The End of Political Cartoons at "The New York Times"

Ed Noor: I am posting this older article because this is another example of censorship although not necessarily against Conservative cartoons; both Liberal and Conservative artists lost their employment with this cowardly act by the editorial leadership of this left wing rag. It is interesting to read Patrick Chapatte's words on losing his work after being the man to bring political cartooning to the publication.

From Chappatte's website.

Cartoon published on the front page of the NYT website on January 8, 2015, after the Charlie Hebdo attacks and won the 2015 Overseas Press Club Award.

All my professional life, I have been driven by the conviction that the unique freedom of political cartooning entails a great sense of responsibility.

In 20-plus years of delivering a twice-weekly cartoon for the International Herald Tribune first, and then The New York Times, after receiving three Overseas Press Club awards in that category, I thought the case for political cartoons had been made (in a newspaper that was notoriously reluctant to the form in past history.)

2011 Overseas Press Club Award

2018 Overseas Press Club Award

But something happened. 

In April 2019, a Netanyahu caricature from syndication reprinted in the international editions triggered widespread outrage, a Times apology and the termination of syndicated cartoons. 

Weeks later, my employers tell me they're ending political cartoons altogether by July. 

I’m putting down my pen, with a sigh: that’s a lot of years of work undone by a single cartoon ~ not even mine ~ that should never have run in the best newspaper of the world.

Cartoon by Antonio Antunes, Expresso, Portugal.

I’m afraid this is not just about cartoons, but about journalism and opinion in general. 

We are in a world where moralistic mobs gather on social media and rise like a storm, falling upon newsrooms in an overwhelming blow. 

This requires immediate counter-measures by publishers, leaving no room for ponderation or meaningful discussions. 

Twitter is a place for furor, not debate. 

The most outraged voices tend to define the conversation, and the angry crowd follows in.

Over the last years, with the Cartooning for Peace Foundation we established with French cartoonist Plantu and the late Kofi Annan ~ a great defender of cartoons ~     or on the board of the Association of American Editorial Cartoonists, I have consistently warned about the dangers of those sudden (and often organized) backlashes that carry everything in their path. 

If cartoons are a prime target

it’s because of their nature and exposure:

they are an encapsulated opinion,

a visual shortcut

with an unmatched capacity 
to touch the mind.

That’s their strength,

and their vulnerability.

They might also be a revealer of something deeper. More than often, the real target, behind the cartoon, is the media that published it.

“Political cartoons were born with democracy. 
And they are challenged when freedom is.”
 
In 1995, at twenty-something, I moved to New York with a crazy dream: I would convince the New York Times to have political cartoons. 

An art director told me: “We never had political cartoons and we will never have any.“ 

But I was stubborn. 

For years, I did illustrations for NYT Opinion and the Book Review, and then I persuaded the Paris-based International Herald Tribune (a NYT-Washington Post joint venture) to hire an in-house editorial cartoonist. 

By 2013, when the NYT had fully incorporated the IHT, there I was: featured on the NYT website, on its social media and in its international print editions. 

In 2018, we started translating cartoons on the NYT Chinese and Spanish websites. 

The U.S. paper edition remained the last frontier. 

Gone out the door, I had come back through the window. 

And proven that art director wrong: The New York Times did have political cartoons. 

For a while in history, they dared.

Along with The Economist, featuring the excellent Kal, The New York Times was one of the last venues for international political cartooning ~ for a U.S. newspaper aiming to have a meaningful impact worldwide, it made sense.

Cartoons can jump over borders.

Who will show the emperor Erdogan that he has no clothes, when Turkish cartoonists can’t do it? ~ One of them, our friend Musa Kart, is now in jail. 

Cartoonists from Venezuela, Nicaragua and Russia were forced into exile. 

Over the last years, some of the very best cartoonists in the U.S., like Nick Anderson and Rob Rogers, lost their positions because their publishers found their work too critical of Trump. 

Maybe we should start worrying. And pushing back. 

Political cartoons were born with democracy. And they are challenged when freedom is.

“The power of images has never been so big.“

Curiously, I remain positive. This is the era of images. 

In a world of short attention span,

their power has never been so big.

Out there is a whole world of possibilities, not only in editorial cartooning, still or animated, but also in new fields like on-stage illustrated presentations and long-form comics reportage ~ of which I have been a proponent for the last 25 years. 

(I’m happy, by the way, to have opened the door for the genre at the NYT with the “Inside Death Row“ series in 2016. 

The following year, another series about Syrian refugees by Jake Halpern and Michael Sloan got the NYT a Pulitzer Prize.) 

It’s also a time where the media need to renew themselves and reach out to new audiences. 

And stop being afraid of the angry mob.

In the insane world we live in, the art of the visual commentary is needed more than ever. And so is humor.

Patrick Chappatte
June 10, 2019

See an archive of Chappatte’s cartoons for the NYT here. 

His comics journalism series inside death row here.
***
UPDATES

Here is the statement issued by the Association of American Editorial Cartoonists on the New York Times' decision to cease publishing editorial cartoons and halting the regular contributions of one of the finest cartoonists in the business, Patrick Chappatte.

Editorial cartoonists across America and the world have consistently, uniformly and vigorously defended the ideal of a free press from the attacks of tyrants, dictators and twittering demagogues. 
.

But now cartoonists are united in their outrage as it has become apparent this week that The New York Times has indeed sadly failed. 
.

Monday, the Times announced it would no longer publish in-house editorial cartoons in its editions, ending their regular publication of the work of internationally acclaimed cartoonist Patrick Chappatte. 
.

This decision comes weeks after the Times was burned by their own editorial negligence in running a syndicated cartoon that was widely condemned as being anti-Semitic. 
.

Doubling down on this clumsiness in response to the resultant furor, the Times announced that they would no longer run syndicated editorial cartoons. 
.

Their decision now to not run in-house cartoons as well only adds to that ham-handedness, blaming the medium of cartoons for what resulted from their own lack of editorial oversight. 
.

In a statement defending their action, the Times said they “plan to continue investing in forms of Opinion journalism, including visual journalism, that express nuance, complexity and strong voice …” 
.

From this description, it seems the type of “visual journalism” the Times envisions has more to do with storytelling than with expressing strong opinions. 
.

The best editorial cartoons are not celebrated for their nuance. 
.

It is their clarity and pointedness, the sharpness of their satire, that makes them such powerful vehicles for expressing opinion. 
.

There is no 

 “on the other hand” 

in an editorial cartoon. 

.

This power, understandably, makes editors nervous, but to completely discontinue their use is letting anxiety slide into cowardice. 
.

With their decision to end using editorial cartoons, the Gray Lady, as the Times has been called, has become even more gray and dingy. 
.

And the environment for free expression and the free exchange of ideas has become even bleaker. 
.

The Board of the Association of American Editorial Cartoonists

Kevin Siers, President

***

By choosing not to print editorial cartoons in the future, the Times can be sure that their editors will never again make a poor cartoon choice. Editors at the Times have also made poor choices of words in the past. I would suggest that the Times should also choose not to print words in the future ~ just to be on the safe side. 

Daryl Cagle, head of the syndicate Cagle Cartoons, which distributes Chappatte’s work to about 800 subscribing clients.

"The New York Times political cartoon ban is a sinister and dangerous over-reaction" in The Guardian.

"The Times chickens out" on Clay Jones' blog.