This is not new information but I am surprised
that I made no mention of it when it was passed. This is an item the late Bill
Cooper forewarned us of. Let no one deny that the US populace is becoming more
controlled than ever before.
Land of the free? I think not! Wakey, wakey, Amerikkka.
Land of the free? I think not! Wakey, wakey, Amerikkka.
April 20, 2012
The U.S. Senate has passed a bill requiring
all new cars manufactured in the United States be fitted with black box data
recorders. Senate Bill 1813 [PDF] was passed by the Senate
and is just waiting for approval from the U.S. House of Representatives, InfoWars reports.
Section 31406 of the "Moving Ahead for
Progress in the 21st Century Act" (MAP-21) bill calls for "Mandatory
Event Data Recorders" to be installed in new vehicles, starting in the
year 2015.
The bill states that within 180 days of the
enactment of the bill, the Secretary must revise part 563 of title 49 (Code of
Federal Regulations) "to require, beginning with model year 2015, that new
passenger motor vehicles sold in the United States be equipped with an event data
recorder that meets the requirements under that part."
The bill then goes on to describe the "limitations" on
information retrieval. Basically, while there will be a "Big Brother"
style recording device in all new vehicles, the data recorded on the device
will be the property of the owner of the vehicle.
"Any data in an event data recorder
required under part 563 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, regardless of
when the passenger motor vehicle in which it is installed was manufactured, is
the property of the owner, or in the case of a leased vehicle, the lessee of
the passenger motor vehicle in which the data recorder is installed," the
bill states.
According to the text of the bill, the data on
the recording device may not be retrieved by anyone other than the owner or the
lessee…unless, of course, the government asks for it.
The data may be retrieved by someone other than the owner/lessee if it is requested, and backed, by a court authorization, or if there is a medical emergency. It may also be retrieved if the owner/lessee consents, or if it's relevant in an investigation or inspection conducted by the Secretary of Transportation.
InfoWars criticizes the bill for its privacy implications, and points out that
there are "innumerable examples of both government and industry illegally
using supposedly privacy-protected information to spy on individuals."
VentureBeat, on the other hand, notes that this privacy
concern is largely irrelevant--Event Data Recorders (EDRs) have been
voluntarily installed in cars for several years. In fact, VentureBeat reports, at least 64 percent of cars in
surveyed in 2005 had an EDR installed, including 100 percent of cars made by
General Motors, Ford, Isuzu, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Subaru, and Suzuki.
Still, I understand InfoWars' concerns. After
all, there have been instances in which the government has used GPS to illegally track suspect's vehicles, and mandatory EDRs
would just make this even easier. Also, what's to stop a court from requiring
data from these black boxes be presented to
insurance companies?
"The ultimate Big Brother scenario would
be a system whereby every driver had to get de facto permission from the state
to drive each time they get behind the wheel, once it had been determined from
an iris scan that they were good citizens who have paid all their taxes and not
misbehaved," InfoWars says, noting that Bill 1813 also contains a
controversial clause that would allow the IRS to revoke passports of citizens accused of owing more
than $50,000 in back taxes.
This provision is designed to keep tax-owing
citizens from leaving the country, but could such logic lead to the government
stripping citizens of driving rights as well?
No comments:
Post a Comment
If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.