THE JEWISH SECRET SOCIETY THAT DOMINATES AMERICA (AND CANADA)

The "dark figures are that inevitably are found to be lurking in the background and foreground" of Stephen Harper. (Chabad Lubavitch)

Dear Radical Reader,

The following article by Christopher Bollyn is a great asset for any Canadian citizen caught up in the massive web of deceit known as the Canadian Human Rights Commission and its attendant handmaiden, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.

After two years of clashing swords with these two organizations due to the machinations of B'nai Brith Canada and the League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada's B.C. representative, Harry Abrams, who, along with 'the League', laid a ec. 13 "hate crimes" complaint against both myself and my website RadicalPress.com back in November of 2007, I have uncovered a vast amount of hidden information on this secret masonic International Jewish society that Mr. Bollyn discusses in his most poignant of articles below.

In light of all the recent controversy over the actions of Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his Zionist henchman, Immigration Minister Jason Kenney, with respect to their blatant pro-Israeli, pro-Zionist policies and their attacks and accusations made against Christian and non-Christian organizations and individuals here in Canada, it should not come as a great surprise to see that former U.S. President Harry Truman, was, like Harper, deeply connected and controlled by these very same forces that continue seeking to undermine all the democratic nations of the world.

In fact, from all of my research over the past few years, it's quite apparent that other U.S. Presidents were in the same compromising boat, most notably President Wilson and Roosevelt, the two men who were supposedly leaders of the free world during the two major Zionist-induced wars of the 20th Century.

Bollyn's sage advice to take the first step by identify who these dark figures are that inevitably are found to be lurking in the background and foreground of all the major political leaders of the 20th and 21st centuries ought to be taken to heart by anyone concerned about our loss of freedom of speech and the ongoing subterfuge surrounding these foreign Jewish lobbyist organizations' attempts to take control of the Internet via whatever devious means they can devise.

The danger, always, when it comes to "leaders," be they Presidents, Prime Ministers or Kings, is that they become extremely susceptible to these nefarious, sinister forces that love the darkness and anonymity which their secret societies give them and thus allow them full measure to insinuate themselves within the corridors of our touted democratic institutions in order to work their demonic magic upon sovereign nations.

My hat goes off in respect to Christopher Bollyn for his fortitude and resolve given that he has been not only been maligned and slandered by the Zionist media but also directly attacked physically for his efforts at rolling over the rocks beneath which these traitorous B'nai Brith troglodytes love to dwell and conspire together.

Please pass this along to your connections and as always continue to ...

Shine your Light for Love,
Peace & Justice for All,
Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
Canada's Radical News Network

http://www.radicalpress.com

radical@radicalpress.com

Membership certificate to B'nai B'rith circa 1895

http://www.bollyn.com/bnai-brith-the-jewish-secret-society-that-dominates-america

B'nai B'rith ~

The Jewish Secret Society

that Dominates America

By Christopher Bollyn

November 22, 2009

B'nai B'rith was instrumental in gaining U.S. support for the nascent Zionist state of Israel in the late 1940s. The Jewish secret society of Freemasons used President Harry Truman's friend ~ and their agent ~ Eddie Jacobson of Kansas City (standing behind Truman) in off-the-record meetings in the Oval Office to persuade the president to approve the Zionist land grab known as the 1947 U.N. Partition Plan of Palestine and then to recognize the state of Israel the next year following the Zionist ethnic cleansing of nearly 400 Palestinian villages and towns.

By applying pressure directly on Truman, B'nai B'rith dictated U.S. policy in spite of strong resistance from the U.S. Department of State. When Truman extended de jure recognition of the Zionist state on January 31, 1949, the only guests invited to the signing ceremony in the Oval Office were members of B'nai B'rith: Eddie Jacobson, the B'nai B'rith executive vice president Maurice Bisgyer, and the secret society's president, Frank Goldman (sitting).

President Truman, a highest level Freemason, was forced to accept the dictates of a gang of Zionist Jewish Freemasons on crafting U.S. policy in the Middle East. What does this say about the real hierarchy of power among Freemasons?

Truman, a Freemason since 1909, had established the Grandview Lodge No. 618 in Missouri and served as its first "Worshipful Master". In 1940, Brother Truman was elected the ninety-seventh Grand Master of Masons of Missouri. In 1945, President Truman was made a Sovereign Grand Inspector General, 33°, and Honorary Member at the Supreme Council of the Ancient & Accepted Scottish Rite (A.A.S.R.) Southern Jurisdiction Headquarters in Washington D.C.

The fact that Jewish Freemasons of the B'nai B'rith were able to meet secretly with the president in the Oval Office whenever they wanted and were able to direct the U.S. president, a highest level Mason, to follow their orders in shaping U.S. policy in the Middle East, shows the immense power this secret society of Zionist Jews has long had over the U.S. government and other Masonic orders.

Barack Hussein Obama was cultivated as a politician in Chicago and made President of the United States by the power of the B'nai B'rith. It's high time for these secret societies to be removed from the corridors of power where U.S. policy is crafted.

The first step to solving America's most serious problems requires that we identify the people who control the hidden hand behind the disastrous policies that are destroying our proud republic. This is the first article in a series about the B'nai B'rith, the Jewish secret society that created the state of Israel and made Barack Obama president.

After one year in office it is clear that the Obama administration, elected on a platform of "change", is actually maintaining the policies of the Bush administration. In some cases, such as the occupation of Afghanistan, President Barack Hussein Obama has actually added to the war effort by sending tens of thousands more troops.

The fact that the political change was only superficial and that the Obama administration intends to follow the basic policies of the previous administration can best be seen in the continuing cover up of the truth of what really happened on 9-11. The false-flag terrorism of 9-11 is the fundamental lie that needs to be protected. Upon this blatant lie the fraudulent "War on Terror" is based, and this illegal war policy has been embraced by Barack Obama.

When the Obama team sent Henry Kissinger to Moscow for early meetings with the Russian leadership, rather than Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, it was evident that the power brokers running the Obama White House were the same as those that ran the Bush and Clinton administrations ~ and those before them.

Rahm Emanuel, Chief-of-Staff of the Obama administration and son of an Israeli terrorist, and David Axelrod, the president's strategy chief and senior adviser, are two of the highest managers of Barack Obama.

Axelrod, the son of a Communist Jew, has been managing Obama's political career since 1992. Emanuel, as a former senior adviser in the Clinton White House, was the person who pushed the disastrous NAFTA legislation through Congress in 1993. But who really manages Emanuel and Axelrod? Who tells them what policies to promote and which to discard?

Our politicians and policies are given to us today via television and the controlled media like the mysterious writing on the wall appeared to Babylon's King Belshazzar, son of Nebuchadnezzar, in the Old Testament. But who controls the hand that creates the politicians and crafts the policies?

The election of Barack Obama has provided us with a glimpse of the hidden hand that controls the government of the United States. The politicians and policies of the U.S. government do not actually come from the people but are presented to the public through the controlled media.

The two most influential papers in the United States, The New York Times and Washington Post, are both controlled by German Jewish families that are among the founding members of the Jewish secret society the B'nai B'rith. The B'nai B'rith, an order of Jewish Freemasonry, is closed to non-Jews which puts its Jewish members at the top of the Masonic hierarchy.

The members of B'nai B'rith are able to join other Masonic orders but only Jews can belong to B'nai B'rith.

Bettylu Saltzman

Barack Obama has been created as a political candidate since 1992 by David Axelrod and Bettylu Saltzman, the daughter of Philip M. Klutznick, the former head of B'nai B'rith International, the supreme body of the B'nai B'rith. This is the secret society of Zionist Jews that controls the White House and the policies of the U.S. government.

The first Chicago newspaper report from the 1860s that revealed that a secret organization of "Israelites" had existed in Chicago for some 20 years.

'Do you really think that criminals are clever, good people, Thrasymachus?'

'Yes, if their criminality is able to manifest in a perfect form and they are capable of dominating countries and nations.'

~Socrates in Plato's Republic

Secret anti-Christian organizations like the Freemasons and B'nai B'rith are like the fabled black holes of astronomy. Like other unseen astronomical bodies, astronomers postulate the existence of black holes based on how they distort light and affect other bodies around them. So is it with the Jewish B'nai B'rith and other Freemasonic secret societies, which we know very little about but whose presence can be seen in how they pervade every level of our society and affect everything around us.

Great nations, like the United States, France, and Germany, once had anti-Masonic and anti-Semitic political parties that acted to challenge the pernicious influence of secret Masonic and Jewish organizations.Today we no longer have such political parties to counter these secret networks and find ourselves ruled by B'nai B'rith and Jewish Freemasons.

In the United States in 1828, the Anti-Masonic Party was the original third party to be active on the national scene. Popular opinion in America was naturally opposed to secret organizations and people feared the Freemasons, believing they were a powerful secret society that undermined republican principles.

The Anti-Masonic Party was right. A democratic republic that allows its government, courts, and media to be run by the members of secret societies will soon find that they have taken over the republic. This is what has happened to the United States.

In 1843, a German Jew who called himself Henry Jones founded a Jewish secret society called the “Bundes-Brueder” (League of brothers) in the Sinsheimer Café near Wall Street in New York. Jones recruited his co-founders from the synagogue where he was in charge. At least four of its founders were Freemasons. The order, which was later re-named the “B’nai B’rith,” was closed to all non-Jews and to any Jew who fraternized with Christians.

The power of the B'nai B'rith has grown immensely during the past 166 years. As an independent journalist who has investigated the evidence of Israeli involvement in the false-flag terror of 9-11, I have seen how this secret society of Jewish Freemasons is able to corrupt every aspect of American society.

It is the force behind the media and government cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9-11. It is also the secret organization behind the brutal attack on me at my house in August 2006 and the malicious prosecution and corrupt court process that followed.

Christopher Bollyn the day after being brutally assaulted by a three-man undercover tactical police squad at his home in Hoffman Estates, Illinois, in August 2006.

Finis

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"B'nai B'rith and Israel: The Unbroken Covenant," 1998, The B'nai B'rith World Center, Israel
http://www.bnaibrith.org/unbrokencovenant/

Fuchs, J.R., Oral History Interview with A.J. Granoff, Kansas City, Missouri, April 9, 1969
http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/granoff.htm#transcript

OH! CANADA! CHRISTIAN CHURCHES ARE ANTI SEMITIC ORGANIZATIONS?

FURY GROWS OVER ANTI-SEMITISM CHARGE

Churches want answers from PM after

senior Tory levels accusation

against aid group they support

The Star.com

December 19, 2009

OTTAWA

"It's a horrible charge to make, and to do it with so little thought cheapens the reality of anti-Semitism in the world," says Bruce Gregersen, United Church spokesperson.

The United Church of Canada and other Canadian churches are demanding Prime Minister Stephen Harper explain why one of his cabinet ministers accused them of being anti-Semitic.

The United, Catholic and Anglican churches are part of KAIROS, an aid group that was shocked to hear Immigration Minister Jason Kenney say its funding was lifted as part of the Conservatives' effort to cut off anti-Semitic organizations.

"It's a horrible charge to make, and to do it with so little thought cheapens the reality of anti-Semitism in the world and diminishes the very careful attention that it deserves," said United Church spokesperson Bruce Gregersen. "We're quite disappointed in the government on this.

"The policies of KAIROS have all been approved by the collective board of KAIROS, so in a sense what Mr. Kenney is doing is accusing Canadian churches of being anti-Semitic and I think that's really unfortunate," Gregersen said in an interview.

Sam Carrière, director of communications for the Anglican Church of Canada, said the church supports a statement released Friday by KAIROS, which condemned Kenney's remarks as false and warned the Harper government against letting politics dominate Ottawa's foreign aid priorities.

Besides the United and Anglican churches, Toronto-based KAIROS's members include the Presbyterian Church in Canada, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada, the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Mennonite Central Committee ~ Canada.

Working with 21 partner organizations around the world, KAIROS sponsors projects promoting social and economic justice in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East.

Canada's development community appeared stunned after Kenney, in a speech in Jerusalem, cited Ottawa's decision to end 35 years of funding for KAIROS as an example of the Conservatives' push to cut funding for anti-Semitic groups.

KAIROS was "defunded," Kenney said, because it took a leadership role in "the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign" against Israel.

"Minister Kenney's charge against KAIROS is false," the group said in its public response.

KAIROS has raised questions about Israeli government policies but rejected the idea of a national boycott against Israel two years ago, its executives pointed out.

"To label KAIROS's criticism of Israeli government actions as `anti-Semitic' silences dissent and honours no one," the statement said. "KAIROS has a clear position of support for the legitimate right of the Israeli people to a safe and secure state."

After its request for $7 million in funding over four years was turned down last month, International Cooperation Minister Bev Oda told KAIROS it was because the group did not fit the government's priorities of food security, helping youths and economic growth.

The Toronto-based group Friday called on Ottawa to restore its funding and explain the discrepancy between Oda's and Kenney's comments.

"Minister Kenney's statement, in a highly charged environment, raises very disturbing questions about the integrity of Canadian development aid decisions," KAIROS said.

Oda and Kenney were not available for interviews Friday. Alykhan Velshi, Kenney's director of communications, explained the decision by citing several non-government sources of information on Middle East political issues going back to 2006 that were critical of KAIROS's activities.

Gerry Barr, president of the Canadian Council for International Co-operation, said Kenney's remarks have compromised the integrity of the Canadian International Development Agency's entire foreign aid funding operation.

"Any aid manager will now be looking two or three times to see what is on the table and wondering what is underneath," he said.

Liberal and New Democrat MPs said Oda should be brought before a House of Commons committee to explain the KAIROS decision.

"There needs to be a larger discussion about CIDA's decision-making than merely what's happened to KAIROS, but KAIROS would be the classic example," said the Liberals' John McKay.

Based on KAIROS's experience, McKay said, a non-governmental organization "could be absolutely welded to the 'priorities' of the government as stated by Minister Oda, but if you fall outside of the government's particular dictum of political correctness, you're toast."

CANADIAN GOVERNMENT CUTS

FUNDING TO HUMAN RIGHTS WORKERS

$7 million muzzling shocker ~ Canadian government cuts off funds for church group it calls anti-Semitic

by Cecilie Surasky
DesertPeace

Despite a 35-year collaboration, the Canadian church group KAIROS: Canadian Ecumenical Justice Initiatives, “one of Canada’s most respected and important charitable organizations,” was stunned when their likely routine 7 million dollar request for the human rights program was denied by the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA).

But they were even more surprised when they discovered why: although the group’s board had made public their opposition to sanctions and boycotts against Israel 2 years earlier, Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney in a speech he gave this week in Israel charged the group with being anti-Semitic for “taking a leadership role in the boycott.”

Kenney, speaking at the Global Forum for Combating Anti-Semitism, said they were “defunding” groups as part of their new “zero-tolerance” approach to anti-Semitism. (Read the full text of his speech here. )

In his speech, Kenney included in a list of acts of anti-Semitism, like the spray-painting of swastikas on a Canadian Holocaust memorial, the spray-painting of the phrase “Stop the Israeli genocide in Gaza”.

Anti-human rights/Israel lobby group NGO Monitor built an extensive dossier on KAIROS– which represents Canada’s Mennonites, the Anglican, United and Catholic Churches and does work in some of the poorest regions of the world.

Kairos came under fire for co-sponsoring, along with 50 other groups, an international Sabeel conference in 2005 on morally responsible investment. (Sabeel is “an ecumenical grassroots liberation theology movement among Palestinian Christians,” and Jewish Voice for Peace frequently co-sponsors Sabeel conferences here in the United States.)

In this comprehensive and thoughtful 2008 strategy paper on using “economic advocacy measures… to advance peace between Palestinians and Israelis, ” KAIROS said:

KAIROS affirms the desire of the Israeli people for a secure homeland, recognizing the long, terrible and continuing history of anti-Semitism, and the vital role of Israel to Jewish people around the world. KAIROS also recognizes the great suffering of the Palestinian people, many of whom live as refugees in surrounding countries, and others who have lived under Occupation for 40 years, and affirms their right to a secure and viable homeland. KAIROS calls for an end to the Israeli Occupation of Palestinian Territories and for two secure states based on the June 4, 1967 borders.

They also explicitly rejected “sanctions against Israel” and “a boycott of products from Israel.” But in line with the universal recognition of the illegality of settlements, they did also advocate for things like:

limiting the geographical applicability of Canada-Israel Free Trade Agreement to within the 1967 borders of the State of Israel; and

enforcing a certification of origin for goods coming from settlements in the Occupied Palestinians Territories;

and, almost identical to the Presbyterian Church USA’s strategy:

That where KAIROS members opt to pursue shareholder action respecting Canadian companies doing business in Israel or the Occupied Palestinian Territories (that are contributing directly or indirectly to violence, occupation or other human rights abuses in the region), shareholder action shall move through several stages, from dialogue with senior company management to filing shareholder proposals and, as a last resort, divestment.

So, after so much thoughtful and sensitive delving into ways to responsibly use economic pressure and investment, what did they get for their troubles? Charges of anti-Semitism.

(At Jewish Voice for Peace, where we have devised a similarly nuanced approach to economic pressure that works for us, choosing to focus on companies that profit from the occupation, or groups that fund settlements, we’ve seen from day one how pro-occupation groups purposefully and immediately ignore the facts, and raise the urgent flag of anti-Semitism as a strategy to kill virtually any resistance activity that goes beyond nicely asking the Israeli government to stop violating international law. Ironically, as they deny more and more people the right to boycott settlement goods only, they leave them with no choice but to boycott all Israeli products. )

A KAIROS official responded in The Star:

“It’s a horrible charge to make, and to do it with so little thought cheapens the reality of anti-Semitism in the world and diminishes the very careful attention that it deserves,” said United Church spokesperson Bruce Gregersen. “We’re quite disappointed in the government on this.

“The policies of KAIROS have all been approved by the collective board of KAIROS, so in a sense what Mr. Kenney is doing is accusing Canadian churches of being anti-Semitic and I think that’s really unfortunate,”

KAIROS director Mary Corkery told the Anglican Journal

“We do criticize actions of the Israeli government and we do support an independent, viable Palestinian state, so we have criticized the settlements, the barrier wall, the occupation of the West Bank, yes, but that can not be associated with anti-Semitism.”

Corkery said that Kairos had also heard from a number of Jewish people who objected to Kenney’s association of anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel. “They may not agree with us, but they don’t want that. That doesn’t honour anybody,” said Corkery.

KAIROS claims they were confused with a document that was recently released by Christian Palestinian leaders called Kairos Palestine, 2009: A Moment of Truth, which states “We see boycott and disinvestment as tools of justice, peace and security,” endorsing BDS as a form of solidarity for international faith-based organizations. Canada’s KAIROS has nothing to do with this statement.

The Liberal party believes KAIROS “was censured for joining seven religious denominations in speaking out against Conservative policies on climate change, overseas mining operations, aboriginal rights, immigration and international trade.”

We’ll give KAIROS the last word from their December 18 press statement:

Minister Kenney’s charge against KAIROS is false. KAIROS did not lead this campaign. In 2007, KAIROS took a public position opposing sanctions and a boycott of Israel.

A recently released document, Kairos Palestine, 2009: A Moment of Truth, is not a document of KAIROS: Canadian Ecumenical Justice Initiatives. Kairos is a Greek word meaning “God’s time” and is commonly used by Christian groups.

A Minister of the Crown says that his government decided, for what is a highly political reason, to cut funds for a proposal developed in consultation with and approved by CIDA.

Canadians need the truth.

Two points must be made: criticism of Israel does not constitute anti-Semitism; and CIDA was developed to fund international aid and not to serve political agendas.

Minister Kenney’s statement, in a highly charged environment, raises very disturbing questions about the integrity of Canadian development aid decisions. If aid decisions are based on political rumour rather than on due diligence, development criteria and CIDA’s own evaluation process then this is a matter of grave concern for the entire international development sector ~ and for the Canadian people who pay for this aid.

Many non-governmental organizations have proposals before CIDA that have been on Minister Oda’s desk for months. Others are about to apply for funding. How can they possibly trust this decision-making process in the future?

In the past two weeks, Canadians from across the country have called for the restoration of CIDA funding to KAIROS.

People working for human rights are the true victims of the funding cut to KAIROS. This decision cuts funding for a new legal clinic in the Congo to help women who have been raped in the brutal conflict there. The 5,000 members of the Women’s Popular Organization in Colombia will lose funding for life-saving protection against rampant human rights abuses in their country.

To label KAIROS criticism of Israeli government actions as “anti-Semitic” silences dissent and honours no one. KAIROS has a clear position of support for the legitimate right of the Israeli people to a safe and secure state.

Actually, KAIROS, a third point needs to be made. It is true that there will always be some who harbor anti-Jewish hatred, like the vicious anti-Semite David Duke, who opportunistically join the Palestinian liberation movement and who should be opposed at every turn. (I’d argue that the entire Christian Zionist right is built on an anti-Semitic doctrine which wants to see Jews either incinerated or converted.)

But the fact remains that there is absolutely nothing inherently anti-Semitic about BDS (boycotts, divestment and sanctions.) As Israeli professor Neve Gordon said, he supports it as a way to save Israel from itself. Further, it follows in a long and extraordinary tradition of nonviolent resistance to injustice, no matter where it occurs.

KAIROS has posted this list of seven ways you can help. Read it and act.

KAIROS Canada member churches speak out against Kenney's 'anti-Semitic' charges.

Scott Tribe
Scott's DiaTribes

As I was hoping they’d do, the member churches that belong to KAIROS Canada are starting to push back against the federal Conservatives and Jason Kenney for his remarks that KAIROS Canada was stopped CIDA funding due to the organization being anti-Semitic or anti-Israel:

The United Church of Canada and other Canadian churches are demanding Prime Minister Stephen Harper explain why one of his cabinet ministers accused them of being anti-Semitic.

The United, Catholic and Anglican churches are part of KAIROS, an aid group that was shocked to hear Immigration Minister Jason Kenney say its funding was lifted as part of the Conservatives’ effort to cut off anti-Semitic organizations.

“It’s a horrible charge to make, and to do it with so little thought cheapens the reality of anti-Semitism in the world and diminishes the very careful attention that it deserves,” said United Church spokesperson Bruce Gregersen. “We’re quite disappointed in the government on this. The policies of KAIROS have all been approved by the collective board of KAIROS, so in a sense what Mr. Kenney is doing is accusing Canadian churches of being anti-Semitic and I think that’s really unfortunate,” Gregersen said in an interview.

Sam Carrière, director of communications for the Anglican Church of Canada, said the church supports a statement released Friday by KAIROS, which condemned Kenney’s remarks as false and warned the Harper government against letting politics dominate Ottawa’s foreign aid priorities.

Besides the United and Anglican churches, Toronto-based KAIROS’s members include the Presbyterian Church in Canada, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada, the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Mennonite Central Committee ~ Canada.

Working with 21 partner organizations around the world, KAIROS sponsors projects promoting social and economic justice in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East.

Opposition MP’s are also suggesting that government officials need to be brought before a House of Commons Committee to explain this KAIROS Canada funding cut decision, as well as the rather large discrepancy between Minister Kenney’s and Minister Oda’s explanations, but I believe the member churches and a potentially big voting block of parishioners ticked off at this will be ultimately the organizations with the most influence to change the Conservative government’s mind on this wrong decision, based on Kenney’s wrong information.

Remember, the member Christian churches are the 7 largest denominations in Canada. There’s a lot more of them out there then there are of Charles McVety’s little ultra right-wing religious group that has denounced KAIROS Canada (and by extension its member churches) as being “leftist ideologues”.

CANADA'S TOP TEN 2009 INSTANCES OF ZIONIST CONTROL

READ THEM AND WEEP MY FELLOW CANADIANS.

Personally I read this list and almost wept. I had no idea a year ago just how complicit my own country was in so many criminal actions of the world. I did not know we were responsible for the emptying of three villages to "give" Israel a park known in that country as Canada Park!

WE MUST START DEMANDING CHANGE FROM OUR LOCAL MPS. I MEAN SERIOUS CHANGE. IF YOUR MP IS LIKE MINE, HE IS OPEN TO DISCUSSION ON A RATIONAL LEVEL. MINE KNEW NOTHING OF THESE THINGS UNTIL WE SPOKE AND ENDED UP ASKING ME FOR MORE INFORMATION ON THE CHABAD LUBAVITCH. IT AIN'T GONNA GET NO BETTER UNLESS WE START PRESSURING EVEN IF ONLY AT A LOWER LEVEL.

By Anarchore
December 24, 2009
Ziofascism

HERE IS ANARCHORE'S COMPREHENSIVE LIST

10. Canada Votes Alone for Israel

Only one out of 47 nations on UN rights panel to refuse to condemn military offensive in Gaza

http://www.thestar.com/article/569872

Jan 13, 2009

OTTAWA–Canada stood alone before a United Nations human rights council yesterday, the only one among 47 nations to oppose a motion condemning the Israeli military offensive in Gaza.

The vote before the Geneva-based body shows the Stephen Harper government has abandoned a more even-handed approach to the Middle East in favour of unalloyed support of Israel, according to some long-time observers.

Thirty-three countries voted for the strongly worded motion, which called for an investigation into “grave” human rights violations by Israeli forces, while 13 nations, mostly European, abstained.

MY Canada does not support a country that would kill the five Balousha sisters in their beds as they slept. Stephen Harper does not speak for me.

9. George Galloway Banned

It was en route to this speaking engagement that Galloway was grabbed and forbidden entrance to Canada based on a complaint from an accredited criminal terrorist in the JDL.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7954923.stm

Saturday, 21 March 2009

George Galloway, a British Lord and member of the British Parliament, has been banned from Canada on security grounds, the country’s immigration service has confirmed.

Mr Galloway, a Respect Party MP, said the ban was “idiotic” and he would look at legal action to try to overturn it.

British media reported the decision was due to his views on Afghanistan and the presence of Canadian troops there.

Meanwhile, on that same day, Splitting the Sky is arrested in Calgary trying to arrest war criminal GW Bush as he speaks at a $1000 a plate meal.

8. Canada Boycotts Anti-Racism Conference, then Boycotts UN Speech

US, Israel and Canada Boycott 2009 anti-Racism Conference

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8585

…the decision was jointly made by Israel and the USA through senior officials of the U.S State Department and the Israeli Foreign Ministry after the issue was discussed in talks between U.S Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, and Israeli Foreign Minister, Tzipi Livni.

Ahmadinejad’s ‘repugnant’ remarks behind boycott: PM

http://ziofascism.net/blog/?p=1693

Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s “absolutely repugnant remarks” about the Holocaust are reason enough for Canadian officials to boycott the Iranian president’s address to the UN General Assembly.

7. Ottawa to spend $1M on Holocaust education

Creation of task force marks 70th anniversary of Canada’s rejection of Jewish refugees

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/643577

TheStar.com - Canada - Ottawa to spend $1M on Holocaust education

June 01, 2009

Canada will contribute nearly $1 million to create a three-year national task force to study and educate Canadians about the Holocaust.

Immigration Minister Jason Kenney announced the task force in Toronto this morning at the start of a conference on the Holocaust that marks the 70th anniversary of Canada’s refusal to let hundreds of Jewish refugees aboard the St. Louis from Hamburg, Germany dock in Canada. The ship was forced to return to Europe and the refugees dispersed to various countries. Many would not survive World War II.

6. Canada’s political leaders pledge allegiance to Bronfman’s Israel Lobby group

Harper, Ignatieff, Layton and May at 29th plenary assembly of the CJC

http://www.thestar.com/news/columnist/article/643445 and http://ziofascism.net/blog/?p=1252

…practically falling over one another to show they love Jews ~ and Israel ~ best.

5. Israel beefing up diplomatic corps in Canada

http://www.cjnews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=17500&Itemid=86

Israeli Ambassador Miriam Ziv hailed this as a “positive” step for ties between the two countries, both diplomatic and cultural.

“It proves the importance the Israeli foreign ministry places on our relations with Canada. The bigger staff will enable us to do more,” Ziv told The CJN last week from her office at the Israeli Embassy in Ottawa.

THINKING CANADIANS WANT TO KNOW, "DO MORE" WHAT?

4. Canada becomes Israel at the UN

http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article10291.shtml

Canadian Prime Minister Steven Harper’s government publicly supported Israel’s brutal assault on Gaza and voted alone at the UN Human Rights Committee in defense of Israel’s actions three weeks ago. Now Canada has taken over Israeli diplomacy. Literally.

In solidarity with Gaza, Venezuela expelled Israel’s ambassador at the start of the bombardment and then broke off all diplomatic relations two weeks later. Israel need not worry since Ottawa plans to help out. On 29 January, The Jerusalem Post reported that “Israel’s interests in Caracas will now be represented by the Canadian Embassy.” This means Canada is officially Israel, at least in Venezuela.

YET ANOTHER EMBARRASSING TIE TO THE PARIAH STATE.

3. Harper says criticism of Israel is Antisemitism

http://www2.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/story.html?id=8558c35f-10eb-43cc-8e63-8714d1649a95

“I guess my fear is what I see happening in some circles is (an) anti-Israeli sentiment, really just as a thinly disguised veil for good old-fashioned anti-Semitism, which I think is completely unacceptable,” Harper said in an interview with Toronto’s CFRB radio.

2. Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Antisemitism

Stealth plan to criminalize criticism of Israel

http://pascasher.blogspot.com/2009/12/harper-et-la-criminalisation-de-la.html

Sun, 06 Dec 2009

One of the most recent ~ but almost totally unreported ~ developments in Canada is something called the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Antisemitism (CPCCA). It is not an official parliamentary body but is a multi-party, voluntary association of 13 MPs. It is currently holding an inquiry into anti-semitism because, it says, “The extent and severity of anti-semitism is widely regarded as at its worst level since the end of the Second World War.

1. Canadian government says Christian churches anti-Semitic

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/740925–fury-grow…

OTTAWA ~ The United Church of Canada and other Canadian churches are demanding Prime Minister Stephen Harper explain why one of his cabinet ministers accused them of being anti-Semitic.

The United, Catholic and Anglican churches are part of KAIROS, an aid group that was shocked to hear Immigration Minister Jason Kenney say its funding was lifted as part of the Conservatives’ effort to cut off anti-Semitic organizations.

This is totally beyond the pale. How Kenney or Harper will attempt to spin this, there is no way this will not rebound badly. The story of this has flown around the globe verry quickly.

CANADA ~ GEORGE GALLOWAY vs JASON KENNEY

December 10, 2009
The Canadian Charger

“British MP George Galloway has recently won an important victory against Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Jason Kenney in the Federal Court of Canada,” said James Clark in an interview with The Canadian Charger.

On October 31, 2009, the court announced that it would hear a judicial review of Mr. Kenney’s decision to ban Mr. Galloway from entering Canada for a speaking tour. The court is expected to issue a final decision in January 2010.

Clark, a member of the Defend Free Speech Committee said the significance of this development should not be underestimated.

“Only about 10 to 15 per cent of all cases ever make it to the court so this (court's decision) indicates that the court considers the complaint legitimate.

Because they believe Canadian's right to free speech hangs in the balance, the Defend Free Speech Campaign is attempting to raise $20,000 for legal costs by December 21.

Mr. Clark said that until now Toronto based lawyers Barbara Jackman and Hadayt Nazami have been working on the case pro-bono, and they plan to continue working for free; but there are still numerous court costs which must be covered as the case proceeds.

“The anti-war movement wants our lawyers to have all the resources they need. It's really important for all Canadian to be involved. It's much more than an issue of whether or not George Galloway can enter Canada. It about whether Canadians can criticize their government without retribution and censorship. If they can't, this jeopardizes free speech in Canada.”

Mr. Clark said the Toronto Coalition to Stop the War (in Afghanistan) was surprised that Mr. Kenney intervened to prevent Mr. Galloway from entering Canada because it would have been the third or fourth time he has given speeches in Canada and, although he was barred from Canada, he spent two weeks speaking to audiences in major cities throughout the United States.

Kenney with Harper and one of their extremist Chabad Lubavitch buddies.

On March 19, 2009 Mr. Kenney prohibited Mr. Galloway from entering Canada.

In a March 20, 2009 letter to Mr. Galloway from the High Commission of Canada, Immigration Programme Manager Robert Orr said, “This letter confirms the preliminary assessment of the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) that you are inadmissable to Canada” followed by the reasons why:

“Among other possible grounds of inadmissibility under section 34 of the IRPA (Immigration and Refugee Protection Act), Hamas is listed as a terrorist organization in Canada. There are reasonable grounds to believe you have provided financial support for Hamas. Specifically, we have information that indicates you organized a convoy worth over one million British pounds in aid and vehicles, and personally donated vehicles and financing to Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniya. Your material support for this organization makes you inadmissible to Canada."

He is coming across as more paranoid then even Tzipi Livni or that Prince of Peace Avignor Lieberman!

In their reply to Mr. Orr's letter, Mr. Galloway's Canadian lawyers Barbara Jackman and Hadayt Nazami, said it's unusual for a person who is not required to obtain a visa prior to arriving at a Canadian port of entry to receive a letter and, even more so for Immigration officials to “rely” on a CBSA opinion.

Moreover, Ms. Jackman and Mr. Nazami said in their reply that the terrorism inadmissibility provision in the IRPA was not meant to permit Canadian officials to sanction individuals because they do not share their beliefs.

“Mr. Harper and Mr. Kenney are involved in the operation of the government of Canada, not the Conservative Party. As such their actions ought to be measured, rational and objective, consistent with their obligation to represent the interests of all Canadians. The decision to exclude Mr. Galloway from Canada because he participated in the symbolic gesture of bringing humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people of Gaza is a political decision. It is perverse and we believe constitutes an abuse of power.”

They also stressed that the aid convoy Mr. Galloway donated consisted of aid donated by groups and individuals in an act of solidarity with the people of Gaza.

“The Viva Palestina website indicates that the efforts were directed towards assisting the Palestinian people of Gaza, that a number of organizations, including Stop the War Coalition, the Anglo-Arab Organization, several British trade unions and a large number of Muslim organizations were involved, and that the aid sent to Gaza was for Palestinian people, not any faction.”

Mr. Clark said Mr. Galloway has publicly provided evidence showing that the $1.5 million he donated was humanitarian aid, the vast majority of which was used for food, medical equipment and health care.

“The government was given the aid,” Mr. Clark said. “Hamas just happens to be the government. It would be the same thing if a country donated aid to Canada. They would be giving it to the government, not the Conservative party.”

He added that the Canadian government shouldn't be hiding behind the war on terror to keep Mr. Galloway out of Canada.

“The government should not be intervening and censoring people that a peace organization has invited to speak in Canada. This is an issue of free speech and civil liberties.”

For more info log on: http://www.defendfreespeech.ca.

CANADA ~ CRITICIZING ISRAEL IS NOT ANTISEMITISM

BUT A NUMBER OF MPS SAY THE TWO

ARE ONE AND THE SAME

November 19, 2009

THE TYEE

By Murray Dobbin

My MANY $.02 on this topic are in the green. All illustrations provided by me as well.

Ever since the Israeli invasion of the Gaza strip last December, the global debate surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has intensified with both sides upping the ante, and the stakes of the framing battle increasing almost daily. One of the most recent ~ but almost totally unreported ~ developments in Canada is something called the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Antisemitism (CPCCA).

It is not an official parliamentary body but is a multi-party, voluntary association of 13 MPs. It is currently holding an inquiry into anti-Semitism because, it says, "The extent and severity of antisemitism is widely regarded as at its worst level since the end of the Second World War."

In fact, antisemitic attitudes in the U.S. are at an all-time low according to Abe Foxman aggressive pitbull/watchdog of the Anti-Defamation League, (originally a terrorist organizaation and a branch of the B'nai B'rith which is, in turn, controlled by the Freemasons of Scotland) whose mandate is to monitor and expose anti-Semitism. Statistics Canada reports the number of hate crimes against Jews has been has been dropping since 2001-2002.

But of course, it all depends on how you define anti-Semitism. Jewish organizations from the Canadian Jewish Congress and Hillel to B'nai Brith have all been vigorously redefining this scourge to capture many more alleged perpetrators in its net of enemies. One of their targets is the handful of Canadian universities where pro-Palestinian activity has been intense.

But it goes far beyond just the universities. For the first time in decades, the unquestioned dominance of Israel's public relations machine and lobbying juggernaut is being seriously challenged. The characterization of Israel as an apartheid state is gaining much more credibility than Israel's supporters had ever anticipated.

So is the international Boycott, Divest and Sanctions (BDS) campaign. These are very serious threats to Israel's credibility as "the only democratic state in the Middle East" ~ one of its most powerful claims.

The BDS is gaining strength around the world because the international community, not necessarily their governments, feel that the genocide of the Palestinian people is just plain wrong. This is the people stating their own feelings and doing it the only legal way possible, with their dollars. It has been proven in the past that the Jews have used the power of the boycott themselves with devastating results, one of them being WW2 after boycotting Germany, after living there at peace for many decades.

'Rebranding' after Gaza

Last December's brutal assault on Gaza by the Israeli army and air force ~ and the deliberate targeting of civilians (as publicly confessed by the soldiers who did it) ~ was a tipping point for many who had preferred to sit on the fence or decline to form a hard opinion. Those hard opinions are forming everywhere and the current government of Israel, led by the hard-line Benjamin Netanyahu, is only making things worse.

The Canadian and American media barely touched this issue. It was up to bloggers to show citizens what was REALLY happening to the people. We are the ones who began to show photographs and videos and put faces on the victims and images of the destruction so that the real situation could be seen by a public held in ignorance by the Zionist controlled media. If any coverage at all was given it was in the back pages and seemed to be bloodless war.

There have been two responses. The newest is what the Israeli government has referred to as "re-branding," and in part it involves "soft" stories about Israel ~ like one I saw on the CBC shot from a beach in Israel where bathers had claimed they saw a mermaid. The most prominent example was the celebration of Tel Aviv's centennial by the Toronto Film Festival. Scores of prominent Jews (and thousands of others) protested.

The other response is conventional. It is the simple rule of all pro-Israeli organizations and activists: either declare outright or hint at the possibility that any individual criticizing Israel is antisemitic. Critics of Israel who are Jewish ~ whose numbers are increasing dramatically ~ are branded as "Jew-hating" Jews. (or "self-hating Jews")The strategy has been extremely effective at intimidating potential critics into silence.

Who's on the CPCCA?

Jason Kenney and a few of the Chabad Lubavitch rabbi.

Which gets us back to the CPCCA. The 13-member group is co-chaired by Conservative Scott Reid* and Liberal Mario Silva and also boasts Winnipeg NDP MPs Pat Martin and Judy Wasylycia-Leis and Conservatives Jason Kenney and Peter Kent. Bob Rae and Ken Dryden are members and the Bloc is also represented. But it is effectively run by Kenney and the other ex-officio member, Liberal Irwin Cotler. Both Kenney and Cotler were in London, U.K. last February for the first meeting of European parliamentarians that lead to the "London Declaration" of which the CPCCA is the follow-up initiative.

Irwin Cottler

Peter Kent

Joe Volpe

Mario Silva

These men are part of the organization wishing to curtail your free speech.

The core message of the coalition is that criticism of Israel itself is now a new form of anti-Semitism. The group's website asks, "What is the 'new antisemitism'?" and answers:

"Antisemitism is an age-old phenomenon, yet it is always re-invented and manifested in different ways. For example, while accusations of blood libel are still being made against the Jewish people, instead they are being directed against the State of Israel, such that anti-Zionism is being used as a cover for antisemitism."

Anti semitism is a fraudulent term right from the start. First of all, 90% the Jews of Israel are NOT Semite. They are Khazars, a very violent pagan people from middle Europe who adapted to Judaism about 1000 years ago at the bidding of their King Bulan. These are known as Ashkenazi Jews and are primarily fair of skin and hair. The other 10% are the Sephardic Jews and are true Semites, as are the Palestinians who have lived in Palestine for thousands of years.

There is no evidence or links to any evidence to support the claim.

This is totally ridiculous because anyone who knows anything about Zionism knows that it is a POLITICAL MOVEMENT not a spiritual or religious movement. Indeed, most Zionists are atheist and there are MANY Christian Zionists in the world. There is the whole Christian Zionist movement led by the Christian fundamental Ministers, paid highly by Israel, such as Haggee. As Joe Biden, VP of the US stated, "Of course I am Zionist. You don't have to be Jewish to be a Zionist!)

In its FAQ section the coalition answers the question of whether or not its inquiry is "really about limiting legitimate criticism of the State of Israel?" No, says the web site: "dissent and opposition to individual actions of the Israeli government are both permitted and encouraged in and outside of Israel."

Apparently this was not allowed last winter when the universities of Canada were banning, and even fining, students for holding the annual international anti-semitic festival on Israeli Apartheid on the grounds that this offended Jewish student rights. The following very basic poster by world famous political cartoonist Carlos Latuff was removed from all campuses.

But not, apparently, inside the inquiry. The coalition formally invited written submissions and stated that "Based on these submissions, the committee will invite witnesses to testify at a series of public hearings." There was virtually no general publicity about the inquiry, but when word did get out, numerous submissions were made arguing against the Coalition's concept of a "new anti-Semitism."

Yet not a single organization or individual known for criticism of Israel has been scheduled to make a presentation to the inquiry (it is holding eight meetings on Parliament Hill from Nov. 2 to Dec. 8).

It seems the fix is in: the conclusion of the inquiry has been pre-ordained. If you are a critic of Israel you are already, by definition, antisemitic and obviously not welcome.

Could thinking in these ways become defined as "Thought Crimes"?

Speech laws in the works?

The CPCCA's inquiry begs a lot of questions, not the least of which is where do they get their funding? The coalition says it does not receive any funding from the government, NGOs or Jewish community organizations. Their budget is considerable, judging by the fact that eight of the 20-odd witnesses so far scheduled to appear at the inquiry are being flown in from the U.K., the U.S., Germany and Israel. While the web site promises to reveal funding sources, none are so far listed.

The purse of most pro Zionists is bottomless and the possibilities are endless.

More to the point, just what do the coalition's members hope will result from their proceedings? The CPCCA will make a report to the government and "anticipates that the Government will respond to it by the spring of 2010."

Based on the fact that Canada is Israel's greatest supporter internationally, it is not too difficult to answer this question. According to extreme fascist ex-bouncer, Russian Jew Avignor Lieberman now second in command of Israel, who publicly advocates bombing Gaza off the map.

" Canada is definitely an ally. Today it’s hard to point out our most loyal ally, but Canada is undoubtedly an exception, in the positive sense. Canada was the first to boycott the Durban II conference that was held in Switzerland. In Canada I met with the head of the opposition and of course with my colleague, the foreign minister.

I also had meetings with four other ministers, including the minister of finance and the minister entrusted with matters of international trade. It’s hard to find a country friendlier to Israel than Canada these days. Members both of the coalition and the opposition are loyal friends to us, both with regard to their worldview and their estimation of the situation in everything related to the Middle East, North Korea, Iran, Sudan and Somalia.

No other country in the world has demonstrated such full understanding of us. The Jewish community in Canada is very united, unlike the communities in most countries, and it maintains solid contacts both in the government and in Parliament. I got the impression of a whole, harmonious picture of great support for Israel.

Canada is so friendly that there was no need to convince or explain anything to anyone. We had amiable talks in a supportive atmosphere; we seriously discussed the problems existing in the world. We need allies like this in the international arena."

That seems pretty specific, especially for a government that is not known for responding readily to outside groups. Has the government already agreed to respond to the report? Will its recommendations find their way into the criminal code?

There is good reason to fear such an eventuality. Jason Kenney ~ the powerful Conservative ex-officio member of the coalition ~ is the point man for Stephen Harper on issues involving Israel and as minister of immigration he personally blocked British MP George Galloway from speaking in Canada.

This was a major international embarrassment for Canada and Sir Galloway made a mockery of out country. Apparently, the fact that this brave man had just been involved in the Viva Palestina movement to provide Gaza with donations from the British Isles, and shaken hands with the head of Hamas, was considered a threat to Canadians. Meanwhile, on that same day, war criminal George Bush was being welcomed with open arms in Alberta!

Stephen Harper surrounded by members of the Canadian Federation of Chabad Lubavitch during a reception on Parliament Hill in Ottawa March 12, 2009. The reception honoured the memory of those who lost their lives in the Mumbai attacks in November.

Like Harper, Kenney is heavily involved with the Chabad Lubavitch, the extremely orthodox group who have very heavy political clout with international politicians. This group is behind the international political drive to remove Christianity from the planet and support not only atheism, but also the annual war on Christmas. Both Harper and Kenney meet with these men for policy advice frequently and attend their rituals.

He also eliminated the half million dollars in funding the Canadian Arab Federation used for settlement programs for new immigrants (and not just Muslims). He refused to provide any evidence justifying the move. Kenney told a Toronto audience to "Be wary of the rise of a new form of anti-Semitism cloaked in debates about Israel's actions in the Middle East."

It remains to be seen what the recommendations of the coalition will be, but its conclusions regarding a sweeping redefinition of anti-Semitism have already been drawn and incorporated into their inquiry process ~ mortally damaging its credibility. The likelihood that the Harper government is working in lock-step with the coalition is high and the CPCCA's purpose may well be to prepare the ground for criminalizing criticism of Israel.

This can do nothing but backfire. Supporting a criminal rogue regime that is despised around the world for its actions and aggressions cannot be good for Canada. What it proves is that our leaders have become Zionists themselves, much to the embarrassment of most Canadians. Muzzling our "free speech" even more than it is already cannot be good for any country and reeks of Bolshevikism.

The remaining question is whether Jack Layton, Michael Ignatieff and Giles Duceppe will allow such an abomination to be reflected in any new legislation.