Tuesday, 12 April 2011

CHUTZPA: PERES TO BAN: UN CAN’T REMAIN NEUTRAL ON GAZA SITUATION

Given enough Chutzpah Rope, 
our “Zionist” friends will surely hang themselves.

Hold on to your last meal, dear Readers. There are SO MANY comments one can make in the following article that I truly don’t know where to begin. The self delusion of these Zionists, not to mention incapability to be honest and forthcoming, and their psychopathic need to distort the truth and hold on to their shoddy history in Palestine, is so thickly layered, I don’t think even they know where their truths end and falsifications begin!

I will endeavor to not fill the following with too much documentary. Although… gosh, with such a huge target, it is difficult to restrain myself.

These ridiculous assertions rank along with the claim that the Cyclon B used to protect Jewish concentration camp inmates from typhus was instead used to murder them…


Posted: April 9, 2011
By crescentandcross
 NEW YORK
 
“Gaza would have remained open were it not for missiles,” President says in NY; “only 3 of 400 accusations in Goldstone Report have merit.”

President Shimon Peres held a meeting with United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon on Friday, during which he discussed the Goldstone Report and recent violence from Gaza towards Israel, and decried any efforts to unilaterally declare a Palestinian state.

Calling his talk with the Secretary General “very open and very clear,” Peres told a press conference afterward that he summarized the Israeli position with regard to Gaza and the West Bank.

In Gaza, Peres said, Israel had made a decision to unilaterally leave and not to return to the territory.
“I don’t understand why once we left Gaza, they started to shoot at us, backed by declarations calling for the destruction of the State of Israel,” Peres said. “The UN cannot remain neutral in such a position.”
Peres does not know why innocent victimized Israel is terrorized by the people they are sworn to turn into “drugged cockroaches”?

Borders to Gaza would have remained open, Peres said, were it not for the shooting of missiles at Israel.
“They were closed in order to preclude such attacks.”
Peres said:
“The first law of human rights is the right to remain alive.

“Flotillas are an unnecessary provocation.”
Provocation to whom? To an illegal country that is starving the life and soul of a nation full of people they consider to be walking on two legs so they can serve the Jews better? To the entire world who generally support the ruin of the blockade and the wish to take aid to a starving people? Of course this is not Israel’s fault!

Heck, the Mavri Marmara was guilty for being full of peaceful humanitarians and deserved worse than it got!  Israel’s fine soldiers did a wonderful job restraining themselves from murdering and thieving from the Marmara and its fiendish criminal/terrorist occupants!

Good Israel. Bad rest of humanity! (Roll up newspaper and swat humanity on its naughty bottom!)

To those who would like to see the borders of Gaza opened, Peres said, he would advise that they:
Speak to the leadership of Gaza and say, “If you will stop smuggling arms and stop shooting, you won’t have problems.”
Peres then talked about the Goldstone Report, saying that Israel “took it seriously,” but:
“Only three of the four hundred accusations made against Israel had merit.”
Do you, dear reader, need a barf bucket yet?

He also noted that the war against terror is
“A conflict between a lawful organization and an unlawful organization that used civilians as shields and targets.”
Hey! According to who is Hamas illegal? Were they not democratically elected by the People of Palestine? As for the shields and targets excuse, Mr. Peres, get thee behind Tzipi Livni and sing that lie in a chorus line. 

Saying something often enough does not make it true, even if Carl Rove figured that was how it went. It seems to me that the IDF were/are very fond of using Palestinians as targets and shields. 

He noted Goldstone’s recent Washington Post op-ed, saying
“I think it’s a little too many regrets.”
Peres said:
“For us, this is not an exercise in judicial exposition. We are a people who are used to blood libels.”
Excuse me; I am going to toss my cookies. Poor us, poor Jews, always accused of atrocities which, of course, we have nothing to do with. We are INNOCENT, I tell you! Innocent!

Peres said that the Israeli government’s support of a two-state solution brought the major division between Israeli political parties to an end, but added that Israel
“cannot leave places in the West Bank without making sure the Gazan story will not be repeated there.”
“Support of the two state solution”? Oh dear give me an ever-lovin break why don’tcha? The world, thanks to WikiLeaks, knows all too well what a sham that has been as well as Israel’s intentions right from the beginning.  There is just too much evidence to even consider this falsehood worth a response.

Peres said:
“If the UN can stop terror, welcome. If the UN can stop missiles, welcome.”
Peres deemed the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
“not a confrontation of forces, but a confrontation of values.”
Such as right to life versus death?

He expressed his hope that:
“The recent democratic awakening in Arab lands would lead to a more democratic, open and humane Middle East.”
Now, let me see here. Is this not all part of the CIA Mossad M16 etc etc plan to topple the Arab countries like dominoes? Once again, he insults the world with this idiocy.

When one reporter questioned Peres on his having equated Goldstone to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Peres responded,
“Anyone who reads the paper knows we left Gaza willingly. It’s a clear situation.”
Please enlighten us further, Sir. The only thing “clear” was the genocidal behavior of the rabbi-driven IDF and IAF. And you have not left Gaza yet. Not by a long shot.

When the reporter pressed and said perhaps those firing missiles in Gaza felt provoked by Israel’s actions “in 1948,” Peres responded:
“What are you talking about? You believe that?”
When the reporter demurred, Peres answered,
“If you don’t believe that, why are you defending them? I can’t understand your logic.”
NO ONE understands Zionist and/or Talmudic logic Mr. Peres. Don’t twist things around anymore than you already have. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.