Monday, 20 December 2010

FREEMASONRY AND THE TOWER OF BABEL


FREEMASONRY AND THE LUCIFERIAN CONNECTION
 
Nimrod, founder of Freemasonry.
Note the all-seeing eye above the tower.
The Rothschilds consider themselves 
to be descendants of Nimrod. 


By Noor al Haqiqa
December 19, 2010


There is a direct connection between Freemasonry and the ancient Babylonian mystery religion from which the ancient pagan religions of Egypt, Persia, Greece and Rome eventually developed. It all goes back to a man named Nimrod who the Freemasons view as the true originator of their Order.

It is written that Nimrod was a great Mesopotamian king who founded the city of Babylon and established the first great empire after Noah's flood. His commissioning the creation of the Tower of Babel in direct opposition to God, a direct challenge.

Nimrod sought to turn men away from God by setting up a tyrannical government and setting up a new religion. In fact, the new religion centered around Nimrod and his mother-become-wife Semiramis. These two/three eventually evolved into Baal worship from which all the pagan religions of the Middle East and Europe later developed. Not only that, according to the Encyclopedia of Freemasonry: The legend of the Craft in the Old Constitutions, Nimrod is the primary founder of Masonry.

Of Nimrod, the historian Flavius Josephus wrote:
Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and contempt of God. He was the grandson of one of Noah's "most wicked" son, Ham, therefore great grandson of Noah, a bold man, and of great strength of hand. He persuaded his people not to ascribe their joys to God, as if it were through his means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which procured that happiness. 

He also gradually changed the government into tyranny, seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of God, but to bring them into a constant dependence on his power. He also said he would be revenged on God, if he should have a mind to drown the world again; for that he would build a tower too high for the waters to reach. And that he would avenge himself on God for destroying their forefathers.

Only a truly wicked woman would marry her son and bear him a child; only a truly wicked male would wed his mother to procreate. From this pair come many of the evils we deal with today. The uppermost levels of Freemasonry keep their memory and rituals alive even today. 
.
Now the multitude of his populace were very ready to follow the determination of Nimrod, and to esteem it a piece of cowardice to submit to God; and they built the  tower, neither sparing any pains, nor being in any degree negligent about the work: and, by reason of the multitude of hands employed in it, it grew very high, sooner than any one could expect; but the thickness of it was so great, and it was so strongly built, that thereby its great height seemed, upon the view, to be less than it really was.

It was built of burnt brick, cemented together with mortar, made of bitumen, that it might not be liable to admit water. When God saw that they acted so madly, he did not resolve to destroy them utterly, since they were not grown wiser by the destruction of the former sinners; but he caused a tumult among them, by producing in them diverse languages, and causing that, through the multitude of those languages, they should not be able to understand one another. 

 The Temple of Solomon

The place wherein they built the tower is now called Babylon, because of the confusion of that language which they readily understood before; for the Hebrews mean by the word Babel, confusion.

Over time, Nimrod was eventually given attributes of two archetypal cruel and persecuting kings ~ Nebuchadnezzar and Pharaoh.

In fact, even today, initiates in at least some forms of Freemasonry are still required to take the "Oath of Nimrod". The Spring 2006 issue of Freemasonry Today (a Masonic publication) tells us that the Oath of Nimrod is part of the initiation process for the "indentured apprentice"

The candidate is led into the Lodge by the Deacons, and after prayer, is investigated prior to taking the initiatory oath called the ‘Oath of Nimrod’. Nimrod, of course, is mentioned in the ‘Old Charges’ as a teacher of the Masonic craft and the architect of many great cities in Mesopotamia. The working tools are explained, the Ancient Charges (c.1663) and modes of recognition are communicated, and a pale blue cord is placed around his neck. The ceremony of closing the Assemblage is completed with prayer and a ‘seven-fold salute’ to The Most High.

In his book entitled "The Arcana of Freemasonry" Freemason scholar Albert Churchwood traces the origins and development of Freemasonry from ancient Egypt to the present day. In the book Churchwood actually includes the text of the "Oath of Nimrod" which new initiates must take:


Oath of Nimrod Apprentice Degree (1st)
I, _______, do in the presence of El Shaddai and of this Worshipful Assembly of Free Masons, Rough Masons, Wallers, Slaters, Paviors, Plasterers and Bricklayers, promise and declare that I will not at any time hereafter, by any act or circumstance whatsoever, directly or indirectly, write, print, cut, mark, publish, discover, reveal, or make known, any part or parts of the Trade secrets, privileges, or counsels of the Worshipful Fraternity or Fellowship of Free Masonry, which I may have known at any time, or at any time hereafter shall be made known unto me.

The penalty for breaking this great oath shall be the loss of my life.

That I shall be branded with the mark of the Traitor and slain according to ancient custom by being throttled, that my body shall be buried in the rough sands of the sea a cable’s length from the shore where the tide regularly ebbs and flows twice in the twenty-four hours, so that my soul shall have no rest by night or by day
(Candidate Signs the O.B.)
While some Freemason apologists attempt to play down the influence of Nimrod on modern Masonry, the truth is that it is still very much there. At the Islamic Party of Britain's website we discover a very open letter concerning Nimrod's influence.
"Indeed the allegory of the Tower of Babel is yet another corruption of a similar theme from the Saracen Mysteries... medieval witches and English Freemasons substituted 'Nimrod' for the name of Lucifer. 

Nimrod is a generic term for the struggle of the 'indwelling god' who would aspire to Heaven. Lucifer as the informing entity in humankind can be equated with Nimrod... 

Most Freemasons would be startled to learn that Nimrod and the Tower of Babel were [originally] one of the pivots of the (Masonic) Craft legend... our first most excellent Grand Master is declared to be King Nimrod himself, the builder of that [in]famous Tower and it was he, not King Solomon, who is said to have given the operative Masons of his day their first 'Charge'." ~ A letter written to Mr. John Hamill, Curator and Librarian, United Grand Lodge of England from David Musa Pidcock, 1996

"The universal sentiment of the Freemasons of the present day is to confer upon Solomon, the King of Israel, the honor of being their first Grand Master.


But the legend of the Craft had long before, though there was a tradition of the Temple in existence, given, at least by suggestion, that title to Nimrod, the King of Babylonia and Assyria. It had credited the first organization of the fraternity of craftsmen to him, in saying that he gave a charge to the workmen whom he sent to assist the King of Nineveh in building his cities.

That is to say, he framed for them a Constitution, and, in the words of the legend, this was the first time that ever Masons had any charge of his science. It was the first time that the Craft was organized into a fraternity working under a Constitution of body of laws. As Nimrod was the autocratic maker of these laws, it necessarily resulted that their first legislator, creating laws with his unlimited and absolute governing power, was also their first Grand Master."

The truth is that Freemasonry has always very closely identified itself with the first great post-flood rebel against God. Nimrod was a tyrant and a purveyor of false religion. Elements of the religious system which Nimrod helped establish can be found in virtually every major world religion. Some of our most cherished "holiday traditions" can be directly traced back to ancient Babylon and to Nimrod. Once you learn to identify the elements of the ancient Babylonian mystery religion, you quickly recognize that they are virtually everywhere in the modern world.

From the very moment that initiates take the "Oath of Nimrod", Masons are plunged into a very powerful dark world based on the ancient Babylonian mystery religion. The truth is that Freemasonry does not have anything to do with the God of the Bible.


Instead, it has everything to do with the "New World Order" that Nimrod originally wanted and that Lucifer is still attempting to bring into existence today. 

SOURCES:



The Cable-Tow  ~ The Cremation Of Care

The Hiramic Legend ~ David Icke Forum

Secret Sects of Syria and The Lebanon  By Bernard H. Springett

What, then, is Freemasonry? ~ By David Musa Pidcock

11 comments:

  1. The actual Tower of Babel is Tell El Obeid today (nothing but the very bottom base ruin left. Babylon was built much later and is 135 miles to the northwest by west). Both were destroyed by God's wrath.

    Nimrod and Abraham were not contemporaries. That is a pagan corruption injected later than actual history. Abraham was indeed told by God to leave Ur of the Chaldees and all of its pagan religion.

    The supposed influence of Nimrod and Babylonian paganism on Christian feast days, and especially baptism, is a post medieval Protestant supposition concocted mostly by Judaizing influences, many of whom were Masonic as well. Not true.

    Judaizing influences, especially through the iconoclastic Protestants, were always the enemy of the Christian faith and sought to destroy it. They tried to corrupt the faith through the centuries in many ways, even well before the appearance of Protestants, many of whom are sincere Christians. In fact, when one reads the Gospel of John, they even tried to corrupt the Lord Jesus Christ Himself. They, of course, failed in that attempt. John 6:15 'Jesus therefore, when he knew that they would come to take him by force, and make him king, fled again into the mountain himself alone.'

    Christmas is the Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ and has nothing to do with Babylonian anything.

    To all of good will, a most blessed and sacred Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MOSES WAS A WAR CRIMINAL

      We often hear people say,

      “If only Jews would return to the Law of Moses!
      “Instead, they follow their secular, atheistic, and Zionist ways!”

      They express horror at the recent deliberate slaughter of Gazans, particularly the slaughter of women and children. (1)
      But haven’t these folks ever read the Hebrew Bible? Are they unaware of the influence of the Old Testament on Judaism?
      Please open your Hebrew Bible. For the moment, focus your attention on the Book of Numbers.
      You are about to learn that Moses, the great “law giver,” was a war criminal who ORDERED his followers to commit war crimes. The most heinous were crimes were committed against women and children.

      NUMBERS 31:13-18:
      (13) Moses, Eleazar the priest, and all the leaders of the community went to meet them outside the camp.
      (14) But Moses was furious with all the generals and captains who had returned from the battle.
      (15) “Why have you let all the women live?” he demanded.
      (16) “These are the very ones who followed Balaam’s advice and caused the people of Israel to rebel against the Lord at Mount Peor. They are the ones who caused the plague to strike the Lord’s people.
      (17) So kill all the boys and all the women who have had intercourse with a man.
      ( 18 ) Only the young girls who are virgins may live; you may keep them for yourselves.

      The rest of Chapter 31 is concerned with distributing the Midianite plunder. Thirty-two thousand (32,000) virgin girls were counted in the booty (Verse 35). Thirty-two of these were given to “the Lord.” That is, 32 of these little girls were set aside for the Levities (heave offerings), to be used as concubines (Verses 40 and 41).

      Yes, Numbers 31 says what it says.
      The Babylonian Talmud sages used Numbers 31 to justify having sex with children. And since the Talmud sages, along with Christians, regard the Old Testament as “the word of God,” why beat up on the Talmud sages? Why not beat up on Jehovah and Moses, who set the standards?

      For further discussion of Jewish teachings on sex with children, see the Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Yebamoth 60b, Soncino 1961 Edition, page 402. Discussion and links at http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_2.html
      It’s true. Moses was a war criminal. The Hebrew Bible tells you so. Should we be surprised at how women and children were treated in Gaza?
      Footnotes
      (1) New Evidence of Gaza Child Deaths, BBC, 22 January, 2009
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/7843307.stm

      TORAH JESUS ENDORSES TORAH
      For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.
      Matthew 5:18

      JESUS ENDORSED MOSES:
      “Do not think that I will accuse you before the Father. Your accuser is Moses, in whom you have put your hope. 46 If you had believed Moses, you would believe Me, because he wrote about Me. 47But since you do not believe what he wrote, how will you believe what I say?”…
      John 5:45 47

      Delete
  2. nemrud.nl .. found via andis kaulins
    also, calendersign.com for the mundane .. almost vulgar and yes nefarious fraction known as 666 ... but remember 1+1 one is the beginning of all such what you call 'sorcery' ..just like giganimussums of dumbest possible globblobules of money will inevitably fund propagandizing to herd folks who did not fight and pre-empt and avoid that type of money with their own (however small) and were fooled into delegating such hygiene, into a war thus mongered.

    ... and just like i admire the talent and acknowledge the need to admire, look up and praise, your worship, ever to close to warship if you ask me, is also too close to idolatry. If that fabulation leads, yet again, to more delegation and self-disempowerment, iow: saviourism ... offending the jews whose generational concept is thus tweaked into a personalization and from their perspective dishonoured. And they are closer to the truth in that innumerable jesus like idealists rise and fall only to rise and fall yet again. Them types (of which i am undoubtedly one and who isn't in at least their very own tiny little way, cannot best, outwit and top, let alone topple the macho beasts of their or any other race

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well a bigger bunch of lies and erroneous information I never heard.
    Seriously where dd you get all this garbage.

    Freemasons as a whole or group do not believe any of this crap.

    Most Freemasons in the US are Christian and since Freemasonry does not meddle with one's faith that is all there is to it.

    generally Freemasons accept the theory that it was derived from the Guilds of stone workers around the 12th century C.E. and eventually developed into a speculative society by 1717 when the premier Grand Lodge of London appeared.
    All this other gobldy gook is wild speculation, conjecture and lots of imagination, no basis in fact.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great blog you have here and great information. Nice to see a blogspot about masonry ranking in google.
    Cheers

    ReplyDelete
  5. If the origin of Freemasonry was a following after of Nimrod and Nimrod declared himself a god, then isn't it logical to conclude that anything derived from the name of Nimrod is cursed and cannot be redeemed by the good intentions of supposed well to do people?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Very good, I have been doing study on this matter for the last 35 years, and you haven't missed much . Again. nice job.

    ReplyDelete
  7. http://www.kotipetripaavola.com/freemasons.html

    ReplyDelete
  8. I noticed a comment from somebody saying most Freemasons are Christian, well we know he doesn't know much about either Christians or Freemasons because a person can not be part of both . I write on Twitter Yahweh_is_Love and Complain_2_EPA C_2_EPA is my experience with freemason, not knowing who they were but believing there was some satanic cult involved . I am an activist against freemason in Jacksonville, Florida williamfdraper@proton.com

    Very interesting article I will be exploring more and posting a link to Thank you , if this has any truth to it , which it just might have , it takes much research sometimes to really find the reality of matters .

    ReplyDelete

If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.