Showing posts with label social conditioning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label social conditioning. Show all posts

Friday, 1 July 2011

THE WEAPONIZATION OF CULTURE: DIVIDE AND RULE

Plato's Republic depicted by Raphael. 
Surely these "brilliant minds" 
did not actually labour to erect this truly awesome hall!

The elites give culture to us. The psychopathic elites are a strange lot. Their ‘bible’ seems to be Plato’s Republic, a blueprint for a New World Order utopia whereby the idle parasitic elites breed a manageable quota of humans as slaves on stud farms for specific tasks when needed, and cull off any useless eaters when obsolete. The Spartans did something like this for almost 250 years.

David Galton, in his book, on page 17, EUGENICS: the future of human life in the 21st century (2001) ISBN0 349 113777 Galton describes the first state, that of Sparta, to be run on eugenic ideas whereby the best and fittest men were bred to fight which enabled Sparta to rule Greece for almost 250 years.
From Plato’s Republic we get the science of the Hegelian Dialectic, falsely attributed to Hegel. Divide and Rule! When you want to steer a society in a pre-planned direction you split that society into warring factions.
This overcomes the inertia and gets the ball rolling for you. People at peace are not going anywhere.
Our version of peace to the elites is stagnancy. To them war is peace regardless of how many die or suffer. When we are all at each other’s throats, we are too angry and blinkered to understand that we are being shifted anywhere, let alone into a new order.
It is difficult to know where to start with this chapter as it involves the total break up and clearing away of an entire society to make way for the march of the psychopathic Platonic/Spartan New World Order.

DETRIBALISATION:

Let’s start with the genocide called detribalization.

A tribe, or clan, is a community. People are gregarious by nature. We survive by gathering together in numbers and cooperating; it’s part of our nature. We congregate with like-minded individuals and survive together.

It is quite likely that tribes bartered with other tribes and got on quite well together. Of course, there would have been some disagreements between neighbouring tribes, which would need resolving by the tribal elders, who had the wisdom of accumulated years.

In a tribe or clan-type community, the men gather and surround the women and children and the women and children feel safe.

This way of life is not acceptable to the New World Order psychopathic control-freaks who want us all standardized into one global multicultural manageable clump. Tribe must be pitted against tribe, and as much divide-and-rule must be applied as possible in order for the invading marauders to dominate and detribalize the mass in its entirety.

The destruction of a tribal culture happens in three stages.
1. Slaughter the elders.
This is equivalent to the burning of a library in order to eliminate history, as the tribal cultures are oral and pass the information down through the generations by word of mouth.
2. Slaughter the native language.
By destroying the language of the indigenous people, the invaders cut off all links with the past; wiping the slate clean for the New Order, which is now enforced upon them. Under pain of death, the people are forbidden to speak in their native tongue. They are humiliated by having their mouths washed out with soap, or worse.
3. Enslave them with money.
When the indigenous tribe is kicked and manipulated into submission and harvested, they are now made to pay their masters to live. Disobedient dissenters are simply slaughtered, sterilised, raped, mocked, tortured and made an example of to teach the new order to the rest.

THE SMASHING UP THE NUCLEAR FAMILY

A tribe is an extended family, but the next stage after the obliteration of the tribe is the destruction of the bonded family unit.

The two should be viewed as a continuous line of fragmentation leading on to the next stage and then the next stage.

The generation gap did not just happen.
It was engineered.


Before the 1950’s there was no such thing as a teenager. The first experiment was the “bobbysoxers” from the Frank Sinatra days in the 1940’s, but it took the creation of the sexy guitar-twanging rockabilly male with his ducktail hair and attitude to pull in the teenage girls who soaked up his rebel/bad boy attitude. With the introduction of Elvis Presley and his controversial hip swagger, the creation of the screaming teenage fan was fait accompli.

The term "teenage angst" entered the common language resulting in a relaxation of societal rules, paving the way for one indiscretion after another to appear and be accepted. 


Since time immemorial young people reaching adolescence have had a natural rebellious attitude as they matured into adulthood. The elite think-tanks knew they could use this to their own advantage and stepped in and introduced music, drama, celebrities, cigarettes, cinema, jukeboxes, television ‘soaps’ and fashion, to hammer a heavy wedge into stable family life. This is when the creation of communication devices such as television were greeted by the elites as the best boon possible for manipulating the masses.

Suddenly teenagers were a breed unto themselves and anyone past the age of 21 was a ‘has-been’. Parents were all stupid and the propagandists, although we did not know they were so, were ‘so cool’. Daycare for the children, old age homes for the elders, all compartmentalized, divided and conquered. And the experiences of lifetimes, wisdom garnered through the ages, once considered so important for the survival of the tribe, cut off and, at best, tolerated as “foolish ramblings” by most contemporary society, to be replaced by shiny, meaningless, time-killing pap.

The sixties gave teenagers the sexual revolution, drugs, free love, promiscuity, sleeping around and provocative dress. Of course, the real reason for all this top-down weaponized culture was the pushing of the eugenics/depopulation agenda through the popularization of the contraceptive pill, the promotion of abortion coupled with the created dreaded fear of unwanted children.  

But any of my readers knows my slant on these things, feminism, playboyism, societal manipulation, the loss of so much potential that terrified the elites. There were so many of us and our expectations had to be curtailed and driven towards their inhumane New World Oder goals. They pulled out all the stops.

In the sixties, the elites divided, ruled and sterilized a large naïve gullible section of society without their parents’ knowledge.

We now have a newly created caste called tweenagers, neither children nor teenagers, little children, painted, perfumed and turned out as tarts and paraded before CCTV cameras as fodder for every salivating voyeuristic paedophile out there to stalk. 

The stars who are popular are getting younger and younger and more sexualized by the week. Age appropriateness has been thrown out the window. She was not the first, but Madonna began the trashification of our children; Britanny Spears and her clones picked up (and still carry) that banner; but now the most dangerous of them all, the satanic and perverted messages of Lady Gaga are heard everywhere gulling our children.

All this was planned. By the way, regardless of all the sex awash in the media, voyeurism is a serious psychiatric illness!

THE SMASHING UP OF MARRIAGE:

The seventies gave us feminism. Having invented teenagers and turned them against the wisdom of their parents, the next stage was to smash up the parents themselves by turning them against each other; the weaponization of the sexes.

This was achieved by targeting mainly the women through feminism, as women are easier to manipulate. The elites, having access to secret archives of social sciences dating at least back to the Ancient Greeks know us better than we know ourselves. No, folks, Freud did not “just happen”!

Apply the same formula
and you get the same result.
They work us like a chemistry set.

Only those with psychopathic tendencies are initiated and allowed access to these secret sciences. It is a Darwinist pecking order. The hoax of feminism was launched on the female population and funded by misogynous homosexuals in silly woolen aprons in lodges. 

Actually it was the Rockefellers who contributed financially to bring about feminism by the hiring, via the CIA, of Friedan and Steinhem, while Azbug cleared the legal background from her position in Congress. All three were Jewish Communists and knew exactly what they were about.

Eugenicists such as Margaret Sanger were used to dupe the women into believing that it is a man’s world and women are household slaves. Other funded con-women were Margaret Mead, Gloria Steinem, Betty Freiden and Germaine Greer. Interestingly, Sanger was almost a poster girl for the KKK with her messages. I have written on her in the past and her quotes on humanity are, on the whole, chilling and soulless as are those of the entire pro NWO species.

Margaret Mead:
"Fathers are biological necessities but social accidents."

Of all the above feminists, and many more, you would find more femininity in the head of a sledgehammer. Betty Freiden was a Jewish lesbian communist posing as a disgruntled housewife, used to help kick-start the movement.
Feminism is about marriage break-up, induced selfishness, depopulation, eugenics, IVF, designer babies, mocking the natural aggressiveness in the male, taxing the untaxed other-half of the slave population (women), expunging the mothering instinct, and ultimately, the State fishing children out of the school for whatever purpose it deems fit. There were some very positive aspects of feminism but they reached so few of us that one realizes the ends do NOT justify the means employed. The price to society has just been too usurious.
Nick Rockefeller announced the above in almost those exact words to deceased film maker Aaron Russo when he was trying to recruit Russo to work with the NWO from the entertainment/propaganda angle. Instead Russo turned him down and exposed these dark motives. (About 7 minutes in) From a vibrant healthy man his health deteriorated rapidly after his exposure due to cancer, which this writer believes was induced as punishment for his preference to be honest to humanity.
There has barely been anything in the mass media since 1970, which hasn’t been a gross insult to real men who will stand up and fight for marriage, family and tribe.

Why don’t women realize they have been sterilized without their consent through feminism?

Why don’t they stand up and have the guts to speak out against the cowardly perverts that pulled the wool over their gullible eyes? In depth brainwashing on an almost unheralded level is why! They just don't ~ are incapable of ~ getting it.
NOW, THERE’S SOMETHING 
WORTH BITCHING ABOUT!
“You are being separated from your moral support…and ruled with an iron fist by cowards”.

Where’s the liberation and equality in that?
BASHING YOUR CHILDREN INTO SHAPE:

Everything has to be a contest in this in this big wide survival-of-the-fittest Social Darwinist world of ours based on dog-eat-dog eugenics.

Children don’t play anymore.

They compete, while their parents are paying the corporate lawyers and corporate courts to do their competing for them, for custody of the children and the children themselves are spoon-fed on military-designed computer games, training them to be desensitized to…well …everything and everybody.

In cyberspace, black clad from head to toe, brainless, like the mini-executioners they are being trained to be, they murder, rape, decapitate, disembowel, impale. When they grow up, they will be excellent fodder for blowing everything including themselves to smithereens, while the sadistic elites watch on, salivating at the mouth at the end product of their perverted brains. 
How many paid for scientific professionals lied to allay the worries of parents who worried about the long term effects of these militarized games upon their children? These games not only train them to kill, but just by their very physicality separate the child from true connectedness with fellows and the real world, the world of nature. Even the most harmless of games, avidly pursued on a little hand held toy separates the attention of the child from reality and other people.

God help us all when these dehumanized, sexless, fatherless, motherless, brain-dead mini-robots, that used to be children grow up. They will welcome a real suit of armour; armed to the teeth with all the latest batch of seething handheld torture devices, dangling all over their black shells, itching to be used on us when there’s no such thing as a job…by design.
Now, I’m not saying all competition is bad; boys generally compete, girls generally cooperate. The point is they are neither boys nor girls. They are being turned into androgynous robots for military purposes.
This is beyond divide-and-rule. This is one-to-one technology-to-brain military training of children under the guise of ‘entertainment’.
Entertainment itself is a joke ~ programmes about competing to be the best performer ~ the best gardener ~ the best at building a wall ~ the best at painting a door ~ the best at cooking a meal ~ the best at wearing a dress ~ the best at cementing a path ~ the best at painting a picture ~ the prettiest walker on a catwalk.
For children all this is supposed to be a healthy distraction from the continuous onslaught of competing to be the best at passing the best stupid exam to be the best tax slave.
What happens if they don’t quite make it ~ there is a solution ~ drug them up to the eyeballs with Ritalin. Lobotomize their vulnerable brains. Murder and maim them with Gardasil so they can continue to have the sex they were trained to have since they were 4 year olds. Hey, why wait till four? Toss meds for STD’s into their infant vaccinations just to get things going young. Just another poison to warp them inside and out.

In the meantime, the teachers in the schools have had a generation of total indoctrination into the ‘greening’ agenda. So much so that they are brainwashing the children to bring up and indoctrinate what’s left of the parents on behalf of the recycling mafia…free raw materials harvested and delivered free…by slaves. Children bringing up their parents, now there’s wisdom.

The Green Party and their advocating of the extreme environmentalist movement in Europe is actually extremely neo nazi in its workings with small children. Their propaganda and methods of turning kids against family are strong. “Does your mother take showers longer than 3 minutes?” “Does your father leave the water running when he brushes his teeth?”

THE WARRING FACTIONS:

The psychopathic elites, living in their superior utopian scientific heads, where there is no such an animal as compassion or guilt, see us all as a residual mass of protoplasm to be moulded, as they say ‘like clay on the potters’ wheel’. 

Right: Battle of the sexes, updated, in advertising. 
The elites are global, internationalists, from all races. They are a clan unto themselves with one thing in common. They are all psychopaths.                                                 
Here’s how the human chemistry set works.
The elites seek out, invent or create differences in otherwise peacefully coexisting communities. They deliberately amplify differences of colour, religion, creed, sex, age, political persuasion, race, environmental opinions etc. and pit them all one against each other…’stirring the witches pot’.
Here’s a stirring Club of Rome invention ~ global warming/climate change ~ and all that utter nonsense:
”In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” ~ Club of Rome, premier environmental think-tank, consultants to the United Nations
By the way, if ever you believe the sincerity of the Club, remember it was founded by David Rockefeller, that "great humanitarian," in 1968.

Al Gore Jr., son of Al Gore Sr. who was. Like his father, a NWO shill/slave under the control of Communist industrialist, the very pro-Zionist Armand Hammer, was designated the task of spreading the word to the general populace of the planet with his junk science novel and speeches. He certainly did not win his Nobel Prize for originality, or because he deserved it. This was just a consolation prize to give him credibility and perhaps a little reward in prestige for obeying his bosses and allowing Bush to take the presidency after a race that he, Gore, had legally won. And no one ever thought to ask why, in a world of recounts, he graciously bowed down and let the apparent loser take over the White House. No one asked!

Above is a statement from the founders of the club in their own words from their own book The First Global Revolution (1991). In my copy, it’s there in black and white on page 85. They wave a false flag, saying there’s an enemy over there, and we, the pawns on the chessboard, the residual mass, all go charging after an enemy that doesn’t exist, too angry to look up at who’s pulling the strings, and steering us all into a fascist/communist New World Order.

This action was eventually planned by PNAC, the new Pearl Harbour that took place was the unforgettable 911.

The New World Order
is to be a hell on earth for us,
a utopia
for the controlling psychopathic elites.

We all know of someone who has a dog that goes charging after a non-existent cat, or snapping the air for a non-existent fly when the owner says ‘get the cat’ or ‘get the fly’, just for the sake of mocking the poor dumb animal the dog barks, snaps and charges. 
We, the victims, are being mocked in this way.

It’s not that we are dumb; it’s just that we prefer to spend our time trying to look after our loved ones, because we have a non-psychopathic thing called compassion. Compassion is no more than a word to these creatures. One wonders if they are capable of loving even their own offspring or view them as pawns to be used to advance their individual chess games.

Non-control-freaks have different priorities. Why do most of us not believe all this is happening, or, if we even notice, ask hot it is that these cunning psychopaths keep getting away with it? The answer is multi faceted but a prime component is that, because we have been taught through religion to value humanistic values and turn the other cheek, we are, on the whole, incapable of understanding or believing such chicanery even exists. THIS is one of their greatest weapons, the unbelievability of it all. As a result it has been easy to create the “tin foil” mockery mentality, and kill off any who are in a position to expose their ambitions and accomplishments.

They will get away with it until we wake up and say no more, stop giving them all our money to buy extravagant weapons, with which to murder us.
 The most elaborate weapon of all though is the culture itself. We live in a weaponised culture. The elites are perpetual war advocates. We are in a perpetual war and we think we are at peace.

DIVIDING AND RULING EVERYONE:

What is this psychopathic New World Order to be like? It is to be an upgraded scientific dictatorship with the superior parasitic breed in charge, and doing as it pleases. The rest of us are to be disposable slaves.

In 1963, I did a major high school comparative essay on dystopian novels. I worked with 1984, Brave New World  and one from Russia called "We" by Yevgeny Zamyatin in 1921. As a result all of my life I have watched these things come to fruition. But as a naive teen, I had no idea that I was studying information intended to preprogramme humanity for a planned society already well in the works! If I had even known of the elites back then, I do not know how I would have interpreted things quite as I did and, I would have held on to a copy of the final work. Sister St. Francis was pleased enough to reward me with 99% so I guess I did not ruffle any feathers ~ must have missed the big points!

Orwell’s book 1984 was originally called The Last Man in Europe. This title referred to the last person to be re-engineered into a posthuman. A posthuman is someone who used to be a human but has been upgraded into a cyborg or machine, to serve the idle elite from cradle to grave.

The ‘New Man’ (childbearing women being obsolete and discarded) is to be a compassionless, androgynous, self-fertilizing slave, produced, owned and run by the State like any other efficiently run factory machine.

Orwell’s book 1984 needs to be read as a forerunner to Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. The two should be read together, as on completion of the Last Man, comes the beginning of the Brave New World. This is your New World Order. Having brutally destroyed all opposition, the powerless residual mass is now to be doped and reconditioned into loving its servitude.

All Brave New World Order slaves are to worship and adore their master-gods and accept everything dished out to them with gratitude for the fact that they were allowed to be born. Only those bio-machines that the State requires will be decanted. Ask yourself why every popular female rock star of the NWO mode appears for some time as a robot woman, similar to Maria of the ultimate NWO film, "Metropolis". Beyonce, Rhianna, Gaga, Minogue, Stefani, Aguilera, every single one of them and play this role at some point, making the robot "sexy".

Less publicized than these two dystopian novels is one by H. G. Wells about a Freemasonry of science, The Shape of Things to Come, in which Freemasons take over the world. Remember, these books were pre-conditioners for the rest of us. These three writers were part of the “in group.”

There will be no birth in the old-fashioned sense. Posthumans are to be created by human gods, and decanted from test tubes by the new white-coated priesthood.
How far are we from this ‘utopia’? Well, look around you!

Look at the gawk and stalk ‘security’ cameras watching and groping your every pubic hair at airports.

Look at the nests of cameras gawking at you from every angle.

Look at the RFID agenda.

Look at the child snatching by the State.

Look at the controlled/planned collapse of the economy.

Look at the zapped police attacking those they signed up to serve.

Look at the poisoning of the food.

Look at the poisoning of the water.

Look at the poisoning of the air supply.

Look at the weather modification they call climate change and blame us.

Look at your behaviour modification taking place, for your own security of course.

Look at the Surveillance State. Everybody is spying on everybody else.

Can it possibly get any worse?

Yes!

We’re now expected to spy on ourselves. We may be harbouring terrorist thoughts unbeknownst to ourselves so our facial expressions, manner of walking, our tone of voice has to be watched day and night so the ‘experts’ can tell us if we are terrorists or not.

They are trying pathetically to overtake the internet, our last bastion of “freedom” and, through surveillance and infiltration, they are doing the best they can to thwart and corrupt the flow of information that so threatens their success.

I fear that this great boon, Wikileaks, which we know is not such a boon despite its historical revelations which cannot be ignored, will prove to be the Trojan Horse that ends up with the de-terrorrization of the information revolution. They certainly are trying and at this point it is in the works. Up here in Canada I have found over the years that access to more and more sites are blocked, inaccessible or “dead”. This happens quite a bit with films especially if they are less than appreciative of the Zionist entity.

I remember years ago laughing and joking that the government could know exactly what books I read to my children from the library if they wanted to. It was just a joke and people laughed. They would say, “Don’t be silly, that is just too funny for words that they would bother.” Wrong! I imagine now they could predict what I would be taking out just by past records.

The gadgets and gizmos know us far better than we could possibly know ourselves, and they have a psychopathic legal system and prison system to back them up to prove it.

Even their goons, the front line workers of the TSE are disposable as their rising cancer rates due to exposure to radiation is denied by those responsible for the whole humiliating mess intended to break spirits through humiliation. To remove the dirty diapers from a senior, pull out a colostomy, grope small children, squeeze men’s genitals until it hurts, inspect women every which way possible, makes it hard to feel compassion for these Neanderthals but cancer is not to be wished upon anyone. Everything and everyone is replaceable in the minds of the elite.

If you don’t like being a slave, there’s what they call a Fixated Threat Assessment Centre/Gulag to force you into liking it.

Start spying on yourself…or else…report to your betters if you are suspicious of yourself in any way! They’ll decide whether you need reframing, or not. Why not just report yourself the next time you react negatively to one of their infinite wars?!

A little torture should do the trick!

Plato would be proud of today’s psychopathic elites!

Saturday, 18 June 2011

THE SOURING OF COMMUNIST FEMINAZISM

 .
If the term "radical feminism" (a.k.a. Marxist- or socialist-feminism) is somewhat new to you, you need to expand your knowledge.  After all, radical feminism, the currently controlling faction of feminism, governs just about everything that is happening in your life. ~ Carey Roberts, author: Marxism And The Roots Of Radical Feminism
 
"Some call it Marxism ~ I call it Judaism" ~ Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, The American Bulletin, May 15, 1935.

"Communism and Judaism are one and the same" ~ Hilary Cotter, Cardinal Minszenty, The Truth about His Real "Crime," p. 6.

The author of the article below,FEMINISM TASTES BITTER AFTER JOB ENDS, Sasha Spencer, speaks for millions of my generation, the Baby Boomers. She tells my story regarding the upswing of feminism; “political correctness” and other events have created a social climate in which if you do not embrace them fully, and all of its bastard children,(abortion, lesbian/homosexuality, birth control, etc) you are suspect, politically incorrect, and open for the venting of much mind-controlled spleen let alone lawsuits.

Sasha’s Spencer's details differ from mine but the overall end results are in essence, the same.She speaks for a generation of disenfranchised men and women.

A few years ago, courtesy of a conversation between Alex Jones and deceased filmmaker Aaron Russo, I got enough information to do some serious research on the origins of feminism.  I found a site named "Save the Males"  (Now known as Henry Makow.com) which was a goldmine of information that opened my eyes. The contents, which I knew instinctively were bang on, left me upset, angry, betrayed and sad for a very long time. 
I realized a whole generation of young men and women had been sucker-punched so hard that the world as we knew it would never stop reeling. The damage was permanent and it had been PLANNED to be that way, to bring about a society none of us would ever have knowingly accepted. But of course, that is the main purpose of "political correctness" ~ to bring about unwanted social changes  by creating victim status, playing on human decency, and then having the people do their own policing as laws are changed under their noses to make these unwanted changes the law.

We were boonswoggled, just as we had been in so many other ways. Say what you will about us baby boomers, but we were the last naïve generation to be born. We were born into a time of unheralded financial security and stability; we trusted, had hopes and dreams that were possible for almost any of us to bring to fruition.  

Who knows what heights we might have reached, what positive boons we could have created, if we had not been so vilely tampered with? 

Would the world be the cesspool it is today? If our ideals had not been so tampered with and corrupted, I do believe it would be a much better place, but such a train of thought is a waste of time. 

I was angry at myself for allowing myself to be socially manipulated, but then trust and turning the other cheek are a gentile "weaknesses" which our enemies, enemies we could not even imagine existed, were fully poised to take complete advantage of. Not even knowing of this social malignancy, we were putty in their scheming plans. I refer to the Rothschild dominated plan to bring about international Communism, enslaving us all. How could we even IMAGINE such an abomination existed?

As far as the feminist movement was concerned, the women who were hired by the CIA, and backed by the Rockefellers, Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan et al, tackled us and corrupted us well. Oh, they were sly and had a message which instilled a restlessness of the spirit and spoke to every girl and young woman of the time.

Freedom! Burn your bra
and set those puppies free
from patriarchal oppression!

Little did we know Gloria Steinem had been "dating" pedophile Kissinger! Or that Betty Friedan was a completely fabricated creature, in reality a paid political activist and professional propagandist for the Communist left for over a decade before the publication of "The Feminist Mystique" launched the modern women's movement. And on and on. 

Feminist leaders of the movement, including Congresswoman Bella Azbug who brought in new laws to open up the civil laws to homosexual acceptance in 1975, (RADICAL HOMOSEXUAL MOVEMENT RUN BY JEWS) were card carrying members of the Communist party hired to utterly destroy the family.

Decades later the connection between Communism/Bolshevism/ Marxism/ Zionism struck home and the full realization of what was done to us became sickeningly clear. Of course by then, such insights were immediately branded as “politically incorrect”!

I have written much on feminism as well as the school responsible for the political correctness and the rot within our society, The Frankfurt School proposed a solution to further prepare us for non violent Communist takeover.  They succeeded in infiltrating our educational systems even more completely to organize the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilization stink. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can they impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.’
 *
‘Revolution and Eros’ ~  
sexual instinct used as an instrument of destruction.
* 
'Until now nations were killed by conquest, that is by invasion: But here an important question arises; can a nation not die on its own soil, without resettlement or invasion, by allowing the flies of decomposition to corrupt to the very core those original and constituent principles which make it what it is?' wrote Joseph, Comte de Maistre (1753-1821) who for fifteen years was a Freemason.



In both pieces I clearly exposed the goals of Marxist social manipulation of the Western masses. The information presented will shock and enlighten and make it easier to understand how we got to the place we are in today. And no big words!  But, let us return to the great betrayal of America.

But women were not alone in being warped; there were the contributions of Hugh Hefner, who was at the same time, "freeing men from their enslavement from dominating women" by the demystification of the feminine gender according to his own warped ideals which effectively dehumanized woman, turning them into the equivalent of brainless pornographic creatures for men to masturbate over. The result was that men, too, began to think that marriage was no longer such a great thing and they bought into the “freedom myth” as well.

I refuse to let women take all the blame for this because the attack on the family was a multi-faceted, well coordinated, war on America and both genders, as is so well explained at the above link to Conspiracy to Corrupt.
With the introduction to drugs and the announcement that God was dead, we were “free” to fall into the free love movement, smash morals and release the passions of a massively huge generation and permanently instill these new-found "freedoms" into society. Meanwhile, naïve as we were, despite our belief in our worldliness because we had “sexual freedom”, we were unaware that, bubbling in the background for many decades, was the huge push for population control via feticide, oops abortion.  Now we were off to the de-balling of the Western men whilst cutting down the population all in the name of “Freedom” and “free choice”.  

Anyone who cannot connect the dots here needs to open their eyes and coolly assess the confused relations between the genders. This is promoted unendingly through the social media and such influential programmes as “Sex in the City” which damaged millions of girls and their values.  Does it make any difference that the movers and shakers of all of this social manipulation were Jews as well as, in most cases, Communists?  That is for you to decide, Dear Reader. 

We had a LOT of company in this disintegration of the family unit, the key pod of all societies, destined for destruction by Marx when they first organized Communism. 
"Communism is Judaism. The Jewish Revolution in Russia was in 1918" ~ H. H. Beamish, speech in New York, 1937.
Miss Spencer, author of the article below, needs to realize all men lost too. She was not just the only one. We all lost. We are in a society in which the pendulum of feminism has swung so far over that men, especially White men, are becoming increasing disenfranchised. Of course, the greatest losers are the young of today who are being radically lesbianized and homosexualized, all victims of the great great great grandchild of radical feminism.

There are MILLIONS of Sasha Spencer's out there. The details may differ, but the story, by the end, is the same and brings about the same final overall result.

The origins of the politically correct movement lies in an adaptation of Marxism which seeks a radical transformation of our traditional culture in order to create a social revolution by imposing a consistency of ideas and behavior which are totalitarian in nature.  This effort goes back farther than the 60’s and the hippies and the peace movement, as far as to World War I. “Yes! What we need today is a social revolution to overthrow the patriarchal system together with its private property, marriage, the family, moral rules, individualism, the rule of law, heterosexuality, nations and national borders, so the human race can revert to its natural communist, bi- and pan-sexual, matriarchal state.”


FEMINISM TASTES BITTER AFTER JOB ENDS


Sasha Spencer presents an insightful analysis
of how feminism programmed her to fail.

June 17, 2011
By Sasha Sencer

“I can now lament at leisure my squandered youth and beauty. I seem to have done it all backwards.”

As a girl growing up in the 60′s and 70′s, in the American Midwest, I felt no societal honor or reward for following the traditional feminine role.

The take-home message was clear: being a wife and mother had no merit. I decided that my ultra-feminine British mother had nothing to teach me.

A naive media sponge, my job was to teach my mother: “You need to be more assertive and less co-dependent.” I assured her that everything she had to teach me as a woman was outdated and no longer applied.

The same applied to my English and very Victorian grandmother, as she attempted to give me direction in the ways of a woman. “My husband can fix his own damn dinner!” Besides, I would have much more important things to do!

No longer could I look to my mother or grandmother for the road map. This was uncharted territory but I was sure I was chosen for greatness.

I was now liberated from man and had the key to happiness. I would prove myself in a “man’s world”. In my youthful blindness, I jumped onto the feminist bandwagon, faithfully devouring every issue of Ms. Magazine.
 .
I fell for the Rockefeller funded B.S. with abandon. I went forth an angry young woman. But at least now, I could identify the problem. It was men!
.
In spite of all this, I married at age 26. My first husband was a brilliant young doctor finishing his residency at the Mayo Clinic. Honestly, I couldn’t have asked for more in a mate. A great provider. Treated me very well. I was set for life!

This wasn’t enough for me however. I still had to prove myself and it had to be great. Deep down, I never felt completely worthy of my great find in a man. I had to make it harder on myself. Therefore, I embarked on my “career” in media, acting and modeling. I was rarely home. This marriage ended in my early 30′s as I embarked on an acting-modeling career. I was off to make my glamorous fortune!

I was nine-years single, had scores of exciting men to date and a few minor television and film experiences under my belt. I then landed my dream job. As Executive Director of the Impressionists Society, I was off to France. I began the journey of my life. I was living and working with the family and heir to a famous French Impressionist painter. My dream had finally come true and it did not disappoint.

JOBS DON’T LAST

As all good things seem to come to an end, my love affair with all things Impressionist and French did too. By this time, I had the nice house, car, beautiful artwork, clothes, boyfriends and I was indeed at my most glamorous. I had it all.

I had never really been the type of woman to dream of a husband and children. I figured I had all the time in the world. Time was on MY side, I was sure of it!.
But after my dream job ended, I began to long for something lasting. I wanted a family.

As fate would have it, I agreed to meet my childhood sweetheart in Houston. We had not seen each other since we were teens and surprisingly, I had business to attend to right in the city.

Soon after, my childhood beau and I fell in love a second time and quickly tied the knot. He was a former football player, the last of the Marlboro men.

Less than one year later, on my 40th birthday, I was shocked to find myself pregnant with my first child. I had already decided to leave my husband. It wasn’t working. He was scary and verbally abusive. Anger reigned supreme. We had the old marital disease called “irreconcilable differences”.

In truth, I had no idea how to be a wife to my two husbands. But I did know how to be glamorous and exciting! I thought these husbands were there to serve and support me and my success, whatever that was. I sure didn’t know.

I was confused by my feminist indoctrination. Being a wife and mother was clearly a degrading situation; it had no societal validation. It was out of the question. I wanted glamor and success.

My inner turmoil was palpable. Everything felt wrong. I was well set upon a dead-end path trying to prove my worth in a man’s world.

REFLECTIONS ON MY INDOCTRINATION

Somehow, I allowed myself to be pushed in a direction that felt false in my gut. But I was afraid to be judged by standards and rules deeply rooted in “Patriarchy.”

Feminism was no place for a fresh-faced young woman like me, naive and wholesome like we make ‘em in the Midwest. But I was hypnotized and lulled to sleep by the popular culture and the demands of the era.

This false agenda perverted my natural feminine instincts. It fostered instead, a quest to prove my worthiness in masculine terms.

My worthiness now compared and graded to that of a male. Which one of us had the ultimate right to exist and thrive in this world? I mean, it’s a competition now, right?

You can love someone you are competing with.

WAKING FROM THE EVIL SPELL

I can now lament at leisure my squandered youth and beauty. I thought it would last forever and a day ~ or, at least until I was tired of it. Don’t we all?

I seem to have done it all backwards.

Instead of painfully questing for my intrinsic worth as a female, in masculine terms, I could have been building a strong family unit, the strength of which could now shield me from the vicissitudes of 21st century life.

We have all suffered from a cruel deception. Many choose not to look. However, since I’ve been on the planet, the heterosexual bond has been the source and sustaining force for humanity.
I now clearly see the utter destruction of the human family. Can we collectively see that the battle of the sexes did not serve us?

The Satanist bankers knew what they were doing when they drove a stake between men and women.
 .
 
FOR YOUR ADDED PLEASURE, DEAR READERS, A PLETHORA OF QUOTES ON THE FEMINIST REVOLUTION AND AN INTRODUCTION TO THE INFLUENTIAL COMMUNIST, ANTONIO GRAMASCI.
.
FEMINISM IS ANOTHER FACET OF COMMUNISM
FEMINISM IS THE VEHICLE FOR COMMUNISM

Feminism was one of the many methods that little known Communist Antonio Gramsci proposed destroying the West with. He surmised that Capitalism was too strong and people too entrenched in their beliefs to ever fully embrace the class warfare of Marxism. Part of his Communist theory included inducing women into the workplace instead of family, promoting abortion, female independence from social norms, easy divorce, etc.

“Rid the law of individual rights and transform it into a bundle of group rights. Women are less concerned than men with abstract notions of justice, less preoccupied with what is 'right' and 'wrong,'" ~ Shirley Robin Letwin, "Law and the Unreasonable Woman", National Review, November 18, 1991, p. 35.
Like Marxism, feminism can explain everything from advertising to religion by following its single thread, the oppression of women." ~ Carol Iannone, "The Feminist Confusion," Second Thoughts: Former Radicals Look Back at the Sixties, eds. Peter Collier and David Horowitz (Lanham, MD: Madison Books, 1989), P. 149.

This successful ploy has become quite routine. I.E. "the oppression of homosexuals" "the oppression of fill in the blank with the ‘victim’ of your choice". 

"The Women's Caucus endorses Marxist-Leninist socialist thought". ~ Robin Morgan. Sisterhood is Powerful, pg 597

"An ideological movement is a collection of people many of whom could hardly bake a cake, fix a car, sustain a friendship or a marriage, or even do a quadratic equation, yet they believe they know how to rule the world." ~ Kenneth Minogue, "The Goddess That Failed", National Review, 18/11/91, p. 46.

‘Marxism and Feminism are one, and that one is Marxism’ ~ Heidi Hartmann and Amy Bridges, The unhappy marriage of Marxism and Feminism. ~ opening page of Chapter 1, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Catharine A. MacKinnon, 1989, First Harvard University Press (paperback in 1991) [a legal treatise comparing and contrasting feminism with COMMUNISM AND SOCIALISM])

‘Sexuality is to feminism what work is to Marxism’ ~ Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Catharine A. MacKinnon, 1989, First Harvard University Press. p. 3. 

.

Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, and Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism. ~ Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Catharine A. MacKinnon, 1989, First Harvard University Press. Page 10. (Catherine A. MacKinnon is a University of Michigan feminist law professor!! Do you think of her? Lawyers are learning Republican government OR are they learning Communism?)
“Love without marriage is holy, and that marriage without love is illegitimate... Advocates a free contract in marriage, and that separation may occur at the will of either "mate” Divorce shall be made easy. "Motherhood" is a mere animal function, and that even a cat may have kittens; that motherhood has been made too much of in the past. She Advocates with the Socialists that the State has a superior right to the parents over the nurture, conduct and education of the children. Advocates the "control of births" by artificial measures. Suggests that any woman may reject motherhood, and any woman with "mother love" may accept motherhood whether she is married or single. The Feminist is a man hater, except as she may be able to use him for her purposes. She claims that man has subjected her to "sex slavery" and "economical servitude," from which she demands "liberation," so she may be made a "free woman. ~ Benjamin V. Hubbard (Socialism, Feminism, and Suffragism, 1915, pp. 142-144)
.
"When I was in college it was the McCarthy era and that made me a Marxist." ~ Gloria Steinem. Outrageous Acts and Everyday Rebellions, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, 1983.

"There are, besides, eternal truths, such as Freedom, Justice, etc, that are common to all states of society. But communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes all religion, and all morality" ~ "The Essential Left" citing "The Manifesto of the Communist Party" ~ by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Barnes and Nobles, 1961. pg 34

"Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation, and destroy the male sex." ~ Valerie Solana, SCUM Manifesto (Society for Cutting Up Men.) This is clearly seditious and treasonous. 

'Women's liberation, if not the most extreme then certainly the most influential neo-Marxist movement in America, has done to the American home what communism did to the Russian economy, and most of the ruin is irreversible. By defining between men and women in terms of power and competition instead of reciprocity and cooperation, the movement tore apart the most basic and fragile contract in human society, the unit from which all other social institutions draw their strength.' ~ Harvard Professor Ruth Wisse.
"Feminism is the intellectual organization of gender hatred, just as Marxism was the intellectual organization of class hatred. Feminism's business is fashioning weapons to be used against men in society, education, politics, law, and divorce court. The feminist aim is to overthrow "patriarchal tyranny." In this undertaking, the male's civil rights count for no more than those of the bourgeoisie in Soviet Russia or the Jews in National Socialist Germany." ~ What civil rights have wrought. Paul Craig Roberts, July 26, 2000. Townhall.com ~ Creators Syndicate.

Modern feminism is a direct outgrowth of American Communism. Communists pioneered the political, economic and cultural analysis of woman’s oppression. Communists pioneered women’s studies, and advocated public daycare, birth control, abortion and even children’s rights. It is hard to escape the conclusion that feminism is Communism by another name. 

Having failed to peddle class war, Communism morphed into a movement dedicated to gaining power by promoting gender conflict. The diversity and multicultural movements represent feminism’s attempt to forge allegiances by empowering gays and people of color. Thus, the original CPUSA (Communist Party USA ~ CPUSA) trio of race, gender and class is very much intact but class conflict has never been a big seller.

Feminists wish to destroy a Western Civilization that is dominated by white men who believe in genuine diversity (pluralism), individual liberty and equal opportunity (but not equal outcomes). Many feminists are embarrassed to discover they are Communist dupes. They try to point out the differences between themselves and Marxists but these differences are matters of emphasis. Their embarrassment, however, is nothing compared to ours when we acknowledge that we have been subverted. They have taken over our minds. Feminists dominate the mass media and the education systems (both primary and secondary) and use these for indoctrination. They have great power in the legal system, many parts of government, and are currently subverting the military. The evidence is everywhere. The term “politically correct” originated in the Communist Party in Russia in the 1920’s. We use it every day to refer to adherence to feminist dogma. Communism is alive and well and living under an assumed name. ~ American Communism and the Making of Women’s Liberation. ~ Henry Makow Ph.D. Too Good Reports. October 3, 2001.
"Remember this: The strongest sign of the decay of a nation is the feminization of men and the masculinization of women. It is notable that in Communist nations women are exhorted, and compelled, to do what has traditionally been men's work. American women, some of them, feel triumphant that they have broken down the barricades between the work of the sexes. 
I hope they will still feel triumphant when some commissar forces a shovel or an axe into their soft hands and compels them to pound and cut forests and dig ditches. 

I hope they will be happy when a husband deserts them and they must support their children and themselves alone. After all, if a woman must be free. She shouldn’t object to men being free too, should she? 

I hope they will feel 'fulfilled' when they are given no more courtesies due to their sex and no kindnesses, but are kicked aside on the subways buses by men, and jostled out of the way by men on busy sidewalks and elevators.

I hope, when they look in their mirrors, that they will be pleased to see exhausted, embittered faces, and that they will be consoled by their paychecks." ~ Taylor Caldwell in 
"They’re Spoiling Eve's Great Con Game,"American Opinion, September 1970, page 8
“Our culture, including all that we are taught in schools and universities, is so infused with patriarchal thinking that it must be torn up root and branch if genuine change is to occur. Everything must go ~ even the allegedly universal disciplines of logic, mathematics, and science, and the intellectual values of objectivity, clarity, and precision on which the former depend." ~ A quote from Daphne Patai and Noretta Koertge, "Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies" (New York, Basic Books, 1994), p. 116

Women's lib is a "ladies" auxiliary of the radical left. The hard core embraces Marxism, although Gloria Steinem will admit only to being socialist. Prime purposes of feminism are to establish a lesbian-socialist republic and to dismantle the family unit. ~ The Declaration of Feminism or The Document

"The cultural institutions which embody and enforce those interlocked aberrations ~ for instance, law, art, religion, nation-states, the family, tribe, or commune based on father-right ~ these institutions are real and they must be destroyed." ~ Andrea Dworkin. From Chapter 9, "The Root Cause". As delivered at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, September 26, 1975. [This commentary is clearly subversive and designed to undermine the United States of America!]

Overthrowing capitalism is too small for us. We must overthrow the whole... patriarchy ~ Gloria Steinem, radical feminist leader, editor of 'MS' magazine.

"Radical feminism is the most destructive and fanatical movement to come down to us from the Sixties. This is a revolutionary, not a reformist, movement, and it is meeting with considerable success. Totalitarian in spirit, it is deeply antagonistic to traditional Western culture and proposes the complete restructuring of society, morality, and human nature." ~ From: Robert H. Bork (1996): Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline, Regan Books/HarperCollins, NY (pp.193-225) 
"Like Marxism, feminism can explain everything from advertising to religion by following its single thread, the oppression of women." ~ Carol Iannone, "The Feminist Confusion," Second Thoughts: Former Radicals Look Back at the Sixties, eds. Peter Collier and David Horowitz (Lanham, MD: Madison Books, 1989), P. 149.

"There are, besides, eternal truths, such as Freedom, Justice, etc, that are common to all states of society. But communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes all religion, and all morality" ~ Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. The Manifesto of the Communist Party. pg 34
.


Since economic Marxism was a failure, Gramsci reasoned that the only way to topple… Western institutions was by, what he called, a “long march through the culture.”  He repackaged Marxism in terms of a… “cultural war”… 
“Gramsci hated marriage and the family, the very founding blocks of a civilized society.  To him, marriage was a plot, a conspiracy... to perpetuate an evil system that oppressed women and children.  It was a dangerous institution, characterized by violence and exploitation, the forerunner of fascism and tyranny.  Patriarchy served as the main target of the cultural Marxists.  They strove to feminize the family with legions of single and homosexual mothers and ‘fathers’ who would serve to weaken the structure of civilized society.”
Another cultural Marxist (George Lukacs) brought the Gramscian strategy to the schools…  As deputy commissioner in Hungary… his first task was to put radical sex education in the schools… it was the best way to destroy traditional sexual morality, and weaken the family.  Hungarian children learned… free love, sexual intercourse, and the archaic nature of middle-class family codes, the obsolete nature of monogamy, and the irrelevance of organized religion which deprived man of pleasure.  Children were urged to deride and ignore… parental authority, and precepts of traditional morality.  If this sounds familiar, it is because this is what is happening in our public… schools.
Under the rubric of ‘diversity,’ its hidden goal is to impose a uniformity of thought and behavior on all Americans.  The cultural Marxists, often teachers, university professors and administrators, TV producers, newspaper editor and the like, serve as gatekeepers by keeping all traditional and positive ideas, especially religious ideas, out of the public marketplace. 
Herbert Marcuse was largely responsible for bringing cultural Marxism to the United States…  He believed that all taboos, especially sexual ones, should be relaxed.  “Make love, not war!” was his battle cry that echoed through ivy-covered college campuses all over America.  His methodology for rebellion included the deconstruction of the language, the infamous “what does ‘is’ mean?” which fostered the destruction of the culture.  By confusing and obliterating word meanings, he helped cause a breakdown in the social conformity of the nation, especially among the… young of America...
 
Marcuse said that women should be the cultural proletariat who transformed Western society.  They would serve as the catalyst for the new Marxist Revolution.  If women could be persuaded to leave their traditional roles as the transmitters of culture, then the traditional culture could not be transmitted to the next generation.

What better way to influence the generations than by subverting the traditional roles of women?  The Marxists rightfully reasoned that the undermining of women could deal a deadly blow to the culture.
If women were the target, then the Cultural Marxists scored a bull’s-eye. Women have traded the domestic tranquility of family and the home for the power surge of the boardroom and the sweaty release of casual sex.  Divorce court statistics, wife and child abandonment, abortion and even spousal murder can be laid at [the feminists] doorstep to a large degree.
Borst, William, Ph.D. American History.  A Nation of Frogs, the Mindszenty Report Vol. XLV-No.1 (January 2003) Cardinal Mindszenty was imprisoned by the Nazi’s and later by the Communists in Hungary.    Online version can be seen at http://www.mindszenty.org/report/2003/mr_0103.pdf  

Writing in the Winter 1996 issue of the Marxist journal Dissent, Michael Walzer enumerated some of the cultural victories won by the left since the 1960s:
*
"The visible impact of feminism." 
*
"The effects of affirmative action." 
*
"The emergence of gay rights politics, and … the attention paid to it in the media." 
*
"The acceptance of cultural pluralism." 
*
"The transformation of family life," including "rising divorce rates, changing sexual mores, new household arrangements ~ and, again, the portrayal of all this in the media." 
*
"The progress of secularization; the fading of religion in general and Christianity in particular from the public sphere ~ classrooms, textbooks, legal codes, holidays, and so on." 
*
"The virtual abolition of capital punishment." 
*
"The legalization of abortion."
*
"The first successes in the effort to regulate and limit the private ownership of guns."
*
Significantly, Walzer admitted… these victories were imposed upon our society by "liberal elites," rather than… "by the pressure of a mass movement or a majoritarian party."  These changes "reflect the leftism or liberalism of lawyers, judges, federal bureaucrats, professors, school teachers, social workers, journalists, television and screen writers ~ not the population at large," noted Walzer…  [T]he left focused on "winning the Gramscian war of position."

Cultural commentator Richard Grenier [notes Gramsci formulated] “the doctrine that those who want to change society must change man’s consciousness, and that in order to accomplish this they must first control the institutions by which that consciousness is formed: schools, universities, churches, and, perhaps above all, art and the communications industry.  It is these institutions that shape and articulate ‘public opinion,’ the limits of which few politicians can violate with impunity.  Culture, Gramsci felt, is not simply the superstructure of an economic base ~ the role assigned to it in orthodox Marxism ~ but is central to a society. His famous battle cry is:

CAPTURE THE CULTURE."

Gramsci recognized that the chief [obstacles] impeding… the triumph of Marxism were… those institutions, customs, and habits identified by Washington and the other Founding Fathers as indispensable to ordered liberty ~ such as the family, private initiative, self-restraint, and principled individualism.  But Gramsci focused particularly on what Washington described as the "indispensable supports" of free society ~ religion and morality.  

In order to bring about a revolution, Gramsci wrote, "The conception of law will have to be freed from every remnant of transcendence and absoluteness, practically from all moralist fanaticism."
Grigg, William.  Toward the Total State.The New American Vol. 15, No. 14.  July 5, 1999.  http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/1999/07-05-99/vo15no14_total.htm