Molten metal, seen by dozens, was deliberately omitted from the NIST report.
NIST caught lying about pools of molten steel
found at the basement of Ground Zero, says no evidence or eye witnesses. This
video shows that NIST officials lied about it and they should be investigated.
More info: http://world911truth.org
The 9/11 disaster scene
in Manhattan, dubbed “Ground Zero,” should have been treated as a crime scene
in accordance with 9/11's immediate appellation “the Crime of the Century,” in
greater measure than simply as the scene of a terrorist attack that would
immediately be labeled an “act of war.”
Instead of being analyzed
to determine the cause of failure, the WTC steel framing pieces were rapidly
shipped off to India and China for recycling. New York Mayor Rudi Giuliani, a
former prosecutor, surely knew the importance of securing evidence ~ and that
the law in fact requires it.
Written by Dick Scar,
BSAE
24 August 2010
The destruction of the
three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11 caused the greatest loss of life
and property damage in U.S. fire history and constituted the largest structural
failures in world history.
This event should have received the most thorough investigation of any event in history.
Even with ordinary house
fires evidence is collected and an investigation is performed in order to
determine the cause, especially if foul play is suspected.
But the WTC
investigations performed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST) were at best incomplete and at worst criminally fraudulent.
FEMA cleanup workers and
NIST engineers alike completely ignored the most obviously relevant and
applicable recommendations of the National Fire Protection Association, NFPA
921, the nationally accepted guideline for fire and explosion investigation.
WHOLESALE
DESTRUCTION OF FORENSIC EVIDENCE
The 9/11 disaster scene
in Manhattan, dubbed “Ground Zero,” should have been treated as a crime scene
in accordance with 9/11's immediate appellation “the Crime of the Century,” in
greater measure than simply as the scene of a terrorist attack that would
immediately be labeled an “act of war.”
Certainly material and
debris, where injured people might be trapped, had to be removed as quickly as
practical. But, as important evidence, it should have been taken to a secure
site for further investigation. NFPA 921 states:
“Once evidence has been removed from the scene, it should be maintained and not be destroyed or altered until others who have a reasonable interest in the matter have been notified.”
Moreover, after there was
no reasonable hope of finding any more victims alive, there was no longer any
need for the headlong rush to dispose of the steel.
As the NIST report admitted,
the three WTC skyscrapers whose destruction was blamed primarily on fire were
the only cases of modern steel-framed high-rise buildings in world history to
have ever completely collapsed because of fire.
The structural steel was
therefore extremely important evidence. Yet this evidence was quickly hauled
away by up to 400 trucks per day and taken … where? Not to a secure place to
await inspection, but to barges where it was readied for shipping.
Instead of being analyzed
to determine the cause of failure, the WTC steel framing pieces were rapidly
shipped off to India and China for recycling. New York Mayor Rudi Giuliani, a
former prosecutor, surely knew the importance of securing evidence ~ and that
the law in fact requires it.
Yet, of the 200,000 tons
of structural steel contained in the Twin Towers, only a few hundred pieces
were saved. And, only one piece of steel framing said to have come from WTC 7
was saved.
According to Erik Lawyer,
founder of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, officials in charge of the scene
admitted that “the majority of the evidence was
destroyed.” Building fire expert and editor-in-chief of Fire
Engineering Magazine Bill Manning wrote,
“Such destruction of evidence shows the astounding ignorance of government officials to the value of a thorough, scientific investigation…I have combed through our national standard for fire investigation, NFPA 921, but nowhere in it does one find an exemption allowing the destruction of evidence. To treat the September 11 incident any differently would be the height of stupidity and ignorance… The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately.”
EXPLOSIVE
EVIDENCE IGNORED
NIST ignored clear
evidence of explosives and incendiaries in the destruction of all three
high-rises. NIST excluded anything that happened after the so-called point of
collapse initiation from the Twin Towers investigation despite that one of
their stated “objectives” was to determine “how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed.”
Hundreds of first
responders and others on the scene reported hearing explosions ~ yet NIST
ignored them. More than 100 of these reports were recorded by
orders of Fire Commissioner Thomas Von Essen in October of 2001, but the City
of New York withheld this key evidence until forced by the New York State Court
of Appeals to release it in August 2005.
NFPA 921 calls for the
consideration of the possibility of exotic accelerants or explosives when
“pulverized concrete”, “high order damage”, and “lateral ejection of building
elements” are found. Pulverized concrete covered all of lower Manhattan and
comprised up to 30% of the WTC dust. The Twin Towers were completely destroyed
down to their individual structural elements, and ejected as far as 600 feet.
NFPA 921 states that
accelerants should be investigated in any fire crime scene and that molten
steel may indicate the use of thermite, an incendiary and accelerant. Yet NIST did
not look for thermite.
Since then, however,
independent scientists have found a high-tech version of thermite,
known as nanothermite, in dust samples
collected from the WTC site. Previously molten iron micro-spheres had
already been found in the WTC dust by USGS researchers and environmental
engineers, further indicating high temperatures associated with the use of
thermite.
MOLTEN
METAL AND HIGH-TEMPERATURE PHENOMENA IGNORED
More than two dozen
eyewitnesses have reported seeing molten steel in the basements of all three
WTC high-rises. This is confirmed by photos and verified by infrared satellite
images indicating extremely high temperatures. Yet John Gross, Lead Engineer
for NIST, denies even having heard any
reports of molten metal at Ground Zero.
NIST stated in 2007 on
its website to have the “vision to lead the world in methods of measurement and
prediction of the behavior of fire and its effects.” Conspicuously, NIST never
has shown any interest in investigating the unusual, allegedly fire-related, high temperature phenomena in the
WTC collapse piles.
A
COVER-UP?
It is clear that the
actions by NYC/Port Authority officials, FEMA managers, and NIST engineers
relative to the collection, preservation, and analysis of the evidence of this
monumental crime looks more like a cover-up than an investigation. AE911Truth
is dedicated to obtaining a real investigation that properly accounts for all
the evidence and which uses the scientific method to analyze it. Join us in
this historic pursuit of justice.
I KNEW FROM DAY ONE THIS WAS A CONTROLLED EVENT”
CONTROLLED DEMOLITION EXPERT SAYS
As we approach the
10 year mark of the tragic 9/11 events, more and more experts in
architecture, engineering, physics and many more are speaking out against the
official Bush administration story. This time we have Tom Sullivan, a
controlled demolition expert who worked for one of the largest U.S. company in
the field, simply called Controlled Demolition Incorporated (CDI) destroying
the official NIST theory.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.