UN REPORT ON SYRIA: BASED ON WITNESS ACCOUNTS..... OUTSIDE OF SYRIA
"The United
Nations is nothing but a trap-door to the Red World's immense concentration
camp. We pretty much control the U.N." ~ Harold Wallace Rosenthal
By Tony Cartalucci
November 28, 2011
Wall Street and London's media machine eagerly churned out headlines like BBC's "Syria security forces 'commit crimes against humanity'" announcing the conclusions of a recent UN Human Rights Council report regarding the ongoing violence in Syria.
However, even upon
reading the BBC article it is soon discovered that, "the investigation
team members say they were denied entry into Syria itself," and that the
entirety of their "evidence" is garnered solely from interviews with
"223 victims, witnesses and also army defectors to investigate alleged
human rights violations."
BBC's article raises immediate suspicion over the veracity of the report, as "victims, witnesses, and defectors," interviewed outside of Syria is not evidence, but rather more hearsay by groups of people with a vested interest in painting the Syrian government in the worst light possible.
BBC's article raises immediate suspicion over the veracity of the report, as "victims, witnesses, and defectors," interviewed outside of Syria is not evidence, but rather more hearsay by groups of people with a vested interest in painting the Syrian government in the worst light possible.
However, upon actually reading the full text of the UN Human Rights Council report, we see just exactly
"how" the report was compiled. Under a section titled, "Methods
of Work" we find a shocking admission of the utter lack of substance and
immense conflict of interest behind the UN's predetermined conclusion, that
Syria is guilty of "crimes against humanity" and that the UN Security
Council must act.
The report states (emphasis added):
The report states (emphasis added):
"First-hand information was collected through interviews with victims and witnesses of events in the Syrian Arab Republic. The interviewing process began in Geneva on 26 September 2011. Overall, 223 victims and/or witnesses, including personnel who defected from the military and the security forces, were interviewed.
A public call was made to all interested persons and organizations to submit relevant information and documentation that would help the commission implement its mandate. It held meetings with Member States from all regional groups, regional organizations, including the League of Arab States and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, non-governmental organizations, human rights defenders, journalists and experts. Reports, scholarly analyses and media accounts, as well as audio and visual material, were also duly considered.
The information collected is stored in a secure database governed by United Nations rules on confidentiality."
Quite obviously this is not an investigation, nor is the information provided
within the report "evidence" by any stretch of the imagination.
The report would go
on to admit that it received no cooperation from the Syrian government meaning
that this publication by the UN is but a one-sided exercise to provide the
worst possible image of the Syrian government as told by opposition groups now on record fully armed, foreign-backed, and trying to
seize power by force.
The inclusion of "non-governmental organizations"
(NGOs) should also raise
immediate concerns.
While the report is
entirely negligent in listing any of these contributing NGOs, it is more than
likely they include the US government and corporate-funded army of sedition emanating out of the National Endowment for Democracy, Geroge
Soros' Open Society Institute, and their myriad of subsidiaries.
It has been these
very NGOs supplying a steady stream of similarly baseless "witness accounts"
since the unrest began earlier this year, as they've done in Libya, Belarus, Tunisia, Thailand, and beyond.
"Alleged" is used throughout the report in various forms further illustrating the tenuous nature of the UN Human Rights Council's "evidence" while all of the testimony, those who gave it, and apparently the NGOs involved in compiling the UN report are conveniently kept "confidential."
This may be because
the United Nations believes that its reputation coupled with global faith in
its work is all that is necessary to lend their report the legitimacy it needs
to bring Syria one step closer to NATO inflicted genocide.
However, considering Iraq and more recently Libya, and the UN's complicit role in facilitating genocide in both nations based on similarly tenuous "human rights" reports, a clear pattern emerges.
Human rights activists,
and the disingenuous UN
are merely dressing up with humanitarian concerns
an otherwise naked campaign of military conquest.
Video: Part 1 & 2 of "Lies
behind the "Humanitarian War" in Libya." The outrageous, confirmed,
confessed "humanitarian-based" lies used with UN complicity to
justify NATO's invasion by proxy of Libya. Libya is now run by a corporate-backed proxy
Abdurrahim el-Keib,
formally of the British Petroleum (BP), Shell, France's Total, Japan Oil
Development Company, and Abu Dhabi National Oil Company-sponsored Petroleum Institute.
It has been pointed out in April's "Globalists Coming Full Circle," and more recently in Salon's "Wes Clark and the neocon dream" that the unrest unhinging the Middle East, North Africa, and slowly creeping toward Moscow and Beijing, is part of a plan 20 years in the making.
Those behind it just so happen to populate the boards of the faux-humanitarian front, National Endowment for Democracy (NED), have affiliations with the so-called "liberal" George Soros and his Open Society Institute, and have signed their names to Hitlerian declarations of world conquest within the notorious "Project for a New American Century."
You're not expected to read the report,
let alone research the authors.
Without a doubt, the UN has compiled a tenuous and transparent fabrication of such little substance, those involved in writing it, Paulo Pinheiro, Yakin Ertürk, and Karen Koning AbuZayd, are clearly conspiring to justify an otherwise unjustifiable escalation in Syria's current unrest.
If they did indeed
have evidence of Syrian brutality, they surely would have included it in their
report and the voices at the BBC, on CNN, in Reuters and beyond would
ceaselessly air it.
Instead, the impact of the report solely depends on people trusting the legitimacy of the UN and not bothering to even objectively read it.
It equally depends on members of the media, including the disingenuous hand-wringing "humanitarians" amongst NED's vast global network to keep their heads down and not expose this willful duplicity.
The impact of the UN's report
also depends on people
not bothering to research
the associations
of those who compiled it.
Should they conduct
such research, they will find that Karen Koning AbuZayd is concurrently a member of the Washington D.C. based
Middle East Policy Council, alongside current
and former associates of Exxon, the US military, the CIA, the Saudi Binladin
Group, the US-Qatari Business Council and both former and current members of the US government.
It is more than
just a coincidence that the UN Human Rights Council report has given the US
exactly what it wanted to hear regarding Syria, and one of those compiling the
report just so happens to sit amongst an organization full of
corporate-financier interests clamoring to despoil the Middle Eastern republic.
Clearly, claims that the UN is merely a tool of corporate fascists on Wall Street and within the City of London represents a truth that confronts anyone who researches any of the claims coming out of the UN.
Image: Just some of the corporate members of the US-Qatar Business Council, whose president just so happens to sit on the same board of directors of the Middle East Policy Center as Karen AbuZayd, co-author of the conveniently timed UN Human Rights Council report on Syria.
Indeed with this tissue of lies and the associations of the liars peddling
them, the UN is truly a disingenuous tool of the world's elite, used to strip
the freedom and humanity of its enemies while simultaneously claiming to uphold
such values in the process.
The Syrian people
are facing a criminal conspiracy of vast proportions in a world increasingly
devoid of empathy, intelligence, or courage.
Like the Libyans
who fought for the better part of a year against the militant aggression of
global corporate fascism, the Syrians will soon be fighting too.
For those indeed repulsed by what has transpired in Libya and what is facing Syria at the hands of the global elite, it should be obvious that the corporations, banks, and institutions involved need to be exposed, boycotted, and promptly replaced.
For those indeed repulsed by what has transpired in Libya and what is facing Syria at the hands of the global elite, it should be obvious that the corporations, banks, and institutions involved need to be exposed, boycotted, and promptly replaced.
It was Libya yesterday,
Syria today,
and inevitably you tomorrow.
Collectively after World War II
we said, "never again,"
regarding fascism
and the rise of Adolf Hitler's Germany,
yet here we are.... again.
Go to this link to see
and read of specific lies made by Al Jazeera to the world about the current
ituation in Syria. They have already been busted several time for using footage
incongruous with events.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.