Brilliant actors like
Larry David and Sarah Silverman are challenging America's powerful religious,
family-friendly culture and asserting their Jewishness by glorifying obscenity.
.
ED Noor: Brilliant by what standards?THIS attitude towards smut and permissiveness that runs rampant through these folks has been responsible for the destruction of many cultures in the past. We see it happening today but do not do enough to stop it, or even, heaven forbid, excuse it and pull political correctness into the issue. These two entertainers are both part of a major campaign to smear Christian ideals as has been proven multiple times in the past. Anyone who considers this article title to be racist or whatever, please note, this is from Haaretz, Israel's major on line newspaper.
.
ED Noor: Brilliant by what standards?THIS attitude towards smut and permissiveness that runs rampant through these folks has been responsible for the destruction of many cultures in the past. We see it happening today but do not do enough to stop it, or even, heaven forbid, excuse it and pull political correctness into the issue. These two entertainers are both part of a major campaign to smear Christian ideals as has been proven multiple times in the past. Anyone who considers this article title to be racist or whatever, please note, this is from Haaretz, Israel's major on line newspaper.
.
By Josh Lambert
February 3, 2014
.
In a tidy
coincidence, two separate videos went viral last week, demonstrating that
American Jews’ love affair with obscenity is still going strong. Sarah
Silverman talks about being visited
by Jesus Christ, who asks her to spread a message about
women’s reproductive rights (“We’ve got to legislate that shit,” the comedienne
said, mocking conservatives who want to use the law to limit women’s health
care options), while a a
fan-produced supercut strung together three minutes of
uninterrupted insults by Larry David on "Curb Your Enthusiasm."
.
As far as I
know, only Silverman has publicly called herself a “dirty Jew,” purring the
words alluringly in her 2005 performance film "Jesus Is Magic,"
but David’s gleeful, exuberant and inimitable spewing of obscenities suggests
he might not exactly mind being thought of as a dirty Jew, either.
.
In my recently
published book, “Unclean Lips: Obscenity, Jews, and American Culture,” I
explain why, beginning in the late 19th century, American Jews have found
the explicit representation of sex, and four-letter words, so very useful. The
answers vary: Some Jews use obscenity to fight anti-Semitism, while others use
it to rewrite traditional Jewish stories in a contemporary idiom.
.
ED Noor: “The only reason that Jews are in pornography is
that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks.”~ Al Goldstein (publisher
of Screw Magazine).
.
Silverman
and David suggest another reason, one that’s specific to our own historical
moment, which can be understood if we look at who’s fighting for tighter
controls on obscenity in America today.
.
ED
Noor: Right here it is admitted that the Jewish people want looser social
control and a more permissive atmosphere. We have noted it for years as they
have been at the forefront of not only the aggressive gay agenda but also for
more permissive laws regarding deviance, all under the term “hate laws”.
.
If you watch
cable television and listen to podcasts, you might think that there’s no longer
any regulation of obscenity in the United States at all. But the Protect Act of
2003 introduced several new prohibitions on sexual representation, particularly
of minors, and also reinforced others.
.
The Supreme
Court’s decisions in the FCC v. Fox cases in 2009 and 2012 reaffirmed
the mandate of the Federal Communications Commission to levy huge fines on
broadcasters who allow even “fleeting” obscenities to air ~ even a dirty word
tossed off, spontaneously, during a live broadcast.
.
Moreover,
the decision rendered in Bethel v. Fraser (1986) still stands, making
clear that in or near American public schools, First Amendment protection
cannot be guaranteed to anyone using sexual innuendo, no matter how silly: The
defendant here was disciplined for a campaign speech that began, “I know a man
who is firm ~ he’s firm in his pants, he’s firm in his shirt, his character is
firm.”
.
So, who’s
behind the tightening of American obscenity laws in the 21st century? Like
Anthony Comstock’s crusade against smut in the late 19th century, this one is
understood by many of its leaders as a Christian project.
.
The late
Democratic Senator James Exon of Nebraska, for example, sponsored what can be
understood as the first major attempt at Internet-age, anti-obscenity
legislation: the Communications Decency Act of 1995. Exon opened congressional
debate about the act by repeating a prayer offered by televangelist Dr. Lloyd
John Ogilvie, then Senate chaplain, who had asked “Almighty God, Lord of all
life" to "give us wisdom to create regulations that will protect the
innocent.”
.
.
Exon was
also reported at the time as appreciating the work of Enough Is Enough, an
anti-pornography group: The organization helped in “laying the groundwork for
compromise between Christian conservatives and pro-business Republicans” in
support of the act. Furthermore, the senator introduced into the Congressional
Record letters of support for his proposal from Evangelical groups like the
Christian Coalition and the Family Research Council.
For his part, Comstock often perceived Jews, in particular, as the spreaders of smut in America, and part of what inspired his activities was clearly a fear of people who didn’t seem Christian or American enough.
ED
Noor: The unspoken being that smut is internationally accepted by all but Christian
America which is afraid of those who do indulge in deviance. This is such BS!
.The
contemporary Christian right has a much more complex and self-aware
relationship with American Jews than its 19th-century predecessors did, though.
So recent anti-porn campaigns have welcomed with open arms any Jews with
compatible ideas, like Orthodox modesty crusader Wendy Shalit. Today’s
anti-porn organizations, even if funded by Christians, often seek out Jews to
sit on their boards ~ though mostly they attract only very marginal rabbis and
other Jewish crackpots.
.
ED
Noor: Rabbis are pro porn?
.
There are
times, too, when you can almost but not quite hear echoes of Comstock’s
anti-Semitism in contemporary discussions of obscenity. Writing for the
majority in the 2009 FCC v. Fox decision, Justice Antonin Scalia made
an odd remark about the relative use of taboo language among Americans of
different backgrounds. He was rebutting a point from a dissenting opinion about
how “small-town broadcasters” would suffer unduly under the court’s decision,
because it would necessitate their purchase of expensive equipment to
bowdlerize fleeting expletives during live broadcasts. These “small-town
broadcasters” would not suffer, Scalia countered, because their “down-home
local guests probably employ vulgarity less than big-city folks [and the]
foul-mouthed glitterati from Hollywood.”
.
Dirty words,
Scalia declared absurdly, aren’t a temptation for “down-home,” “small-town”
American; they’re only a “big-city,” “Hollywood” problem. Scalia did not, of
course, go so far as to suggest that the one demographic group most insistently
associated both with American “big-city” life and with “Hollywood” ~ Jews ~
tend to speak more obscenely than other Americans. If he had wanted to, though,
he could not have a better illustration of his hypothesis than Larry David and
Sarah Silverman.
.
These
Christian campaigns against obscenity ~ and the vague, recrudescent sense
promoted by Scalia’s remark that the people using obscenity are not
sufficiently Christian or authentically American ~ may help to explain why, in
a media environment in which the representation of sex and the use of taboo
language smacks increasingly of banality, brilliant performers like David and Silverman
continue not only to assert their Jewishness emphatically, in virtually every
one of their performances, but also to glory in and glorify the use of such
language.
.
Especially
because the Christian right goes to such great lengths to demonstrate that Jews
should not feel excluded from its initiatives ~ who loves Jews nowadays more
than the Christian right, right? ~ identifying oneself as a “dirty Jew” in
21st-century America is one way to signal your opposition not just to the
banalities of the market-driven family-friendly culture, but also to the
nation’s most powerful socially, religiously and politically reactionary
movement.
.
.
A SHORT HISTORY OF JEWS AND OBSCENITY: Author Explores Link Between Purity Laws and
Anti-Semitism
I was disgusted by Lenny Bruce. My Pal could not get enough of this trash talker. My freedom loving pal is deep in the gutter. I am not in the gutter. Utter disrespect is not smart and there are times when it is exceedingly dangerous. I really could not play your tube as this fellows thinking processes are bent.
ReplyDelete