By Stephen C. Webster
RAW STORY
July 5, 2012
July 5, 2012
A study in the August edition of The Journal
of School Health finds that the generations old theory
of a “gateway drug” effect is in fact accurate for some drug users, but shifts
the blame for those addicts’ escalating substance abuse away from marijuana and
onto the most pervasive and socially accepted drug in American life: alcohol.
Using a
nationally representative sample from the University of Michigan’s annual Monitoring the Future survey, the study
blasts holes in drug war orthodoxy wide enough to drive a truck
through, definitively proving that marijuana use is not the primary
indicator of whether a person will move on to more dangerous substances.
“By delaying the
onset of alcohol initiation, rates of both licit substance abuse like tobacco
and illicit substance use like marijuana and other drugs will be positively
affected, and they’ll hopefully go down,” study co-author Adam E. Barry, an
assistant professor at the University of Florida’s Department of Health
Education & Behavior, told Raw Story in an exclusive interview.
While Barry’s
study shows evidence that substance abuse behaviors can be predicted with a
high degree of accuracy by examining a subject’s drug history, he believes that
the persistent and misguided notion of
marijuana as the primary gateway to more harmful substances went awry
because its creators ~ who called it the “Stepping Stone Hypothesis” in
the “Reefer Madness” era of the 1930s ~ fundamentally
misread the data and failed to conduct an adequate follow-up.
“Some of these
earlier iterations needed to be fleshed out,” Barry said. “That’s why we wanted
to study this. The latest form of the gateway theory is that it begins with
[marijuana] and moves on finally to what laypeople often call ‘harder drugs.’
As you can see from the findings of our study, it confirmed this gateway
hypothesis, but it follows progression from licit substances, specifically
alcohol, and moves on to illicit substances.”
“So, basically,
if we know what someone says with regards to their alcohol use, then we should
be able to predict what they respond to with other [drugs],” he explained.
“Another way to say it is, if we know someone has done [the least prevalent
drug] heroin, then we can assume they have tried all the others.”
And while that
standardized progression certainly doesn’t fit every single drug user, the
study took that into account too. “There were a low enough number of errors
that you are able to accurately predict [future substance abuse behavior]… with
about 92 percent accuracy,” Barry said.
By comparing
substance abuse rates between drinkers and non-drinkers, they ultimately found
that seniors in high school who had consumed alcohol at least once in their
lives “were 13 times more likely to use cigarettes, 16 times more likely to use
marijuana and other narcotics, and 13 times more likely to use cocaine.”
Barry also noted
that the rates of tobacco and marijuana use among all 12th grade high school
students were virtually the same, confirming a report the Centers for Disease
Control published in June, and an analysis Raw Story published in
May.
The study should
give pause to anyone involved in youth drug awareness programs, as its findings
suggest that making science-based alcohol education a top priority could
actually turn the tide of the drug war ~ but only if lawmakers and leading
educators decide to use that same science as a foundation for public policy and
school curriculum.
“I think [these
results] have to do with level of access children have to alcohol, and that
alcohol is viewed as less harmful than some of these other substances,” Barry
added.
That social
misconception, largely driven by the sheer popularity of alcohol and the
profits it generates for private industry, is diametrically opposed to the most
current science available on drug harms. A study published in 2010 in the medical journal Lancet ranked
alcohol as the most harmful drug of all, above heroin, crack, meth, cocaine and
tobacco. Even more striking: The Lancet
study found that harms to others near the user were more than double those of
the second most harmful drug, heroin.
In its last
Youth Risk Behavior Survey, the CDC found (PDF)
that about 71 percent of American students have had at least one alcoholic
beverage in their lifetime, and almost 39 percent reported having at least one
drink within the last 30 days.
“This is a time
of budget tightening,” Barry concluded. “Many social services are being cut. If
you take [our findings] and apply them to a school health setting, we believe
that you are going to get the best bang for your buck by focusing on alcohol.”
Too much cheap alcohol available to kids.
ReplyDelete- Aangirfan