Showing posts with label ADL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ADL. Show all posts
Wednesday, 23 August 2017
How the Jews Won the Battle of Charlottesville
ED Noor: What it really boils down to is , there is no "left" vs "right". It is (((Them))) vs Us. Plain and simple. The same folks infiltrate everything they can and then foment. It is up to us to be aware of this and scrutinize the persona and motivation of everything and everyone with an equally discerning eye. It is time for folks to wise up and get with the programme because we really are in the throes of war, a civil war, and the stakes are high ~ the future.
August 21, 2017
“We have been working on the ground and behind the scenes leading up to, during, and after the rally.” ~ Anita Gray, regional director of the Anti-Defamation League.
It was the
best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the high point in a period of
increasing Alt Right confidence and activism, and it was the moment that marked
our first major clash with the globalist hydra. In the wake of Charlottesville,
the System that we now find ourselves in more or less open conflict with has
followed its dissemination of false narratives of the day’s events with
opportunistic boldness and a series of actions.
In the first
few days after ‘Unite the Right’, an event which saw the apparently
co-ordinated ambush of White Identitarian attendees, various arms of the Alt
Right have suffered logistical attacks on their internet-based activities,
Steve Bannon has left the White House, the myth of the ‘right wing extremist’
has been resurrected with a vengeance, and dangerous precedents have been
established on the vital issues of internet freedom and freedom of speech. We
are, to a greater degree than any point in recent memory, backed into a corner.
However,
despite these strained circumstances, and the hectic and confused media
coverage of events in Virginia, it is crucial to understand that none of these actions and reactions
against the Alt Right have been spontaneous or ad hoc.
Rather, what we have witnessed is the culmination of intensive efforts by our opponents to forge a hegemonic anti-White interface encompassing Jewish ethnic activists, the police, all levels of government, Antifa, and the incentivized agents of globalism and Cultural Marxism.
In the
following essay I want to step back from the finer points of events in
Charlottesville in order to illustrate and contextualize some of the broader
patterns of Jewish activity that are in evidence.
*****
The most
important aspect of the ‘Unite the Right’ rally was that it wasn’t allowed to
go ahead. In this regard, we are supposed to believe that local police botched
the placement of opposing factions, and then had a knee-jerk reaction to the
resultant early disturbances, subsequently (and conveniently) declaring a state
of emergency and ending the rally before it began.
The apparent
surprise of leading Alt Right figures to this forced abortion was puzzling to
me, not least because the actions of Charlottesville police were entirely
predictable in light of emerging patterns of Jewish-orchestrated law
enforcement indoctrination, and the fact that the expression of White Identitarian
ideas are on course to be exiled beyond the bounds of legal protection.
Setting
aside the fact that police forces throughout the West are now politicized to an
unprecedented degree, they are now regularly subjected to intensive
indoctrination with propaganda produced and disseminated by Jewish
organizations, the ADL and the Jewish-funded and Jewish-staffed SPLC foremost
among them. Moving forward as a movement, it is imperative that the complicity
of law enforcement in hostile actions is anticipated and taken into account
when formulating street actions and other areas of political and social
strategy.
ED Noor: Another result is that the Charlottesville
riot hastened the removal of Confederate monuments throughout the US. City
and state governments seek solution of what to do with the "controversial"
statues.
The
involvement of Jewish activist organizations in the politicization and
weaponization of law enforcement, in the form of ‘race training,’ is little
discussed in our circles, but it is well-attested. The earliest forms of ‘race
training’ were pioneered by Jewish academic Judy Katz, who formulated a program called ‘White Awareness Training,’ also the
title of her handbook published in 1978. The program was built on the premise that
“racism is a pathological condition from which white people suffer, and by
which they are subsequently immobilized. The program concentrates on
enabling white people to take responsibility for tackling their own racism and
that of other whites at a personal level, and to act on this in their
subsequent lives.”
The format
was eagerly adopted by the Anti-Defamation League, and by 2013 the ADL began describing itself as “the foremost
non-governmental organization in the United States that offers law enforcement
training on terrorism, extremism, and hate crimes.” During the period
2003–2013 the ADL claims to have trained “well over 100,000 federal, state,
local, and military law enforcement officers.” This ‘training’ consists of
the intensive indoctrination of attendees with the ADL’s own hyperbolic and
extremely biased ideology on matters such as White identity politics and
multiculturalism; it is offered free of charge as an added incentive for
departments to participate. Far from involving mere beat cops and detectives,
even the very highest ranks are drawn into the ADL’s ‘education’ network.
The ADL
boasts that “more than 1000 law enforcement executives and commanders” have
graduated from its programs, which includes a course on “implicit bias” and
another titled “Lessons of the Holocaust.” The ‘lessons’ in question are that
everyone involved in law enforcement has a duty to ensure a ‘tolerant,’ ‘diverse,’
and ‘multicultural’ society, and the definition of these terms is of course
fully in keeping with Jewish interests.
Agencies
subscribed to this program include “the Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S.
Secret Service, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, while local
departments include the Washington, D.C., Metropolitan Police Department, the
Philadelphia Police Department, and dozens more. It has also been incorporated
into the curriculum of the FBI National Academy, the FBI National Executive
Institute, and the FBI Law Enforcement Executive Development Seminar. In
addition to the original program in Washington, DC, it is also now offered in
Los Angeles, Tampa, Nassau County (NY), Houston, and St. Louis.”
In short, every influential arm of American law enforcement is now under the propaganda reach of one of the most malicious and insidious Jewish activist groups.
Such
‘educational’ links breed wider and deeper associations and levels of
co-operation. The ADL, by its own admission, was working intensively “behind
the scenes” with police and government networks in Charlottesville. Anita Gray,
regional director of the Anti-Defamation League, told one Jewish media outlet in the aftermath of ‘Unite
the Right’:
We have been working on the ground and behind the scenes leading up to during and after the rally. Our Center on Extremism has been collaborating with law enforcement for weeks, providing intelligence on the various white supremacist groups who subsequently showed up in Charlottesville, and investigating specific threats in real time. We remain in close contact with law enforcement, elected officials, community leaders and others and continue to provide critical research, resources and community support. All of our offices have been working around the clock to respond, inform and take action [emphasis added].
Gray’s
statement can be interpreted with little effort as meaning that the ADL stepped
up its ‘educational’ efforts with law enforcement in Charlottesville,
saturating both the local police department and presumably also the state
police with horror stories warning of dire potentialities at the hands of White
Identitarians, no doubt invariably described in their seminars as ’domestic
terrorists.” Even if the shambolic handling of the opposing factions in the
city was not pre-planned ~ a theory I am reluctant to totally discount, it was
pre-ordained by virtue of the fact that law enforcement had been primed by
Jewish ethnic activists to view the event as being potentially violent on a
catastrophic scale. This for a rally of moderate size intended merely to protest
the removal of a historical monument.
Media
exaggerations aside, and despite the placement of opposing sides in close
proximity, the aborted event was not the scene of catastrophic violence or
city-wide disturbance. More destructive violence has been witnessed at Black
Lives Matter rallies or, indeed, in any given weekend in cities like Detroit or
Chicago.
However, in a media masterstroke, Charlottesville became the subject of a carefully orchestrated ‘moral panic,’ which was relentlessly stoked until it was ‘hot’ enough to be tactically useful to Jewish interests, and to the achievement of Jewish goals which have hitherto proven elusive.
I have to
confess to being taken aback by the skill with which this ruse was presented. I
was in Europe as events unfolded in Charlottesville, but on the day of the
rally I was in close contact with a number of participants. I followed
proceedings via a combination of their communications, a separate live feed,
and the mainstream media. A disparity between what was actually taking place,
and the mainstream media narrative was almost immediately apparent.
In the
European mainstream media, the rally was presented exclusively as a ‘hate
rally’ organized by neo-Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan, and was very often linked
to a putative ‘rise in hate’ caused by the election of Donald Trump. The steady
erosion of the White racial presence in America ~ the broader theme of ‘Unite
the Right’ ~ was totally absent, as was the exceptionally restrained behavior
of the overwhelming majority of Identitarian attendees. The mass audience was
thus primed from the beginning to perceive events in a biased manner.
Although I
despise his Marxist affiliations, I’ve always agreed with Slavoj Žižek that the Left is addicted to its failures and
notions of victimhood in order that it might deny that it is in, or has ever
genuinely held, power. Such a position, described by Žižek as a
‘comfortable position of resistance,’ is what permits the Left to indulge in
such fantasies as “real socialism has never been tried” or “Communism would
have worked if only….” It also permits it to assert un-ironically that we
currently live in a quasi-fascistic society.
Taking the
ideas of Žižek further, I argue that radical factions of the Left make even
more of a fetish of victmhood. As such, the radical Left craves situations in
which its members may be killed ~ the ultimate form of victimhood, and perhaps
the only one remaining to it since the Marxist social form is now, by all
cultural and political metrics, in power.
It is my contention that many of the highly neurotic White elements of
Antifa, often from wealthy backgrounds yet preaching ‘class warfare,’ engage in
extreme violence primarily in order that they may have extreme violence visited
upon them. Antifa’s intellectually and emotionally dubious
act of obstructing and attacking moving vehicles is an excellent case study in
this regard, and in Charlottesville the Left received its martyr with gory
glee, screaming through the tears with an apparent mixture of horror and
satisfaction.
ED
Noor: Just consider the act of bird dogging practiced by so many leftists
during Trump rallies in 2016; paid protesters (including an old woman who
provided exceptional film footage never showing the acts of antagonism that led
to the incident). “Bird dogging” and consists of getting in someone’s face and
driving them to violence. Antifa members have done this again and again and
again.
The
hagiography of the British M.P. Jo Cox illustrated well the fact that the Left
cherishes its martyrology. It is so rarely confronted with victims by its
opposing ideology that it can name them, praise them, remember them, and bestow
secular sainthood upon them. By contrast,
the untold millions of faceless and nameless victims of Communism, and the
untold tens of thousands of forgotten victims of multicultural and Islamist
violence, are simply too much for the Right to fully digest and venerate.
We drown in the glut of our martyrswhile the Left gloriesin the personal touchafforded by the paucity of its fallen.
The death of
Heather Heyer, detached in Leftist minds from its questionable circumstances,
was somehow much-needed ‘proof’ that the Alt Right really were ‘domestic
terrorists.’ This ‘proof’ in hand, the media, the political establishment, the
hostile cultural apparatus, the ‘deep state,’ and the technocracy in Silicon
Valley could move into over-drive in their generation of, and response to, an
entirely artificial moral panic.
ED Noor: "She died for a reason," Felicia Correa, a law firm client who once
sought help from Heyer said. "I don't see any difference in her or a
soldier who died in war. She, in a sense, died for her country." Pardon me, but is not a martyr one who purposefully places him/herself in a position of danger to risk proving a point? Ms. Heyer just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Meanwhile, there is a large movement to commemorate her death by building a monument to replace the Confederate history now removed. All part of the agenda to remove the past from the public eye, to bring the people into the eternal now of Communism.
On the
whole, European mainstream media attention to the non-event in Charlottesville
lasted an astonishing three full days, and at time of this writing some
newspapers are still trying to drain a few more drops of coverage and
commentary. In air-time and spilled ink it approximates coverage devoted to
instances of Islamic terror and eclipses Western coverage devoted to serious
terrorist incidents in the Middle East.
Much of the
reason for this can be found in the way Charlottesville has been packaged for
mass consumption. Media narratives have been attempting to spin the banned
rally as some kind of defining historical moment ~ a litmus test for the
tolerance of contemporary society and the tattered, rotting remains of Obama’s
‘post-racial’ vision of America.
Jews have
clearly been prominent in this ‘packaging’ process. Most recently, Rep. Steve
Cohen of Tennessee announced he is introducing articles of impeachment against
President Trump, citing his grievance with the latter’s response to events in
Virginia. In a lengthy statement, predictably full of misrepresentations and
hyperbole, Cohen said:
“I have expressed great concerns about President Trump’s ability to lead our country in the Resolution of No Confidence (H.Res. 456) that I introduced in July with 29 of my colleagues; however, after the President’s comments on Saturday, August 12 and again on Tuesday, August 15 in response to the horrific events in Charlottesville, I believe the President should be impeached and removed from office. Instead of unequivocally condemning hateful actions by neo-Nazis, white nationalists and Klansmen following a national tragedy, the President said ‘there were very fine people on both sides.’ There are no good Nazis. There are no good Klansmen. …When I watched the videos from the protests in Charlottesville, it reminded me of the videos I’ve seen of Kristallnacht in 1938 in Nazi Germany. It appeared that the Charlottesville protesters were chanting ‘Jews will not replace us’ and ‘blood and soil,’ an infamous Nazi slogan, as they marched with torches that conjured up images of Klan rallies. None of the marchers spewing such verbiage could be considered ‘very fine people’ as the President suggested. …As a Jew and as an American and as a representative of an African American district, I am revolted by the fact that the President of the United States couldn’t stand up and unequivocally condemn Nazis who want to kill Jews and whose predecessors murdered 6 million Jews during the Holocaust, and could not unequivocally condemn Klansmen whose organization is dedicated to terrorizing African Americans. President Trump has failed the presidential test of moral leadership. No moral president would ever shy away from outright condemning hate, intolerance and bigotry. No moral president would ever question the values of Americans protesting in opposition of such actions, one of whom was murdered by one of the white nationalists.”
While there
is much that could be unpacked from this vulgar, disingenuous, and ultimately
subversive document, the stand-out features for our purposes are that Cohen
presents the ‘Unite the Right’ rally as a post-modern Kristallnacht (historians
now agree that the original Kristallnacht was itself a media-exaggerated moral
panic), and the context in which it took place as being one in which the
imminent genocide of Jews in America is a distinct possibility.
Cohen’s
emphasis on Trump’s duty to be a ‘moral president’ (the phrase is notably
repeated) is intended both to underscore the expectation that holders of public
office or influence (much like the indoctrination of law enforcement) have a
duty to the new ‘moral’ paradigms of tolerance and diversity underpinning the
modern multicultural globalist state, and to signal to the general public that
this criterion should dominate their own political and social behaviors.
The framing of Charlottesville as a serious moral crisis has also enabled influential figures in Silicon Valley to abandon previously held principles such as free speech and freedom of the internet.
This is
potentially the most catastrophic consequence of events in Virginia because the
precedent has now been set for internet censorship based on the same interplay
of ‘morals’ and politics espoused by Cohen. Much like the indoctrination of law
enforcement by the ADL, the foundations for internet censorship had already long been laid by Jewish activist
organizations. During the last four years the ADL and similar
organizations in Europe have lobbying against ‘cyberhate’ and forming ‘working
groups’ with access to the highest levels of leading internet providers, civil
society, the legal community, and academia. Multiple consultations have also
been held with representatives of Facebook, Google/YouTube, Microsoft, Twitter,
and Yahoo. The Southern Poverty Law Center and affiliated groups have also
lobbied financial platforms such as PayPal with the goal of having access to
those platforms denied to organizations deemed to be ‘hate groups’ by
multi-culturalists.
Until
Charlottesville, intensive Jewish lobbying for internet censorship hasn’t been
as successful as those behind it might have hoped (I’ve previously written in more detail about this topic). However, the moral panic
surrounding Charlottesville enabled these Jewish groups to finally claim a
number of prominent scalps in record time, with internet-based actions taken by
Google, PayPal, CloudFlare, and Facebook against the Daily Stormer, the
National Policy Institute, Radix Journal, Identity Europa, VDare,
Counter-Currents and many individuals and smaller associations linked to the
Alt Right.
Again, while the moral panic provided the indignation and immediate emotional cover for these actions to take place, the ideological foundations for such moves against internet freedom were pre-existing.
ED
Noor: Much like the extensive Patriot Act was ready to go within a few weeks of
September 11, 2001.
Jewish
agitation against the Trump administration also pre-existed Charlottesville,
but the moral panic appears to be hitting the White House hard. The full
details of the departure of Steve Bannon from the Trump administration are yet
to be divulged in full, but it appears a tremendous coincidence that Bannon,
long smeared as a racist and anti-Semite by the Jewish press, should leave
within a week of the media swindle on Virginia. It has certainly been greeted
as another Jewish victory, with the Huffington Post even adopting the
headline “Goy, Bye!” to celebrate Bannon’s exit.
ED
Noor: That very title, Goy Bye, is indicative of overt Jewish triumphalism, a
taunt invested with a distinctly racial overtone. There must have been much
mirth over that one. The Talmudization of America is now openly on display contradicting the message that Jews do not control the media. Note: An enterprising Jewish-owned company is already marketing a clothing line with the logo "Goy Bye" emblazoned across the chest.
Organized
Jewish groups in Congress, the media, and society have also, like Steve Cohen,
taken Charlottesville as their cue to commence renewed attacks on Trump, who
continues to refuse to grovel to the extent dictated by Jewish tastes. Trump’s
inclusion of Leftist agitators in his denunciation of Charlottesville, and his
insistence that there were still some good people on both sides, led the
Republican Jewish Coalition to issue a statement “calling upon President Trump to provide greater
moral clarity in rejecting racism, bigotry, and antisemitism.”
Marvin Hier,
founder and dean of the Los Angeles Simon Wiesenthal Center was given a media
platform to utter the banal and meaningless remark: “No one, whether
Republican, independent or a Democrat … wants to see the Klan or Nazis parading
down the streets of the United States, as if they’re taking over. No one could
ever compare neo-Nazis, the Klan and white supremacists to demonstrators that
are demonstrating against them. To equate the two sides is preposterous.”
Rabbi Elazar
Muskin, president of the Rabbinical Council of America, returned to Steve
Cohen’s ‘moral leadership’ devices for his statement, in which he argued that
“There is no moral comparison. Failure to unequivocally reject hatred and bias
is a failing of moral leadership and fans the flames of intolerance and
chauvinism.”
Whether or
not Charlottesville was a battle in the physical sense, it certainly became so
in the immediate aftermath of the day’s events. In the battle for narratives
and results, it is an unfortunate fact that Jewish interests, at time of this
writing, appear to be triumphant. This is largely the case because of the
manner in which Charlottesville played into longer-term Jewish strategic efforts.
This is not, and should not be, a ‘black pill’ moment, or a cause for undue despair.Charlottesville was, after all, merely a single battle in a broad conflict older than any of us.There will be other battles, and the war is far from over.
It is crucial,
however, that some lessons are learned. A summary of lessons from
Charlottesville should include the realization that law enforcement are not
there to protect your rights or keep you safe. They are pre-programmed by our
opponents to despise you and your ideology, and they will always view you,
despite all evidence to the contrary, as the primary danger.
Another
realization should be that our internet activity, the élan vital of the
contemporary movement, has a half-life in the sense that our opponents will try
to further restrict our online presence. We will need to be creative in
developing a Plan B. A further realization should be that the primary
importance of street activity is always going to be in relation to internal
impacts ~ the development of cohesion and trust.
As long as
mass narratives are determined by the hostile media, our street activities, no
matter how benign and polished, will be invariably portrayed as the worst of
the worst.
Perhaps a final realization is that we should make hay while the sun shines, by which I mean that entrenched interests are simply not going to rest until Trump fails utterly in even his most modest attempts to resist globalism, and disappears from political life.
I believe
that although Trump isn’t perfect, with Bannon gone, he is effectively all that
we have left in terms of a powerful political figure at the top level
advocating for ideas even remotely congruent to our own. We need to capitalize
on every minute he is in power.
For now, our
primary focus should be on letting our opponents know that we’ve weathered the
storm. They’ve raised their game, and the spotlight is now on us. If they
wanted an escalation, they should know that we aim to please.
Saturday, 10 September 2011
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: SPEAKING THE TRUTH ABOUT 9/11 IS ANTI-SEMITIC
Posted: September 2, 2011
Being labeled an “anti-Semite” is an honor these days. All it means is someone who is against the Jewish criminal gang that dominates the global power structure. In our Orwellian world, “anti-Semite” and “American patriot” are actually synonymous.
Simply accurately describing the most influential faction of the crime gang that sits atop the global power structure, which controls the United States government, media, and banking system, is anti-Semitic according to a lot of people, and that’s fine with me. We need to continue to point out that these are the same people who did 9/11, and if that’s anti-Semitic, so be it.
Stating these obvious facts is not the most politically correct thing to do, but it needs to be said if we are ever going to regain control of our country and our future. I get e-mail updates from the Anti-Defamation League, and in the latest e-mail I came across this article entitled, “Decade of Deceit: Anti-Semitic 9/11 Conspiracy Theories 10 Years Later.”
Being the raging anti-Semite that I am, I was really interested in this article. In the introduction, the ADL laments the fact that people actually know who pulled off the FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOBon 9/11:
In the ten years since the September 11 terrorist attacks on America, conspiracy theories surrounding the attacks have become an entrenched propaganda industry. These assaults on memory and history attempt to place blame for the attacks on sources other than Al Qaeda, such as the U.S. government.
Prominent among such 9/11 conspiracy theories are those that make the anti-Semitic claim that Jews ~ whether Israeli, American, or both ~ were involved in planning and executing the attacks. This anti-Semitic faction is only a part of the so-called “9/11 truth movement,” yet it is vocal and pervasive, particularly on the Internet.
That’s right, it’s anti-Semitic to state the fact that the only people actually arrest on 9/11 were Jewish spies and military operatives directly from Israel. It’s now common knowledge that federal agencies of the United States government actually uncovered an elaborate, sophisticated, and state sponsored espionage operation involving Israeli intelligence and military operatives posing as art students as a cover for engaging in espionage at numerous federal facilities, buildings, and military bases.
I’d like to present the Detailed Summary (beginning on page 49) of the Gerald Shea Memo, which was prepared for the National Commission On Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (9/11 Commission), the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and the House Permanent Committee on Intelligence in September of 2004 shortly after the 9/11 Commission released its report coverup:
Set forth below is a detailed summary of the tentative conclusions reached in this memorandum, which amply illustrate the urgent need for a public inquiry into the activities of the Israeli DEA Groups and the Israeli New Jersey Group. The inquiry must include, without limitation, the examination of members of the Israel Groups and related persons; officials of the Israeli government and certain of its agencies, including Mossad; FBI suspects, agents of the DEA, the INS and the FBI; certain local law enforcement officials; agents of the CIA (in camera to the extent required); other intelligence sources cited by the public press to the extent possible; the boxes of documents and computer hard drives (referred on page 29) seized by the FBI from the Israeli New Jersey Group; and of all other relevant documents, reports, communiqués and information.
1. The Israeli DEA Groups were spying on the Drug Enforcement Agency and thus upon the United States. The DEA itself has concluded that they were probably engaged in organized intelligence gathering on our soil.
2. A highly regarded American journal knowledgeable about Israeli affairs, has concluded
(a) based on its own sources, that the Israeli DEA Groups were spying on radical Islamic networks suspected of links to Middle East terrorism, and
(b) based on the representations of a former American intelligence official regularly briefed on these matters by law enforcement officials, that(i) at least two members of the Israeli New Jersey Group were Mossad operatives,
(ii) Urban Moving, the company used by the Israeli New Jersey Group, was a front for Mossad and its operatives, and
(iii) the Israeli New Jersey Group was spying on local Arabs.
3. The intelligence sources of a substantial American television network report that the Israeli DEA Groups may have gathered information about the September 11 attacks in advance, and not shared it with the United States. One investigator said that evidence linking the Israeli DEA Groups to such intelligence gathering was classified and could not be disclosed.
4. The Israeli DEA Groups were comprised of 125 or more Israelis operating on our soil. Their leaders and apparent associates included military commanders and experts with military backgrounds in intelligence, electronic intercepts and telecommunications.
5. The wiretapping and intelligence expertise of members of both Israeli Groups, and the use of vans in local neighborhoods where the future hijackers were planning the attacks, and the extensive use by the hijackers of cell phones and land lines, made the Israeli Groups ideally suited to gather information regarding the hijackers’ plans.
6. The principal operation of the Israeli DEA Groups was located in and around Hollywood, Florida, the central training and staging ground for the hijacking of North and South Tower Planes and the Pennsylvania Plane. The addresses and places of residence of the members of the Israeli DEA Groups in Hollywood itself were within hundreds of yards those of the future hijackers.
7. The operations of both the Israeli New Jersey Group and the hijackers of the Pentagon Plane were centered in Hudson and Bergen Counties in New Jersey, within a common radius of about six miles.
8. All five celebrating members of the Israeli New Jersey Group arrested on September 11 were aware, when the North Tower Plane struck the World Trade Center, based on their immediate reaction to the attack and the information said to be contained in their van, that the attack had been planned and carried out by Arab terrorists.
9. After being questioned by the FBI on September 11, the leader of the Israeli New Jersey Group immediately fled the United States to Israel. His name and aliases appear, along with those of the hijackers and other FBI suspects, on the May 2002 FBI Suspect list.
10. Israeli intelligence officials have reported that two senior officials of Mossad warned the United States in August 2001 that as many as 200 terrorists on American soil were planning an imminent large-scale attack on high visibility targets on the American mainland. One press report states that in August Mossad provided the CIA with the names of future hijackers Khaled al Mihdhar and Nawaf al Hazmi.
11. The CIA’s explanation of how Mihdhar’s and Hazmi’s names were placed on the Watchlist through the spontaneous efforts of CIA and FBI agents is not only difficult to follow but, as the sole reason for the Watchlisting, hardly credible.
12. Mossad’s own information appears to have come from its sources inside the United States. All of the facts and circumstances set forth in this memorandum appear to show that Mossad’s two likely sources of information were:
(a) the Israeli DEA Groups, comparable in number to that of the Arab suspects and who appear to have tracked the future hijackers in their central places of operation and in other states, and
(b) the Israeli New Jersey Group, operating through their Mossad front in another principal locus of operations of the future hijackers, two of whom were Mossad agents, and five of whom appeared immediately aware of the origin of the attacks on September 11.
13. While little direct evidence supports the contention that the CIA was aware of or condoned the Israeli Groups’ tracking of Arab terrorist groups in the United States prior to September 11, the CIA’s pressing for the expulsion of members of the Israeli DEA Groups when they were detained before September 11, their failure to cooperate with the FBI, their circuitous explanation of how the above two hijackers were placed on the Watchlist, and other relevant considerations require that the issue be taken up as a part of the public inquiry into these painful events.
Pointing out these inconvenient facts is clearly anti-Semitic. The article goes on to describe the evolving nature of anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists:
The most prominent promoters of these anti-Semitic conspiracy theories today tend less often to be white supremacists and right-wing anti-Semites. Rather they are more commonly members of a group of anti-Israel conspiracists who see the 9/11 attacks as one of a series of “false flag” operations that Israel has carried out to manufacture a war against its Muslim enemies (the term “false flag” operations refers to acts of sabotage or terror conducted by one perpetrator but designed to appear as if conducted by another, with the goal of setting the victim at odds with the false perpetrator).
How irrational that these anti-Semites “see the 9/11 attacks as one of a series of “false flag” operations that Israel” has carried out to frame the Muslim world!
Why would anyone think that?
Well, the Israelis have a long history of engaging in these sort of false flag attacks. From TheOutrage: The Bombing of the King David Hotel:
On the morning of the 22nd of July 1946 a party of between 15 and 20 Jews, dressed as an Arabs entered the King David Hotel. The hotel housed the Secretariat of the Government of Palestine and Headquarters of the British Forces in Palestine and Transjordan. The terrorists were able to enter the building without arousing too much attention because part of the building was still being used as a hotel and other people frequented it. The Jews pretended to be an Arab working party. Having unloaded from their lorry several milk churns filled with 225 kilogram’s of explosive, they placed them in the basement of the wing of the hotel occupied by the Secretariat.
A British officer standing nearby, one Major Mackintosh, became suspicious of this group of Arabs and began to ask questions, but was suddenly gunned down by a member of the Jewish gang and subsequently died. [...]
There was no time to evacuate the building and the charge exploded with devastating effect. Many were killed instantly as the whole wing of the building collapsed about them, others were trapped and many more injured.
The Lavon affair (“Esek Habish” ~ the shameful affair) was one of the most bizarre chapters in Israeli history. In 1954, the Israeli secret service set up a spy ring in Egypt, with the purpose of blowing up US and British targets.
The operation was code-named “Susanah.” The terrorist hits were to be blamed on the regime of Egyptian President Gamal Abdul Nasser, with the purpose of alienating the US and Britain from Egypt and Nasser and somehow preventing Egyptian nationalization of the Suez Canal. The ring was discovered.
Strict censorship ensured that that the Israeli public officially knew little or nothing of the affair for many years.
When U.S.Navy sailor Phil Tourney saw Israeli planes circling the USS Liberty on June 8, 1967, he and his crewmates thought nothing of it. The Israelis waved at the crew and the Liberty crew, waved back. The USS Liberty was a unique vessel, unlike any other in the world, with a large tower and radio dishes used for eavesdropping, so the chance it could be mistaken for an “enemy” vessel were zero. The oversize U.S. flag and the large ID numbers painted on the ship also made identification of the ship possible from miles away.
Imagine the shock and horror when the Israelis attacked the lightly armed intelligence gathering vessel in broad daylight. A torpedo was fired and struck the Liberty dead on. Israeli aircraft strafed the men aboard and dropped napalm on the decks. Torpedo boats machine-gunned the crew as they tried to rescue wounded U.S. servicemen. The Israelis even shot up life rafts to prevent any escape.
The article goes on to describe the evolution of these anti-Semitic 9/11 conspiracy theorists, and their main talking points:
The most popular conspiratorial allegations include the following:
The Mossad was behind the attacks.
Variations of this theory assert that the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, was behind the 9/11 attacks; the “proof” is the “five dancing Israelis” arrested on 9/11 who were allegedly celebrating as the Twin Towers burned. Although this theory has circulated since 2001, the initial scenario painted the five Israelis as “spies” who knew that the attacks were going to happen and chose not to inform the U.S government. Over time, the theory evolved and today proponents claim that the five Israelis were actually directing the attacks and began dancing when they realized that their mission of creating a false flag operation had been accomplished.
Jewish neo-conservatives were behind the attacks.
Proponents of this theory claim that neo-conservative American officials of Jewish faith within the Bush administration, particularly Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and Douglas Feith, methodically worked out a plan, with the assistance of the Mossad, to carry out the attacks in order to benefit Israel. This theory alleges that these officials orchestrated a plan well before 9/11, with the goal of invading Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries to allow the U.S. and Israel to seize control of resources and power in that area.
The Jewish controlled media and government work to prevent the truth from emerging. The “truth” about Israeli and Jewish involvement in the 9/11 attacks will not be allowed to emerge, claim conspiracy theorists, because Jews were in charge of the 9/11 Commission report and actually control the media and government.
In addition to these key themes, a multitude of lesser conspiracy theories also continue to circulate.
These range from an alleged Israeli art student spy ring keeping track of the hijackers before the attacks, to Israeli companies controlling U.S telecommunications, to Jewish owners wanting to gain financially from the destruction of the World Trade Center complex.
Well, we do know that some of the Israeli spies arrested on 9/11 were Mossad operatives (and all of them appear to be former military specialists), including three of the 5 “dancing Israelis” discovered filming the attacks on 9/11.
We also know that many of the neoconservatives in the Bush administration, including Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Dov Zakheim, Michael Chertoff, and others, were American Jews with direct ties to Israel and many of them even had dual citizenship with Israel. Many of these individuals have been alleged to have engaged in espionage for the state of Israel in the past, and were involved in publishing various policy papers advocating and preparing for a scenario that just happened to come about on 9/11.
We also know that the Jewish controlled media and U.S. government work very hard to keep the truth about 9/11 from reaching the American public. But their propaganda efforts are extremely poor, and their effect is wearing off on the American people as more and more of us are waking up each day to these facts.
We also know that there was indeed an Israeli art student espionage and drug smuggling ring operating in the United States prior to 9/11, and that these Israeli military/intelligence operatives were actually surveying the alleged Arab terrorists blamed for 9/11 in addition to spying on federal agencies of the U.S. government around the country.
Further, credible sources have alleged that the Mossad was actually running the Arab hijacker patsy cell that was later blamed for the 9/11 attacks:
British intelligence reported in February 2002 that the Israeli Mossad ran the Arab hijacker cells that were later blamed by the U.S. government’s 9/11 Commission for carrying out the aerial attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. WMR has received details of the British intelligence report which was suppressed by the government of then-Prime Minister Tony Blair.
A Mossad unit consisting of six Egyptian- and Yemeni-born Jews infiltrated “Al Qaeda” cells in Hamburg (the Atta-Mamoun Darkanzali cell), south Florida, and Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates in the months before 9/11. The Mossad not only infiltrated cells but began to run them and give them specific orders that would eventually culminate in their being on board four regularly-scheduled flights originating in Boston, Washington Dulles, and Newark, New Jersey on 9/11.
Finally, we do in fact know that Israeli telecommunications companies control U.S. telecommunications and that the Jewish owners of the World Trade Center complex profited tremendously from the destruction of the towers on 9/11.
It’s telling that the ADL article never actually disputes any of this, just labels it anti-Semitic.
How typical.
Hey Abe, your tired canards don’t work anymore.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)