ED Noor: Basically the following article concerns that international JWO (Jewish World Order) drive for population reduction primarily covering the financial aspect of the current process of selection. It seems wars are just not killing us off fast enough of late ~ and yes, we are all under the gun of genocide. This international culling takes on many guises as covered in this blog (chemtrails, DU, nuclear radiation, pollution, big pharma, etc) ~, one major step being financial destruction.
Partway along this cycle, austerity is enforced on the unwary and then the parasites begin to seriously suck all marrow from the bones of the rapidly decaying corpse. . This is termed "austerity" ~ the painful cell by cell sucking to death and slow devouring of entire peoples and nations. They have been at it for a very long time and have perfected their methodologies.
Remember that, when considering the usage of "austerity" to pay the debts of the Talmudic bankers, Jews have always favoured starvation and neglect as a cost effective manner by which to dispose of chattel/cattle populations,. In our modern history only a few of their efforts have included the Christian White Russians, the Boers,, unwanted Jews in Europe, Eisenhower's Germans, the Armenians, so many African peoples, Palestinians;the list is endless. European countries and North Americans are now involved in the austerity culling of the unwanted that has been going on in Third World countries for decades, perhaps even centuries.
By William Manson
Partway along this cycle, austerity is enforced on the unwary and then the parasites begin to seriously suck all marrow from the bones of the rapidly decaying corpse. . This is termed "austerity" ~ the painful cell by cell sucking to death and slow devouring of entire peoples and nations. They have been at it for a very long time and have perfected their methodologies.
Remember that, when considering the usage of "austerity" to pay the debts of the Talmudic bankers, Jews have always favoured starvation and neglect as a cost effective manner by which to dispose of chattel/cattle populations,. In our modern history only a few of their efforts have included the Christian White Russians, the Boers,, unwanted Jews in Europe, Eisenhower's Germans, the Armenians, so many African peoples, Palestinians;the list is endless. European countries and North Americans are now involved in the austerity culling of the unwanted that has been going on in Third World countries for decades, perhaps even centuries.
By William Manson
December 29th, 2012
Memorandum:
Internal (Confidential)
Problem: High-Surplus Labor Pool
Solution: Austerity (i.e., De Facto Classicide)
Problem: High-Surplus Labor Pool
Solution: Austerity (i.e., De Facto Classicide)
A troubling problem that refuses to go away: what to do with
our growing “surplus-population” (to paraphrase Scrooge by way of Malthus)? That is to say: in our 21st century post-industrial economy, tens of millions of people ~ i.e., human beings, right? ~ now have little or no “market-value.”
Two factors are primarily responsible: hi-tech automation
and offshoring (capital flight, “race to the bottom”).
Their job-skills ~ such as they were ~ are now overpriced,
redundant, outmoded, superannuated. They can neither be exploited as productive
(but underpaid) workers nor as affluent (well-paid) consumers. They are idle,
discontented, restless ~ and are liable to sudden spasms of rage and social
unrest.
What to do?
We’re talking of, say, up to 20% of the people living in the
U.S. Within the ideological prism of late-capitalism ~ in which individual
“worth” is reduced entirely to “market-value” ~ they’re “worthless.”
(Remember: “there is no [civil] society” ~ Margaret Thatcher.)
You can’t just… kill them ~ although that would be the
easiest, most-efficient and cost-effective way of disposing of the problem. The
elite 1% (or should we say, one-tenth of 1%) may still enjoy limited-liability
for the crimes and reckless actions of the thousands of profit-squeezing
machines they rely on, which we call Corporations.
.
.
ED Noor: Misleading ad. Walmart is responsible for a great deal of this damage. Putting all competition out of business, ruthlessly cutting costs, shipping production overseas, both killing jobs and community tax bases, employee mistreatment..... the list is endless.
Still: there remains a residual, normative/legal constraint against premeditated murder. The unmentionable if glaring exception: bombing and burning thousands of innocent people in places like Iraq and Afghanistan.
Still: there remains a residual, normative/legal constraint against premeditated murder. The unmentionable if glaring exception: bombing and burning thousands of innocent people in places like Iraq and Afghanistan.
So, I ask once again: what to do?
In the U.S. alone, structural unemployment (plus part-time
“under-employment”) equal close to 20%. And according to new UNICEF statistics,
23% of children in the U.S. are now living in poverty.
.
.
One approach often works ~ a variety of the “shock
doctrine.” To paraphrase:
“In these times of financial uncertainty ~ or rather, crisis! ~ we simply can no longer ‘afford’ to help all these people. After all, no one should simply be ‘entitled’ to low-cost, government-subsidized services like basic medical care or (substandard) housing.”
In a word: Austerity.
When these people are “down,” a swift kick will make them
“out.”
How so?
Out of desperation, they will steal a loaf of bread
(figuratively speaking); and this army of Jean Valjeans can then at least fill
some profit-making function ~ longterm “guests” in the expanding hostelries of
PrisonsUSA (LLC).
But despair and hopelessness can also simply make a lot of
these people “go away” in another way ~ into self-destructive (and eventually)
fatal alcoholism, drug abuse, shootings, “accidents.”
You see ~
adopting a valuable military metaphor ~
you’ve attacked the poor and the useless;
now, put them under a “siege”
called austerity.
This is simply business: maximizing profit, the bottom-line.
These people are “worthless,” right? But they’re an irritant, an annoyance, and
we want to “get rid of them.”
Do you get my drift? So get to work on it.
There are many, many historical precedents to study for your
strategy and planning.



