Dispatches from the Edge
December 30, 2012
To Lord John Gilbert, former UK defense minister in Tony Blair's government, for a "solution" to stopping terrorist infiltration from Pakistan to Afghanistan: Nuke 'em. Baron Gilbert proposes using Enhanced Radiation Reduced Blasts ~ informally known as "neutron bombs" ~ to seal off the border. According to Gilbert,
"If we told them [terrorists] that some ERRB warheads were going to be dropped there and that it would be a very unpleasant place to go, they would not go there."The border between the two countries is a little over 1,600 miles of some of the most daunting terrain on the planet. And since the British arbitrarily imposed it on Afghanistan in 1896, most the people who live adjacent to it, including the Kabul government, don't recognize it.
Baron Gilbert went on to gild the lily: "I am absolutely delighted that nuclear weapons were invented when they were and I am delighted that, with our help, it was the Americans who invented them."
The residents of Nagasaki and Hiroshima were decidedly less enthusiastic.RUNNER UP IN THIS CATEGORY:
Sandia National Laboratories and Northrop Grumman for researching the use of nuclear powered drones that would allow un-piloted aircraft to stay aloft for months at a time. Nuclear-powered drones, like the Reaper and the Predator, would not only be able to fly longer and further, the aircrafts could carry a greater number of weapons.
This comes at a time when the Obama administration has approved the use of drones in the U.S. by states and private companies.
"It's a pretty terrifying prospect," Chris Coles of Drone Wars UK told The Guardian. "Drones are much less safe than other aircraft and tend to crash a lot." Iran recently claimed to have brought down a U.S. Scan Eagle drone and to have fired on a Predator. Last year Iran successfully captured a CIA-operated Sentinel drone.
To the U.S. and Israel for unleashing cyber war on the world by attacking Iran's nuclear industry. The Stuxnet virus ~ designed by both countries ~ successfully damaged Iran's uranium enrichment facility at Natanz, and the newly discovered Flame virus has apparently been siphoning data from Iranian computers for years.
But the "malware" got out of Iran ~ what do these people not understand about the word "virus"? ~ and, in the case of Stuxnet, infected 50,000 computers around the world. Two other related malware are called Mini-Flame and Gauss.Iran retaliated this past summer, unleashing a virus called "Shamoon" to crash 30,000 computers in Saudi Arabia's oil industry. Saudi Arabia provides 10 percent of the world's oil needs.
A Russian anti-virus specialist recently told computer expert Misha Glenny that cyber weapons "are a very bad idea," and his message was: "Stop doing this before it is too late."
Three winners this year,
the F-35 "Lightning" fighter,the F-22 "Raptor" fighter, andthe Littoral Combat Ship (LCS).The F-35 and F-22 are repeat winners from last year's awards (it is not easy to cost a lot of money and not work, year after year, so special kudos to the aircraft's manufacturers Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Northrop Grumman).
At $395.7 billion, the F-35 is now the most expensive weapons system in U.S. history, and the costs are still rising. It has constant problems with its engine, "unexplained" hot spots on the fuselage, and software that doesn't function properly.Because the cost of the plane has risen 70 percent since 2001, some of our allies are beginning to back away from previous commitments to purchase the aircraft.Canadians had some sticker shock when it turned out that the price tag for buying and operating the F-35 would be $45.8 billion. Steep price rises (and mechanical problems) have forced Britain, Italy, the Netherlands and Australia to re-think buying the plane as well. If that happens, the price of the F-35 will rise even higher, since Lockheed Martin was counting on U.S. allies to buy at least 700 F-35s as a way to lower per-unit costs.The U.S. is scheduled to purchase 2,457 F-35s at $107 million apiece (not counting weapons). The plane coast $35,200 per hour to fly.
The F-22 ~ at $143 million a pop ~ has a major problem: the pilots can't breathe. When you’re traveling 1500 MPH at 50,000 plus feet that's a problem as Capt. Jeff Haney found out in November 2010 over the Alaskan tundra.The Air Force had to wait until the spring thaw to recover his body. Since then scores of pilots have reported suffering from hypoxia and two of them recently refused to fly the aircraft. The breathing problems did not stop U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta from deploying two-dozen F-22s to Japan, although the planes are restricted to lower altitudes and have to stay no more than an hour and a half from land.That will require the pilots to fly to Alaska, and then hop across the Pacific via the Aleutian Islands to get to Kadena Air Base on Okinawa.
The cost of operating an F-22 is $128,389 a flying hour. In comparison, the average income for a minimum wage worker in the U.S. is $15,080 a year, the medium yearly wage is $26,364, and average yearly household income is $46,326. Dispatches suggests paddling the planes to Japan and raising the minimum wage.
The LCS is a very fancy, shallow water warship with lots of bells and whistles (at $700 million apiece it ought to have a few of those) with one little problem:
"It is not expected to be survivable in a hostile combat environment," according to one Pentagon weapon's tester.Since combat is generally "hostile" that does restrict what the ship can do. And given that cracks and leaks in the hulls are showing up, it might not be prudent to put them in the water. So while it may not work as a traditional ship ~ floating, that is ~ according to the LCS's major booster in the Congress, U.S. Rep. Jo Bonner (R-Ala) "It's going to scare hell out of folks."
Particularly the ones who serve on it.
The LCS was originally designed to fight Iranian attack boats, but the feeling now is that it would lose in such encounters.But all is not lost. According to Joseph Rella, president of Austal USA, the company in Alabama that builds the LCS, "If I was a pirate in a little boat, I'd be scared to death."
Dispatches suggests that rubber "wolf man" masks would accomplish the same thing for considerably less money.THE GOLDEN SOW'S EAR AWARD
To U.S. Rep. Harold Rogers (R-Ky) for successfully lobbying the Pentagon to buy an oil drip pan for the Army's Black Hawk helicopter for $17,000 a throw. The manufacturer, Phoenix Products, is a major contributor to Rogers' campaigns. A similar product made by VX Aerospace costs $2,500 apiece. But Phoenix does have a strong streak of patriotism: The oil drip pans are discounted from the $19,000 retail price.THE MISPLACED PRIORITIES AWARD
To Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his Conservative Party for shelling out $28 million to celebrate the bicentennial of the War of 1812 ~ including $6.3 million in television ads ~ while cutting $5.2 billion from the national budget and eliminating 19,200 federal jobs. The cuts have fallen particularly hard on national parks and historic sites.
Canada was not Canada in 1812, and the war was between the U.S. and the British Empire. Canada did not become a country until 1867.THE QUEEN OF HEARTS AWARD
This also goes to Harper and his Conservatives for "streamlining" the process of approving new oil and gas pipelines and limiting public comment. "Limiting" includes threats to revoke the charitable status of environmental groups that protest the pipelines and unleashing Canada's homeland security department, Public Safety Canada (PSC), on opponents.
The PSC considers environmentalists potential terrorists and lumps them in the same category as racist organizations. Dispatches suggests that Harper and Co. study the works of Lewis Carroll on how to sentence first, try later. Saves time and money.THE CHERNOBYL AWARD
To the Japanese construction company BuildUp, hired by the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) to clean up the Fukushima nuclear plant that melted down in the aftermath of last year's tsunami.
A government report found that TEPCO did not issue radiation detectors to most of its workers even though it had hundreds of dosimeters on hand. BuildUp admitted that it had workers put lead plates over the detectors to avoid violating safety thresh holds.
Teruso Sagara of BuildUp said the company only had their employees' best interests in mind and thought that
THE CHICKEN LITTLE AWARD"we could bring peace of mind to the workers if we could somehow delay their dosimeters' alarms going off."The report also cited the government for refusing to use computer projections on fallout from the crippled plant. In one case, two communities were directed into the middle of the radioactive plume.
To the British government and the International Olympic Committee for approaching the 2012 London Olympics in much the same way the allies did the beaches at Normandy in 1944.
The government deployed 13,500 ground troops, 20,000 private guards, plus the Royal Navy's largest warship, along with armed helicopters, armored personnel carriers and Starstreak and Rapier anti-aircraft missiles.
According to Linden Empson, Dispatches’ intrepid reporter on the scene, the announcement that surface-to-air missiles were going to installed on six housing projects in the city were "delivered via a pizza company." She suggested that was both "terrifying and hysterically funny."
One resident of Fred Wigg Tower told the New York Times that the leaflets "looked like one of those things where you get free pizza though the post, but this was like free missiles."
The local residents were not amused and sued to stop the deployment. "Is the government seriously suggesting the answer to potential airborne threat is to detonate it over the city?" a former Royal Artillery officer wrote in a letter to The Guardian. The court eventually ruled against the residents.
The cost of all this security is close to $900 million at a time when the Conservative-Liberal government is slashing social welfare programs, education, and health care.THE SELECTIVE REPORTING AWARD
To the Los Angeles Times for reporting that the Assad regime was using cluster bombs, which "have been banned by most nations." The newspaper pointed out that more than 100 countries had signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions, but that Syria did not.
What went unmentioned was that neither did the U.S., Russia, China, Pakistan, India, and Israel. According to the Cluster Munitions Coalition, the weapons "caused more civilian casualties in Iraq in 2003 and Kosovo in 1999 than any other weapon system." The U.S. also used clusters in Afghanistan. American cluster weapons still take a steady toll of people in Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam. All of those cluster weapons were made in the USA.
The most egregious use of clusters in the last decade was by Israel, which spread four million sub-munitions in Lebanon during its 2006 invasion of that country. According to the UN, one million of those "duds" remain unexploded.
But the U.S. also uses the weapon on many occasions. In 2009, President Obama ordered a cluster strike in Yemen that ended up killing 44 people, including 14 women and 21 children.And the White House, according to The Independent, "is taking the leading role "to torpedo the global ban on clusters." The administration argues that clusters manufactured after 1980 have less than a 1 percent failure rate, but anti-cluster activists say that is not the case. The widely used BLU-97, for instance, has a failure rate of 30 percent.
According to Handicap International, 98 percent of the casualties inflicted by clusters are civilians, 27 percent of those children.