When waging unconventional warfare, timing is
everything.
In some
pro-Israel circles, President Barack Obama and his Secretary of State John
Kerry are now being hysterically compared to Neville
Chamberlain for their alleged “betrayal” of the self-defined “Jewish state” to yet
another imminent Holocaust as a result of Obama’s historic, albeit so far limited, rapprochement with today’s
supposed equivalent of a genocidal Nazi regime in Tehran and Kerry’s sustained
diplomatic effort to get Israel to return to its so-called “Auschwitz borders” prior to its premeditated 1967 Land Grab.
In light of
this dual “existential threat” posed by the Obama administration to a Greater Israel, the interview given to
Israeli TV by Glenn Greenwald, the journalist who first published documents
leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden that revealed the scope of U.S.
spying worldwide, is as close to a “game theory warfare” smoking gun as you’re
going to get.
Speaking to Israel’s Channel 10 ~ whose biggest shareholder, cosmetics billionaire Ronald Lauder, is President of the World Jewish Congress ~ Greenwald criticized “the continued imprisonment of Jonathan Pollard,” who was sentenced to life in prison in 1987 after passing more than a million highly classified documents to Israel while working as an intelligence analyst for the U.S. Navy. (Incidentally, Channel 10 owner Lauder is also a supporter of clemency for Pollard.)
As reported
today by Haaretz, here’s what Greenwald told his
Israeli audience about the spy, who, in the words of former CIA officer Philip Giraldi,
“did more damage to the United States than any spy in history”:
Greenwald
agreed that the Snowden revelations are relevant to Pollard’s case.
“When the U.S. government goes around the world criticizing other countries for spying on allies and prosecuting them,” he said, “are they going to maintain that with a straight face when they’re doing exactly that?”
It’s proper
to raise Pollard’s case in the context of U.S. spying on its Israeli ally, he
continued, because that underscores the hypocrisy of what the U.S. itself is
doing. The U.S. government, Greenwald charged, does exactly what it accuses its
enemies of doing, and no country has the right to say other countries shouldn’t
do something while it is secretly violating that very same taboo.
.
.
While some
may be willing to concede that Greenwald’s charge of U.S. government hypocrisy
is perfectly valid, the acclaimed “independent” journalist’s remarks that
American national security does not require surveillance of its so-called “ally” in Tel Aviv is at best naïve, at
worst disingenuous:
Asked about the U.S. government’s claim that the purpose of the eavesdropping is to fight terrorism, he responded by citing the documents’ revelations that the NSA eavesdropped on both German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Israeli officials, asking:Does the U.S. government think Angela Merkel is a terrorist?Or that democratically elected Israeli officials are involved in terror?
ED
Noor: Greenwald is supporting the words and actions of Netanyahu? Seems he is, after all, just another Israel firster. But to push for release of Pollard? That is beyond the pale.
Although
many Greeks and other Europeans may justifiably view Chancellor Merkel’s
austerity measures as a form of economic terrorism, could Greenwald seriously
be oblivious to Israel’s long track record of terrorism, not only its state
terrorism against the indigenous Palestinians and their neighbours but its less
widely-known, albeit acknowledged, false flag terror attacks on
its American benefactor and imperial proxy?
Given the
account of the “Five Dancing Shlomos” caught celebrating in
Liberty Park, New Jersey as the twin towers burned on Sept. 11, 2001, as well
as much other well-documented evidence pointing toward Israeli
complicity in the 9/11 attacks ~ seized on with great alacrity by Israel
loyalists such as Joe Lieberman as a pretext to strip
Americans of much of their constitutional rights while others such as Michael
Chertoff profited from the hyped “need” for greater “security” in the post-9/11 “Homeland” ~
what kind of journalist genuinely concerned about civil liberties would deny
that monitoring the conversations of a “spook, terrorist or criminal” such as
Netanyahu, a harsh critic of NSA spying who infamously admitted that 9/11 as “very good” for
Israel, is an essential requirement of any genuine fight against terrorism?
Like that
other much-adored Jewish “critic of Israel” Noam
Chomsky, Glenn Greenwald would appear to be just the latest branded
anti-imperial “hero”
serving to provide cover for a less transparent Israeli agenda.
Maidhc Ó
Cathail is an investigative journalist
and Middle East analyst. He is also the creator and editor of The Passionate Attachment blog, which
focuses primarily on the U.S.-Israeli relationship. You can follow him on Facebook and Twitter @O_Cathail.
I'm sure Israel has been poring over the Snowden docs, letting Greenwald know which to publish and which to trash, or take back to 'Stolenland.'
ReplyDeleteRaising the specter of a holocau$t that never happened might sell to the older Jews and braid-dead GOY, but the younger ones are tired of hearing that BS.
And that has Israel scared, that a generation free of holocau$t brain-washing ideology will appear.
When are people going to figure out that Jews will almost ALWAYS support that great state of hate and its minions? Greenwald has shown his true faggish, stinking Jewish colors.
ReplyDeleteThat both Chomsky and Greenwald, given the vast number of connections and contacts both men have, accept the official story of 9/11 is practically equivalent to admitting that Israel had an important hand in that event. They would be more convincing if they merely said they did not know what happened. This is like the NSA responding to Senator Sanders that Congress persons have the same protections as the rest of the citizenry.
ReplyDeleteGreenwald is not trustworthy. And I am wondering what he is doing with all the documents yet to be revealed. My guess is that we have seen most of what we will ever see. Greenwald probably has Snowden in a position where Snowden must go along in order to get help from various sources.
At this time Greenwald is working with the Billionaire. What benefits money benefits Greenwald. Too bad as he had good start.