Thank you SO MUCH to whoever shared a link to this page last week. I went out and the visitors were few since I had posted on Saturday am. When I got home it was in the thousands. So thank you so much whoever you are. It really is gratifying to see those numbers, shallow woman I am to think that way. But, even better are your comments and suggestions.
Be well, all of you, and be grateful for your every day.
We cite Rorschach because, as is the case with other meaningless ink blots, everyone interpreted Comey's remarks however they wanted: the Right sees Trump as completely exonerated, and the Left believes they heard so much dirt that they can't decide whether to take the time to impeach the President or simply march on the White House with pitchforks and torches and burn the building down while he's still inside.
The reality, as nearly as we can tell, is that Trump didn't do anything legally wrong when talking to Comey about Mike Flynn and the Russian investigation. But in true snowflake-style, Comey is now interpreting his own bizarre feelings and fantasies related to that conversation as proof of wrongdoing.
Comey, who is dishonest and Machiavellian but no fool, is fully aware that Trump did nothing to obstruct justice ~ but he was spinning like a Dervish trying to imply otherwise. Which makes it fortunate that he no longer runs the Federal Bureau of Implication.
Comey did occasionally share interesting truths, including his concern that former DOJ head Loretta Lynch had been compromised during her meeting with Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac. He additionally confirmed that Lynch asked him (which in Comey's mind is apparently a direct order) to refer to Hillary's criminal investigation as a "matter" ~ which Comey subsequently did, even though he freely admits that it was a lie designed only to help Hillary's image during election season.
All in all, his testimony showed only that Trump can be ham-handedly (but legally) direct when expressing his thoughts... and that Comey (among others associated with Obama and Clinton) has genuinely made a practice of obstructing justice by attempting to interpret the hints, nuances, and implied desires of his political masters.
Because a nod is as good as a wink when justice isn't intended to be blind.