.jpg)
The
underlying philosophy of Values Clarification
holds that for teachers to promote virtues such as
honesty, justice or chastity constitutes
indoctrination of children and
‘violates’ their moral freedom.
It is urged that children should be free
to choose their own values;
the teacher must merely ‘facilitate’ and
must avoid all moralizing or criticizing.
~ THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL: CONSPIRACY TO CORRUPT
The following is a topic which I have posted about many times in
the past. Allow me to throw up a few Talmudic quotes to get the ball rolling.
At the end of Pushkin’s piece you will find an extensive and comprehensive list of links to posts I have done on this
topic in the past. The titles speak for themselves. I include a few
agendas there simply because there is so much overlap in our modern society and
the confused (and frequently reprehensible) cultural and sexual mores being “normalized’”
today.
One legal factor not mentioned in this article is the removal of
parental rights just over a decade ago which helped to set the stage for what
is happening now.
America is already more or less under Talmudic law, though not
quite so thoroughly yet as Canada, but it is coming if people do not pay
attention. And they don’t. Despite all warnings regarding the Hate Bills passed
last year they passed… setting the stage for the scenarios below described by
author Pandora Pushkin.
When a grown up man has intercourse with a little
girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (3 years and 1 day old)
it is as if one puts the finger into the eye….(i.e. the tears come again and
again, so does the virginity come back to the girl under three years) For more on this, see the article listed below on infant sexuality and the unwanted (by gentiles) new laws for fathers in Germany.
A male aged nine years and a day who cohabits with
his deceased brother’s wife [the former having left no issue] acquires her [as
wife]. (src. here)
“The purity of the relationship between mother and child is
implicit in a portrait like this. To Americans, there is no suggestion of
eroticism. Yet the Talmud indicates that eroticism between mother and son is
not unexpected. It is not an actionable offense and the Sages have only the slightest
condemnation for the mother. Depending on the son's age ~ is he older than
eight years? ~ the mother may be ineligible to marry a priest.
Our Rabbis taught: If a woman sported
lewdly with her young son [a minor], and he committed the first stage of
cohabitation with her ~ Beth Shammai [Sages] say, he thereby renders her unfit
to the priesthood. Beth Hillel [Sages] declare her fit. … All agree that
the connection of a boy aged nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst
that of one less than eight years is not: their dispute refers only to one who
is eight years old … ~ Sanhedrin 69b
Such practice is foreign to the standards of most Americans. It will take some getting used to.”
Such practice is foreign to the standards of most Americans. It will take some getting used to.”
"For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly
choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A (ED Noor:
Preferably blue-eyed blonde) male child of perfect innocence and high
intelligence is the most satisfactory and suitable victim." ~ Aliester
Crowley, Inner Masonic teachings
.
.
How can anyone with eyes to see not understand that
the above much-ballyhooed photographs of children in pain by renowned media darling Jewish photographer
Jill Greenberg are created to desensitize the viewer to the pain of children in
distress? The “artist” says it is all about lollipops but that rings pretty
hollow. This series of work by Greenberg is discussed in a Talmudic context in the video below.
.
.
By Pandora Pushkin
In which Pandora Pushkin discusses the
latest push to legalize pedophilia and make it a trendy new “alternative
lifestyle”.
.
ALICE IN WONDERLAND
ALICE: Help! I’ve just been raped by Jimmy Savile disguised as the Mad Hatter!
MAD QUEEN: Too many complaints ~ off with her head!
If
Jimmy Savile had lived a few more years ~ say ten at the most ~ he could have
found himself living in a world in which pedophilia was legal. Instead of being
vilified for his creepy sexual activities, Jimmy could have found himself a
national hero.
Resorting to the same tactics used by gay rights activists, pedophiles have begun to seek a similar legal status, arguing that their sexual desire for children is just a natural “sexual orientation”.If homosexuals like going to bed with their own sex and that’s okay, why is it so wrong if a 70-year-old man wants to go to bed with a 7-year-old girl?
“If a guy
offers the kid candy and she consents to sex, what’s the big deal?” it’s now
being asked. It’s not like he’s forcing
her, is it?
Shouldn’t the
child have a choice to say Yes
or No?
Critics of
the homosexual lifestyle have long claimed that once it became acceptable to
identify homosexuality as simply an “alternative lifestyle” or sexual
orientation, logically nothing would be off limits.
Gay advocates
have taken offense at such a position, insisting this would never happen.
.
.
Well, it’s happened.
.
Pedophiles are using exactly the same brand of logic as homosexuals once used to get their preferred form of sex legalized.
Pedophiles are using exactly the same brand of logic as homosexuals once used to get their preferred form of sex legalized.
Sodomy is just an alternative lifestyle.Gay sex is cool.Sure, we all know that.Like the world is round, gay sex is cool.Nothing wrong with gay sex.Gays are made like that.They can’t help it.
It follows
from this argument that if a guy in his seventies fancies a 7-year-old girl, or
boy, there’s nothing wrong with that, either.
Heck, that’s how he’s made!It’s his sexual orientation.And what harm is he doing if the 7-year-old girl (or boy) doesn’t mind being specially nice to him for a little extra pocket money?
Calling him a
“dirty old man” is sooo wrong!
It shouldn’t
be allowed.
That’s hate speech, like calling someone a
“kike” or “nigger”.
Come to think
of it, what’s so wrong if this same guy is into corpses, like Jimmy Savile is reported to have
been? Corpses can’t say “No”. So there’s no question about getting cadaveral
consent.
Let’s
consider necrophilia for a moment. This is not off-topic. It’s highly relevant.
I guess it’s
possible to argue that sex with corpses can also be pretty cool and awesome.
Like it’s
just an alternative lifestyle. I mean, if you happen to be born with a natural
sexual orientation for sex with the dead, maybe society should be a bit more
tolerant and not start making moral judgments.
Maybe
necrophiliacs ought to put in for protected minority status, just like
pedophiles and homosexuals…?
I guess one way to settle this vexed question about necrophilia, if it’s right or wrong, is to ask yourself: if YOU were a corpse, how would you like someone to make use of your dead body for sexual purposes?It can easily be argued that most people are not going to mind, for no other reason than this: they’re going to be dead! How can you mind if you’re dead? When you’re dead, what do you care?If you don’t mind being burned to ashes or put six feet under, why should you mind being used as a sex object that gives pleasure to a necrophiliac?Thus the smooth casuist will be able to argue.
I foresee
certain problems of course with legalized necrophilia, but I am sure these can
be overcome easily enough with advertizing campaigns on TV assuring the public
that sex with corpses is just fine and dandy ~ just like killing innocent
people in Iraq and Afghanistan and Palestine is fine and dandy, if you can con
people into thinking these people are very wicked.
I mean, if torture is okay ~ and torture IS
perfectly legal in America and Israel ~ there’s absolutely no reason why
necrophilia (or pedophilia with dead children) shouldn’t be legal too, is
there?
I can
understand that the relatives of
the corpse might get a bit upset. That’s to be expected. Relatives can be like
that. Uncooperative. But the responsible necrophiliac is never going to
misbehave with a corpse, is he? If he’s got any self-respect, he’s
going to check it out with the deceased’s relatives first. To ask if they mind.
To get their compassionate consent.
.
.“I’m dead and in the cooler
But I wanna come back
As a serial killer
Or a necrophiliac.”
~ Anon, Kinky Graffiti
.
.
But I wanna come back
As a serial killer
Or a necrophiliac.”
~ Anon, Kinky Graffiti
.
Psychiatrists are now
beginning to advocate
redefining pedophilia
in the same way
homosexuality
was
redefined several years ago.
In 1973 the
American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality from its list of
mental disorders. A group of psychiatrists recently held a symposium proposing
a new definition of pedophilia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Health Disorders of the APA.
.
.
They decided
that pedophiles were to be called “minor-attracted people” from now on.
“Pedophile” was thought to be too harsh a word. It had negative connotations.
So a clear attempt is now being made to “prettify” pedophilia and make it not
only socially acceptable but a harmless and trendy “alternative lifestyle.”
Just like homosexuality.
The idea is
this:
if people can be brainwashed into thinking homosexuality is nice and normal, why can’t they be brainwashed into thinking pedophilia is nice and normal too?
In ten years
time, it is hoped, the public will be ready for the legalization of pedophilia.
In the meantime, they need to be softened up.
The stigma
attached to pedophilia needs to be removed. Not only this, but the same stigma
will need to be subtly transferred to those who oppose pedophilia and feel pedophilia is morally wrong and
repugnant.
These child protectors will need to be portrayed as desperately out-of-touch cranks, as reactionary crackpots hostile to the child’s right to free sexual expression.
Will a new
word of abuse and contempt, like “homophobe” and “anti-Semite”, have to be
invented for the nasty people who disapprove of pedophilia? I don’t think so.
There’s already a word that will do beautifully: PEDOPHOBE.
Loosely
translated, this means “child hater”. By extension, it also means
“pedophile hater”. The word can be applied to anyone who opposes pedophilia and
thinks it is disgusting.
The word “pedophobe”, in other words, will soon be applied as a term of abuse to anyone who opposes pedophilia. If you don’t like pedophila, you will soon find yourself labeled a “pedophobe” ~ an object of disgust and contempt which will put you into the same category as a “homophobe” or “anti-Semite”.
As far back
as 1998, the APA issued a report claiming that
“the negative potential of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences.”
Only earlier
this year two psychologists in Canada declared that pedophilia was a sexual
orientation just like homosexuality. So there was nothing to worry about. It
ought to be accepted.
.
.
Mr Van
Gijseghem, psychologist and retired professor of the University of Montreal,
told members of Parliament,
“Pedophiles are not simply people who commit a small offense from time to time but rather are grappling with what is equivalent to a sexual orientation just like another individual may be grappling with homosexuality.”
Dr. Quinsey,
professor emeritus of psychology at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario,
agreed with Van Gijseghem. Quinsey said that pedophiles have a definite
sexual preference for children. “There is no evidence that this sort of
preference can be changed through treatment or through anything else,” he said.
(See here)
In July,
2010, Harvard Health Publications chipped in and gave pedophilia another boost.
“Pedophilia is a sexual orientation and is unlikely to change,” they said.
Harvard is
now 25 percent Jewish, and the most influential part too, so one can expect a
trendy contempt for Christian values to emanate from this ivory tower. Indeed,
it was only last week that a sex bondage club, catering for student sadists and
masochists, was set up at this august university. (See here and here)
Linda Harvey,
of Mission America, said the push for pedophiles to have equal rights will
become more and more common as LGBT [Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender] groups
continue to assert themselves.
“It’s all part of a plan to introduce sex to children at younger and younger ages.” (See here)
It’s only a
matter of time before Harvard university and its Ivy League imitators begin to
set up student clubs for pedophiles and child porn enthusiasts, provided they
can first give the whole enterprise a veneer of academic respectability ~ which
of course they will be able to do, given all that Jewish talent at their
disposal.
.
.
ED Noor: Of all the complexes Dr. Sigmund Freud allegedly found in the human
subconscious, the Oedipus complex is probably the most well-known. According to
Freud, a child lusts carnally for the flesh of his mother and yearns to replace
his father in the marriage bed. The world was deeply shocked by Freud's
statement when he published it. Freud said the world's denial was really an
affirmation of his theory, but some scholars have a different perspective. Freud's
work loses the sparkle of originality when seen in the light of the Talmud doctrines
that formed a part of his cultural background.
.
.
THE SEXUALIZATION OF CHILDREN BY THE
JEW-CONTROLLED MEDIA
Children like this
are being deliberately groomed for pedophilia. Toxic hormones are being
surreptitiously introduced into junk foods, soft drinks, and the water supply
so as to produce early puberty and sexual precocity on an epidemic scale.
Milton
Diamond, a University of Hawaii professor and director of the Pacific Center
for Sex and Society, stated that child pornography could be beneficial to
society because,
“Potential sex offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex against children.”
I am not
surprised that a man with a name like “Milton Diamond” should put in a good word
for child pornography. We know what ethnic group benefits most from the
promotion of pornography. And Milton Diamond obviously belongs to this elite
group of cultural Marxists who would like to see the entire world take up
compulsive masturbation as a hobby.
Dr Diamond is
a distinguished lecturer for the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human
Sexuality in San Francisco. The same institute lists, on its website, a list of
“basic sexual rights” that include “the right to engage in sexual acts or activities
of any kind whatsoever,
providing they do not involve nonconsensual acts, violence, constraint,
coercion or fraud.”
Another thing
they praise is “the freedom of any
sexual thought, fantasy or desire.” The Institute also states,
significantly, that “no one should be
disadvantaged because of age.”
Dr Diamond
makes it crystal clear what kind of brave new world he would like to see us all
living in. It is reassuring to know that no one will be left behind ~
that “no one should be disadvantaged
because of age.”
Dr Diamond
sees the protection now extended to toddlers as a “disadvantage”.
Why are these adorable little creatures, full of life’s promise, being denied the pleasures of sexual intercourse with wise old coots ten times their senior?
Just think what
a 7-year-old child could learn from entering into intimate relations with a
70-year-old senior citizen! To deprive the child of the benefits of his
superior wisdom is positively cruel!
Penis size
will of course have to be taken into account, and men with exceptionally large
penises will obviously have to be disqualified from intercourse with toddlers.
Or maybe they can be encouraged to use Vaseline and special lubricants which
will help to anaesthetize the three sexual orifices likely to be utilized.
In any case,
it’s early days. Not to worry. The experts will work it all out. Leave it to
the boffins.
Here’s more
good news for you if you happen to be a pedophile: Dr Diamond says he would
like to legalize child porn so that you can enjoy the innocent pleasure of
masturbating over children. Isn’t that kind of him?
He thinks this will stop you raping and killing
children.
Gosh, why
didn’t someone think of this before? For more information on this fascinating
topic, click on:
Sex offender
laws protecting children have been challenged in several states including
California, Georgia and Iowa.
Sex offenders claim that the laws prohibiting them from living near schools or parks, for example, are unfair because it penalizes them for life.
.
Sex offenders claim that the laws prohibiting them from living near schools or parks, for example, are unfair because it penalizes them for life.
.
“Why’s that pedo
flashing at me from behind that tree? Hmm, I guess flashing at kids is pretty
cool… an awesome alternative lifestyle.”
Let’s face
it, friends: perversion is cool. I mean, anything can be perceived as cool ~ even eating shit.
If you’re born a perv, you need respect and understanding from the community.
You need special facilities laid on for you so that you can indulge your
perversion as a human right.
Child porn is
just a stepping stone toward even greater liberties. Child brothels, regulated
by the state, will obviously be the next step on the Noble Eightfold Path. Even
cannibalism and murder, provided you get the written consent of your victim,
ought not to be ruled out.
As they say
in New Zion or USreal, every option
should be kept on the table.
This is the
way the word ends…not with a bang but a whimper…as one pushes beyond the
borderlines of the banal in the ultimate quest for mystical union with the
divine ~ or diabolical.
PEDOPHILE VICTIM
Beautiful
6-year-old Jersey Bridgeman, from Arkansas, was found raped and murdered last
week a few doors from her mother’s home. She is here seen wearing LIPSTICK. Why
has this child been so needlessly sexualized
and made to look more like an adult? If her mother hadn’t bought her that
lipstick, would she still be alive today? (See here)
.
Is
this little girl “asking” for it?
Is she being groomed for pedophilia?
Is she being groomed for pedophilia?
ED
Noor:
Appointing puppet leaders who can be controlled by blackmail
is from The Protocols of Zion.
is from The Protocols of Zion.
If the person is clean,
set them up and MAKE something to control them.
Have these Jews become so arrogant that they feel that
they can get away with such behavior without repercussion?
Is this just a small part of what we can expect
should the world fall under their
Communist godless Zionist rule?
Communist godless Zionist rule?
YOU BETCHA!
RELATED READING:
PEDOPHILIA: THE TALMUD'S DIRTY SECRET
.
[Hello, Noor. Saw this on the web. To see one of Hollywood's best friends, Google "The Background Obama Can't Cover Up"! Sally]
ReplyDeleteControl Hollywood, Not Guns!
Instead of gun control, why not Hollywood control?
Gun triggers are touched by fingers. But Hollywood, guided more by profits than OT prophets, poisons the minds that pull the triggers.
Even more insidiously, some of the most powerful Hollywood moguls quietly embrace the most unspeakably evil forms of child abuse. Google or Yahoo "The Talmud" which says that Jewish adults are allowed to have sex with children as young as three years old!
Also Google or Yahoo "Pedophilia: The Talmud's Dirty Secret." (There are those who even want to normalize and legalize pedophilia! - Google "jewishfaces.com/porn.html.")
Why do politicians focus only on "mopping up" the aftereffects of hypocritical Hollywood's overflowing sex-and-gun-violence "faucet" instead of trying to shut it off? Let's control the big "guns" of Hollywood - and NOT guns!
you are nothing but white trash racist asshole
ReplyDeleteThank you for your excellent and illuminating commentary. I am so sorry to see that you approve of pedophilia and crimes against children.
DeleteThank you for dropping by with your highly educated opinion ... and for being so brave as to leave your identification so that I could thank you for your support!
BTW tell that to my lovely Eurasian daughters... or my Trinidadian sister in law that I am racist! I mean. you really are a Doofus.
I am so sorry , i do not approve of pedophilia and crimes against children. either necroplia /zombiesm /etc..
ReplyDeletebut not meant to be a war..
It was merely a literal misunderstanding. No problems... all is well! Thank you for coming back and we got this sorted out. I apologize for misinterpreting your words perhaps as well. Anyhow it is over... not worth a "war" and please have a wonderful day!
Delete