Showing posts with label Dictator Bush. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dictator Bush. Show all posts

Wednesday, 21 September 2011

LET’S NOT FORGET: BUSH PLANNED IRAQ 'REGIME CHANGE' BEFORE BECOMING PRESIDENT

This old bit of information might serve to refresh our collective memories of how it all began... more or less. I have covered this topic many times before, but this is just a succinct reminder to us oldies and a nice nibble to open the eyes of those just learning to see.  The saddest part of it is, these buzztards are right on schedule. 

15 September 2002:
 
A SECRET blueprint for US global domination reveals that President Bush and his cabinet were planning a premeditated attack on Iraq to secure 'regime change' even before he took power in January 2001. 

The blueprint, uncovered by the Sunday Herald, for the creation of a 'global Pax Americana' was drawn up for Dick Cheney (now vice- president), Donald Rumsfeld (defense secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy), George W Bush's younger brother Jeb and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of staff). 

The document, entitled Rebuilding America's Defences: Strategies, Forces and Resources for a New Century, was written in September 2000 by the neo-conservative think-tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC). 

The plan shows Bush's cabinet intended to take military control of the Gulf region whether or not Saddam Hussein was in power. It says:
'The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.'
The PNAC document supports a:
'blueprint for maintaining global US pre-eminence, precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping the international security order in line with American principles and interests'.
This 'American grand strategy' must be advanced for 'as far into the future as possible', the report says. It also calls for the US to:
'Fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars' as a 'core mission'.
The report describes American armed forces abroad as 'the cavalry on the new American frontier'. 

The PNAC blueprint supports an earlier document written by Wolfowitz and Libby that said the US must 'discourage advanced industrial nations from challenging our leadership or even aspiring to a larger regional or global role'. 

The PNAC report also: 
~ refers to key allies such as the UK as 'the most effective and efficient means of exercising American global leadership'; 

~ describes peace-keeping missions as 'demanding American political leadership rather than that of the United Nations'; 

~ reveals worries in the administration that Europe could rival the USA; 

~ says 'even should Saddam pass from the scene' bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait will remain permanently ~ despite domestic opposition in the Gulf regimes to the stationing of US troops ~ as 'Iran may well prove as large a threat to US interests as Iraq has'; 

~ spotlights China for 'regime change' saying 'it is time to increase the presence of American forces in Southeast Asia'. This, it says, may lead to 'American and allied power providing the spur to the process of democratization in China'; 

~ calls for the creation of 'US Space Forces', to dominate space, and the total control of cyberspace to prevent 'enemies' using the internet against the US; 

~ hints that, despite threatening war against Iraq for developing weapons of mass destruction, the US may consider developing biological weapons ~ which the nation has banned ~ in decades to come. It says: 'New methods of attack ~ electronic, 'non-lethal', biological ~ will be more widely available ... combat likely will take place in new dimensions, in space, cyberspace, and perhaps the world of microbes ... advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool'; 

~ and pinpoints North Korea, Libya, Syria and Iran as dangerous regimes and says their existence justifies the creation of a 'world-wide command-and-control system'.
Tam Dalyell, the Labour MP, father of the House of Commons and one of the leading rebel voices against war with Iraq, said:
'This is garbage from right-wing think-tanks stuffed with chicken-hawks ~ men who have never seen the horror of war but are in love with the idea of war. Men like Cheney, who were draft-dodgers in the Vietnam War. 

'This is a blueprint for US world domination ~ a new world order of their making. These are the thought processes of fantasist Americans who want to control the world. I am appalled that a British Labour Prime Minister should have got into bed with a crew which has this moral standing.'

Friday, 26 August 2011

WERE PLANS FOR A MIDDLE EAST WAR ESCALATION EXPOSED IN 2008 BUSH-BLAIR EXCHANGE?

 
Bush & Blair before open mike

This conversation took place in 2006. Here we are 5 years later and things are right on according to the agenda as mentioned below. And NO ONE listened. This writer, however, picked it up and I now offer it to you. I won’t even mention Libya because the takeover of Libya and assassination of Qaddafi has been a Western goal for decades, at least since the 1980’s.

This is all part of the long term agendas drawn up by the neocon think tanks and, with Syria today, they are right on target agenda-wise. The only thing that is changed is the method of waging war. Now they rot from within and then move in and do as they wish with a tired populace.

By Larry Chin,
July 20, 2006

A microphone unintentionally left open at Monday's G-8 summit luncheon picked up snippets of unguarded talk between George Bush and Tony Blair.
While most media coverage focused on the embarrassing, stupid and profanity-laced portions of the comments uttered by Bush, a closer examination of the transcript confirms the targeting of Syria and Syrian president Bashar Assad.
It also suggests that severe Anglo-American pressure, via the UN, will continue to be applied to Syria and Iran, both of which have been broad-brushed as the “terror masterminds behind Hamas and Hezbollah terrorists.”

MORE THAN AN IDIOT’S PROFANITY
The worldwide media, Bush’s damage control apparatus, have spun the Bush-Blair exchange in the most deceptive Bush-friendly manner. The New York Times spun it as a “blunt call for diplomacy,” while another New York Times piece refers to “wise-guy Bush’s blunt and coarse chit-chat.”

Other headlines hailed the performance as “straight-talking Dubya,” Bush “lets fly,” “curses Hezbollah actions,” “Bush urges Assad to end fighting,” etc. All false.
First, Bush demonstrated what seasoned observers already know:
Bush is a grotesque simpleton suffering from some mental affliction, who is also a ruthless intimidator wielding violence and power without intellect, and without regard. In short, a gangster.

Gangsters do not need a great intellect to successfully conduct criminal activities, or head criminal empires. (In fact, intellect gets in the way.) Bush (and Cheney) routinely speaks using profanity.
More importantly, the Bush-Blair exchange was not a “call for peace.” They were caught talking in practical and casual fashion about covert back door deals, and geostrategic plans that are either in the works, or in process.
The precise nature of their plan is hard to ascertain, but what can be interpreted should be cause for alarm. The key passages, from the complete transcript from the Washington Post [my comments in italics-LC]:
Bush: What about Kofi? That seems odd. I don't like the sequence of it. His attitude is basically ceasefire and [then] everything else happens. You know what I'm saying?
Bush finds it “odd,” and “doesn’t like” how UN secretary-general Kofi Annan has apparently put ceasefire ahead of “everything else.” What is this “everything else” that will “happen”? Conditions for ceasefire? Or a new attack by some party or another? Has this “everything else” already been put into place? What are the US, UK, Israel and the UN really up to? Bush is not liking the choreographed order, of some future event. What is the event?

Blair: Yeah. No, I think ~ the thing that's really difficult is we can't stop this unless you get this international presence agreed. Now, I know what you guys have talked about but it's the same thing.
What are they seeking to “stop” with “international presence”? Does “stop” refer to ending the current violence, or “stopping” as in a multinational conquest (of Syria, Iran or both)? What have they “talked about”? Does the international “presence” refer to diplomatic talks, or military forces?

If it applies to military force, are they talking about a peacekeeping force in Lebanon, or a new multinational operation that has been “agreed” upon?
Blair: . . . see how reliable that is. But you need that done quickly.
What is “reliable”? What needs to be done quickly?
Bush: Yeah, she's going. I think Condi's going to go pretty soon.
Condi is going to do what? Given the known Bush administration position, she is not going to negotiate a ceasefire that offers anything whatsoever to Hamas and Hezbollah “terrorists,” nor will she make overtures towards what she and the Bush administration have insisted are their masters, Syria and Iran. What back door deal is Rice cooking up?
Blair: Right. Well, that's, that's, that's all that matters. If you ~ see, it'll take some time to get out there. But at least it gives people a ~
What “people”? Is he referring to political players, who need time to negotiate something, or is he talking about creating the propaganda illusion of diplomacy for the benefit of the masses (“people”)? If it is the latter, it would be a political cover for what?
Bush: A process, I agree. I told her your offer too.
Should this be read at face value as “diplomatic process,” or a process towards something else? Is he talking about a real or fake (propaganda) process? More importantly here, some sort of “offer” has been made between Blair and the US, and Rice is aware of it. What is it?
 Blair: Well, it's only if it's ~ I mean, you know, if she's got to ~ or if she needs the ground prepared, as it were. Obviously, if she goes out, she's got to succeed, as it were, whereas I can just go out and talk.
She (Rice) needs the ground prepared to “succeed” doing what? “Whereas I can just go out and talk” suggests that Blair intends for him and the UK to take a back seat, and let the US and Rice lead the way ~ towards what? Peace or more war? A ceasefire or an opportunistic maneuver of some kind?
Bush: See, the irony is what they need to do is get Syria to get Hezbollah to stop doing this shit, and it's over.
This is a key passage. What is “ironic”? Is the irony that they must ask for Syrian cooperation ~ or is it ironic that they are setting up Syria to take the blame (for “Hezbollah’s shit”)? What is “over” ~ the current violence, or any remaining obstacle to a full-blown Middle East war? 
Blair: Who, Syria?

Bush: Right.

Blair: I think this is all part of the same thing. What does he think? He thinks if Lebanon turns out fine, if we get a solution in Israel and Palestine, Iraq goes in the right way, he's [inaudible]. That's what this whole thing's about. It's the same with Iran.
The inaudible word is critical. Without the word, the passage is hard to interpret. Blair seems to be characterizing Syrian president Bashar Assad as somewhat naive (a “solution in Israel and Palestine,” and happy endings in Iraq, as well as Iran are farfetched), as well as a dupe who is willing to play along with Anglo-American and Israeli plans.
Note: some media reports, including the San Francisco Chronicle, have the last line of this passage as “It’s the same with Iraq.” An error or an intentional lie?

Bush: I felt like telling Kofi to get on the phone with Assad and make something happen. We're not blaming Israel. We're not blaming the Lebanese government."
What does Bush want the UN to “make happen”?

Is Bush talking about an Anglo-American diplomatic stance (don’t blame Israel or Lebanon) towards a ceasefire, or he is talking about the creation of a political cover by which a larger “anti-terror” war targeting Hamas and Hezbollah, and their alleged masterminds in Syria and Iran, will be conducted?

Is Assad complicit, or is he being set up?
Apocalypse ahead
As noted by William Arkin, in his Washington Post analysis of the Bush-Blair exchange, "Early Warning":
“As I've been watching the latest Middle East saga unfold, I've been struck by the almost universal insights being offered by pundits and talking heads that Iran or Syria planned the Hamas and Hezbollah kidnappings of Israeli soldiers and also control what happens now.

“In this narrative, Iran is trying to divert attention from its nuclear weapons program; Syria is seeking revenge against American isolation and seeking to enlarge its power base.  The two countries provide missiles and supply lines and sanctuary for Hezbollah and Hamas.  Iranian ‘soldiers’ are even secretly in Lebanon, aiding Hezbollah in its Friday attack on the Israeli naval vessel, an attack that Hezbollah could not have otherwise mounted.

“In this telling, Hamas and Hezbollah are reduced to almost unimportant terrorist dupes of Iran and Syria, Lebanon is just a poor victimized country, and Israel is only defending itself.  The United States and the international community are also absolved of any responsibility for their failures of diplomacy because what is unfolding is part of a grand conspiracy that no amount of intervention could have an impact on.

“In this version of history, Iran and Syria can also just snap their fingers and ‘stop’ the fighting.  Even if this is a false characterization, their failure to do so confirms that the Bush administration's approach towards them is the only option.  The two are thus confirmed as rogue nations and new axis of evil.”
“In this world, various leaders and factions plot their next moves, plan covert operations, undertake assassinations, decide on who to support and how based upon inside information.

“The danger of this type of intelligence, and of leaders obsessed with gossip and the lurid details of world events, is that pretty soon the geopolitical double dealing crowds out any true picture and any sense of State responsibility.”
With all due respect, there is not simply “double dealing.” There is also blackmail and extortion, with violent military ramifications. Outright thuggery is the basis of much imperial geostrategy.

It remains to be seen what Bush, Blair, and the brutal Israeli government have in store. The gates of hell have already been opened. Only the naïve would think they have any desire to close them.

Saturday, 25 June 2011

EVERYTHING WE’RE DOING NOW WAS PLANNED BEFORE 9/11


June 25, 2011

We’ve been told that 9/11 changed everything.

Is it true?

Let’s look at the facts:

The Afghanistan war was planned before 9/11. See this and this.

The decision to launch the Iraq war was made before 9/11. Indeed, former CIA director George Tenet said that the White House wanted to invade Iraq long before 9/11, and inserted “crap” in its justifications for invading Iraq.

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill ~ who sat on the National Security Council ~ also says that Bush planned the Iraq war before 9/11. Top British officials say that the U.S. discussed Iraq regime change even before Bush took office. And in 2000, Cheney said a Bush administration might
“have to take military action to forcibly remove Saddam from power.”
Cheney apparently even made Iraqi’s oil fields a national security priority before 9/11

And the Sunday Herald reported
“Five months before September 11, the US advocated using force against Iraq … to secure control of its oil.”
Remember that Alan Greenspan, John McCain, George W. Bush, Sarah Palin, a high-level National Security Council officer and others all say that the Iraq war was really about oil.

The Patriot Act was planned before 9/11. Indeed, former Counter Terrorism Czar Richard Clarke told Stanford law professor Lawrence Lessig:

After 9/11 the government drew up the Patriot Act within 20 days and it was passed.
The Patriot Act is huge and I remember someone asking a Justice Department official how did they write such a large statute so quickly, and of course the answer was that it has been sitting in the drawers of the Justice Department for the last 20 years waiting for the event where they would pull it out.
(4:30 into this video).

Cheney dreamed of giving the White House the powers of a monarch long before 9/11

Cheney and Rumsfeld actively generated fake intelligence which exaggerated the threat from an enemy in order to justify huge amounts of military spending long before 9/11. And see this

The government’s spying on Americans began before 9/11 (confirmed here and here. And see this)

The decision to threaten to bomb Iran was made before 9/11

It was known long before 9/11 that torture doesn’t work to produce accurate intelligence … but is an effective way to terrorize people.

And ~ sadly ~ America played dirty games to justify and win wars before 9/11

Saturday, 27 November 2010

GORDON DUFF: IRAN-KOREA NUCLEAR LIES, ORDERS FROM TEL AVIV

 Mordechai Vanunu, the Whistleblower responsible for so much information on the nuclear prgramme that Israel says it does not have, in Dimona.

TWO IMAGINARY NUCLEAR PROGRAMS,
ONE CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY
By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor, 
 (veteranstoday.com) 

Former President George W. Bush planned to invade Iran in 2007, even though America’s military was exhausted and overstretched by two unsuccessful wars.  His own popularity, at a real 8%, was the reason, that and the economic collapse that he was trying to push back until he left office.  He believed a war would have saved his presidency, buried the $3 trillion dollars stolen by his friends and given him a legacy to be proud of, even if every family in America suffered.

Bush brazenly admits pretty much exactly these things in his ghost written autobiography, an incoherent rant, that rambles between blithering and megalomaniac delusion .  The only thing that stopped this disaster was the National Intelligence Assessment, (NIE) that proved categorically, that Iran had no nuclear weapons program whatsoever. 

Even then, Bush tried to hide this report and demanded that falsified intelligence be created as he had done for 9/11, Afghanistan and Iran. However, as a lame duck and failed president, nobody listened.

Integrity won out over insanity, greed and corruption this time.  It wouldn’t last.

THREE YEARS LATER, 
NEW PRESIDENT, MORE OF THE SAME

Talk of war helps everyone,  It takes focus off the fact that both Russia and China dropped the dollar as a trade currency today.  

Pushing that out of the news is important as it is real news.  

Real news points fingers at real problems.  

Instead, everyone is having fun with North Korea and Iran but 90% of the abuse isn’t toward the countries themselves.  No, its against the English language.

Joseph Schuman of “AOL News” call the centrifuges in North Korea “ultra-modern.”  Do they have fins?  Are the deco?  Is there a post impressionist aspect about them?  We also read the glowing description, “astonishingly modern.”  Did Picasso design them?  Is there a touch of Matisse?


GAZA WALL, 
PALESTINIAN GHETTO OR “NUKE BARRIER?”
 
More words are bandied about, “potential” and vague reference to, perhaps another facility, with even more “ultra-modern” or, perhaps “spectacular” or even “fabulous” centrifuges.  Schuman even describes them in the most fearful terminology of all, as resembling those from “Iran.”

All of the talk about uranium enrichment and “weapons grade” is purposefully vague.  The most dangerous possible materials either nation is capable of producing would be unable to duplicate the nuclear carnage America has wrong on Iran and Afghanistan.  Oh, you don’t know that, someone told you that DU, Depleted Uranium, another abuse of language, is harmless?

Worse yet, Depleted Uranium, which is “partially” depleted like being “partially” dead or “partially” pregnant, is one of dozens of radioactive compounds used in every American weapon system from penetrator rounds for the ancient M-2 .50 cal. machinegun to the bombs we drop every hour, many carrying “potentially” lethal doses of “murderous” uranium oxide.

Isn’t language fun?

THE STRANGE CASE OF NORTH KOREA

North Korea is backward and dirt poor.  South Korea has an economy 300 times larger, if you don’t get that number correctly, picture one car in a restaurant parking lot and 300 cars.  One lot says long lines and great food, the other….food poisoning and no staff.

That’s North Korea, “food poisoning and no staff.”

They also have no money, no exports, no foreign currency, no economy, no technology to export, no money to buy technology but they have missiles, fancy new German built submarines and, supposedly have exploded two nuclear weapons so far, two vastly different weapons, two extremely strange weapons but certainly not two “ultra-modern” nuclear weapons.

Back in 2006, North Korea created a nuclear “fizzler.”  This is an explosion that has a nuclear signature but no fission or fusion reaction has occurred, no “chain reaction” like with a nuclear weapon.  Even stranger, the explosion itself, actually thousands of tons of ammonium nitrate fertilizer, enough to stimulate food production in North Korea and end their eternal famine.  

Instead, North Korea put a plutonium “pit” from an unserviced and aged hydrogen bomb on a ship load of fertilizer and blew the whole thing up.

The United States had “misplaced” 3 or more hydrogen bombs back in 1991 off the coast of Somalia, weapons that were recovered by arms dealers that were part of a South African, Rhodesian, Israeli nexus that helped fuel, not only “Iran/Contra” but armed both sides of the Iraq/Iran war.

For those of you who don’t know, a hydrogen bomb has a Plutonium “pit,” small in size that is stimulated by a Uranium 235 “sparkplug,” essentially two separate weapons that, when used together, produce a fusion reaction, many times larger than that of a simply atomic bomb.  Oh, I forgot, there is a canister of tritium gas that helps fuel the reaction, an extremely rare gas that needs to be replaced often.  Old hydrogen bombs don’t work.

Thus, someone who bought such a weapon somewhere would need to have it serviced by a super-power or buy a “trigger.”  During the 1990s, the CIA led by Valerie Plame, and aided by Pakistan’s A.Q. Khan, offered such “triggers” for sale in order to locate and recover these missing weapons.

You now know a big secret.  You also know that, if one of these weapons harms someone, former Vice President Dick Cheney, the man who undermined this vital CIA mission, is responsible, not “Scooter” Libby, the “fall guy.”  With all the leaks around, you might wonder how all this was kept out of the papers?  Who owns “the papers?”  Who owns the news?

The signature of the Plutonium was odd.  The cover story is that North Korea got Plutonium, not by producing it, but “found” it inside centrifuges they bought from Pakistan.  This is the rough equivalent of finding enough spare change under the cushions of your couch to buy a new Ferrari.

North Korea does not have the technology to create, mold or machine Plutonium, almost no one has.  Breeder reactors create Plutonium but it is impossible to machine or mold without using special alloys which, of course, are traceable during any nuclear explosion.  North Korea has had two “nuclear” explosions and both have been traced.

Not one ounce of “North Korean” material was ever involved.

The 2006 explosion did have a nuclear signature, a North Korean explosion but an American nuclear signature.  That there wasn’t something worse, an implosion based explosion or, worse, a thermonuclear device demonstrates a partially successful CIA operation with Pakistan’s A.Q. Khan and Valerie Plane to thank, heroes the Bush administration tried to hound to death.  Why?

THEN A REAL NUKE WENT OFF
IN NORTH KOREA,
DID THEY FORGET THE RECIPE?

Then it happened, or did it?  North Korea built a nuclear weapon and exploded it, an 18.2 kiloton “Hiroshima” type “gun” weapon they built themselves?  This was May 25, 2009 when a country incapable of enriching uranium to “weapons grade” exploded the impossible nuke, or did they?

Yes, there was an explosion, North Korea theoretically became a nuclear state but, funny thing, the world never treated them as such.  Why is that?  What was the secret?  Why was this so quickly forgotten?

The answer is simple, North Korea bought a nuclear weapon, one identical to one exploded in 1979 by Israel and South Africa, one with a history.  Identifying the weapon was easy, the size and design said “Arms Core” and “Pelandaba.”  The technology was American, the designers and builders Israeli but the uranium signature was South African.

South Africa built 10, no, not the 6 spoken of, but 10 nuclear weapons.  The rogue regime in South Africa was aided by Israel in building nuclear weapons, an arrangement that begun in 1975, one violating every international law, perhaps the single most serious crime of its type in our century.  South Africa had used germ warfare in Africa, chemical weapons, spread anthrax, plague, small pox and now, with the help of Israel, had nuclear weapons.

But, South Africa was collapsing and was going to be forced to release Nelson Mandela from prison and turn the government over to him.  They weren’t going to give Mandela 10 nuclear weapons, though.  Britain and the United Nations were approached to dismantle the program in 1990.  

Specialized equipment was designed to hold the weapons in 20 foot containers and the 9 remaining weapons, after one was tested on September 22, 1979, were to be shipped to the United States to be dismantled.  6 came to America.  3 were sidetracked by Margaret Thatcher in 1991, purchased for 55 million pounds and shipped to Oman to be kept as “blackmail” to frighten Saddam, or so it was explained.  In reality, Britain hired the same arms dealers that were responsible for Iran/Contra to move the weapons.

Dr. David Kelly, once considered a suicide, now known to be a murder victim, oversaw the project.  The bombs were stolen, Kelly knew and kept his mouth shut, for awhile at least, and then threatened to go public, not just about the bombs but about a 17,8 million pound “kickback” (backhander) paid by the bomb thieves to certain prominent British politicians.  Kelly was murdered, “they” tried to cover it up and now someone in Britain is going to jail over it, probably a “patsy.”

One of these weapons exploded in North Korea, an Israeli built nuclear weapon.  It passed through the hands of South African and Saudi arms merchants, one notorious Rhodesian and, we are told, into the open arms of those who built the weapons originally, the bomb designers from Dimona.  

The scary part, of course, is that these weapons are “unattributed.”  Whoever controls them, and that is Israel according to reliable sources, is now capable much “evil doing” with these weapons:
One could be sold to a nation such as Iran or, as we have learned, North Korea, in order to foster international instability and peddle arms to both sides.  Today, Israel is one of America’s largest arms suppliers and the not so secret supplier for all armaments North Korea currently has in its arsenal, from American cluster bombs to German built submarines.  
Israel’s primary business has always been selling weapons to rogue nations and North Korea is now customer #1. 
With “secret” missing nuclear weapons, Israeli intelligence can tell America:
  1. Saddam has them and is “prepared to use them in 45 minutes” or ship them to Syria “by ambulance.”  Israel told the Bush administration both stories.  They believed the “Saddam” story but rejected the “ambulance” tale. 
  2. Iran has them and has put them in shipping containers for a false flag attack on the United States.  Israel has informed the United States of exactly this 
  3. These weapons were shipped to Syria then to Lebanon where they were kept in a hospital X-ray room and that Hizbollah is planning to move them to Gaza where they can be smuggled by tunnels into Israel and used against the port of Haifa. America would be forced to send in the Army Corps of Engineers to build a wall around Gaza and to support Israeli military incursions as being justified as searches for these weapons that Israel has had all along, one of which Israel sold to North Korea.
  • One of these weapons could mysteriously explode in an American city unless Israel, not only received the cash payoffs it normally gets but billions of dollars of munitions, shipped to Israel by the Pentagon, which Israel is allowed to sell, according to a highly illegal secret protocol, to, well, North Korea or anyone else.  These shipments are made regularly and if the weapons stores were actually kept as the public is told, Israel would be a bomb warehouse from one end to the other.
CLEANING HOUSE

America is now, officially, two camps.  Fox News viewers, America’s most conservative and typically, most volatile “news junkies” are now being told that the 9/11 investigation was a coverup and the Building 7 demolition is proof of a massive conspiracy. 

For America’s #1 news source to go this far, not on one show but two of their top rated journalists, Judge Napolitano and Geraldo Rivera, has been a serious blow for all those who supported the Bush administration and believed in the “war on terror.”

No other network, no newspaper is touching this story, this “third rail” which debunks two wars, debunks “Osama bin Laden” and makes the case for America being a nation of dupes.  It doesn’t just stop at America.  Most of the world got “sucked in” on 9/11, buying in on an event that now has gone from historical milestone as a disaster to the greatest scam in world history.

Bush admissions, though it is doubtful he understand the nature of such admissions and the criminal implications, over Iran and his willingness to send Americans to a hopeless war for his personal aggrandizement are only part of a pattern of which 9/11 itself was a part.  

If, as Fox News claims, Building 7 was a controlled demolition, then all of 9/11 was staged.  Any other assumption is insane.  The only questions are whether to leap to blaming Israel as so many are willing or to see Bush himself as a prime mover.  Neither choice is likely to be promoted by either a government in bed with the Israel lobby, AIPAC, or still led by those who likely to be prosecuted.

THE NUCLEAR SHAM

The media has started in, on Iran and North Korea.  Again, Iran is “5 minutes away from being a nuclear power” and North Korea is ready to invade the South, armies on the move, donkeys fueled up, starving troops armed to the teeth.

Both nations, friendless, easy targets for American military technology, easy targets for the carefully orchestrated world press, serve one real purpose, to deflect attention from the thieves, the torturers, the drug barons, the ethnic cleansing in Gaza, from a dozen stories, especially from the ticking time bomb of 9/11.

With the world coming down around America, Afghanistan a hopeless quagmire, even by “Vietnam” standards, the dollar in free fall, AIPAC spying openly revealed in civil proceedings and Americans, by the million, abandoning traditional news media, the “nuclear option,” an attack on an American city by, well, Americans themselves, with or without Israel, becomes more likely.

The mechanisms are there, spy organizations, controlled press, a quick and dirty “whitewash” investigation such as with 9/11 “in the can.”

“Black ops” and intelligence groups, now little more than criminal fronts, psychopaths, misfits and degenerates of every kind, exist by the dozen, funded with billions in taxpayer revenue, defense, intelligence and, of course, the flood of drug money pouring in from Afghanistan.

What is believed by those Americans that other Americans should revile and fear?  It is believed that the only way of “moving forward” is the extreme path, totalitarianism, more government, fewer rights, gun seizures and, perhaps even those FEMA camps that “internet nutcases” and “conspiracy theory” types talk about.

The remainder of the Bush/Cheney gang are slowly becoming hunted animals.  

They see it even if many Americans don’t. 

Hunted animals are capable of anything.