dominant race, and, whether emancipated or not, yet remained subject to their authority, and had no rights or privileges but such as those who held the power and the government might choose to grant them .... In the opinion of the Court, the legislation and histories of the times, and the language used in the Declaration of Independence, show, that neither the class of persons who had been imported as slaves, nor their descendants, whether they had become free or not, were then acknowledged as a part of the people, nor intended to be included in the general words used in that memorable instrument.... They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order; and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit.... This opinion was at that time fixed and universal in the civilized portion of the white race. It was regarded as an axiom in morals as well as in politics, which no one thought of disputing, or supposed to be open to dispute; and men in every grade and position in society daily and habitually acted upon it in their private pursuits, as well as in matters of public concern, without doubting for a moment the correctness of this opinion.... There are two clauses in the Constitution which point directly and specifically to the Negro race as a separate class of persons, and show clearly that they were not regarded as a portion of the people or citizens of the Government then formed ... the right to import slaves until the year 1808.... and the States pledge to each other to maintain the right of property of the master, by delivering up to him any slave who may have escaped from his service.... the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution ... the Circuit Court of the United States had no jurisdiction in this case, and could give no judgment on it... Its judgment for the defendant must, consequently, be reversed, and a mandate issued directing the suit to be dismissed for want of jurisdiction."
The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court paid dearly
for this decision. His name has almost entirely been erased from the legal
history of this nation; he was repeatedly threatened with house arrest during
the Civil War by President Lincoln, and after the war, his two elderly
daughters, shunned as prospective brides, eked out a precarious existence as
government clerks at the very bottom of the pay scale, always on the verge of
complete destitution.
After the Dred Scott decision, events moved rapidly
toward an actual military confrontation, with the Knights of the Golden Circle
taking their places throughout the Southern states. John Brown then attacked Harper's Ferry, an incident which was
intended to set off a slave uprising throughout the South. The anticipated
popular revolution failed to materialize, and Brown was captured and hanged. To
this day, he remains a martyr in the cabbalistic circles of New England, the
Fundamentalists. Their ideological leader, Ralph Waldo Emerson, wrote, "He
makes the gallows as Glorious as the Cross." Emerson later promoted John
Brown as "a new Saint in the calendar."
In order to arouse provocation for the Fort Sumter
attack, Lincoln now dispatched heavy reinforcements to the fort. Even his
Secretary of War, Seward, objected to his move, suggesting instead that Fort
Sumter be yielded peacefully to the state of South Carolina.
Lincoln himself was eagerly anticipating the
approaching bloodbath and would hear of no compromise. He is known to have
suffered from hereditary insanity, which did not come from the Lincoln family,
for they were not his actual forebears. His mother, Nancy Hanks, being
homeless, had been taken in as a charitable act by the Enloe family; she was
thrown out by Mrs. Enloe after she had become pregnant by Abraham Enloe.
Ward H. Lame, Lincoln's law partner, later wrote a biography of Lincoln stating that Lincoln was of illegal parentage, and referring to his real father as Abraham Enloe.
The
Yorkville Enquirer, April 8, 1863, noted that Lincoln's mother, Nancy Hanks,
was
"a single woman of low degree [Canaan means 'low'. Ed.] ... generally reputed to have from one-eighth to one-sixteenth Negro blood in her veins, and who always associated with Negroes on terms of equality."
The Atlanta Intelligencer in 1863 noted of his vice
president, Hannibal Hamlin, who had been named after the historic leader of the
Canaanite forces of Carthage, Hannibal, that Hamlin was identified by State
Senator Hon. John Burham, of Hancock County, Maine, who lived in the area and
knew of Hamlin's ancestry.
The Senator reported that Hamlin's great
grandfather was a mulatto, who had married a Canadian woman;
his grandfather during the Revolutionary War commanded a company composed only
of mulattoes, Negroes, and Indians under Generals Sullivan and Green.
This Captain
Hamlin is recorded as having embezzled the funds sent to pay his troops; he
also was said to have stolen wine and other supplies. The father of Hannibal
Hamlin's father lived in Paris, Maine, and had a brother named Africa. When
Hannibal Hamlin was born, one of his uncles peered into his cradle and
exclaimed, "For God's sake, how long will this damned black blood remain in
our family?"
.
.
In Louisiana, John
Slidell, who was also a New Yorker, was the leader of the state's secessionist
party; his second in command was one Judah
P. Benjamin. Slidell was the Masonic protƩgƩ of the Grand Master, Edward
Livingston, also of New York, a key member of the Aaron Burr treason apparat.
Benjamin, from the West Indies, was a British subject. He was hired as a law
clerk by Slidell. He later became the Secretary of State in the Confederate
Government. After the Civil War, he was permitted to leave the United States
without hindrance, and he lived his later years in splendid luxury as one of
the highest paid Queen's Counsels in London, while his former superior,
Jefferson Davis, languished in a federal prison, burdened with heavy chains.
In Texas, the secessionist conspirators were
blocked for a time by Sam Houston, a Virginian who was the founder of Texas.
Houston ruled that the secessionist efforts were illegal. The conspirators then
succeeded in deposing Governor Houston by a "rump" election, which
was similar to the tactics which the Cromwellians had used to condemn King
Charles I in England. The conspirators then claimed that their secessionist
delegates had received 40,000 votes, as compared to only10,000 for Houston's
supporters. This was later cited as the "popular" support for the
"insurrection,” as the action taken by the Southern states was later
termed.
The Confederacy was officially established at
Montgomery, Alabama, chaired by Scottish
Rite Supreme Commander Howell Cobb. He was ably assisted by Scottish Rite
backers from the Charleston Mother Lodge and representatives from other Masonic
groups.
Thus the American people were manoeuvred into a Civil War which they neither envisioned nor desired. They were manipulated by Masonic Canaanite conspirators working together in the Northern and the Southern states.
The resulting bloodbath proved to be the greatest
disaster ever suffered by the people of Shem. The great civilization which they
had spent some two hundred years building in this land was now swept away,
"Gone with the Wind"; the Constitution which they had written to
protect their existence as the people of Shem was scrapped, being replaced by
“Amendments" which reduced them to the status of serfs, while giving the
Canaanites total power to set up a tyrannical dictatorship.
Nevertheless, the anticipated division of the United States into two small, weak countries, each to be easily controlled from the European headquarters of the Rothschilds, failed to take place.
At one point, the massing of French and Spanish
troops in Mexico seemed to doom the future of the United States, and to bring
about the division which the Rothschilds desired. However, the Czar of Russia, a great leader of the Shemite
people, learned of the plan. He immediately dispatched two of his fleets to the
United States, one which landed at San Francisco, which was commanded by Admiral Lesowsky, and the second
squadron, which arrived in New York harbour, commanded by Admiral A.A. Popoff.
Needless to say, these names are not encountered by
students of American history.
However, the presence of these Russian fleets
served to preserve the Union. James de Rothschild
was left without his anticipated empire in Mexico, while Lionel was forced to
forego his over the Northern states.
Because of these good offices on behalf of the Union, the Czar was later murdered by Rothschild agents, and Russia was condemned to be turned over to the atrocities of the demonic Canaanite revolutionaries.
The Civil War ravaged the Southern states, while
leaving the North untouched. The civilization of the people of Shem was in
ruins. Once again, as during the Revolutionary War, hordes of German
mercenaries moved through the South. Southern ladies reported that their homes
had been put to the torch by Union soldiers who could speak only guttural
English. Yet these horrors were only a harbinger of what was to come. The
defeat of the underfinanced and poorly prepared Southern states had been a
foregone conclusion, as they were overrun by the numerical and financial
superiority of the Northern states.
Their defeat was followed by an unrivalled brutality
toward the vanquished population. For generations afterward, Southern families
suffered genetic diseases directly attributable to the starvation forced upon
them by their conquerors; such formerly unknown illnesses as scurvy, rickets,
gum disease, and other diseases gave rise to the depiction of the Southern
people which is still universal in the New York owned and controlled publishing
industry, movies, and television, the Joads of Tobacco Road. However, no
explanation of their pitiful condition is ever offered.
.
.
The 1949 World Book states under the title "Reconstruction,""This plan was unmatched in history for its generosity to the defeated foe."
This is typical of the anti-Southern bias of the publishing
industry; no Southern writer can be published in New York unless he depicts his
fellow Southerners as alcoholic womanizers and homosexuals. In fact, this
"generosity" consisted of military occupation for many years after
the war, ruinous taxation, systematic starvation, and brutal military courts in
which the Southern people found it impossible to obtain justice (the same
system is largely in place today).
In his First Inaugural Address, Lincoln had clearly stated, "I have no purpose, direct or indirect, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so."
Despite this pledge, on January 1, 1863, Lincoln
issued his Emancipation Proclamation.
It had actually been previously written on September 22, 1862; Lincoln had
prepared the first draft as early as July, 1862. Lincoln excused his action as
due to "military necessity," and therefore warranted by the
Constitution. No court challenge was ever made to this claim.
On the same day that Lincoln issued this
proclamation, the Illinois State Legislature, hardly a hotbed of Southern
reactionaries, issued a formal denunciation of the proclamation:
"Resolved, that the emancipation proclamation of the President of the United States is as unwarrantable in military as in civil law; gigantic usurpation, at once converting the war, professedly commenced by the administration for the vindication of the authority of the Constitution, into the crusade for the sudden unconditional and violent liberation of three million Negro slaves .... The proclamation invites servile insurrection as an element in this crusade-a means of warfare, the inhumanity and diabolism of which are without example in civilian warfare, and which we denounce, and which the civilized world will denounce, as an ineffaceable disgrace to the American people."
The key word in the Illinois Legislature's
Resolution is "diabolism."
Perhaps someone in the Legislature realized that this was the triumph of the
Will of Canaan, a celebration of the demonic concepts of the Canaanites. They
have celebrated it ever since.
The Masonic Canaanite forces throughout the world hailed the Emancipation Proclamation as a great victory for their program of worldwide revolution.
Garibaldi, at that time the most famous Masonic
leader and revolutionary in the world, signed a Proclamation from Italy to
Lincoln saying,
“weal to you, redeemed sons of Ham."
Whether Garibaldi knew of Lincoln's actual origins
is not known. Certainly he hailed him as a fellow revolutionary. A little-known
incident of the Civil War was Lincoln's
offer to Garibaldi to take the commander in chief's post of the armies of the United
States in 1861; he repeated the offer in 1862. Garibaldi had considered it
seriously, but was forced to decline because of other commitments.
European writers generally were appalled at the
excesses committed by the Union troops and the Lincoln administration during
the war. The great French writer, Alfred de Vigny, had written to a Southern
lady on September 10, 1862,
"Those abominable acts of cruelty perpetrated
by the Northern armies in New Orleans remind one of the invasion of the
Barbarians, of Attila's Huns, or even worse than the VandaIs. I well understand
your hatred for those depraved and ferocious men who are drowning in blood the
whole of your beloved country.... A wise state is not one that resorts to brute
force, to murder and fire in order to find a solution to the complex problems
of states’ rights. It is a question that should have been settled in public
debate."
A public debate was just what Masonic Canaanite conspirators did not want; they managed to avoid it each time the issue came up.
The Times of London, October 21, 1862, editorially commented,
"Is the name of Lincoln to be classified in the catalogue of monsters, wholesale assassins, and butchers of humanity? ... When blood begins to flow and shrieks come piercing through the darkness, Mister Lincoln will wait until the rising flames tell that all is consummated, and then he will rub his hands and think that revenge is sweet."
The Times did not know this, but Lincoln's entire
political career was dedicated to the revenge of the Canaanites against the
fair-skinned people of Shem, those who were always to be considered his enemies
because of the color of his skin.
The Civil War was merely the latest campaign in a battle which had been surreptitiously waged during the past three thousand years.
After Lincoln's assassination, the Radical
Republicans in Congress moved to impose even more Draconian measures against
the defeated South. The Southerners had offended the basic principle of Masonic
Canaanism, that is, Oriental despotism; any
refusal to obey the command of the dictatorial central government must
automatically be followed by the severest punishment.
No matter that the Constitution of the United
States had been written by the people of Shem, or that it guaranteed them their
States rights; no matter that the federal government was legally confined in
its authority to the District of Columbia by statute; no matter that no federal
authority could enter any state except by express request of the state
legislature. All of this was systematically violated, and now the violated ones
were to endure even greater punishments.
.
Caricature of carpet bagger Carl Shurz.
.
Hordes of carpetbaggers followed the Federal troops
into the Southern states like avid camp followers; Federal courts and Federal
insane asylums were now set up in the states for the first time, in flagrant
violation of the Constitutional prohibitions against them.
Now ensued a series of "legal” measures which
were hailed by the revolutionary Mazzini, who was known as "the
prophet" by Masonic organizations throughout the world. Mazzini enthused
to the Northern conquerors,
"You have done more for us in four years than fifty years of teaching, preaching, and writing by your European brothers have been able to do!"
These measures effectively scrapped the
Constitution. A hastily written "Civil Rights Act" was rushed through
Congress. President Andrew Johnson immediately vetoed it, noting that the right
to confer citizenship rested with the several states, and that "the
tendency of the bill is to resuscitate the spirit of rebellion."
Indeed, many of the measures enacted by the Radical
Republicans were deliberately intended to provoke the Southerners into open
resistance, so that they could then be exterminated by the overwhelming
superiority of the military forces quartered in their states. The Civil Rights
Act was passed over Johnson's veto, as were other similar measures.
ED Noor: Until now I have battled myself
to not add commentary to this wonderful work but here I must remind the readers
of the plight of the Palestinian people currently dealing with the Israelis.
The measures taken against the people of the South sound devastatingly similar
to those against the Palestinian and Christian inhabitants of that beleaguered
land. These techniques are still in use today with a much heavier hand as the
ensnared populace loses sight of itself under the current onslaught against its
culture and mores. And the Canaanites are dangerously close to their goal,
despite pockets of resistance which are being destroyed at an increasing pace.
The Federal troops now ordered that
"conventions" be held in the Southern states, which were akin to the
conventions called by the perpetrators of the French Revolution. These
conventions were ordered to do three things:
(1) nullify the ordinance of secession;(2) repudiate all Confederate debts; and(3) declare slavery abolished.
Collier's Encyclopaedia notes that these Constitutional
conventions held in the Southern states were composed of
(1) scallywags (renegade Southerners);(2) carpetbaggers; and(3) Negroes.
The World Book lists them in slightly different
order, as blacks, carpetbaggers, and scallywags. These conventions set up Radical Republican governments in the Southern
states, which were nothing more than occupation governments, set up by military
force.
From 1868-1870, the Southern states were once again
represented in Congress, but only by delegates chosen by these three groups.
Collier's notes that after Grant was elected President In1868,
"It was important to maintain Radical Republican governments of the southern states because these corrupt organizations provided votes for the Republican Party. Largely for this reason, the Fifteenth Amendment was passed by Congress and its ratification made a condition for readmission to the Union for Virginia, Mississippi, Texas, and Georgia. The Reconstruction governments in the South could only be sustained by force."
Thus Collier's makes a definitive statement about
the Fifteenth Amendment that it was passed by blackmail of the Southern states,
and that it was merely a political ploy of the Republican Party to maintain its
political power. The reason that these brutal and alien state governments of
the Masonic Canaanites could only be sustained by force was because of their
unwavering hatred and brutality toward the people of Shem. Military and Federal
courts whose dicta can be enforced only by martial law can hardly be welcomed
by any people.
The military occupation of the South was similar to
the present military occupation of East Germany, Czechoslovakia, and other
European nations by the Soviet armies.
An alien ideology was imposed on a defeated people by brute force.
The Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the
United States was enacted in 1865 by martial law. The Fourteenth Amendment was
enacted in 1868 by martial law. The Fifteenth Amendment was enacted in 1870 by
martial law. Military occupation of the Southern states did not end until 1877,
twelve years after the end of the Civil War. The occupation was maintained
throughout those years solely as a punitive measure, in the hope of starving to
death the last white survivors of the Civil War.
Thus we find that the Thirteenth Amendment, enacted
in 1865, during military occupation, abolished:
~ slavery;~ the Fourteenth Amendment, which changed the status of citizenship in the United States, was enacted in 1868 during the military occupation;~ and the Fifteenth Amendment, dictating voting procedures, was enacted in 1870 during the military occupation.
These amendments were similar to orders issued by
the Soviet commanders today in East Germany or in Czechoslovakia. In1868, when
the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified, Great Britain was still shipping
boatloads of political prisoners to the Swan River in Western Australia as
slave labour. Many of them were "Irish politicals," who were deported
to wipe out popular resistance to the British occupation of Ireland.
The Civil Rights Act of April 9, 1866, stated,
"Be it enacted, that all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States."
This Act nullified Art. 1, Sec. 2, Cl. 3 of the
Constitution defining “free persons"; even so, the Civil Rights Act
continued the exclusion of "Indians not taxed" from citizenship.
The state of martial law under which these three
amendments to the Constitution were ratified was authorized by the First Reconstruction Act, dated March
2, 1867:
"Whereas no legal State governments or adequate protection of life or property now exists in the rebel states," the ten Southern states were thereby divided into five military districts.
President Johnson vetoed the bill on the same day,
noting that "The bill places the people of the ten States therein named
under the absolute domination of military rule but each State does have an
actual government." Johnson further noted that the commanding officer is
"an absolute monarch," which was a clear violation of the provisions
of the Constitution. He also said, "This is a bill passed by Congress in
time of peace [the war had been over for two years]." He further noted the
absence of "either war or insurrection” and that laws were already in
harmonious operation in the Southern states. Johnson concluded his veto message
as follows: "The Constitution forbids the exercise of judicial power in
any way but one-that is, by the ordained and Established courts." Thus
Johnson excluded the exercise of military courts in the Southern states.
The
Second Reconstruction Act, dated March 23, 1867,
established military control over voting in the Southern states. Free
elections, anyone? President Johnson again vetoed it the same day. "No
consideration could induce me to give my approval to such an election law for
any purpose, and especially for the great purpose of framing the Constitution
of a State." The bill was passed over his veto.
The
Third Reconstruction Act, dated July 19, 1867, extended even greater
powers to the military commanders of the Southern states. It provided that no
military officer in any district shall be bound by any civil officer of the
United States. By giving absolute power to the commanding officer, the Third
Reconstruction Act confirmed that the Southern states were under absolute
martial law, an important point to be brought up in a Constitutional challenge
to the validity of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments. There
is also the legal point to be made that if these amendments were and are
illegal, having been enacted under martial law, all of the subsequent
amendments to the Constitution are also invalid, since they not only are not
numbered correctly, but they also must be considered as having been enacted
according to the provisions of these three amendments, which changed the
requirements for citizenship and voting rights!
The
Fourth Reconstruction Act imposed even greater
voting restrictions on the militarily occupied Southern states.
Because he opposed the four Reconstruction Acts,
which were patently unconstitutional, the Radical Republicans moved to impeach
President Johnson and remove him from office. This has been a favorite tactic
of those who have been defeated at the polls, as Presidents Nixon and Reagan were
later to discover. The move to impeach Johnson lost by only one vote.
The Radical Republicans had passed the four
Reconstruction Acts only because they had previously taken the precaution in July
of 1866 to reduce the number of justices on the Supreme Court from ten to
seven, fearing that President Johnson might appoint justices who would uphold
his opinion of the Reconstruction Acts. Such is the "law of the
land."
In April, 1869, after Grant had been elected
President, the Congress again increased the number of justices to nine, which
remains the number today. Congress subsequently denounced Presidents for their
attempts to "pack" the Supreme Court, which seems to
be reserved for themselves. Grant appointed justices who unanimously ruled to
uphold the unconstitutional Reconstruction Acts.
As Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Salmon P.Chase, the New York banker,
resisted all challenges to the Reconstruction Acts by the captive Southern
states, declaring that these Acts were indeed "constitutional." From
1830 to 1860, he had been renowned in Ohio for his work in aiding fugitive
slaves; he was called "the attorney general for runaway slaves." He
later founded the Chase Bank, which is now allied with Aaron Burr’s Manhattan
Company to form the Chase Manhattan Bank.
.
.
The Radical Republicans in Congress were led by the fiery Thaddeus Stevens, a lawyer from Pennsylvania who, through judicious investments in real estate, had become the largest taxpayer in Gettysburg. He was a grotesque cripple, clubfooted, described by his contemporaries as "fox-featured, with hollow voice and a permanent pout." He was bald from the effects of some disease, and wore a chestnut coloured wig. For many years his only companion had been his mulatto mistress, one Lydia Smith; he died in her bed.
The military occupation was the principal force
upholding the depredations of the carpetbaggers in the Southern states. They
had swarmed in to quickly amass huge fortunes in land by having the property of
the impoverished Southerners confiscated, they being unable to pay the ruinous
increases voted by the scallywag legislatures.
During Reconstruction, six million acres in the state of Mississippi were sold for back taxes.
The scallywag legislatures embarked on great
spending sprees, running up huge state debts to the bankers. During
Reconstruction, the state debt of Louisiana increased from fourteen to
forty-eight million dollars; in South Carolina from seven million to twenty-nine
million; in Florida from a mere $524,000 to five million dollars.
The Fairfield Herald in South Carolina wrote
editorially, November 20, 1872,
"Reconstruction ... a hell born policy, which has trampled the fairest and noblest of states, our great statehood beneath the unholy hoofs of African savages and shoulder strapped brigands-the policy which has given up millions of our freeborn, high-souled brothers and sisters, countrymen and countrywomen, of Washington, Rutledge, Marion, and Lee, to the rule of gibbering, louse-eaten, devil-worshipping barbarians, from the jungles of Dahomey, and perpetuated by buccaneers from Cape Cod, Memphremagog, Hell, and Boston."
Note that even a Southern editor knew about the
devil-worship of the Canaanites.
Amazingly enough, this was written during the
military occupation, or rather, during its close. The descendants of the
carpetbaggers now own all of the Southern press, and such an editorial cannot
be read anywhere in the South today.
The military occupation of the South was further
reinforced when President Grant passed the aptly named Force Act of 1870. This act suspended habeas corpus and placed
total power in the hands of the military occupiers of the Southern states. His
Enforcement Acts of 1871 put Congressional elections in the South under the
control of federal authorities, a method which was revived in the1960s and
1970s, when federal authorities again invaded the Southern states to place elections
under their supervision. These were the auspices under which the Constitution
of the United States was rewritten and nullified.
In 1877, twelve years after the end of the Civil
War, twelve years after the Thirteenth Amendment was ratified, nine years after
the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified, and seven years after the Fifteenth
Amendment was ratified, President Hayes withdrew the federal troops from the
Southern states.
The scallywag looting of the impoverished South was
typified by the career of Franklin
Israel Moses Jr. in South Carolina. His father had been appointed Chief
Justice of the Supreme Court of Carolina during the period of
Reconstruction, serving in that office from 1868-1877. Significantly, he ended
his term when the federal troops were withdrawn.
In 1866, Moses Jr. began to publish a newspaper,
Sumter News, which enthusiastically endorsed all four of the Reconstruction
Acts. He was elected as Speaker of the House by the "Loyal League," a
scallywag group. For more than a decade, he spent millions of dollars in lavish
living, money which he accumulated by accepting bribes in office, and by filing
bogus state pay vouchers for hundreds of nonexistent state employees.
He also dealt heavily in fraudulent state
contracts. He purchased a $40,000 mansion (the equivalent of $10 million in
today's money), and was renowned as the biggest spender in South Carolina. With
the withdrawal of federal troops, which zealously protected the
"rights" of such scoundrels, he came under scrutiny for his criminal
acts. In 1878, to avoid prosecution, he fled to Massachusetts, where he finally
died in 1906. Throughout the remainder of his life, he was known as a dope
addict and confidence trickster. The Moses saga is redolent of the aroma which
attended every act of the scalawags and carpetbaggers in the South.
In "The Tragic Era" by Claude Bowers, one
of the many books which have documented the excesses of the Reconstruction
period, Bowers writes on p. 29,
"... in Louisiana, Sheridan rattling the sword, was spluttering epithets in an attempt to save the Radicals he served from the destruction they merited ....”
Bowers describes the Reconstruction as
"Cromwellian," an apt description. The revolution in the South which
it served to introduce was in essence a Cromwellian interpretation of the
Masonic Canaanite Order. The mockery of election laws and indeed of the legal
system under Reconstruction was remarkably exposed by Bowers when he wrote of
the Durell episode.
A conservative group had elected John McEnery as Governor, but an
illegal returning board had ignored his election and given the Governorship to
his opponent, W. P. Kellogg, without
even counting the votes, although a legal returning board had already certified
the election of McEnery. Bowers writes,
"The drunken Federal Judge Durell, with the trembling fingers of inebriety, had written his midnight injunction against the legal returning board, and instructed U.S. Marshal Packard, the Republican manager, to take possession of the State House .... The next morning, the besotted judge declared the lawful board illegal and restrained it from counting the election returns."
Bowers noted that "the audacity of the crime
rocked the Nation." Terming Durell a “drunken tyrant," Bowers
chronicles the widespread protest against his vicious act.
Today, the name of Durell is still despised in the
State of Louisiana as a synonym for federal judicial tyranny. Durell was
typical of the besotted Oriental despots, acting with the backing of federal
troops, as they still do today, who use the Constitution of the United States
as toilet tissue while they crush the people of Shem under the heels of their
judicial Masonic Order of Canaanite tyranny. It is the Durells who have made
the federal courts the most hated institutions in American life today, in 1987,
just as Durell caused them to be despised in 1872.
Because of the depredations of such scallywags as
Durell and Moses, the defeated Southerners had lost more than $500 million in
cash during the Civil War, the result of their patriotic purchases of Confederate
bonds, which were repudiated one hundred per cent by the scallywag
legislatures. Only their land holdings were left. Almost half of their assets
were computed in their holdings of slaves, and these were now gone. Much of
their land was now confiscated, due to heavy taxation imposed by the authority
of the federal troops.
Of a total population of sixty million, the ten
Southern states had suffered five and one-half million casualties, roughly ten
per cent; one-fourth of the male
population was dead or incapacitated by 1865. It would seem impossible for
even the people of Shem to go on after such losses, yet survive they did, even
though the cruel twelve years of the Reconstruction Period was designed to
ensure that none of them would survive.
It is a fact of law that legislation enacted during
periods of martial law is valid only during the period for which martial law is
declared and sustained.
Amazingly enough, the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and
Fifteenth Amendments have never been challenged on this basic premise of law.
The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery, even though President Johnson
informed Congress that they had no power to interfere with slavery; the
Fourteenth Amendment changed the requirements for citizenship, even though
Congress had no power to act on this question. Johnson urged the Southern
states to reject the Fourteenth Amendment; he vetoed the four Reconstruction
Acts, showing that the executive branch of the government was unalterably
opposed to the excesses of the Radical Republicans in Congress.
The Oxford Companion to Law states,
"In the Middle Ages, martial law meant law administered by the Court of the Constable and the Marshal ~ it now means law applicable by virtue of the Royal Prerogative to foreign territory occupied for the time being by the armed forces of the Crown."
Thus the federal troops who occupied the Southern
states were exercising a Royal Prerogative, which had nothing to do with the
Constitution of the United States-hence President Johnson's veto of the
Reconstruction Acts.
It was the exercise of absolute power over the
population by a military officer who was directly responsible to the President.
No martial law has been imposed in Great Britain since the seventeenth century.
"Martial law may, exceptionally, be established within the State itself, in substitution for the organized government and administration of justice, when a state of war, or rebellion, an invasion, or other serious disturbance exists; in that event, justice is administered by its martial and military law tribunals."
There cannot be two governments exercising the same
authority in the same area; when the military governments were established by
the Reconstruction Acts in the ten Southern states from 1865 to1877, no other
government had sovereignty in those states; thus no legislation could be enacted
except under the umbrella of martial law; therefore, when martial law ended,
all legislation enacted under martial law was void.
Black's Law Dictionary says of martial law,
"military authority exercises control over civilians or civil authority
within domestic territory. Ochikubo v. Bonesteel, D.C.Cai. 60 F supp. 916, 928,
929,930."
Webster's Dictionary says of martial law,
"From Mars, Roman God of War. Law applied to all persons and property in
occupied territory by the military authorities." The Oxford English
Dictionary says of martial law,
"1548 Hall Chron. Hen IV 7b. He.... caused dyvers lustie men toappele diverse older men upon matters determinable as the common law of the court marcial." OED further states of martial law, "That kind of military government of a country or district, in which the civil law is suspended and the military authorities are empowered to arrest all suspect persons at their discretion and to punish offenders without formal trial. 1537 Hen VIII. Let, Dk Norfk St Paprii 537.... The cours of our lawes must give place to the ordinaunces and estates marciall, our pleasure is that you shall cause such dredful executions to be done on a good nombre of the inhabitantes o euery towne, village and hamlet that have offended in this rebellion and they maybe a ferefull spectacle to all other hereafter, that wold practise any like matter." The OED quotes Wellington as saying in 1851, on military law in Hansard, "Martial law was neither more nor less than the will of the general who commands the army. In fact, martial law meant no law at all. "
Thus these three amendments to the Constitution
were ratified while the ten Southern states were under martial law, and
"had no law at all." The Force Acts, the four Reconstruction Acts,
and the Civil Rights Act were all passed by Congress while the Southern states
were not allowed to hold free elections, and all voters were under close
supervision by federal troops. Even Soviet Russia has never staged such
mockeries of the election procedures!
The Congress in 1987 went even further in changing
the requirements for citizenship. The Washington Post, March 17, 1987, reported
that Congress was now offering sales of citizenship for$185 each, with a
bargain rate of $420 for entire families! It is expected that some two million
aliens will purchase these bargain citizenship offers.
The only requirement is that they be criminals, that
is, that they be present in the United States in open violation of the laws of
the United States. It is the greatest threat to the people of Shem since
President Carter persuaded Castro to let him have many thousands of Cuban homosexuals and criminally insane Marielitos to import into the United States. The ensuing nationwide crime wave has terrorized our cities. The Carter-Castro deal openly violated our entire mandated immigration procedures.
There are two inescapable conclusions to be drawn
from this record-first, that the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth
Amendments, which drastically changed qualifications for citizenship in the
United States, voting rights, and other fundamental matters, were ratified
while the ten Southern states were under martial law, and their rightful
governments had been superseded by military force; and two, that legislation
passed during periods of martial law effectively ends or is automatically
repealed when martial law ends and the troops are withdrawn. The Reconstruction
governments, which, as Collier's notes, could only be sustained by force, ended
when that force was withdrawn.
Thus these amendments to the Constitution have had
no legal status since 1877, when President Hayes withdrew the federal troops
from the Southern states. These amendments are and have been invalid since
I'll reserve the bulk of my comments for later, but I just want to again thank you,
ReplyDelete... {think of} many young people who are literate, and will in the future benefit in ways too numerous to imagine by just having access to this information...
it has been just a little over 20 years ago when I went to see Steve Cokely in S. Dallas and acquired this book from some very precious "Black Folk" {Texans} who had a book store and were at Steves' presentation that night with some of their books...
http://buelahman.wordpress.com/2013/05/14/when-did-the-american-government-and-its-lick-spittle-minions-ever-tell-us-the-truth/
Seek and ye shall find...