The systematic
Manufacturing of War, challenging Russia and China in Race for either Global
Full Spectrum Dominance or Global Full Spectrum Devastation. A Comprehensive
Analysis.
By Christof Lehmann.
June 15, 2012
One cannot emphasize it often
enough. Both the crisis in Syria, the crisis between West and East over Syria,
and the explosive Iran nuclear debates are symptoms of a long-planned,
cynically and systematically implemented US/NATO war plan against Syria,
Lebanon, Iran, Russia, and ultimately China.
In the light of the tense and confrontational atmosphere between
NATO/GCC, Syria, Iran, Russia and China, and before analyzing the latest
evolutions of the crisis over Syria, it is incumbent to take a few steps step
back. Without an understanding of the genesis of what is rapidly developing
towards a serious threat of a global war it is unlikely that the warranted
diplomatic as well as popular actions are taken.
GENESIS: PAX
AMERICANA:
THE RACE FOR GLOBAL
FULL SPECTRUM DOMINANCE.
When Russia´s Chief of Staff
states that Russia will reserve itself the right to a first strike against the
recently activated NATO missile defense shield it is not a prop from the
requisites of the Russian diplomatic box of tricks, used with the purpose to
achieve the one or the other trade benefit, the relief of sanctions against an
allied Iran or any other demand. It is a clear and unequivocal demand for
guaranties for the safety of Russia and its allies. (1)
.
It is a demand from a Russia that
has been under threat evener since the discontinuation of the USSR, and the
subsequent US and NATO demand for a Pax Americana and Global Full Spectrum
Dominance.
The reason why many Westerners have not perceived the fact that Russia has been threatened is, because the transgressions against Russian security have largely been marketed as initiatives for peace and cooperation, or defense against terrorism and rogue states, and who could be against terrorism and rogue states.
One cannot emphasize the
importance of Vladimir Putin´s speech at the International Security Conference
in Munich in 2007 enough, as a basis for understanding that NATO
systematically, cynically and willfully has committed the one foreign affair,
domestic affairs, economic, as well as geo-political, security and military
transgression against Russia after the other ~ often under the guise of free
trade, of a supposed “Partnership for Peace”, war on terrorism, human rights,
and democracy. (2)
That the expansionism and
threatening posture was not only designed to impress Russia, but that it would
be scrupulously used by both the US and NATO, including Germany, that the
alliance would not be shying away from manufacturing covert, and initiating over
military aggressions in nations that are allied to Russia or that provide
geo-political advantages for Russia or China has become evident since the war
on Yugoslavia ~ a war that has been sold to the Western Public as a war for
human rights, freedom and democracy.
Yugoslavia: A Missile for China and a Finger for Russia ~
China, one may recall, has gotten
a warning shot straight into its Belgrade Embassy. The signal was clear. “Do
not harbor the President of a Sovereign Nation who is on our death list and do
not dare to interfere when we wage war“. The Chinese Embassy in Belgrade was
hit by a cruise missile in an attempt to “decapitate” the Yugoslavian “regime“.
(3)
Russian convoy stopped
at Kosovo Border
The fact that NATO warfare
doctrine for establishing the Pax Americana would be based on using the guise
of human rights, of constructing false reports of massacres, or even committing
massacres that are blamed on the targeted nations government and of political
show trials at the ICC became obvious with the charade of a trial against
former Yugoslavian president Slobodan Milosevic.
Since his trial threatened to
turn into a public relations disaster for NATO, of course, President Milosevic
conveniently died while in captivity in The Haag, and after vain Russian
protests against his treatment and trial.
Subsequently to the successful
“Balkanization” of Yugoslavia, NATO is now occupying Kosovo, where it
facilitated the establishment of a de-facto, according to international law,
highly questionable new state. Regular Russian protests abut even more regular
human rights abuses and violence against the civilian Serb population in
Kosovo, like the issuing of shoot to kill orders against civilian protesters, (4) or the harassment of humanitarian
aid convoys (5) are falling on deaf ears in NATO
member states.
Complicit or should we say
co-opted Western Main Stream Media cover it up. After all, when the Pentagon
invests millions in the BBC and other strategic media, one must expect results
for the money. All is neatly following the D.o.D´s Information Operations
Road-map from 2003. (6). The fact that absolute image and
media control is part of NATO doctrine will be clarified more detailed below.
A War of Terror: Afghanistan, US/NATO Presence at all Russian
and Chinese Borders in the Greater Middle East.
A classical NATO strategy is to use mercenary armies ad hoc as respectively allied, as enemy or both. The then bin Laden led Al-Qaeda was the ally in the war on the USSR in Afghanistan, in fact, so he claims, it was a creation of Zbigniev Brzezinski.
ED: Perhaps one could
call Al-Qaeda NATO’s informal ground troops?
The same Al-Qaeda was a useful
ally in the war on Yugoslavia, later on Serbia and Serbians in Bosnia as well
as Kosovo. 2001 and post the attacks on US targets on 11 September 2001, Al
Qaeda became the enemy ~ the enemy that facilitated a US/NATO invasion of
Afghanistan.
While the US and NATO already
were present in most of the former Soviet Republics along the Chinese and
Russian borders in the Wider Middle East, its presence in Afghanistan and de
facto in Pakistan literally encircled one of Russia´s and China´s most
important regional allies, Iran. The encirclement became almost complete after
the war on Iraq.
A decades long diplomatic war of
attrition against Iran, accompanied by sanctions and Israeli threats of Mad Max
Military Intervention has culminated in what can only be described as
diplomatic stalemate.
After the recent nuclear talks,
the next round is due to be held in Moscow soon. The talks will be held within
a climate where all present will know that all which so far has prevented a
NATO attack on Iran is, that the NATO equation about the prior destabilization
of Syria and Lebanon has become one year delayed.
A decision to wage the war on Syria, Lebanon and Iran has long been made, and is being systematically implemented. (7)
WHY THE WAR ON IRAQ MATTERS TODAY.
Rather than analyzing the
situation pertaining Syria isolated, it should by now have become evident that
it is necessary to analyze the post-soviet geo-political developments as one
constantly evolving crisis with its current epicenter being Syria.
The relevance of Iraq today is
not so much the fact that NATO and allies are capable of committing war-crimes
with impunity, murdering millions of Iraqi citizens by creating a radiation
public health disaster of unprecedented scale that can only be described as
genocidal. The most important factors to be taken into account with the current
or acute status of the developing crisis are:
.
US perception of Arab States as not being covered by the provisions of the Treaty of Westphalia.
Arab states, argues Henry Kissinger in an article (8) that was deconstructed by an article of this author (9), that Muslim Middle Eastern nations do not enjoy the protection under the principles of the Treaty of Westphalia which prohibits the interference into other nations internal affairs. This, Kissinger argues, is valid because only three of the Middle Eastern Muslim nations, Iran, Egypt and Turkey, have a historical existence.The others, so Kissinger argues, are more or less arbitrary creations of colonial powers. Kissinger´s argument is historically invalid; it also contradicts his stance with respect to Israel, but more importantly, it is symptomatic for and illustrates the arrogance, disrespect and masters modo-colonialist attitude and outlook of the United States and NATO on foreign affairs. (Modo-Colonialism, Contemporary Colonialism. Edt.)
US Negotiation Strategy and Sanctions, A Precursor for Disaster.
Prior to the onset of the “kinetic” war on Iraq it has been made subject to devastating and murderous sanctions based on purported “Weapons of Mass Destruction” which off course were never found. Standard US-negotiation strategy is that purported negotiations are consequently accompanied by UN-fulfillable demands such as the demand to provide evidence that one does not have these or those weapons or other demands to provide “negative evidence” without clearly stating under what precise conditions sanctions will be lifted.These negotiations are usually a precursor for military action being taken.The fact that the USA and NATO today are making use of precisely the same strategy on Iran is most likely a precursor of military action against Iran. The details are described in the article “Iran Nuclear talks: Explosive Issues Amidst Burning Middle East”. (10)
Overt Murder of Heads of State.
Iraq also matters today because even though it was not the first incident, it was this century’s and the post-cold-war era´s first overt murder of a sovereign nation’s head of state, and as we will see, it has created precedence for further murders of heads of state. A show trial and an execution by hanging that was made into a public execution because of a video that “accidentally was taken and released”, was televised worldwide.The message was “either you are with us, or we become the terrorists that kill you“.
A head of state is murdered with utter and absolute impunity. This practice would later, in 2011, be used against Muammar Ghadafi, although in a slightly different variant. Today Pentagon and NATO war planners speak of the possible decapitation of the Syrian government. The difference today is that Syria has the support of Russia, so a decapitation or military action would have potentially catastrophic consequences, which will be looked at below.
Weapons of Mass Destruction.
Iraq also matters today because it provides precedence for a war that is based on lies pertaining weapons of mass destruction. The same strategy has been attempted with respect to Syria. So far it has not been successful but the attempt was made.The campaign about purported human rights violations, war crimes, and other purported outrages by the Syrian government however, has been extremely successful. The success of this strategy, which is designed for creating a pretext for invasion on the grounds of “the responsibility to protect” is mainly based on the complicity of mass media as well as systematic war crimes and massacres committed by NATO/GCC and allied forces, being blamed on the Syrian Government.
Libya and the 25th NATO Summit in Chicago ~ The New NATO Doctrine and the Threat to Global Security.
During Putin´s visit to Copenhagen, the outrage of the then Russian P.M. Putin over the NATO/GCC alliance´s criminal abuse of UNSC Resolution 1973-2011 on Libya (11) was palpable, when Putin met former Danish P.M. Lars Løkke Rasmussen in Copenhagen.
The fact that Putin has a KGB background and that he must have been aware of the fact that Lars Løkke Rasmussen during the 80th strongly supported the Taliban and most likely Al Qaeda in Afghanistan has probably contributed to that outrage. (12)As detailed in an article by the author about the 25Th NATO Summit in Chicago (13), however, NATO did not only declare that it´s missile shield was brought on-line. What NATO declared during the Chicago Summit, and which was further manifested in an article by Daalder and Stavridis, (14) was that Libya-Style interventions now had officially become part of NATO´s new doctrine.
In their article Foreign Affairs, Daalder and Stavridis are calling the intervention in Libya a model intervention for future interventions. (ibid.)In other words, the use of terrorists and mercenary forces, the murder of a head of state are a teachable moment.They are calling the bombing of civilian infrastructure, the destruction of the man made river project, the use of cluster bombs in densely populated areas in Brega (15) and the use of fuel air bombs against civilians in Bani Walid, the bombing of civilians in Sirte including the bombing of the hospital, which according to an eyewitness known to the author caused over one thousand casualties in two days for “a successful air-campaign of unprecedented precision“.
NATO, including Daalder and Stavridis, has the audacity of calling the massacres of tens of thousands of Black African Migrant Workers, and tens of thousands of Black Libyans, (16) the slaughter of over 10.000 Tawergha, the utter wiping out of the city from existence and the internal displacement of the survivors, (17) as a
“teachable moment and model for future interventions”.
WHAT NATO´S “TEACHABLE MOMENT” TEACHES THE WORLD.
The “teachable” part of NATO´s audacity is that Russia, China, Syria, Iran, India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Afghanistan, the DPR Korea, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, and every other nation worldwide who opposes NATO´s ambition for Global Full Spectrum Dominance is, that NATO´s Operation Unified Protector in Libya has taught the world that NATO stops at nothing.
NATO revealed that it creates the humanitarian crisis it needs to plead at the UNSC for intervention under the pretext of the “responsibility to protect“.It abuses the UNSC when it can get away with it.It cooperates with mercenaries including Al Qaeda, Muslim Brothers, CIA Imported Taliban Fighters, like the 1.500 fighters from Mazar e-Sharif which the CIA flow in to Libya after the Libyan military had inflicted heavy losses on NATO´s rag tag rebels. (18)
NATO shies from no massacres, no
genocide, respects no law, and provides itself and its political and military
leadership impunity while conducting fraudulent show trials at the ICC, like
the trial against the purported murderers of Rafiq Hariri, and that, even
though a secretly recorded audiotape published on nsnbc clearly proves that
Saad Hariri is buying witnesses. But then, Saad Hariri also sponsors the “Free
Syrian Army, so such slight mistakes are covered up at the ICC. (19) That´s what friends are for.NATO does not shy from provoking a thermo-nuclear war on Iran and Russia.
A thermo-nuclear war in which
NATO assumes that its missile defense against Iran, which is directed against
Russia, provides them a first strike capability. A capability that they assume
will prevent an organized, full scale retaliation from Russia.
.
In other words, NATO also does not shy from making the sacrifice of millions of NATO member states citizens whom they are claiming to protect. (20) The fact that the USA is fully capable of murdering millions of innocent civilians in unprotected cities in a nuclear holocaust has been demonstrated sufficiently in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Tartus naval Base,
Syria
Finally, when analyzing Libya, it
is necessary to understand that the war on Libya was ultimately directed
against Russia and China (21), that Russia and China already on
24 October 2011 saw it incumbent to put their armed forces on highest alert, (22) and that Russia has clearly drawn a
line in the Syrian Sand already in September 2011, when it became evident that
the Syrian unrests were products of a blatant and relentless NATO
Unconventional War.
An attempted subversion whose
managers would not want to achieve less than the absolute destabilization of
Syria for decades and regime change in a country that is one of the most long
standing Russian allies and the sole Russian ally that provides Russia a base
in the Mediterranean. (23)
It became evident that Russia
neither would allow, nor could afford another Yugoslavia-Style loss of a long
standing and close ally and strategic partner. Considerations about Russia´s
security forced Russia to draw a sharp line.
Clearly, Russia cannot rely on
further promises and assurances by NATO. NATO has been trying to make the best
possible use of this Russian position. It is a position where Russia is under
extreme political and strategic pressure and cornered.
The question is:
when will the peaceful bear have to lash out, not to be munched up by the terriers?
After the disaster of the Jeltsin
and the ambivalence and placidity of the Medvedjev Presidency, it has only just
begun being able to reassert its geo-political position. (24)
Down To The Dirty Details Before Analyzing The Latest Evolution
Of The Crisis And Proposing Realistic And Peaceful Solutions.
In fact, the world has not been
as close to the onset of a high intensity stage of the ongoing World War III,
including the risk of the use of thermo-nuclear weapons since the Cuban Missile
Crisis. It is therefore absolutely necessary to have a critical look at the
details.
It is the “Dirty Details” that facilitate a comprehensive understanding of scope of the audacity and severity of the situation.
It is also by acquiring a
detailed and comprehensive understanding of the “Dirty Details” that it is
possible to develop realistic proposals of solutions that could defuse the
situation and hopefully create the basis for realistic, peaceful solutions.
UN ~ Co-Opted by NATO. UN-FAIR-UN-JUST-UN-SPEAKABLE-UN-DENIABLE-UN-FORGIVABLE-UN-DONE.
UN ~ Co-Opted by NATO. UN-FAIR-UN-JUST-UN-SPEAKABLE-UN-DENIABLE-UN-FORGIVABLE-UN-DONE.
With the ratification of the
UN/NATO Joint Declaration from 2008 (25), which was kept secret and from
public scrutiny as long as possible, the United Nations became a de facto
instrument of US-Foreign Policy. Simultaneously NATO became the de facto
leading military force of the United Nations.
Based on the argument that NATO is uniquely able to rapidly deploy forces globally within a joint command structure and joint weapons systems down to the caliber and so forth, NATO has been declared as the World Police Force.No other major power of global reach, like China or Russia, so NATO states, have the same unique capabilities to rapidly establish international forces at “trouble spots“.The reality behind this euphemistic sales pitch is that NATO creates a humanitarian crisis in Syria, pushes for intervention on the grounds of the United Nations responsibility to protect, and naturally NATO is the sole power that has the unique capability to conquer the world in precisely that manner.
NATO´s problem today is that
Russia and China are not buying the sales pitch any more. Latest since Libya
that Little Dirty Trick has become too obvious. The result is that the
UN-Security Council has utterly lost it´s functionality.
Moreover, the United Nations has utterly lost its credibility as honest broker and international guardian of peace.
NATO Special Forces / Al Qaeda / Muslim Brotherhood ~ Joint
Command Structure and Logistics.
Late August 2011 a high-ranking officer with the U.S. Special Forces at Ft. Bragg, North Carolina turned whistle-blower. The officer reported to the author, that US Special forces have been actively preparing for and actively begun implementing a war on Syria, Lebanon, Iran, and ultimately Russia. (26)
The officer also reported and provided indisputable evidence for the author that US Special Forces were training mercenaries that were belonging to Al Qaeda associated forces, Muslim Brotherhood, and other. Special Forces took actively part in combat in Syria, had a joint command and logistics structure with the terrorists, and were based in NATO bases in Turkey.Furthermore the officer provided a copy of a Special Forces Training Circular, TC 18-01, which is being used to train foreign fighters in systematically bringing about the subversion of Syria (or any other targeted nation) in a structured and coordinated manner, together with, supported and supervised by, and with the active participation of US Special Forces, agents of the D.I.A., NATO Intelligence, as well as non-military organizations such as the National Council of Syria, Human Rights Organizations and so forth.The Training Circular TC 18-01 is published in its entirety on nsnbc. Reading it reveals the military logic behind that, which otherwise may seem like a chaotic situation in Syria. (27) Only months after the author published the statement of the S.F. whistle-blower, a senior Whitehall official made it public, that British, Turkish, and as he said “probably also US” Special Forces were operating in Syria. (28) At that time however, the “revelation” was already part of a careful preparation of Western populations to accept that the illegal deployment of Special Forces, a war crime, had to be committed in the name of human rights and democracy.
Al Qaeda ~ State Sponsored Terrorism NATO´s and the GCC´s Weapon
of Choice.
The Director of the Canadian Center for Research on Globalization (29), Professor Michel Chossudovsky, compares the NATO/GCC-Strategy that is being used against Iraq, and which is now used against Syria with the Reagan Administration’s El-Salvador Death Squads strategy. (30)In an earlier article the author of this article compared the strategy used against Syria with a “Modified Chechnyan Model“. (31) As it transpired, both comparisons are quite correct and should once and for all have discredited the narrative about a genuine political opposition that took up arms in Syria, had it not be for a criminally complicit and co-opted Western Media. Media complicity will be looked upon below.
Saudi Arabia´s Omar Brigade.
In September 2011 Russian and Syrian Intelligence Services reported that they had analyzed what they called “Internet Chatter” that strongly indicated that the Saudi Arabia based Al Qaeda unit Omar Brigade (32) which is under the command of the Saudi Arabian Minister of the Interior and widely recognized as Al Qaeda´s assassination and bomb expert brigade, had been deployed from Saudi Arabia to Syria. (ibid.)
Saudi Arabia is, together with Qatar, consequently channeling vast amounts of money as well as weapons to its Al Qaeda brigades in Syria. (33)Al Qaeda brigades which of course are fighting under the euphemistic name “Free Syrian Army”.At other times, when opportune with respect to the Media and Diplomatic War they are of course called Al Qaeda. More precisely that is, when it is opportune to argue that the security of the population of Syria is so endangered by “terrorism” that a “UN/NATO” intervention is warranted for.
The Libyan Islamic
Fighting Group, LIFG.
The Al Qaeda brigade “The Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, LIFG” under the command of Abdelhakim Belhadj is fighting with at least 18.000 fighters in Syria under the name of “Free Syrian Army“. The 18.000 Al Qaeda fighters under the command of Belhadj are mainly deployed in the Jordanian – Syrian border region. (34)
The LIFG has been a major asset in the war on Libya and has since changed its name to “Tripoli Military Council“. It´s commander, Abdelhakim Belhadj is a veteran NATO and MI6 double agent. His register of crimes published in an article by the author from 2011 (35) could today be vastly extended.The former Spanish P.M. Aznar and Spanish intelligence services accuse him of having masterminded the Madrid Train Bombings that killed numerous commuters, and which resulted in Spain´s military contribution to NATO´s “war on terror” in Afghanistan ~ the homicidal variant of the Hegelian Dialectics of Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis. Create a Problem, that elicits a predictable Reaction, and offer a pre-designated Solution.
Turkey and the Muslim Brotherhood ~ The
Turkey/NATO/Al-Qaeda/Hamas/Mossad Joint Venture.
Already August 2011 it was evident that Turkey was harboring, training, arming and financing armed brigades of the Muslim Brotherhood. Special Facilities were established at Turkish NATO bases. US Special Forces participated, supervised, took part in armed transgressions against Syria. (36)According to the US Special Forces Officer referred to earlier in this article, the kidnapping of the Attorney General of Hama, Adnan Bakkur, where helicopter gunships were used by the kidnappers, was supported by US Special Forces. (37) A complicit or co-opted Al Jazeera propagandized Arab and Western populations with a false defection story and a video of Adnan Bakkur that visibly was recorded under duress. (ibid.)
According to a well placed Palestinian Intelligence Source in Turkey, the war on Syria and the co-operation between NATO, Turkey in particular, Al Qaeda, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, and the Israeli Intelligence Service Mossad have been operational as far back as 2010.According to the intelligence source, the killing of nine Turkish citizens on board the Turkish registered Gaza Freedom Flotilla vessel Mavi Marmara was such a joint operation. The information was published in an article written by Martin Iqbal. (38)Both the Commander of the LIFG, a.k.a. Tripoli Military Council, a.k.a. Free Syrian Army, Abdelhakim Belhadj and his second in command Harati were on board the Mavi Marmara to point out the targeted Turkish Muslim Brothers to the Israeli Forces assassins.
The operation had several utilities:~ To assassinate influential members of the Turkish Muslim Brotherhood who were opposed to a war on Syria.
~ To boost the waning public support for Turkish P.M. R. Tayyip Erdogan due to the fact that he could publicly blast Israel.~ The increased public support enabled him to fire some of the most secular Generals of the Turkish High Command. (ibid.)Hamas, which has its historical roots in prominent Muslim Brotherhood families, has secretly re-aligned itself with the International, Qatari led, MI6 and BND infiltrated Muslim Brotherhood and away from its alliance with Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah.
The price for Hamas U-turn and betrayal?The promise of a “leading role in a Palestinian Spring after the expected fall of the Syrian Government.”One day after the author of this article published this information, Hamas urgently, and opposite to previous promises of solidarity with the Syrian Government, vacated it´s Damascus office. (39)
THE PLANNED WAR ON
LEBANON.
The Lebanese Jamaa Al Islamiya has made a U-Turn comparable to that of Hamas too.
Their U-Turn is one of the reasons for, why the Syrian Conflict could so easily spill over into Lebanon as planned by NATO. Jamaa Al Islamiya realigned itself with the International, Qatar based, NATO allied wing of the Muslim Brotherhood and away from its alliance with Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah. (40)The Qatari, Saudi and NATO plan is most likely to isolate Hezbollah politically and militarily and prepare a new 70th-80th style Lebanese Civil War that is meant to last decades.Other main Lebanese facilitators of the war on Syria and the planned Lebanese civil war are the Saudi ~ Lebanese Saad Hariri and his Future Movement, as well as the Leader of the Lebanese Druze community and Chairman of the Lebanese Progressive Socialist Party Walid Jumblatt.Their involvement in financing and arming the Syrian Insurgency has been documented in a previous article. That includes Jumblatt´s delivery of Israeli weapons via Raphael Industries to the “Free Syrian Army“. (41)
FUNCTIONS OF A LONG
PLANNED REGIONAL WAR AND WAR ON RUSSIA AND CHINA.
It would be possible to continue
for hours, listing various different factors that document, that the “Arab
Spring” is a long planned, meticulously and relentlessly executed war plan with
the following objectives:
~ To destabilize Syria and Lebanon and to bring about long lasting civil wars that significantly weaken Iran in preparation of an attack on Iran.~ To engage Russia in a Middle Eastern Conflict, counting on one of three possibly attainable objectives. These objectives are strategically interchangeable and may be achieved simultaneously. All of them however, aim at engaging Russia directly or indirectly in a regional conflict with global geo-political consequences.~ To contain Russian involvement in the Middle Eastern theater due to the threat of NATO´s plausible first strike capability against Russia, thus forcing Russia to surrender its strategic allies to NATO and the GCC. Preventing Russia from direct engagement while the NATO, GCC, Israel Coalition destabilizes and brings about regime change in Syria, Lebanon and Iran.~ Weakening Russia and preparing a long, protracted, Chechnya style war of attrition against Russia via a destabilized Iran and Syria. A continued and intensified attempt to destabilize Russia by proxy in Georgia and other former Soviet Republics like Moldavia. Color revolutions in Belarus and other allied nations with the aim to bring about “regime change” in Russia. Denying Russia access to the Mediterranean by destabilizing Syria.~ Alternatively to draw Russia into a long, protracted proxy war in Syria, Iran and Lebanon with an Afghanistan like defeat of Russian forces, in preparation of a direct engagement of Russia via Georgia, Azerbaijan, and the region in general.
All of the objectives are pursued
with the possibility of initiating what NATO perceives as a plausible nuclear
first strike capability against Russia to contain Russian interference into
NATO´s Middle Eastern Conquest.
The risk of a thermo-nuclear war on Russia is perceived as a calculable risk and plausible, viable possibility, if not as a goal in an on itself.
Considering the recent decades
geo-political developments, the coagulation of loose alliances like the BRICS,
SCC and ALBA into more solid blocks that counter Western Ambitions of Global
Full Spectrum Dominance, a final war against China becomes plausible only,
after a military and political defeat of Russia.
Back to the Present. The Importance of Proper Parliamentary
Briefings.
Based on this background information
it becomes possible to begin to comprehend the scope of what otherwise could be
perceived as isolated and easily manageable incidents, namely a plausible civil
war in Syria and Lebanon, and a plausible protracted war of sanctions and
attrition against Iran on nuclear issues, with the perspective of a plausible,
limited military strike against Iran by either Israel and/or the NATO/GCC
alliance.
Having spoken to numerous
European members of parliaments in different European Countries over the course
of the last week, it is generally this perception of the situation, as
isolated, manageable affairs that is most prevalent.
This mis-perception and
mis-evaluation of the crisis is mainly based on the fact that most members of
parliaments, in many cases even those who are members of foreign policy
committees, either receive their information via co-opted and complicit Main
Stream Media, or that they are receiving their information and briefings from
national Intelligence Agencies who often use and analyze the same media as
source of information.
Another aspect is that many
Western Intelligence Services are deeply involved in the ongoing war, and that
the information that is passed on to members of parliament is highly filtered.
TURNING-POINT
~ AL-HOULA.
Since the appalling massacre in Al-Houla that would have created nation-wide cries of outrage in most Western countries had the truth been truthfully reported in Western Media, the situation in Syria and the evolution of the crisis overall has changed significantly.
Sadly the BBC, to mention just one example, refused to take the results of the preliminary investigation into the massacre into account, blamed the Syrian Military, and to add outrage to audacity, published old images from Iraq, claiming the bodies in the images were victims of the Syrian Army. (42)The Al-Houla Massacre prompted the author to write the article From Sabra and Shatila to Homs and Damascus (43) which is recommended for understanding the scope of the inhumane audacity and appalling nature of the humanitarian situation in Syria.After having failed to pressure Russia and China into accepting a Libya-Style NATO led military intervention in Syria, it is transpiring clearly, that NATO will no longer hesitate to intervene militarily in Syria and Iran, regardless of a Russian or Chinese veto at the UNSC. A recent article by the author explains the situation. (44)As previously detailed, however, Russia cannot allow itself another Yugoslavia, Serbia Style defeat in Syria or Iran, without seriously and in fact terminally endangering its own security.Emphasis should be put on understanding the fact that a defeat in Syria and Iran “terminally” endangers Russian security. That said and understood, it must transpire with all clarity and in its fullest consequence that Russia has no other option than applying the least possible necessary “forward defense“, preemptive military strikes included if necessary or perceived necessary.The signals from Russia are not ambivalent and it cannot be taken lightly when Vladimir Putin states that a continued violation of international law by NATO and the GCC threatens to unleash a global conflict.The situation has changed too much since his speech at the International Security Conference in Munich 2007 (ibid.) to expect that Russia will continue behave like a hedgehog, tugging in and making itself as small as possible to protect itself for another five or ten years.
RUSSIAN DEMANDS FOR
PEACE AND STABILITY BACKED BY MILITARY PREPAREDNESS.
While Russia is forced into a position where it has to assert that it can and will defend itself and its allies when it has to, its demands are as a matter of fact that of moderation and peace, as well as human rights and a continuation of reforms.
Before analyzing the Russian
proposals however, it is absolutely necessary to understand that a NATO/GCC led
war with catastrophic consequences is in the final stages of preparation, and
that Russia is preparing to counter such moves.
In fact, it is not alarmist to
state that the evolving dynamics of the crisis do not render much time before
the dynamics in and of themselves make a peaceful resolution impossible. This
must be understood with all possible clarity.
Recent Evolution of the Crisis towards NATO/GCC Intervention in
Spite of VETO at UNSC.
The aggravation of the crisis is
recognizable by the fact that the massacre in Al Houla has been followed by new
massacres that the massacres and violence is predominantly initiated and
conducted by the “Free Syrian Army” with the intention to create a civil war
based on ethnic, religious, and political grounds. The tactic of scourged earth
and massacres is used where ever the “Free Syrian Army” has to retreat.
A massive media war has been
carefully planned. It´s final stages are expected to be implemented any time of
NATO´s convenience. The objective is to bring about a civil war based on
political, ethnic and religious grounds, to create confusion, convince the
people of Syria that the Government has fled, that massive massacres are being
committed by the Syrian Military.
NATO planned a massive
disinformation campaign to aggravate the crisis in order to achieve the
objective to justify NATO military intervention among NATO and GCC member
states populations. (45) The genesis of the campaign was the
Arab League´s initiative to make Nilesat and Arabsat cease to carry Syrian TV
and Radio signals. (46)
For the first time since the
onset of the post-cold war era, Russia has demanded that the Collective
Security Treaty Organization, CSTO, (47) is preparing its forces for a
deployment of Blue Barret Troops. It is a sign that Russia is ready and capable
of taking on international responsibilities. The posture is also a sign of
Russian opposition to NATO´s self-proclaimed special status at the UN, and it
is a sign that Russia is ready to oppose a Western military intervention.
Russia´s readiness to protect the
line it has drawn, and the fact that Russia meant it seriously when it stated
that NATO is driving the world towards a nuclear war was underlined by the
recent firing of a Bulava missile from a submarine in the Mediterranean. (ibid.)
A 24 hours manned operations room
of the Russian Military forces at the Caspian Sea is established to closely
monitor the military situation at the Caspian Sea and the Gulf. Navy, Air
Force, Infantry and Armored Forces are battle ready. The Russian Mediterranean
Navy base in Tartus, Syria is on heightened alert. Three Russian brigades,
including Speznaz, Special Forces and Airborne Divisions are on alert and ready
for rapid deployment.
The Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Lavrov stated that an unauthorized military intervention against Syria will warrant a Russian response.Iran made it clear that a military intervention in Syria will warrant an Iranian response.Hezbollah is somewhat and surprisingly silent but will have to respond too.
SYRIAN REFORMS AND
RUSSIAN INITIATIVES TOWARDS PEACE.
First of all it is necessary to
emphasize that the Syrian Government has, in spite of the relentless war that
is waged against Syria, managed to implement reforms that by far exceed any of
the reforms it´s Arab neighbors would badly need. It is by far the most
democratic Arab nation.
In spite of the crisis, the
emergency laws were lifted. The emergency laws were implemented subsequent to
the 1973 war with Israel, and which among other had been maintained because
Syria de facto is still in a state of war with Israel, because Israel still
occupies the Golan Highs, illegally, and because Syria has been under a
constant threat of Israeli insurgencies for decades.
Syria has held a referendum about
a new constitution. In spite of the ongoing violence, over 54 % of took part in
a referendum, and 89% voted in favor of the new constitution. (48) The constitution is by far the most
democratic among all Middle Eastern nations. (49)
Four new political parties have
been registered. Parliamentary elections have been held. The message of the
people of Syria and the message of the true Syrian opposition parties is clear.
Foreign terrorists, foreign Special Forces, foreign mercenaries, get out of Syria and let us continue our reforms.
Syria is by far the most democratic, the most liberal of all Arab nations, the one that gives the greatest protection to minorities, secures gender equality, and participatory democracy ~ much in contrast to the GCC states who are preaching democracy and human rights while beheading their women for sorcery.(and this is not a joke)
RUSSIAN SUGGESTIONS
ARE SUGGESTIONS TOWARDS A PEACEFUL SETTLEMENT OF THE DISPUTE.
Russian suggestions include that
NATO and GCC member states immediately halt their illegal deployment of Special
Forces, and an immediate cessation of the arming, financing and other support
of foreign and domestic terrorist organizations in Syria. In other words, that
NATO and the GCC adhere to international law.
As clearly demonstrated above, the violence in Syria will cease when the ongoing and illegal foreign intervention is discontinued.A peaceful solution is not possible while waging war.
Russia suggests that the
fraudulent “Friends of Syria” group is discontinued. The group is
demonstratively a creation designed with the intent to support the illegal
insurgency with political, military and other material support. A peaceful
solution is not possible while waging war.
Russia suggests that all parties
adhere to the Six Point Plan negotiated by Kofi Annan, and that the foreign
insurgency ceases to systematically disrupt any attempts of the Syrian
Government and Military to adhere to the plan. Russia suggests that the
“Friends of Syria” group is substituted by an international ad hoc Contact
Group.
IN SO MANY WORDS ~
IT IS EITHER PEACE OR WAR.
In so many words, what both
President Vladimir Putin, Foreign Minister Lavrov, as well as the Syrian
Government and all genuine Syrian Political Parties suggest is, that NATO/GCC
Coalition withdraws its bloodhounds and weasels, it´s Belhadj and any other of
their professional terrorists and mercenaries.
Based on a de-escalation of the
conflict it would become evident that the “crisis” is not endemic to Syria but
that it has been created by foreign elements and influence. A de-escalation
could be monitored by an international Contact Group. Syria could in fact
legitimately appeal to Russia for the deployment of Blue Helmets deployed by
Russia and/or the CSTO.
A de-escalation, requires nothing
but a NATO and a GCC that adheres to international law. The alternative is an
escalation of the conflict, which is all to obviously planned, but which
consequences should make any Western member of Parliament, every citizen, every
military officer stand up and say “enough already“.
The World does not need a World
war Three, and it is time to stop its evolution.
Briefings. The article is written within the context of
parliamentary briefings. Parliamentary Groups, Members of Parliament, Peace
Movements, Initiatives worldwide are welcome to contact the authors for
individual or group briefings on the situation in the Middle East by writing
to: dr.christof.lehmann@gmail.com
NOTES:
1) Showdown with Russia and
China: U.S. Advances First Strike Global Missile Shield System
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14843
2) Vladimir Putin’s inflammatory
speech terrifies the audience at the Munich Security Conference 2007
3) US Air Strike on China’s
Embassy in Belgrade in 1999 was Deliberate. The attack planned as a
“decapitation” attack, intended to kill Milosevic.
4) NATO Issues Shoot To
Kill Warning In Kosovo Border Dispute.
5) Russian
Humanitarian Convoy Blocked at Kosovo “Border”.
6) D.o.D. Information Operations
Roadmap 2003
7) Iran Nuclear Talks;
Explosive Issues Amidst Burning Middle East.
http://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2012/05/26/iran-nuclear-talks-explosive-issues-amidst-burning-middle-east/
http://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2012/05/26/iran-nuclear-talks-explosive-issues-amidst-burning-middle-east/
8) Henry Kissinger: Syrian
Intervention Risks Upsetting The Global Order.
9) A Response to Henry
Kissinger on Syria and the Global Order by Christof Lehmann. http://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2012/06/09/a-response-to-henry-kissinger-on-syria-and-the-global-order-by-christof-lehmann/
10) Iran Nuclear Talks: Explosive
Issues Amidst Burning Middle East.
11) UNSC Resolution 1973-2011 on
Libya.
12) Libya Denmark and Dirty
Double Dealings.
13) NATO`s 25th Summit in
Chicago in Preparation of Global Full Spectrum Dominance, Interventionism,
Possible Preparations for A Regional War Directed against Russia and China, and
Developments in Global Security.
14) Ivo H. Daalder, James G.
Stavridis (2012). NATO`s Victory in Libya. The
Right Way to Run an Intervention. Foreign Affairs. March/April
2012. Pp.2 – 7.
15 ) SEE VIDEO BELOW ARTICLE
16) Blacks in Libya Still
Targeted by anti-Ghaddafi Forces: killings,
beatings, abuse http://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2011/09/23/blacks-in-libya-still-targeted-by-anti-ghaddafi-forces-killings-beatings-abuse/
17) Ethnic cleansing,
genocide, and the Tawergha.
18) CIA recruits 1,500
from Mazar-e-Sharif to fight in Libya
19) Hariri Implicated in Arming
NATO Insurgency in Syria.
20) NATO Missile Shield
Aimed at Neutralizing Russian Strategic Deterrent: Official
21) NATO`s War on Libya is
Directed Against China.
22) NATO Prepares Global War –
Russian and Chinese Military on
Highest Alert. http://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2011/10/24/nato-prepares-global-war-russian-and-chinese-military-on-highest-alert/
23) Russia is drawing Line in
Syrian Sand.
24) Waking Sleeping Bears – The
Putin Presidency.
25) The UN and NATO:
Forward from the Joint Declaration.
26) ARABIAN SUMMER OR NATO´s
FALL.
27) US-Military Logic behind
Syrian Insurgency. The “Special Forces Unconventional Warfare” manual TC
18 01
28) NATO Special Forces in Syria
now Official.
29) Center for Research on
Globalization.
30) El Salvador-style “death
squads” to be deployed by US against Iraq militants http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=4027
31) Syria NATO and the Modified
Chechnyan Model
32) Jaish al-Janna and
Najaf
33) Secret
Qatari-Saudi Agreement to Supply Syrian Opposition
with Weapons
http://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2012/01/28/secret-qatari-saudi-agreement-to-supply-syrian-opposition-with-weapons/
34) Attack on Syria likely
before March?
35) Abdelhakim Belhadj The
Mask Behind The Many Men
36) ARABIAN SUMMER OR NATO´s FALL.
37) Syrian Info War – Syrian
Attorney General Adnan Muhammad Bakkur Not Defected But Kidnapped By Armed Gang
With Helicopter Gunships.
38) Was the Gaza Flotilla
Massacre a Turkish-Israeli False Flag and Precursor to the War
on Syria?
39) Hamas, the Architecture of
Treason on Syria, Iran and Palestine.
http://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2012/02/06/hamas-the-architecture-of-treason-on-syria-iran-and-palestine/
40) Hamas and al-Jamaa
al-Islamiya: The New MB Look
41) Attack on Syria
likely before March?
42) BBC Illegally Uses Image of
Iraqi Victims: The US/NATO, UN Demonization Propaganda Against Syrian
Government Further Intensify
43) From Sabra and Shatila to
Homs and Damascus.
44) US / NATO War on Syria
and Iran likely in Spite of Security Council Veto. http://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2012/06/02/us-nato-war-on-syria-and-iran-likely-in-spite-of-security-council-veto/
45) SYRIA: URGENT! NATO
preparing vast disinformation campaign
46) Preparation of Absolute Image
Control in War on Syria.
47) Syrian Conflict Threatens to
Degenerate into World War
48) BREAKING NEWS 89 % Vote in
Favor of new Syrian Constitution
49)
USE OF CLUSTER
BOMBS IN BREGA.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.