ED Noor: How refreshing! A world leader with a deliciously dark sense of humour.
RUSSIAN President
Vladimir Putin, known for his black humour, has said he hoped that Syria’s
opposition will not send organ-eating rebels to proposed peace talks.
.
.
Speaking to an
EU-Russia summit, Mr Putin described seeing televised footage in which “members
of the Syrian armed opposition pull out internal organs of their enemies and
eat them”.
.
.
He seemed to be
referring to a video uploaded to YouTube in May which showed a rebel apparently
cutting out and eating the heart of a Damascus regime soldier.
.
.
“I hope that such
participants of the negotiations do not appear at Geneva 2,” Mr Putin said of
world powers’ second attempt to solve the crisis through direct negotiations in
Geneva.
.
.
“Otherwise, it
will be hard for me to ensure the safety of the Russian participants. It would
also be hard to work with such people,” Mr Putin deadpanned.
.
.
Meanwhile, France said tests run on samples taken from Syria proved the
regime of President Bashar al-Assad’s has used the chemical weapon sarin gas.
.
.
The video showed
a rebel leader leaning over the body of a uniformed soldier before cutting out
his heart and then raising it to his mouth, provoking horror around the world.
.
.
Washington said
it was “appalled”, while the moderate Supreme Military Council of Syrian rebel
fighters insisted it did not support such actions.
.
.
While Syrian
President Bashar al-Assad’s regime has agreed “in principle” to attend the
talks, the main opposition National Coalition is refusing to take part until
key demands are met.
.
.
The National
Coalition has been recognised by many Western and Arab governments as the sole
legitimate representative of the Syrian people. Russia supports Mr Assad’s
regime.
Now let me get this straight. The rebel opposition, propped up by countless foreign mercenaries, supported by the USSofA, UK and various pseudo Arab countries, all pooling to achieve regime change in Syria to make it favourable to the shitty little country, cuts out the heart of a legitimate(?) soldier. (Sorry that was a long one)
ReplyDeleteI'm sure there was some 'outrage across the world' but not nearly enough for the atrocity committed.
But then, it's all in good fun, ain't it, because the right guys are doing it.
Assad better watches his back.
'Bad Vlad' likes the world stage, where he can strut around and pretend to be a Big Shot.
ReplyDeleteBut he's just another Zionist tool, witness his decision to not sell those S-300 missiles to Syria, giving the 'Coalition of the Killing' another entire state to wreck.
When those Patriot missile batteries get to Jordan, along with those F-16's, all hell will start breaking loose when the NWO types liberate another nation with death and destruction that could of been stopped by those missiles.
Russia isn't going to go after the bastard offspring of the unholy marriage of Zionism and Communism, Israel, that would be a type of infanticide.
BTW, where is Russian PM Medvedev thru all of this? Doesn't he have a say in Russia's foreign policies or is he holed up in the palace, taking drugs and listening to Black Sabbath while Putin runs the country?
I am afraid that my deepest spidey sense agrees with you on Putin. I have been lazily researching him and cannot find any proof other than rumors of his Jewish background OR being taking in by an orthodox Jewish family who took pity on the hungry child. (Nice myth, true or not true). My theory, unproven but also not poohpoohed by some greater analysts than I, is that there is a deep agreement between Moscow and Tel Aviv with the US of A being the end game.So yes I agree with your "infanticide" analogy completely. Why else has America been feeding Russia for so long often at her own expense? Why do Russian Jews only have the one option of leaving Russia.... Israel? (Well that deal involved the Bronfmans and brought down Walhein and a lot of free Russian grain for their booze business).
DeleteI too do not share the appeal of Russia but I do appreciate his humour.... I get it much better than Soweto's.
Check out this letter to the Columbia Daily Tribune, from Columbia, MO. It surprised me that it even made it to the 'Letters to Editor,' considering there's so much truth and he used the Zionist word.
ReplyDeleteUsed to live in that town and at one time, it was a laid back college community, home of the University of Missouri. But now, it's just another big, noisy, indifferent city.
I was going to leave a comment, but you have to either belong to 'CIAbook' which I don't or pay to upgrade, which I won't..... unless the Stolenland psychos start coming out of the woodwork and telling lies.
Editor, the Tribune: A long-standing staple of Zionist rhetoric is "what-aboutery," the argument that supporters of Palestinian human rights single out Israel while giving a pass to much worse abusers. "What about Darfur?" "What about Tibet?" And so forth. The implication is that the true motivation must be irrational hatred of Israel, or even of Jews, rather than principled support of human rights.
Mona Charen's indictment of Stephen Hawking in the May 22 issue of the Tribune is a classic of this genre. On May 8, at the urging of Palestinian colleagues, the renowned physicist canceled his scheduled participation in a conference honoring Israeli President Shimon Peres. Because Hawking didn't boycott conferences in the Soviet Union in 1973 or Iran in 2007 — countries with arguably even worse human rights records than Israel — Charen implies his selective boycott of the latter cannot be grounded in principle.
If what-aboutery were taken seriously, it would instantly paralyze every human rights movement in the world. Only after the very worst abuse had been agreed upon and addressed could work begin on the remaining injustices in their proper order. The task would be impossibly monumental, the postponement indefinite. Every human rights abuser on Earth would be off the hook.
Charen is undoubtedly correct that Palestinian rights activists single out Israel over worse abusers. But does it follow that our activism is hypocritical? That we condone the abuses we don't elect to focus on? That Israel is not guilty as charged of ongoing dispossession and oppression of the Palestinian people?
George P. Smith 228 E. Parkway Drive
http://www.columbiatribune.com/opinion/letters_to_the_editor/comparing-rights-abuses-delays-action/article_42cdcdde-cdff-11e2-af2b-10604b9f6eda.html
My family begs me to do Facebook. I had an acct once but closed it years ago.... was just a waste of time. Fortunately my daughters post their stuff on a public format because their pages are also their modelling portfolios. I never trusted any of those social media services and don't think I ever shall.
Delete"Who went where? Jewish immigration from the Former Soviet Union to Israel, the USA and Germany, 1990-2000", a paper by Y. Cohen et al. taken from www.columbia.edu (the URL is just too long to copy for my present attention span).
ReplyDelete"Between 1990 and 2005 over 200,000 Jews from the FSU and their family members entered Germany as refugees, an option that had been open to all FSU Jews. There were practically no visa restrictions for Israel and Germany, USA quit accepting Jews as refugees after the break-down of the Soviet Union and required visas."
Aside from that, I never understood the Facebook appeal to the young and told my kids, you'll never catch me on there. Baring your crappy pictures and superficial thoughts? No, thank you. Data mining? What's that? Can't find a job because of your facebook profile? No way! Anyways, more and more comes to light about that 'data mining' stuff.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/prism-collection-documents/
Someone already suggested WP might take it down but Mike Adams from NaturalNews has it too, I guess.