Sunday, 8 July 2018

Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: The Democratic Party’s Obituary


July 6, 2018
 
Tom Perez, the Big Labor Establishment-backed Democratic National Committee Chairman, declared that the upstart Berniecrat, Bronx-native Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was the future of the Democratic Party. She rocketed to the forefront of Democratic politics when she had trounced liberal Democratic House leader Joe Crowley 57%-43% in a Democratic primary upset. She’s young, a minority, and energizing to the Left. She also opposes secure borders, wants Medicare for all, demands the abolition ICE, and she calls housing “a right.” In other words, she’s a socialist. 

As expected, the liberal press, including The Nationwrote a glowing review of this self-avowed Democratic Socialist Millennial of Puerto Rican descent who campaigned hard for Bernie Sanders in 2016. The likely reason why Perez called Ocasio-Cortez the Democratic Party’s future is that he fears losing his job. The left tends to cannibalize itself when the younger generation demands socialist outcomes at a faster rate. Instead of heeding the past and ignoring these demands, the leadership and doubles down on this self-defeating insanity.

None of this sick, self-defeating cycle among left-wing partisans should surprise us. During the French Revolution ~ the template for every modern, radical, self-destructive political movement ~ the liberal reformers established a freer, more equitable system, but clashed with the increasingly radical, upset Jacobins.  

Where did this dangerous arrogance spring from? 

A growing secular self-importance, which arose out from the growing split within the Enlightenment movement. Not content to challenge traditions in order to arrive at the truth, these radicals derided and discarded all Western legacies. They wanted tear down everything in order build up something new based on their “enlightened” ideals.

The French radicals, the progenitors of Ocasio et al., wanted to create perfected men within an ideal society. Their utopian agenda meant dispensing with God, rejecting Christian revelation (not just Catholic tradition), and inventing a new society by force. Thus came the Terror, and with it the tool to shape this “brave new world”: the Guillotine. 

Facing foreign invaders without and civilian uprisings within (human nature resists being told what to do, even if it’s “for the common good”), the Revolutionary leaders enacted the Law of Suspects. They arrested and eliminated anyone opposed to their “free and equal” ends. When even Robespierre’s violent confidants thought he was going too far, Robespierre shoved them under the national blade for treason, too.

A century later came the Russian Revolution. Lenin’s communist agenda brought forth not just a worker’s revolution, but abolition and then execution of the Russia royal classes. The inevitable infighting followed, which gave Joseph Stalin the upper hand, while his rival Leon Trotsky got an icicle in the chest. The quest for naked power and self-interest among communist agitators will crowd out the push for the common good and egalitarian ends. These left-wing revolutions inevitably collapse upon themselves.

The United States is not witnessing the bloodshed which flooded the streets of Revolutionary France and Russia. However, the disturbing uptick in violence ~ against elected officials as well as peaceful citizens ~ should alarm us of the aggressive push of the regressive Left. Their animus isn’t just reserved for their political adversaries on the right. 

They have attacked their own, too. Black Lives Matter protesters have interrupted gay pride parades in Washington DC, Minnesota, and even Toronto, Canada. Today’s millennial progressive mob has deemed Democratic Socialist Bernie Sanders as part of the problem. He’s too “Right-wing” for their taste because he won’t advocate for the dissolution of ICE, and “Sanders is not a revolutionary.” Neither is presidential contender Kamala Harris. Will that ruin her intersectional appeal to the Democratic base?

Ocasio-Cortez is not the future 
of the Democratic Party.
She’s their obituary.

 
Her radical demands are splitting the party and will turn off independent voters, too.  Ocasio’s enticement of “free stuff” may have been alluring during the Obama Administration, but the Trump Administration’s regulatory rollback and tax reforms have unleashed unprecedented wealth, prosperity, and opportunity. The new, rising generation of makers don’t want to pay for takers. 

Americans want to enjoy peace along with their prosperity, public safety as well as private enrichment. Ocasio-Cortez’ call to terminate ICE and remove all borders is backfiring, big time. These Anti-Trump lunatics crowd outside homes where ICE agents serve federal warrants to end human trafficking and drug smuggling, not just deport illegal aliens. 

To appease their rising left-wing partisans, Democrats have embraced crime, corruption, and chaos: not a winning platform for Election 2018 or 2020.

Besides, the world at large, including the United States, is already witnessing this political and moral plague of socialism at its best (i.e. worst) in Venezuela. Government greed in the name of “the common good” has squeezed out private interests and investment. Anyone with money fled that country, and everyone else left behind scrounges through garbage cans or invades the local zoo to forage for food. 

Even historically Communist countries don’t want communism anymore. China has long embraced economic reforms, even though they remain an abusive, authoritative state. 

Uber-Stalinist North Korea wants out of its self-imposed communistic predicament, enough that Little Kim met with Uncle Donald to discuss peace and rapprochement.

Whether it induces or tears or laughter, the Democratic Party has descended down this socialist, suicidal decline before in 1972 and then 1984. Democrat George McGovern was a roaring progressive who didn’t heed the Silent Majority’s outrage over rising crime. Nixon won re-election in a 49-state landslide. In 1984, Democrat Walter Mondale was weak on Soviet aggression and promised to raise everyone’s taxes. Reagan tromped Mondale in another 49-state sweep.

When a political movement embraces quality as the determined result, when moral standards no longer stand, that movement won’t last very long. 

Ocasio-Cortez’ socialism is not the future, 
but a failed reverberation of the past. 

The Democratic Party’s decision to embrace this repeated, reckless stupidity is sad but not necessarily shocking. In fact, it could serve as a relief to the Republican Party in particular and American voters in general. I am definitely looking to President Donald Trump winning 2020 with another 49-state victory. 

6 comments:

  1. The DNC is going to replace the worn-out Pelosi hag with a fresh face, but it will be the SOS.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Recall the law of 3 January 1973 called Rothschild-Giscard law forcing France to borrow from private banks with interest rates instead of borrowing at zero rate near the Bank of France.
    https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loi_de_janvier_1973_sur_la_Banque_de_France

    In the wake of this law Simone Veil demanded family reunification for foreigners in France, then created the law on the legalization of mass abortion.
    https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simone_Veil#Biographie

    At the same time, Étienne-Émile Baulieu born Étienne Blum invented the abortion pill RU486 to abort French girls. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Étienne-Émile_Baulieu#Famille

    Subsequently, the Fabius-Gayssot law condemned racism (supposed) in the law.
    https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loi_Gayssot

    https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laurent_Fabius#Situation_personnelle

    https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Claude_Gayssot

    Finally, Robert Badinter created the law of abolition of the death penalty for murderers where his co-religionist Simone Veil allowed it for children not even born
    https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Badinter#Biographie

    But there is better. Immigration, population replacement, a money pump for a certain community:

    1-Rothshild, of which Macron was the partner, feeds on the public debt of France. (interest, rate of wear of the usurer)

    2-George Soros (his real name Grégory Swartz) the co-religionist of Rothschild, finances hundreds of thousands of "Syrian-black" illegal immigrants to invade France and Europe. (major specialist in financing revolutions and destabilization of countries, Ukraine, South Africa etc ...)

    3-Macron partner Rothschild, seeing the France breathless, does not stop funding the suction pump that are the Temporary Allowance Waiting and State Medical Aid to the attention of illegal immigrants in situation illegal. (The temporary ATA waiting allowance is an active incentive to be illegal illegally in France.The AME is care taken by the French 100%, for the whole planet provided it lands.)

    4- Immigration costs the French 73 billion euros a year, this for 30 years, make the calculation 73 billion multiplied by 30 years, the total covers the entirety of the debt of France. (read "The French ruined by immigration" by Gérard Pince)

    Great supporters and promoters of the clandestine and immigration continues in France, for France, not for them;
    George Soros, Bernard Kouchner, Jacques Attali, Benjamen Stora, Guy Bedos, Ruth Elkrief, Sacha Reingewirtz, Raphaël Glucksmann, Pierre Moscovici, Pierre Lellouche, Paul Nahon, Nicolas Sarkozy-Mallah (le Marrane Séfarade de la famille Mallah et son métissage OBLIGATOIRE), Nicolas Bedos Michel Field Meyer Habib Martin Hirsch Laurent Fabius Julien Dray Jean-François Kahn Daniel Bensaid Harlem Désir Franz-Olivier Giesbert Francois Rebsamen Enrico Macias Daniel Cohn Bendit David Kessler Daniel-Schneidermann Cyril Hanouna Bernard Kouchner faiseur de guerres sanglantes et de génocides Arthur Jacques Esselbag Anne-Sinclair Ivan-Levai Andre-Glucksmann Alexandre Adler Bernard-Henri Lévy Esther Benbassa etc...

    ReplyDelete
  3. In the year 711, this community joined Tarik crossing the Strait of Gibraltar. The Muslim troops were enlarged by all the Jews who had been banished from Spain, as well as all those who remained in the peninsula. As Tarik moved on, Tarik left the Jews guarding the cities he had captured. Thanks to this, the Muslim generals had almost all their army to continue the conquest of the country. In Toledo, on Palm Sunday (religious festival) * in the year 712, the Jews brought the Moors into the city. * The Christians invoked divine protection in the churches, the Jews opened the doors of the churches and s 'unite with Muslims to massacre Christians in prayer.' Sources: Henrich Graetz & Jacques Attali

    "Netanyahu changes opinion and cancels agreement with UN" "Despite his shocking statement of April 2, Benjamin Netanyahu decided to cancel the agreement with the UN that Israel expelled some of its African migrants towards "developed countries like Germany and Italy."

    "IsRatHell will resettle some of its African migrants in Western countries" https://francais.rt.com/international/49371-israel-reinstallation-migrants-pays-occidentaux

    "Residency card against forced sterilization in Israel" https://www.humanite.fr/world/residence-card-for-sterilization-force-for-514240

    "When Israel imposes contraception on its Ethiopians" http://www.lepoint.fr/monde/quand-israel-force-ses-ethiopiennes-a-contraception-30-01-2013-1622050_24.php

    Oddly the UN does not provide for population replacement in IsRatHell:

    http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/migration/migration.htm
    I say strangely, although we know what is the obedience of 1/3 of the UN officials.

    In 1933 a few small people declared war on a German leader who only wanted to expel foreign citizens while his country was ruined, in economic crisis. Of course the good-hearted will say "but they were born in Germany", it's true, but the same good-natured people have never been moved that white people born in Africa and living there for several generations have been expelled. The expelled Black Feet were still not considered African after being born in Africa for several generations in a row. So why would this argument hold (they are born there) for one but not for the other? For a very simple reason: Anti-white racism!

    Sorry for the rough translation but I try to inform you at best, with documents sourced therefore indisputable.

    As my grandfather used to say: In life, an assassin has all the rights except the right to have the weapon taken by hand

    We know, we know all the details, this in a totally official way

    ReplyDelete
  4. Here's something on one of your standard issues, Noor:
    https://alethonews.com/2018/07/09/a-matter-of-life-death-15000-white-south-african-farmers-seek-refuge-in-russia-report/
    Good luck to them!

    ReplyDelete
  5. A complete waste of my time,total shite.

    ReplyDelete

If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.