Sunday 19 February 2012

U.S. PUBLIC TAKES STRONG STANCE AGAINST IRAN'S NUCLEAR PROGRAM


February 15, 2012

According to notes on the survey, when conducting the poll, it was aimed towards “the youngest person in the household over 18” which means that these are results taken from a primarily generally inexperienced and malleable group ~ a group still, on the whole, fresh from an education system that drills “Holoco$t sensitivity” and pro-Israeli sentiments into them unrelentingly.

What interested me in the description of the poll, offered at the bottom of the article is that it was taken “in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.” This wording verifies the fact that the District of Columbia is indeed a separate country within United States borders as I have asserted before many times. (EMPIRE OF THE CITY)

MEANWHILE this Empire wants war and the people, the younger ones surveyed, seem to be fairly in agreement. Sighs. So remember, there are no greybeards who speak with wisdom and experience in these results. 

I wonder how many of those interviewed could find Iran on a world map.....
 
The public supports tough measures ~ including the possible use of military force ~ to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

Nearly six-in-ten (58%) say it is more important to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, even if it means taking military action.
Just 30% say it is more important to avoid a military conflict with Iran, even if it means that country develops nuclear weapons. These opinions are little changed from October 2009.

There have been reports in recent weeks that Israel may soon attack Iran’s nuclear facilities.
 About half of Americans (51%) say the United States should remain neutral if Israel takes action to stop Iran’s nuclear program, but far more say the U.S. should support (39%) than oppose (5%) an Israeli attack.
The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press conducted Feb. 8-12, 2012, among 1,501 adults, finds substantial partisan differences over how to deal with Iran’s nuclear program.

Republicans are far more supportive of using military force to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons than are either Democrats or independents. Moreover, a majority of Republicans (62%) say the U.S. should support an Israeli attack to stop Iran’s nuclear program, compared with just a third of independents and Democrats.

There also is a wide partisan gap over President Obama’s plans for withdrawing U.S. forces from Afghanistan. Overall, 53% say Barack Obama is removing troops from Afghanistan at about the right pace. Just 20% say the president is withdrawing troops too quickly and 22% say he is not removing troops quickly enough.

Last June, 44% said they thought Obama would handle the troop withdrawal about right, and 50% expressed this view in March 2o11.

A plurality of Republicans (43%) now say that Obama is removing U.S. troops from Afghanistan too quickly; 30% say Obama is handling this about right while 21% say he is not removing the troops quickly enough. In June 2011, just 28% of Republicans thought Obama would remove the troops too quickly.

An overwhelming majority of Democrats (77%) continue to say Obama is handling the troop withdrawal about right, an increase of 11 points from June 2011.

Similarly, about half of independents (51%) think the president is handling the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan about right, up from 40% in June. About a quarter (28%) of independents say Obama is not removing troops quickly enough and 17% say he is removing them too quickly.

WOMEN, YOUNG PEOPLE WANT U.S. TO STAY NEUTRAL

About half of Americans (51%) say the U.S. should stay neutral if Israel attacks Iran.
 Nearly four-in-ten (39%) say the U.S. should support Israel’s military action while just 5% say the U.S. should oppose military’s action.
There are large demographic differences in views about what the U.S. should do if Israel attacks Iran.
A majority of women (55%) say the U.S. should stay neutral.

Men are more divided over whether the U.S. should stay neutral (47%) or support Israel (45%).

Young people also are far more likely than older Americans to say the U.S. should stay neutral.
Fully 64% of white evangelical Protestants say that the U.S. should support Israel if it attacks Iran in an effort to stop their nuclear weapon program. That compares with 42% of white mainline Protestants and 41% of white Catholics.

There is a wide divide among Republicans on the issue of Iran. Fully 71% of conservative Republicans think the U.S. should support Israel’s military action if they attack Iran, compared with 43% of moderate and liberal Republicans. A majority of independents and Democrats (including both liberal and more moderate Democrats) think the U.S. should stay neutral.

Overall, there has been modest attention to the dispute over Iran’s nuclear program; 38% say they have heard a lot while 39% have heard a little and 23% have heard nothing at all. That is comparable to attention paid to Iran’s nuclear program last month and in October 2009.

Republicans (47%) are more likely than independents (38%) and Democrats (31%) to say they have heard a lot about the dispute over Iran’s nuclear program. And two-thirds (67%) of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents who agree with the Tea Party say they have heard a lot about Iran’s nuclear program.

 

MOST SEE TOUGHER SANCTIONS AS INEFFECTIVE


Despite the recent push for tougher economic sanctions against Iran by the U.S. and its allies, 64% of the public thinks that tougher economic sanctions will not work in getting Iran to give up its nuclear program. Just 21% think they will work.
In October 2009, 56% thought tougher economic sanctions would not work in stopping Iran’s nuclear weapons program.

There is wide consensus across party lines that tougher economic sanctions on Iran will be ineffective. Most Republicans (72%) and independents (67%), as well as 56% of Democrats, say that Iran will not give up its nuclear program even with tougher economic sanctions.

 

TEA PARTY REPUBLICANS BACK TOUGH APPROACH


An overwhelming majority of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents who agree with the Tea Party (84%) say that the U.S. should prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, even if it means taking military action. That compares with a smaller majority (64%) of Republicans who disagree with or have no opinion of the Tea Party.

The gap among Republicans is even larger on what the U.S. should do if Israel attacks Iran to stop its nuclear weapons program. Fully 81% of Tea Party Republicans say the U.S. should support Israel’s military action, compared with just 43% of non-Tea Party Republicans.

There also are differences among Republicans about how Obama is handling troop withdrawal from Afghanistan. A majority of Tea Party Republicans (61%) now say that Obama is removing troops too quickly. A year ago, when asked if Obama will remove U.S. troops too quickly, just 33% of Tea Party Republicans said he would remove troops too quickly and 35% said he would handle it about right.

Far fewer non-Tea Party Republicans (27%) say Obama is removing troops too quickly. More say Obama is handling the troop withdrawal about right (38%). Views among non-Tea Party Republicans have changed little since last year.

ABOUT THE SURVEY

The analysis in this report is based on telephone interviews conducted Feb. 8-12, 2012, among a national sample of 1,501 adults, 18 years of age or older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia (900 respondents were interviewed on a landline telephone, and 601 were interviewed on a cell phone, including 284 who had no landline telephone). The survey was conducted by interviewers at Princeton Data Source under the direction of Princeton Survey Research Associates International.

A combination of landline and cell phone random digit dial samples were used; both samples were provided by Survey Sampling International. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. Respondents in the landline sample were selected by randomly asking for the youngest adult male or female who is now at home.

Interviews in the cell sample were conducted with the person who answered the phone, if that person was an adult 18 years of age or older. For detailed information about our survey methodology, see http://people-press.org/methodology/

The combined landline and cell phone sample are weighted using an iterative technique that matches gender, age, education, race, Hispanic origin and nativity and region to parameters from the March 2011 Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey and population density to parameters from the Decennial Census. The sample also is weighted to match current patterns of telephone status and relative usage of landline and cell phones (for those with both), based on extrapolations from the 2011 National Health Interview Survey. 

The following table shows the sample sizes and the error attributable to sampling that would be expected at the 95% level of confidence for different groups in the survey:

 

Sample sizes and sampling errors for other subgroups are available upon request.

In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.

3 comments:

  1. Israel owns America so there won't be any staying neutral when the shooting starts. I love how the left was wailing and gnashing under Bush but not a peep about anti-war now.

    ReplyDelete
  2. typical, cleverly constructed psychobabble - designed to further confuse and also to reinforce mind control of the already brainwashed minds

    Starting with the title itself, this is nothing but one psyop -

    "U.S. PUBLIC TAKES ..."

    some of the totals are: 58%, 39%, 51%, etc. this is hardly the total and it is therefore grossly misleading to call this "the U.S. PUBLIC" - but the subconscious mind will swallow this bait whole - and U.S. PUBLIC deception is -as always - successfully implanted

    similarly - the 1500 (cited as amount of persons surveyed) do not constitute the u.s. public - not even statistically - even if statistics are honestly used - the 1500 represent those most successfully brainwashed;

    really, what else are the average people going to think, but what they've been constantly fed - i.e. one-sided, non-stop, 24-7-365 zio-tavistock created psycho-babble

    do they have much if any exposure to opposing views (controlled opposition in media doesn't count); do they ever hear about, read of, view, their "enemies'" side of the story (isn't that the "democratic" way?); even if they do - it will be artillery barraged out of their minds, by the non-stop, relentless brainwashing pro-war, pro-rascism, pro-ziopropaganda they are subjected to

    a good sign: this "pole" shows that the zio-tavistock brainwashing is becoming less and less effective - as more and more people become aware of their manipulators and the techniques used against them - in all levels of society

    the real reason the zio-beast is in such a hurry and is so desperate to start it's next set of wars leading to WW3 - more and more people are becoming aware of them and their deviant, murderous ways

    ReplyDelete

If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.