Showing posts with label Disaster. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Disaster. Show all posts

Wednesday, 12 October 2011

INFLUENTIAL AFGHAN WOMEN'S RIGHTS ADVOCATE SAYS HOPE IS LOST

As she stood over her father’s corpse laid out by the veranda of her home in Kandahar, Rangina Hamidi initially felt grateful. She was relieved the suicide bomber’s explosion did not shatter his handsome, angular face, only his back and neck. 

It is not often we hear from educated outspoken women from Afghanistan. This American Afghan woman speaks of her impressions of her home country and minces no words. She does not speak of Israel or oil or the poppy, but she does speak of corruption and politics and her last meeting with her father's oldest friend, Hamid Karzai. Perhaps her political views are different from ours, but the things she says are important nonetheless.

By Martin Kuz

October 10, 2011

Kandahar Mayor Ghulam Haider Hamidi, who was killed by a suicide bomber in July. His daughter, Rangina Hamidi, is disillusioned by what she views as Afghanistan’s descent into entropy. File photo

KABUL 

Rangina Hamidi sat down with President Hamid Karzai inside his heavily guarded palace and waited for the question she knew would come.

In late July, a suicide bomber had killed her father, Ghulam Haider Hamidi, the strong-willed, reform-minded mayor of Kandahar and a close Karzai ally. A naturalized U.S. citizen, Ghulam had returned to his native Afghanistan in 2007 after more than a quarter-century away to snuff out corruption in the nation’s second-largest city.

One of Afghanistan’s most influential and outspoken advocates for women, Rangina traveled from Kandahar to meet Karzai in mid-September. She had prodded her father to serve as the city’s mayor; the president had appointed him.

Karzai offered condolences to Rangina and extolled Ghulam, his childhood friend, lauding his efforts to tame Kandahar’s culture of venality and coercion. Her father had made progress, he said. The work needed to continue.

The president looked at Rangina. “Would you consider carrying on his political legacy?” he asked.

Hamidi replied without pause.
“My dad got the reward of death for doing good,” she said.

“And all the guys who are doing the opposite, they are still in power and getting bigger and bigger. So why should I join this system? You answer me. Why should I do this?”

She had spoken truth to power.
In response, power fell mute.

“He was speechless,” Hamidi said, recalling the conversation two days later. “He wasn’t confused or angry. He knows what is happening.”

Her frustration with the status quo and Karzai transcends words. The 34-year-old Hamidi, who left Virginia in 2003 to promote women’s rights in her homeland, has decided to return to the United States, disillusioned by what she views as Afghanistan’s descent into entropy.

Her departure suggests the country, swirling in “360 degrees of chaos,” as she describes it, will struggle to find a new generation of leaders to confront the guns-and-graft ethos that afflicts Afghan politics and policy-making.

“I’ve lost all my hope,” said Hamidi, founder of Kandahar Treasure, a company that employs about 350 women who produce embroidered handicrafts.
“You’d think that things should go forward in eight years. We’ve gone backward.”
Hamidi possesses qualities that would make her a natural choice to nurse Afghanistan’s nascent democracy toward maturity over the next three to four decades. Articulate, educated and worldly, she shares her late father’s sense of urgency for change and desire for the country to surmount its ethnic schisms.

But since her return, she has watched politicians and street-level power brokers in Kandahar, Kabul and elsewhere wield clout through extortion, threats and violence. Among many culprits ~ the Taliban, Pakistan, the U.S., ISAF, NATO, NGOs ~ she faults above all others the nation’s besieged president.
“By allowing corrupt individuals to continue on within his government, I think he has certainly let the country down,” she said.

“Personally, I have nothing against him. I think he’s a good person, he’s very kind. But politically, I think he’s responsible for the mess of Afghanistan.”
Hamidi left Afghanistan as a toddler when her family fled to Pakistan in 1981 during the Soviet invasion. They moved to Northern Virginia seven years later, and Rangina went on to earn a bachelors degree in religious and gender studies from the University of Virginia.

Two years after U.S. forces toppled the Taliban-led government in 2001, Hamidi gave up the comforts of her adopted home, where her six siblings still live, and moved to Kandahar.
“It was an undeveloped nation: no roads, no electricity, bombed-out buildings,” she said. “Yet there was still this energy of people wanting to do things. Everywhere you looked, people were trying to start a new life, trying to invest in businesses.”
She started working on women’s issues for a nonprofit formed by Qayum Karzai, the president’s brother. Her efforts have since drawn the attention of dozens of international media outlets, among them CNN, Time, the BBC and Radio Free Europe, and she has spoken at women’s rights and peace conferences around the world.
.
Then as now, the country suffered from a paucity of progressive leaders. Hamidi believed her father, who had worked as an accountant in Alexandria, Va., for almost two decades, could remedy the blackmail and bloodshed plaguing Kandahar, a city of almost 1 million people and the cradle of the Taliban insurgency.

Since becoming president in 2001, Hamid Karzai had tried in vain to lure his old friend to Afghanistan for a political position. Six years later, relenting to Rangina’s entreaties, Ghulam accepted an appointment as Kandahar’s mayor.

As he told The Washington Post earlier this year, “None of my relatives wanted me to move back here, but Rangina said, ‘Dad, please come. If you die from a car accident in the States or a bomb in Afghanistan, what’s the difference? You are needed here.’ So I came.”

Lean and silver-haired, with a manner at once affable and direct, Ghulam brought a reformer’s zeal to the job.

He demanded payment of delinquent taxes from store owners; if they rebuffed him, he ordered their shops razed. He required developers to make space for parking and bathrooms in their building plans and ousted tribal leaders who illegally occupied public lands. His call to modernize the city spurred the building of schools, roads and sidewalks.

The changes gained Ghulam praise and enemies alike. A roadside bomb detonated beside his car as he drove to work one day in 2009; though he escaped injury, he began traveling with bodyguards and limiting his public appearances. Two of his deputy mayors were assassinated in separate incidents the following year.

Rangina feared her father would meet the same fate. For years she had asked him to help save Afghanistan, but by last spring, she wanted him to save himself. He ignored her pleas to return to the U.S., and in the months before his murder, angry at his obstinacy, she seldom spoke at length with him.

“I knew the threats he was getting were so real,” she said. “That’s why I was mad. That’s why I was telling him to please quit. And of course he never listened.”

Ghulam’s ties to the Karzai family, including Ahmed Wali Karzai, the president’s half-brother and the powerful provincial chairman of Kandahar, sparked accusations of influence peddling. 

Criticism over Ghulam’s role in transferring public lands to Mahmoud Karzai, another of the president’s brothers, and private developers close to the family crescendoed during the first half of this year.

Tensions climaxed in July. Ahmed Wali Karzai was gunned down by a member of his security detail on July 12. Fifteen days later, a man with a bomb under his turban approached Ghulam outside the mayor’s office.

“It finally happened,” Rangina thought when she heard of his death. He was 65. She once told him that, assuming the worst happened, she wished his sacrifice for Afghanistan would equal that of Mohandas Gandhi’s for India.

“I knew it wouldn’t,” she said. “I think he accomplished quite a lot, pretty much all by himself. But for right now, (his death) is extremely painful because no matter what good things people say about him, we’re not going to have the loving man we had.”

Despite the Taliban claiming responsibility for the assassination, Hamidi’s suspicion falls on the business and political factions opposed to her father’s reforms. She excoriates U.S. officials and President Karzai for enabling those malefactors to linger in positions of authority across the country.
“America came to Afghanistan and aligned itself with the very people who destroyed Afghanistan and who continue to destroy Afghanistan: warlords, drug lords, gun lords,” she said. “Investing in them and considering them allies to the movement of reconstructing Afghanistan was the first wrong step America took.”
Unable to quell the nation’s fighting, Karzai has blamed a lack of autonomy for hampering his control of the country’s disparate ethnic groups. Hamidi finds the complaint hollow.
“He’s been president for 10 years ~ he has to take responsibility,” she said. “Even if you buy his argument that outside forces are not allowing him to clean up the mess, then if I was in his position, I would resign. I would simply say, ‘Sorry, brothers and sisters, I can’t do it.’ ”
Hamidi has made the choice her father rejected. She and her husband, Abdullah Sidiq, a civil engineer, and their 1-year-old daughter, Zara, will move to Virginia next month.

As the family prepares to leave, Hamidi sees a nation unraveling.

“When we first came to Kandahar, I’d go out without a burqa and not think twice about it,” she said. 

“We used to hop in a car whenever we felt like it and drive to Kabul. Now? You don’t go anywhere without a burqa, and I can’t even think about driving that road ~ it’s too dangerous.”

She has not received explicit threats on her life, which helps explain why she has yet to go back to the United States. The Taliban has seldom targeted women for assassination, and Hamidi, while mindful of her elevated profile, believes she faces less danger than a public official.

But her father’s murder and the existential condition of the insurgency in Kandahar, where a trip to the market can be cut short by a suicide bombing, has drained her of the resolve to disregard the everyday danger in Afghanistan.

“I think it would be irresponsible for me to stay in such an insecure country, risking my life, when my daughter is not even 2 yet,” she said.

In her analysis of Afghanistan’s unrest, Hamidi contends foreign aid exacerbates both violence and indolence. She asserts that money from abroad, in addition to presenting an irresistible temptation to corrupt officials and contractors, has given rise to a kind of feral welfare state.
“What the international community needs to do is to get themselves out of the mentality of seeing Afghans as these poor creatures who need to be spoon-fed,” she said.

“Stop giving charity to Afghans. Period. Let them start thinking about rebuilding their lives, rebuilding their country, rebuilding their communities with their own hands and sweat. That’s the solution to Afghanistan because when they are busy building, they are going to be less busy fighting.”
Hamidi offers her own business as an example of gradual self-sufficiency. She launched Kandahar Treasure as a nonprofit in 2003 with the help of grant money from foreign donors. Five years later, she converted it to a for-profit enterprise and stopped accepting aid, and in 2010, her company finished in the black.

The business will remain open during her indefinite absence from Kandahar. Once back in the U.S., she intends to seek a job connected to Afghanistan, likely with a nonprofit group or the government.

Her decision to leave deprives Karzai of another ally. The president has lost numerous intimates during his decade long reign, with most of them murdered. Last month, a suicide bomber killed former Afghan President Burhanuddin Rabbani, whom Karzai had appointed to oversee the High Peace Council, a panel charged with negotiating an end to the Taliban-led insurgency.

Perhaps Karzai had in mind his shrinking circle of confidants as he bid goodbye to Hamidi after their recent meeting in Kabul. “Don’t forget about us,” he told her.

She vows to always remember. Whether she will live here again is less certain.

“I will only come back when I know that I can help make my people a free people again,” she said. “Right now, I don’t think we’re free.”

Monday, 3 October 2011

THE FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR DISASTER: IS THIS WHAT REALLY HAPPENED?

Another amazing exposure presented by Northern Truth Seeker. I am posting both this article as well as his, as ever, insightful commentary.

Sunday, October 2, 2011

SECRET US-ISRAELI NUKE TRANSFERS LED TO FUKUSHIMA BLASTS (!)

Since the Earthquake/Tsunami of March 16th, 2011, that supposedly triggered the eventual meltdown of 3 nuclear power cores at the nuclear power plant at Fukushima, Japan, there has been much speculation as to what actually occurred that caused the meltdowns in the first place. 
Many crazy and absolutely wild ideas were promoted across the Internet about the cause of the disaster, and the MSM tried to first dismiss the entire accident as being caused by the Tsunami that hit the plant after the earthquake off the coast of Japan.

From the very beginning of this horrific disaster, I and others in the REAL truth movement have had our own doubts about the official government stories and excuses... Including the fact that there was a definitive link between this disaster and the fact that the Israeli Stuxnet virus that somehow shut down the reactor's safety systems.  I personally smelled a rat from the very beginning.

Now, I want to present the following most interesting article that comes from Yoichi Shimatsu, through the Rense website, at
www.rense.com, entitled: "Secret US-Israeli Nuke Transfers Led to Fukushima Blasts". 
It contains some startling and shocking revelations that the Fukushima disaster is definitely not as it seems, and that there is strong evidence that the US and Israel may have had their hands in creating this disaster in the first place!  
Here is that article, and I do have some of my own perspectives and comments to follow:
 .
Cheney and  Abe
SECRET US-ISRAELI NUKE TRANSFERS LED TO FUKUSHIMA BLASTS

By Yoichi Shimatsu
October 2, 2011

Sixteen tons and what you get is a nuclear catastrophe. The explosions that rocked the Fukushima No.1 nuclear plant were more powerful than the combustion of hydrogen gas, as claimed by the Tokyo Electric Power Company.

The actual cause of the blasts, according to intelligence sources in Washington, was nuclear fission of Warhead cores illegally taken from America's sole nuclear-weapons assembly facility.

Evaporation in the cooling pools used for spent fuel rods led to the detonation of stored weapons-grade plutonium and uranium.
The facts about clandestine American and Israeli support for Japan's nuclear armament are being suppressed in the biggest official cover-up in recent history.
The timeline of events indicates the theft from America's strategic arsenal was authorized at the highest level under a three-way deal between the Bush-Cheney team, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Elhud Olmert's government in Tel Aviv.

TOKYO'S STRANGELOVE

 
In early 2007, Vice President Dick Cheney flew to Tokyo with his closest aides. Newspaper editorials noted the secrecy surrounding his visit ~ no press conferences, no handshakes with ordinary folks and, as diplomatic cables suggest, no briefing for U.S. Embassy staffers in Tokyo.

Cheney snubbed Defense Minister Fumio Kyuma, who was shut out of confidential talks. The pretext was his criticism of President George Bush for claiming Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction.

The more immediate concern was that the defense minister might disclose bilateral secrets to the Pentagon. The Joint Chiefs of Staff were sure to oppose White House approval of Japan's nuclear program.
An unannounced reason for Cheney's visit was to promote a quadrilateral alliance in the Asia-Pacific region. The four cornerstones ~ the US, Japan, Australia and India ~ were being called on to contain and confront China and its allies North Korea and Russia. From a Japanese perspective, this grand alliance was flawed by asymmetry: The three adversaries were nuclear powers, while the U.S. was the only one in the Quad group.
To further his own nuclear ambitions, Abe was playing the Russian card. 
As mentioned in a U.S. Embassy cable (dated 9/22), the Yomiuri Shimbun gave top play to this challenge to the White House:
"It was learned yesterday that the government and domestic utility companies have entered final talks with Russia in order to relegate uranium enrichment for use at nuclear power facilities to Atomprom, the state-owned nuclear monopoly."
If Washington refused to accept a nuclear-armed Japan, Tokyo would turn to Moscow.

Since the Liberal Democratic Party selected him as prime minister in September 2006, the hawkish Abe repeatedly called for Japan to move beyond the postwar formula of a strictly defensive posture and non-nuclear principles. 

.
Nixon and Nobusuke

Advocacy of a nuclear-armed Japan arose from his family tradition. His grandfather Nobusuke Kishi nurtured the wartime atomic bomb project and, as postwar prime minister, enacted the civilian nuclear program. His father Shintaro Abe, a former foreign minister, had played the Russian card in the 1980s, sponsoring the Russo-Japan College, run by the Aum Shinrikyo sect (a front for foreign intelligence), to recruit weapons scientists from a collapsing Soviet Union.

The chief obstacle to American acceptance of a nuclear-armed Japan was the Pentagon, where Pearl Harbor and Hiroshima remain as iconic symbols justifying American military supremacy. 

The only feasible channel for bilateral transfers then was through the civilian-run Department of Energy (DoE), which supervises the production of nuclear weapons.

 
CAMP DAVID GO-AHEAD

 
The deal was sealed on Abe's subsequent visit to Washington. Wary of the eavesdropping that led to Richard Nixon's fall from grace, Bush preferred the privacy afforded at Camp David. There, in a rustic lodge on April 27, Bush and Abe huddled for 45 minutes. What transpired has never been revealed, not even in vague outline.

As his Russian card suggested, Abe was shopping for enriched uranium. At 99.9 percent purity, American-made uranium and plutonium is the world's finest nuclear material. The lack of mineral contaminants means that it cannot be traced back to its origin. In contrast, material from Chinese and Russian labs can be identified by impurities introduced during the enrichment process.

Abe has wide knowledge of esoteric technologies. His first job in the early 1980s was as a manager at Kobe Steel. One of the researchers there was astrophysicist Hideo Murai, who adapted Soviet electromagnetic technology to "cold mold" steel. Murai later became chief scientist for the Aum Shinrikyo sect, which recruited Soviet weapons technicians under the program initiated by Abe's father. After entering government service, Abe was posted to the U.S. branch of JETRO (Japan External Trade Organization). 

Its New York offices hosted computers used to crack databases at the Pentagon and major defense contractors to pilfer advanced technology. The hacker team was led by Tokyo University's top gamer, who had been recruited into Aum.

After the Tokyo subway gassing in 1995, Abe distanced himself from his father's Frankenstein cult with a public-relations campaign. Fast forward a dozen years and Abe is at Camp David. After the successful talks with Bush, Abe flew to India to sell Cheney's quadrilateral pact to a Delhi skeptical about a new Cold War.
Presumably, Cheney fulfilled his end of the deal. Soon thereafter Hurricane Katrina struck, wiping away the Abe visit from the public memory.
THE TEXAS JOB

BWXT Pantex, America's nuclear warhead facility, sprawls over 16,000 acres of the Texas Panhandle outside Amarillo. Run by the DoE and Babcock & Wilson, the site also serves as a storage facility for warheads past their expiration date. The 1989 shutdown of Rocky Flats, under community pressure in Colorado, forced the removal of those nuclear stockpiles to Pantex. Security clearances are required to enter since it is an obvious target for would-be nuclear thieves.

In June 2004, a server at the Albuquerque office of the National Nuclear Security System was hacked. 

Personal information and security-clearance data for 11 federal employees and 177 contractors at Pantex were lifted. NNSA did not inform Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman or his deputy Clay Sell until three months after the security breach, indicating investigators suspected an inside job.

While Bush and Abe met at Camp David, 500 unionized security guards at Pantex launched a 45-day strike. Scabs were hired, but many failed to pass the entry exam, according to the Inspector General's office at DoE. The IG report cited witnesses who said: "BWXT officials gave passing grades to some replacement guards even though they actually flunked tests," and "contractor officials gave correct answers to those that failed the tests." 

Although the scene was nearly as comical as the heist in "Ocean's Eleven", Pantex is not some Vegas casino. At stake was nuclear Armageddon.

At an opportune moment during the two-month strike, trucks loaded with warhead cores rolled out of the gates. Some 16 metric tons of nuclear cores packed in caskets were hauled away in refrigerated containers to prevent fission. 

At the port of Houston, the dangerous cargo was loaded aboard vessels operated by an Israeli state-owned shipping line. The radioactive material was detected by port inspector Roland Carnaby, a private contractor working under the federal program to interdict weapons of mass destruction.

The intelligence community is still buzzing about his shooting death. On April 29, 2008, Houston police officers pursued Carnaby on a highway chase and gunned him down. 
His port monitoring contract was later awarded to the Israel-based security firm NICE (Neptune Intelligence Computer Engineering), owned by former Israeli Defense Force officers.
Throughout the Pantex caper, from the data theft to smuggling operation, Bush and Cheney's point man for nuclear issues was DoE Deputy Director Clay Sell, a lawyer born in Amarillo and former aide to Panhandle district Congressman Mac Thornberry. 

Sell served on the Bush-Cheney transition team and became the top adviser to the President on nuclear issues. At DoE, Sell was directly in charge of the U.S. nuclear weapons complex, which includes 17 national laboratories and the Pantex plant. 

(Another alarm bell: Sell was also staff director for the Senate Energy subcommittee under the late Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska, who died in a 2010 plane crash.)

 
AN ISRAELI DOUBLE-CROSS

 
The nuclear shipments to Japan required a third-party cutout for plausible deniability by the White House. 

Israel acted less like an agent and more like a broker in demanding additional payment from Tokyo, according to intelligence sources. 

Adding injury to insult, the Israelis skimmed off the newer warhead cores for their own arsenal and delivered older ones. 

Since deteriorated cores require enrichment, the Japanese were furious and demanded a refund, which the Israelis refused. 

Tokyo had no recourse since by late 2008 principals Abe had resigned the previous autumn and Bush was a lame duck.

The Japanese nuclear developers, under the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, had no choice but to enrich the uranium cores at Fukushima No.1, a location remote enough to evade detection by nonproliferation inspectors. 

Hitachi and GE had developed a laser extraction process for plutonium, which requires vast amounts of electrical power. This meant one reactor had to make unscheduled runs, as was the case when the March earthquake struck.
Tokyo dealt a slap on the wrist to Tel Aviv by backing Palestinian rights at the UN.
Not to be bullied, the Israeli secret service launched the Stuxnet virus against Japan's nuclear facilities.

Firewalls kept Stuxnet at bay until the Tohoku earthquake.
The seismic activity felled an electricity tower behind Reactor 6. The power cut disrupted the control system, momentarily taking down the firewall. 

As the computer came online again, Stuxnet infiltrated to shut down the back-up generators. During the 20-minute interval between quake and tsunami, the pumps and valves at Fukushima No.1 were immobilized, exposing the turbine rooms to flood damage.

The flow of coolant water into the storage pools ceased, quickening evaporation. Fission of the overheated cores led to blasts and mushroom-clouds. Residents in mountaintop Iitate village overlooking the seaside plant saw plumes of smoke and could "taste the metal" in their throats.

 
GUILTY AS CHARGED

 
The Tohoku earthquake and tsunami were powerful enough to damage
Fukushima No.1.
The natural disaster, however, was vastly amplified by two external factors: release of the Stuxnet virus, which shut down control systems in the critical 20 minutes prior to the tsunami;
and presence of weapons-grade nuclear materials that devastated the nuclear facility and contaminated the entire region.
Of the three parties involved, which bears the greatest guilt? All three are guilty of mass murder, injury and destruction of property on a regional scale, and as such are liable for criminal prosecution and damages under international law and in each respective jurisdiction.
The White House, specifically Bush, Cheney and their co-conspirators in the DoE, hold responsibility for ordering the illegal removal and shipment of warheads without safeguards.
 
The state of Israel is implicated in theft from U.S. strategic stockpiles, fraud and extortion against the Japanese government, and a computer attack against critical infrastructure with deadly consequences, tantamount to an act of war.
 
Prime Minister Abe and his Economy Ministry sourced weapons-grade nuclear material in violation of constitutional law and in reckless disregard of the risks of unregulated storage, enrichment and extraction. Had Abe not requested enriched uranium and plutonium in the first place, the other parties would not now be implicated.
Japan, thus, bears the onus of the crime.
The International Criminal Court has sufficient grounds for taking up a case that involves the health of millions of people in Japan, Canada, the United States, Russia, the Koreas, Mongolia, China and possibly the entire Northern Hemisphere. 

The Fukushima disaster is more than a human-rights charge against a petty dictator; it is a crime against humanity on par with the indictments at the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals.
Failure to prosecute is complicity.

If there is a silver lining to every dark cloud, it's that the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami saved the world from even greater folly by halting the drive to World War III.

NTS Notes:  Readers, you really have to ask yourselves the following: 
Why is it that whenever you dig deep into any "terrorist" attack, war, uprising, or Worldwide disaster these days, you find either US, or Israeli, criminal involvement the deeper you go?
Again, there has always been evidence showing Israel involved in the Fukushima disaster due to the actions of their nefarious Stuxnet Virus, and this article only further backs up their criminal involvement with even more accusations.

And now it appears that the US may have been directly involved as well as creating this horrific disaster!
If any of the accusations presented in this article prove to be true, then yes, the US and Israel should be brought up on charges of crimes against humanity in International courts... But I guarantee that due to Jewish total control over most worldwide governing bodies that will never happen...
What is to be done in the meantime? 

People everywhere must be made aware of the truth behind the Fukushima disaster and whether or not they are being subjected to Plutonium poisoning. 

It is better for people everywhere to again hope for the best, but be prepared for the worst!

Definitely more to come......

NTS

Monday, 26 September 2011

SEPTEMBER 27TH: A CLOSE CALL NOT NAMED ELENIN

I have steered away from the whole Elenin/Nabiru controversy simply because the magnitude of the event was/is just too much for me to grasp. Besides, what can we do in the face of such an overwhelming event? 

However, consider a few of the things I have written and posted in the past little while. Bunkers. Drills in Denver. Then there are the suddenly absentee Wall Street honchos. All around September 27, 2011. 

Germany’s President’s schedule is empty after September 25, 2011.

American President leaves DC during this week to Denver. There is some sort of military DEFCON exercise going on this week.

Top NASA staff leaves this week for Denver.

Senate and House of Reps leaves DC this week on vacation from September 25th through October 2nd, 2011. They always take the month of August. This is the first time they are recessing again the next month.

The UK Parliament is in recess from September 15th through October 10th, 2011.

The main British royalty is nowhere to be found on these dates.

The United Nations has an empty schedule from September 23rd through October 10th, 2011.

The Russian Duma will be in recess this week.

The pope will be off this week.
From:  THE RATS ABANDON SHIP AS ELENIN MOVES INTO ALIGNMENT

Let us not forget that mysterious (or not) video from Nasa speaking to its employees ('our NASA family") about disaster preparedness that was released June 10, 2011. Remember how he said, "responsible for the safety of people, not only here on earth, but also off this planet"?

Then I awoke to find the following video in my email today. Part of me is saying, heck, just live on ice cream today, it does not matter any more. The good part of me is saying, "stock up on beans!"

The chart below has three NASA links I recommend you check out. Then decide whether or not to make last minute preparations and / or worry.
.

This one is going to be quite close as you can visualize in the video below. According to NASA's JPL chart below, Asteroid 2011 SE58 will be 0.0016 AU away from Earth, or nearly half the distance of the moon away from the Earth; this on the same day as Elenin's alignment with the sun and the supermoon. The chart below shows a miss distance of .6 LD, which stands for Lunar Distance from the Earth. Traveling at approx 15.85km per second, the object is between 8-18 meters in diameter (26-60 feet).

Please check out the highlighted Applets from NASA below.

UPCOMING CLOSE APPROACHES TO EARTH 


1 AU = ~150 million kilometers
1 LD = Lunar Distance = ~384,000 kilometers 

Object
Name
Close
Approach
Date
Miss
Distance
(AU)
Miss
Distance
(LD)
Estimated
Diameter*
H
(mag)
Relative
Velocity
(km/s)
 2011-Sep-26
0.1392
54.2
550 m - 1.2 km
18.4
10.67
 2011-Sep-27
0.0016
0.6
7.9 m - 18 m
27.6
15.85
 2011-Sep-27
0.1960
76.3
160 m - 360 m
21.1
15.56
.
.



 


 

Uploaded by booTubeDude on Sep 25, 2011

This is also heading our way this week!

ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=2011%20SE58;orb=1

IF TOM FRIEDMAN CAN SAY IT, YOU CAN SAY IT TOO


 Even Israel’s most ardent supporters
now say its lobby 
skews the political landscape
and damages both the US and Israel.

MJ Rosenberg
September 26, 2011

The most appalling aspect of the Obama administration’s inept handling of the upcoming UN vote on Palestinian statehood is the reason for the administration’s bumbling. 

Its moves are dictated by fear of offending Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, his lobby and, especially, the campaign donors who take direction from that lobby.


One can respond: So what else is new? 

But that is only if you get your information from some place other than the electronic or print mainstream media. 

There, due to a decades-long campaign of intimidation, the lobby’s actions are rarely reported.

That is because the organizations that compose the lobby ~ including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League ~ have demonstrated that even mentioning the lobby’s excessive power will lead to being smeared with the label of “anti-Israel” or “anti-Semitic”.
No matter that the lobby’s most powerful component, AIPAC, brags about its power over Washington policymakers in speeches, literature and at its annual conclave, which is attended by most of Congress and often the president and the secretary of state. 

No matter that AIPAC’s eight-story headquarters overlooking the Capitol testifies to its wealth. 

No matter that members of Congress themselves ~ occasionally publicly and often privately ~ discuss the bluntness of AIPAC’s threats.

No, those who dare cite its huge influence are accused of indulging in myth.
However, that may be changing after a bolt of illuminating lightning struck this week.

INCOHERENT POLICY

Writing in the New York Times, influential foreign policy columnist Thomas Friedman came right out and said that the lobby is the cause of America’s seemingly incoherent policy toward Israel and Palestine and for the embarrassing and dangerous sucking up to Netanyahu.

The US government, he explains, is:
“fed up with Israel’s leadership but a hostage to its ineptitude, because the powerful pro-Israel lobby in an election season can force the administration to defend Israel at the UN, even when it knows Israel is pursuing policies not in its own interest or America’s”.
In other words, policymakers are torn between doing what is in our national interest (and consistent with our democratic values) and pleasing a powerful lobby that threatens to withhold funding from any politician that deviates from the line.

There is nothing particularly new in what Friedman says about the lobby, other than that it comes from a consistent friend of Israel ~ who says that his motivation in writing the column was that he has “never been more worried about Israel’s future”.

Although the lobby would like to smear Friedman, it can’t lay a glove on him. What are they going to do? 

Call him an anti-Semite?
Try to get him fired?
For what?
Because he cares about Israel too much to let a right-wing politician sacrifice its future?

Nonetheless, it is unlikely that Friedman’s column will impress President Obama as much as it will infuriate Binyamin Netanyahu. This administration made its decision back when it repeatedly retreated on the matter of Israeli settlements. It will support Netanyahu no matter the cost to Israel, the Palestinians, or to the standing of the United States.

NETANYAHU’S GRAND PLAN

And Netanyahu knows it. In fact, Friedman writes that, contrary to the common view that Bibi is just a bumbler, he actually has a strategy ~ not just for Palestine but for all the areas in which he has made such a colossal mess. And it is predicated on the power of the lobby:
“OK, Mr Netanyahu has a strategy: Do nothing vis-à-vis the Palestinians or Turkey that will require him to go against his base, compromise his ideology or antagonize his key coalition partner, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, an extreme right-winger. 

Then, call on the US to stop Iran’s nuclear programme and help Israel out of every pickle, but make sure that President Obama can’t ask for anything in return ~ like halting Israeli settlements ~ by mobilizing Republicans in Congress to box in Obama and by encouraging Jewish leaders to suggest that Obama is hostile to Israel and is losing the Jewish vote. 

And meanwhile, get the Israel lobby to hammer anyone in the administration or Congress who says aloud that maybe Bibi has made some mistakes, not just Barack. There, who says Mr. Netanyahu doesn’t have a strategy?”
I don’t know what this all means in terms of this week’s vote at the UN except for this: 

The US position, whatever it turns out to be, will be dictated
by people whose sole goal is to defend Netanyahu and the status quo.

I expect the president to do exactly what Netanyahu wants him to do.

And, given Netanyahu’s choices of late, 
the outcome will be disastrous.

I feel terrible about all this. And I’m not alone. Many people who care about Israel understand that it can only survive if it ends the occupation and supports the establishment of a viable Palestinian state. 

In fact, the people I know who are most happy about the course Netanyahu and Obama will likely adopt at the UN are either robotic supporters of the lobby (“if Netanyahu says it, it must be right”) and those who would like to see Israel replaced by one state, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, dominated by the Palestinian majority.

Two things are terribly wrong here. 

Most significantly, our foreign policy in the US is being dominated by a lobby that takes its orders from an inept leader of a country that is the largest recipient of US aid ~ but that never does anything to make life easier for the United States. 

The other is that the lobby in question calls itself “pro-Israel” ~ but repeatedly and consistently promotes policies that endanger the very survival of Israel.

For the lobby, it’s all a DC power game. 

Too bad that so many lives are at stake. Not to mention a 1,900-year-old dream.