YOUR SATURDAY CARTOONS: JANUARY 19, 2018

Sen Schiff is going on about how this canceled trip was important to do work regarding American troops being pulled from the Middle East; it is my humble opinion that they were going there to meddle in troop withdrawal and had to be stopped. Not to mention that Democratic "elders" should not be gallivanting about the globe when they are involved in a national emergency at home. Such travel is to make the mess look even worse and deflect responsibility from themselves to Trump. Military work is done from Washington by the military not desperate Democratic politicians.

Two weeks into 2019, dear Readers, and I have already missed a post! The truth is I fell asleep early and just could not wake up in time. Today I offer a pretty good collection with, of course, a focus on the Wall situation in its various forms.  Gillette and its advertising fiasco gets plenty of attention; other than that it is just a lot of interesting things I have picked up here and there with you, personally, in mind. Please settle back and enjoy!
 .

Giddy and goofy as AOC behaves, she is being her genuine foolish self, but she is not as stupid as most think; she is backed by the most powerful criminal players and supporters of them all. She knows how to attract attention; of course the complicit media pushes her; I am sure if she passed gas it would be praised and compared to a floral scent. 

 

"This is our child unit, Pumpkin!" 

There surely must be stories in which the phrase "a federal district judge has ruled" actually leads to something good, or at least vaguely like justice. But today's news item is decidely not one of those stories.

Specifically, Judge Jesse Furman has ruled that the Trump administration may not add an outrageously offensive question to the 2020 Census asking, "are you a citizen?" Which, in our opinion, would have saved a lot of time and money by keeping dogs and cats from being interviewed. But noOOooo. 

The judge made this ruling because he "infers from the various ways Commerce Secretary Ross and his aides acted like people with something to hide that they did have something to hide." For instance, they might have been hiding a suspicious desire to know how many actual American citizens there are, or been attempting to get a better grip on the number of aliens who are illegally in the country.

Had the wildly unacceptable question been allowed (which will be reviewed by the Supreme Court once Ruth Bader Ginsburg is again able to cling to her perch and gnaw her cuttlebone) it would have had terrible effects, according to the director of the ACLU's Voting Rights Project (who is apparently unaware that illegals aren't supposed to be voting).

"The inevitable result," he said, "would have been to strip federal resources and political representation from those needing it most." In other words, the Left wants illegals to maintain the same access to taxpayer-funded benefits and political representation that citizens have...essentially making citizenship itself meaningless.

Whether or not that's the future we want for our country is worth discussing...but as usual, it's a discussion the Left wants to make sure has no reliable facts about which to argue.

I miss the Canada I grew up in!

And THIS is why I support America so strongly; President Trump so much; he is not perfect but he is taking THAT stand. Fortunately a few European nations are beginning to stand with him.

A Canadian ahead of all those who have been working hard for the PRIVILEGE of Canadian citizenship by the normal channels!? Ah, the virtue signalling! 

I could care less if she is ahead of the illegals, but this is a slap to honest migrants. It is also a slap to Saudi Arabia but I doubt the Saudis are stinging from this blow from our weak Prime Minister. His ineptness has also landed us in difficulties with China who is now arresting Canadians and administering the death sentence to one charged with shipping 500 pounds of meth out of that country. 

In this case, IMHO, they are taking out Canadian trash, but were our leader a more respected person things might be different. They are not bothering American ex pats at all. As it is they criticize Freeland saying she never thinks before she opens her mouth. This is, alas, true.

Point SO WELL taken! The West has been milked for aid to contribute to its own eventual destruction via these charities. These families have as many children as possible whilst the Caucasian families of the West are encouraged to not breed. Pass the bacon, please.

"We have more to do!"

Canadian patriots have so much MORE to do to get this Libtard embarrassment out of office.

Kid isn't a great student. Read the answers to Question 2. Didn't do so well on Question 3 either! But the answer to Pt.3 Question 1 is terrifying. It shows that the constant bombardment is beginning to show its rotten fruit in young minds. 

I don't watch SNL but I am sure they will not depict this current situation in any way that can reflect poorly on the Democrats. Sorry. Their TDS is too all-encompassing.

That statement did not age well, Nancy!

 

The toxic masculinity just oozes from that heavy signature! And I am sure it was written in a very thick pen on purpose. That Trump humour.

My Grandmother would be rolling over in her grave if she saw this. When I was about 5 I was given a little black "Pickaninny" doll. (I just looked up the word 'pickaninny' and read that it is a racial slur; by today's standards it is but that is what the doll was sold as at the time.) 

When Grandmother saw it I sensed her distaste. Although I never heard any discussion between Grandma and my parents, within a few days it disappeared and I was taken to Eaton's to find a doll for the one that "had wandered away and gotten lost in the forest nearby". This was circa 1954.

Carnaby Street. The fashion centre of the world during the "Swinging Sixties". I maintain this is when the public feminizing of males began. Like all other impressionable girls of the time I was fascinated by the long hair, the ruffles, the velvet and lace that was all the rage at the time. Perhaps  this partially accounts to the popularity of drag queens.

Historically men were peacocks in dress at no price to their masculinity; there was nothing effeminate about men in lace and velvet who were still completely "toxic males". But the world has moved on. Now those Carnaby days are almost innocent compared to today's decadence. 

No one would have called King Louis XIV of France, the Sun King, effeminate, ever. Dressed in layers of gold and lace, he was quite masculine in all of his pursuits.

 

Pretty well accurate quotes from this interview.

Really, Gillette?!
Stilton says: There's a message worth delivering about real men not being rapists, bullies, and all-around assholes, but like candidate Hillary Clinton, Gillette chose to call all men Deplorables. Except, of course, for those Gillette-approved pajama boy types who intercede to tell their neanderthal friends that it's "not cool" to show that you're attracted to a woman, and a bad idea to stand idly by as a gang of feral boys beat the living crap out of another kid who looks like a little boy, but whose gender we don't want to assume out of fear of traumatizing him/her/it.

The imagery in the commercial includes a "Stepford Husbands" row of toxic men in a suburban back yard, standing shoulder to shoulder behind their evil, smoke-emitting grills as animal meat sizzles menacingly...soon to become testosterone-fuel coursing through the veins (sometimes dangerously remaining in certain veins for four hours or longer) of a nation of grunting, hirsute, brutal man-beasts eternally cursed by their possession of a Y chromosome.

Having had a long career in advertising, we find ourselves wondering how in Hell any overpaid ad exec (and teams of testers) thought the way to sell razors to men was by insulting them? Seriously, you don't see "Summer's Eve" running commercials telling women not to be vicious, overly-emotional harpies who should ~ oh yeah! ~ buy more lemon-zesty douche products. 

Which is why the ad isn't really intended to rein in sexists and bullies at all, but is rather a crass and commercial appeal to neutered social justice warriors who enjoy seeing the unwarranted slander of one of nature's two favorite genders.

Our bottom line: toxic masculinity is a lot less of a threat to our culture than toxic emasculation. We don't need Gillette's razor to tell us that; Occam's will do nicely.

LIBERAL cartoon, folks. Calm down. Sorry for the shock.

Historically speaking, this image appeals to me greatly. All part of our ancient struggle to survive; the same one we fight today against the same enemies.

Dinner is served. In clear gelatin.

My daughters who are 6 and 8 yrs older than she, have not done the Lib route, look MUCH younger than this woman! But then I warrant they have taken better care of what the good Lord gave them. Liberalism is not a good look.

This is true.

Toxic media

Poor clueless Jim Acosta. We could almost pity him. Almost. But not so much nonetheless. He is such a sweet target and sacrifices himself constantly in the name of "journalistic integrity"; he deserves our attention.

Math in America. This kid is brilliant. Thinks outside the box! Pity the teacher disagrees.

This one is a victim of Common Core math!

This is, apparently, a false quote. I believe that; not how these boys think. Meanwhile high end Dem-owned restaurants are offering the team fabulous cuisine to try to virtue signal, gain publicity, etc all while slamming Trump. So far, there have been no takers because the team was very happy.

Give these Democrats credit where credit is due! They are standing aside from the usual herd they run with and that will cost them.