Vittorio may have died, but he is a man who truly lived.
The world is indeed a better place for his having lived in it.
September 8, 2011
The trial of four surviving defendants in the April 14 kidnapping and murder of Italian journalist and International Solidarity Movement activist Vittorio Arrigoni began today in a Gaza military court.
The hearing, which began at 10:30 am, was open to the public. Two International Solidarity Movement members, along with a number of Vittorio’s Palestinian and international friends, observed it.ED:The Italian activist and journalist was murdered after being kidnapped by a group that identified itself as Salafist in April.(In contemporary times, Salafism has become associated with (extremist) literalist and puritanical approaches to Islamic theology. In the West the term Salafi has become particularly associated with the small minority of Muslims that espouse violent jihad against civilians as a legitimate expression of Islam, the so-called Salafi Jihadis ~ Wikipedia)
It was held in a light, airy hall in Gaza’s military court compound. The four Salafi defendants, Abu Ghoul, age 25, Khader Jram, age 26, Mohammed Salfi, age 23, and Hasanah Tarek, age 25, appeared to be in good health, occasionally smiling or waving to family in the courtroom.
ED:After his kidnapping, Arrigoni was found hanged in a house northwest of Gaza City on April 15, 2011.
Hamas security forces were able to find the group allegedly responsible for the murder in Nuseirat refugee camp three days after the murder.
Clashes erupted between the group and Hamas forces, killing two of the accused murderers. A third was injured and a fourth detained.
News of the Vittorio's murder was greeted with widespread condemnation, and demonstrations and vigils were held across the West Bank in his memory.
Proceedings began with a request by attorneys from the Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR), which holds power of attorney for Vittorio’s family in Bulciago, Italy, that they be allowed to participate in the trial.
Military judge Abu Omar Atallah responded that while Palestinian military law does not allow for participation in criminal trials by third parties, the case and its files would be open to PCHR as well as the public.
After the PCHR attorneys moved their chairs from the front of the courtroom back into the public seating, prosecutors attempted to introduce the video contents of a compact disk, as well as a forensic report on the crime scene, as evidence.
The defense counsel responded that the prosecution had not yet made these materials available to them, and that they would need time to review them before deciding on their legal strategy.
Prosecutors also asked that testimony from their witnesses be postponed to allow them further time to prepare. The defense counsel objected, noting that testimony had been scheduled to begin today.
Taking these positions into account, Atallah opted to allow time for the preparation of witnesses by the prosecution and the review of evidence by the defense. Before adjourning the court at 11:30 am, he scheduled its next hearing for Thursday, September 22.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.