DAVID ICKE POINTS OUT THE POWER OF INDIVIDUALS AND THE NET

 “It is possible nowadays for a government to be very much more oppressive than any government could be before there was scientific technique. 

Propaganda makes persuasion easier for the government; public ownership of halls and paper makes counter-propaganda more difficult; and the effectiveness of modern armaments makes popular risings impossible. 

No revolution can succeed in a modern country unless it has the support of at least a considerable section of the armed forces. But the armed forces can be kept loyal by being given a higher standard of life than that of the average worker, and this is made easier by every step in the degradation of ordinary labour. 

Thus the very evils of the system help to give it stability. 

Apart from external pressure, there is no reason why such a regime should not last for a very long time." ~ Bertrand Russell, “The Impact of Science on Society” (61)

The Rothschild's Death Star

Dear Reader,

It truly is a conundrum and a dilemma that we find ourselves in regarding the weird and wonderful world of party politics. As David Icke shows us in his observations of the U.K. and the USA (and, of course, we can include Canada, Australia, the European nations, and other so-called democratic nations around the world) any party that actually gains a significant amount of support from the general populace inevitably turns out to be one with roots buried deep within the synthetic soils of political Zionism.

This has been the case for so long now that most voters alive today have never actually had the opportunity to vote for any party that was other than those firmly entrenched in the Zionist propaganda paradigm. Thanks to the Zionist control of the media which ensures that only their parties and candidates of choice get any exposure, any new party with an actual agenda differing from the Zionist ones is destined to be vilified at best and then censored and left out of the bigger picture.

This being the reality, what actual options are therefore available to the growing mass of cyberians who now know this but still refuse to accept it? On the surface it would appear that the only two options are to

a) not bother getting involved in the political process in one's country or


b) try to work from within a particular party and see if one can affect any changes that way.

Failing these two the only third option would seem to be a resort to civil disobedience leading to actual violent revolution. 

This, of course, is what those within the Zionist camp are hoping will eventually occur. Then they'll be able to use their control of the established police forces and military to round up the dissidents and cart them off to camps or simply put a bullet in their heads as an example to anyone else who might think that such actions are going to bring about any radical changes.

The simple facts are that the Zionists now control the parameters that determine the outcome of the political process.

But what they don't control is the net or the abilities of people who know their game to creatively counter this apparent stalemate we seem to be caught in and to use this digital medium to initiate real and new forms of change that will first take root in cyberspace then flourish and blossom to such an extent that eventually the seed forms will precipitate downward into whatever constructive, organizations are created by the mass of cyber voters who desire to bring about real changes without having to resort to violent means.

Please let that last line sink in, readers. Arthur knows whereof he speaks!

I, and countless others, have maintained that the net is the Achilles Heel of the Zionist conspiracy to entrap and enslave the world. What we haven't yet come to realize though is how to utilize this tool in such a way that it will allow us to make the changes necessary to dismantle the imminent Zionist threat we all live under.

Maybe it's time we started moving in that direction. A first step would be to organize a whole new cyberian political system based upon cyber parties that were free to operate outside the constraints that the Zionists impose upon any individual or group who wishes to play the political game within their rules. This would free up the process and allow people to become active and to voice their opinions and ideas and actually have them heard rather than censored as we see happening in the Zionist media on a regular basis.

The net is sophisticated enough now to do these things and to empower people and motivate them and give them hope, something sorely lacking these days whenever we think about how to initiate meaningful changes without selling our souls to the Zionist political machine.

“Political freedom is a society’s safety valve, allowing the passionately critical a nonviolent way to express their dissatisfaction with the status quo.” ~  David Cole, “Quotes on Democracy”

It's an idea that needs to be developed. As David shows it won't develop within the framework of the Rothschild Zionist model. It can't. It's impossible. So rather than give up, we must create a new model that will allow the masses to express their sovereignty and their heart's desires.

The net is the key.

It's time to pick it up and open the door to a new future where peace and justice and environmental sanity will once again prevail.

As David says, "It's a choice." Our choice.

Shine your Light for Love, 

Peace and Justice for All,

Arthur Topham

Publisher/Editor

The Radical Press

Canada's Radical News Network

"Digging to the root of the issues since 1998"

http://www.radicalpress.com

radical@radicalpress.com

 “Freedom's just another word for nothing left to loose” ~ Janis Joplin

Copyright David Icke, 
2010. All Rights Reserved.

The David Icke Newsletter,
October 3rd 2010 

'LEFT', 'RIGHT' AND 'CENTRE' ...

... THE ILLUSION OF CHOICE

The rapid growth of the Internet and Internet technologies provides a renewed opportunity for international citizens to have their voices heard on a wide variety of issues, including their government, the corporations that have an increasing role in their economic security, and the unions that represent their labor interests. The Internet affords individuals the ability to exchange ideas on these and other issues with an ever-growing world community ~ an ability that no citizen in any previous society has had.

Hello all ...

The most effective and most unchallenged form of human control is that which the population doesn't see. Who is going to rebel about not being free when they think they are?

None are so hopelessy enslaved as those who believe they are free. ~ Goethe

Key to that illusion of freedom is the illusion of choice. Once people realise they have no choice in the force and agenda that governs their society, the penny drops that they live in a one-party state, a tyranny.

The task of any Control System, therefore, which has ambitions for long term pre-eminence, is to maintain the façade of political choice and central to this is 'the people's right to vote'. 

“It doesn’t matter who the people voted for; they always vote for us”. ~ Lenin

This is seen as the ultimate confirmation of a 'free' society ~ people can cast their vote every four or five years to 'choose' their government and so, by definition, they must live in a free country.

But, of course, the equation of democracy = freedom is a nonsense from the start. At best democracy is the dictatorship of the majority and in many 'democratic' countries governments are formed from less than half the votes anyway.

Freedom has its life in the hearts, the actions, the spirit of men and so it must be daily earned and refreshed – else like a flower cut from its life-giving roots, it will wither and die.~ Dwight D. Eisenhower

The population has been sold the lie that democracy means freedom to create a manipulated perception of 'freedom' behind which a tyranny can operate unseen and so unchallenged.

For a vote to be worth anything it must be cast as a choice between different political and policy options. If those options, with their different names, colours and rhetoric, are basically the same there is no choice and thus the vote is worthless. 


Americans were offered the "radical" alternatives in the last election between a black man or a woman. The fact that both were fully puppets of the Illuminati primed to intensify the same programmes their unpopular predecessor instigate never even crossed their minds. Their blind acceptance of the two runners satisfied their need to feel they had choice and radical options.

With this, the concept of a free country must fall, even under the illusory and tenuous definition of the right to vote meaning that you must be 'free'.

This is most obvious in places like South Africa where rule by the white minority (apartheid) has been replaced by the rule of black minority (democracy).

This might sound strange at first sight and I'll explain what I mean. If everyone has a vote then surely South Africa must be governed by the black majority? But this is not so, except in theory.

When apartheid unravelled, Nelson Mandela became head of the African National Congress (ANC) and then President of South Africa, and those two roles have been inseparable ever since. 

The ANC is really the OPS ~ One Party State.

The renewal of the non-proliferation treaty was described as important "for the welfare of the whole world and the new world order." ~ Nelson Mandela, in The Philadelphia Inquirer (October 1994)

The political system is structured to ensure that the ANC is so dominant, and the opposition so weak, that South Africa is little more than a one-party state masquerading as a free society.

It means that whoever is elected head of the ANC will become president of the country at the next national election ~ witness the examples of Thabo Mbeki and Jacob Zuma who followed Mandela as both heads of the ANC and South African presidents.

'It is so easy ~ the ANC cabal chose me and then they chose him. We love democracy.'

This is what I mean by the country being run by a black minority. The tiny clique of manipulators and in-fighters who decide the leader of the ANC are, in doing so, deciding the leader of South Africa. All the rest is mere window dressing. 

The scam is so blatant 

it is extraordinary that

more people can't see it.

The same theme of undemocratic 'democracies' can be found all over the 'free world', not least in the United States and Britain. I'll come to the US in a moment, but events in the last few months, indeed days, have proved this very point in the UK.

This week the opposition Labour Party of former prime minister and mass killer, Tony Blair, elected a new leader called Ed Miliband who defeated his brother, David Miliband, in a tight election.

Brothers at bore: winner Ed with David at the back.

Ed Miliband is being dubbed 'Red Ed' by the media because of his alleged 'left-wing' beliefs, but this just more baloney to hide the fact that Britain is a one-party state under three names ~ the Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties that currently operate a coalition government, and the Labour Party which ruled the country disgracefully for 13 years under the Rothschild puppet, Tony Blair, and his hapless successor, Gordon Brown.

The leader of the Conservative Party and now Prime Minister, David Cameron (Rothschild Zionist), will now be 'opposed' by the Labour Party's Ed Miliband (Rothschild Zionist) while the Liberal Democrat leader and current deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg, is one of those power-groupies who will do a deal with anyone to secure high office.

If you ask Clegg 'what are your policies and beliefs', his reply would be 'what would you like them to be?' If you are rich he will tell you that wealth creation must be encouraged and if you are poor he will say that there must be a fairer redistribution of wealth. The policies change with the audience.

What I am saying here is that all three leaders of the main political parties in Britain are standing on basically the same ground with only words to separate them in the public mind, and even then ever less so.

All three come from privileged backgrounds, went to the schools and universities that are conveyor belts for future political leaders, and all entered politics at an early age with minimal experience of the world the rest of us have to live in.

David Cameron ('Conservative') comes from a banking family steeped in royal and aristocratic bloodlines with close connections to the House of Rothschild. He attended the elite Eton College, where the royal children go, and went on to the Illuminati-owned Oxford University.

Eton has produced 20 British prime ministers while Oxford University has produced 26 ~ plus 28 overseas presidents and prime ministers. Eight of the last 12 British prime ministers have been Oxford graduates. 

Nick Clegg ('Liberal Democrat') is the son of the chairman of United Trust Bank and Clegg's paternal grandmother, Kira von Engelhardt, of German-Russian and Ukrainian origin, was a Baroness in Imperial Russia. His great-great grandfather was the Ukrainian nobleman, Ignaty Zakrevsky, an attorney general of the Imperial Russian senate.

Another kid off the street, then. Clegg attended the elite private Westminster School and then Cambridge University, an Illuminati bedfellow of Oxford and known together as 'Oxbridge'. He also studied in America at the University of Minnesota.

Ed Miliband (Labour) is the son of the Marxist intellectual Ralph Miliband and attended both Oxford University and that production line for Labour and Illuminati politicians, the London School of Economics, which was created, and is still controlled by, the Illuminati Fabian Society. He was also a visiting scholar at Harvard. 

These are three political leaders 

who claim to stand for different things,

but, in truth, occupy the same ground. 

They are all agreed on the basic structure of the system and society, that 9/11 and other false flag events happened as the official stories claim, that humans are causing 'climate change', and so on, and on.

Britain is a one-party state with no real choice of political options and this has been achieved through systematic manipulation over decades. The same in America and elsewhere.

Canada suffers this affliction as well, and has for decades.

Click here for details ...

I told the story in my 1995 book, ... And The Truth Shall Set You Free, of my meeting with a so-called Oxford 'don' (the name for a tutor/research fellow at Oxford University). Her name was Dr Kitty Little.

Her scientific career has included research for the Ministry of Aircraft Production during the Second World War, followed by nine years at the Atomic Energy Research Establishment at Harwell. She was also a long time researcher into the corruption and infiltration within British Intelligence.

In her conversation with me, and in her submission to the 1995 Nolan Committee on Standards in Public Life, she revealed an attempt to recruit her to the Communist Party at Oxford University in 1940.

She said that the communists had gone 'underground' by joining the university Labour Party and she attended a meeting of a Labour Party 'study group' in a room at University College. The organisers had falsely believed that Dr Little was 'one of them'.

The main speaker at the meeting, who clearly believed he was among friends, began to reveal the plot to 'destabilize the United Kingdom and Commonwealth, ready for a Marxist takeover'. She later realised that this was part of the plan to introduce a centralised global dictatorship.

Oxford University ~ a production line for Illuminati assets.

It is at Oxford where Cecil Rhodes Scholars such as Bill Clinton are sent for training, the place where those who are deigned "the brightest and the best" study.

The plot was outlined by the speaker at this Oxford meeting to destroy United Kingdom defences, engineer a Marxist takeover of Rhodesia and South Africa, and to use what became known as the European Union as a smokescreen to hide the changeover to a centralized, Marxist, rule of Europe.

Remember, this was all said in 1940 before there was any talk of even the European Common Market, or European Economic Community (EEC), from which the European superstate was developed via the technique I call the Totalitarian Tiptoe. The plan was also to destroy British manufacturing industry, the Oxford speaker said, something else that has demonstrably happened.

He said there was a 'subversive organization' with a political section and a 'biological section', the latter of which appears to have been headed by the late Lord Victor Rothschild, the infamous manipulator of British Intelligence.

Lord Victor Rothschild.

The speaker at the Oxford University meeting said that members of the political section were going to infiltrate the British parliament and civil service, some entering each of the political parties. Many would go into the right wing of the Labour Party (with its 'left-wing' image), others to the left wing of the Conservative Party (with its 'right wing' image). Eventually there would be a fusion into a new 'centre' party.

He said that the British distrusted extremists and so posing as 'moderates' occupying the centre ground would allow them to dismiss their opponents as 'right wing extremists'. This subversive organisation did not have a name, he said, because that would make it harder for people to prove it existed.

The speaker said that he had been chosen to be the head of the political section of this organisation and he expected himself one day to become the prime minister of the United Kingdom. All this was said in 1940 and that man did indeed become prime minister.

His name was Harold Wilson.

Wilson was the British prime minister throughout the period between 1964 and 1976, except for the four years between 1970 and 1974 when the Conservative Party leader, the Satanist and child-killer, Edward Heath, was in office. 

Harold Wilson and Ted Heath knew each other when they attended Oxford University (yet again), both were members of the Illuminati Bilderberg Group and close associates of Lord Victor Rothschild.

Wilson took over the Labour Party leadership with the death of Hugh Gaitskell in 1963. Significantly, Gaitskell was not in favour of a federal Europe and his death was very convenient because Wilson became leader at an opportune time that allowed him to quickly become the prime minister. 

It is quite amazing how often this seems to happen. The number of times in the last 20 years is of course, just a coincidence, nothing much to worry about. It seems that this is what happened with Arnold Schwarzenegger when he took over California. 

Not by co-incidence, I would suggest, a similar situation happened in 1994 when the Labour leader, John Smith, died at just the right time for Tony Blair to take over and later become prime minister for a decade.

As I say, nothing to worry about, case made!

So now here we are in the very situation that Harold Wilson predicted in 1940. Britain has three major political parties and two are now in a coalition government with the opposition Labour Party not a stone's throw away from them in terms of policy and direction, despite the propaganda.

As I have been saying for so long, the conspiracy is not put together on the hoof; it is planned in much detail decades and more in advance with its personnel and stooges carefully developed from an early age to play their part.

That is one reason Bush HAD to win those two elections and Al Gore stepped down so lightly. They are all in on the same plot after all.

Four of a kind.

This is most certainly the case with Barack Obama, Boy George Bush, Bill Clinton, Father George Bush and so on, and it is no surprise, therefore, that America is also a one-party state where the name of the president changes, but little else.

The apparent differences have to be 'spun' and manufactured by way of the president's rhetoric, for, in substance, there are none. No-one could have appeared more different from Boy George Bush than Barack Obama during his election campaigns and yet nothing has changed. 

That "change" which was not, given the nod of approval by Oprah Winfrey in front of millions upon millions of well heeled white voters, almost guaranteed the stripling Obama his win. But we all know now, there was no change really.

Bush served the interests of the bankers and oil companies; Obama does the same; 

Bush sent troops into Afghanistan and Iraq; Obama has massively increased troop numbers in Afghanistan and still has 50,000 in Iraq while selling the lie that the US has pulled the troops out; Bush used Guantanamo Bay to incarcerate and torture often innocent people; Obama said he would close it within a year, but it's still open.

The buzz-word to sell and promote the illusion of choice is ... change ... and they are all at it now. Obama's campaigns were founded on the constant repetition of the word 'change' to hide the fact that he was business-as-usual.

David Cameron's campaign to be prime minister was based on him 'standing for change' and this week the new Labour leader, Ed Miliband, said that his party, which spent 13 years devastating Britain's economy, fighting engineered wars and rolling out the Orwellian State, now stood for 'change'. Then we have Sarah Palin (a female Boy Bush with an intellect to match) talking about 'standing for change' as she targets a run for president in 2012. 

Pull the bloody other one. 'Change' is just a holding position to entrap the public mind in the 'hope' that the next political glove-puppet will make some positive difference. This is like sitting on a carousel horse hoping that you will eventually catch the one in front. Don't hold your breath.

The Illuminati-instigated 'Tea Party' movement was devised to capture those who wanted a means to rebel against particularly the Republican Party and the way it offers no policy alternative to the Democrats.

But how can anything be 'change'. or indeed be taken seriously as a political 'revolution', when its 'darling' is Sarah 'Change' Palin, the ludicrous vice-presidential candidate who was brought in specifically to undermine any chance that the elderly John McCain had of beating Obama in 2008. 

The Tea Party movement is a blind alley, a cul-de-sac, because the system is not going to be changed through politics when politics as we know it was created from the start by the bloodline families to serve their interests after the population began to rebel against the overt dictatorship of royalty and aristocracy.

The crown and coronet became the dark suit and the 'ballot box' with the same force in control.

True rebellion and real change can only come when we begin to stop co-operating en masse with the system that enslaves us and seeks to make that slavery even more fierce and extreme.

It will not change if we think that the only way forward is to enter the system to change the system. It's been tried and it doesn't work because the system swallows up the rebel until he or she becomes the system.

Only when we stop co-operating with our own enslavement can that enslavement end. The rest is diversion.

It's a choice.

OUR CHOICE!

True individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.~ Franklin D. Roosevelt, (1882-1945) Thirty-second President of the USA.

Freedom is not the right to do what we want, but what we ought. Let us have faith that right makes might and in that faith let us; to the end, dare to do our duty as we understand it.

Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves. ~ Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) Politician. President of the United States.

The will of the people is the only legitimate foundation of any government, and to protect its free expression should be our first object.~ Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) Politician. President of the United States.

True individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) Third president of the United States.

The unity of freedom has never relied on uniformity of opinion.~ Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882-1945) Thirty-second President of the USA.

The cost of freedom is always high, but Americans have always paid it. And one path we shall never choose, and that is the path of surrender, or submission. ~ John F. Kennedy (1917-1963) Thirty-fifth President of the USA

Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.~ John F. Kennedy (1917-1963) Thirty-fifth President of the USA

 

Free will is not the liberty to do whatever one likes, but the power of doing whatever one sees ought to be done, even in the very face of otherwise overwhelming impulse. There lies freedom, indeed.~  Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968) American black leader.

Liberty is the right to choose, freedom is the result of that choice.~ Unknown Source

The law will never make men free, it is men that have to make the law free. ~ Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) American naturalist, poet and philosopher.