BEHIND THE SCENES: THE SECRET NATO REPORT ON AFGHANISTAN

Nothing will really change the lives of these women at this point.

By Thomas Riggins

Countercurrents.org

February, 6, 2012

The secret NATO report, "State of the Taliban 2012," commissioned by the US and NATO was never supposed to see the light of day. Unfortunately for the US war party it was leaked to the press and the New York Times has published many of its observations and conclusions ("Taliban Captives Dispute U.S. View on State of War" 2-2-2012).

The report was based on information taken from 4000 prisoners, Taliban and others, who have fallen into the hands of US forces. To the surprise of the US, the prisoners are rather upbeat about the progress of the war and think they are actually winning it. The report says that while the US thinks it is winning and is about to start winding down its own participation, the interviews of the captives shows, according to the NYT, "a Taliban insurgency that is far from vanquished or demoralized."

The same issue of the Times reported the optimistic statement of Defense Secretary Panetta that the US would set 2013 not 2014 as the date for ending US combat in Afghanistan. This was later corrected by the ground commanders in Afghanistan ~ 2014 is the date ~ and we may still remain after that date for a long, long time. They wish.

The report says the prisoners state that in those areas where the US forces withdraw and turn over control to the Afghan Army, that army begins to cooperate with the Taliban ~ as do the local Afghan government officials.

"Many Afghans are already bracing themselves for an eventual return of the Taliban."

The report also says that while the Afghan government says it will carry on the war after the US withdraws "many of its personnel have secretly reached out to insurgents, seeking long-term options in the event of a possible Taliban victory." Well of course, all options should be kept on the table.

The report gives the impression that the war is lost and the government can't deal with this reality.

Lt. Col. Jimmie E. Cummings a US-NATO spokes person had this to say about the information gotten from the prisoners.

"This document aggregates the comments of Taliban detainees in a captive environment without considering the validity of or motivation behind their reflections. Any conclusions drawn from this would be questionable at best."

Wait a minute. We captured these people and interrogated them to get information about the enemy.

We don't like the information we get so then say due to a "captive environment" the conclusions are "questionable."

But all interrogations of prisoners take place in a "captive environment" and are therefore "questionable."

So why bother? It appears that if the government likes the information it gets its credible otherwise it’s "questionable."

This is completely intellectually dishonest and we should not believe a word we are told by the military unless we have independent third person verification.

What could be more comical than NATO spokespersons attempting to refute their own report once it became public? The State Department has also gotten into the act.

The report mentions the fact that the Taliban has strained relations with their "Pakistani patrons."

But Pakistan is supposed to be a US "ally." How foolish does the US look when the money it lavishes on the Pakistanis is redirected to the Taliban and used to kill US troops?

How can you even dream of winning a war when you are all tied up in these contradictory circumstances?

The State Department realizes how bad this looks and also played down the significance of the NATO report, saying it was "in no way designed to impact our ongoing efforts to be back on track with Pakistan."

Were we ever "on track" with Pakistan or just being used by the Pakistanis after they realized we didn't know what we were doing in Afghanistan?

For example, the Pakistani government, according to the report, "is thoroughly aware of Taliban activities and the whereabouts of all senior Taliban personnel." And,

"There is a wide spread assumption that Pakistan will never allow the Taliban the chance to become independent of ISI [the CIA/FBI of Pakistan-the Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate] control."

Yes, let’s get back on track ~ the US is at "war" with the Taliban, the Taliban is controlled by Pakistan therefore….. draw your own conclusions.

An important conclusion of the report, that NATO and the US really don't want people to know about, is the following:

"Taliban commanders, along with rank and file members, increasingly believe that their control of Afghanistan is inevitable. Though the Taliban suffered severely in 2011, its strength, motivation, funding and tactical proficiency remains intact."

Where does the funding come from?

It comes from us! Money from the US to Pakistan goes to the Taliban. Trucks and weapons we give to the Afghan Army are sold off at bargain basement rates, or "donated", to the Taliban by corrupt elements in the Karzai government.

The Taliban's strength is intact ~ we are withdrawing.

Their motivation is intact ~ we just want to get out as soon as possible (sooner).

Their tactical proficiency is intact, we are turning operations over to the Afghan Army many of whose troops would rather shoot us than the Taliban.

Is it really too hard to see how all this is going to end?

Oh, I forgot to add that besides the ISI, the report says the Afghan intelligence agency also supplies the Taliban with information about where American troops are located so that they can be attacked.

So there you have it.

We are spending 2 billion dollars a week to support the war against the Taliban and both our "ally" Pakistan and the Afghan governments we set up and are "defending" are on the side of the Taliban.

General Petraeus retired just in time. If he runs the CIA as well he did the war in Afghanistan the decline of US imperialism will be well underway.

Thomas Riggins is the associate editor of Political Affairs and also writes for the People's World.