April
10, 2013
On
September 22, 2013, Germany will hold general elections. These elections will
be observed with special attention given what it will mean for the austerity
policies of the Merkel government and the ‘Euro crisis.’ From an anti-austerity
and socialist perspective, the elections are also important with regard to the
situation for the new German Left Party Die
LINKE.
.
.
Despite
growing economic and social inequality, the Left Party stands at just 8 per
cent in opinion polls. The party faces the challenge of presenting itself as a
genuine alternative in an unfavourable and even hostile political environment
in Germany. In this article, published exclusively in the left-wing daily
newspaper Junge Welt, Oskar Lafontaine reflects on the current conjuncture
for the party.
.
.
Lafontaine
started his career as Willy
Brandt‘s most politically talented ‘son’; became the most
popular leader of West Germany’s Social Democratic Party (SPD) during its years
in opposition between 1982 and 1998; was deemed “the most dangerous man in
Europe” by the British press for his financial market regulation plans as the
Finance Minister of the first coalition government of SPD and Greens in 1998,
but stepped down when he realized the lack of support for his left-Keynesian
policies within the coalition.
.
.
In
the early 2000s Lafontaine was a prominent critic of the new government’s
neoliberal course and in 2004 he joined the new West German party Election
Alternative for Work and Social Justice (WASG) formed by trade unionists,
left-wing economists, SPD dissidents and radical leftists, on the condition
that it would merge with the East German Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS) to
form a united German Left Party.
.
.
In
the 2005 national elections Lafontaine led the new party formation into the
Bundestag with 8.7 per cent and in 2009 with 11.9 per cent of the popular vote.
For health reasons Lafontaine stepped down from his leadership positions
nationally and decided to concentrate on the role of opposition leader in his
home state of Saarland. His voice nevertheless remains influential within the
Left Party and calls for his return to the national stage are frequent.
.
.
In
the forthcoming German elections the Left Party (Die Linke) can only be
successful if it refuses to become another wing of the ‘German Unity Party.’
In the coming months a comedy
will be staged in Germany. The piece is called ‘Electoral Battle of the
Political Camps.’
.
.
The leading actors are Angela Merkel and Peer Steinbrück. In supporting roles
we’ll see Horst Seehofer, Sigmar Gabriel, Philipp Rösler, Jürgen Trittin and
the other respective leaders of the Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social
Union (CDU/CSU), the Social Democratic Party (SPD), the Free Democratic Party
(FDP) and the Green Party.
.
.
An appearance by Die Linke is
not envisaged for this revue. With the help of the intelligence service, the
corporate media and public broadcasters, everything possible is being done to
banish this inconvenient party from the catwalks of capitalism.
.
.
Years ago the sharp-tongued
American author Gore
Vidal observed, “Democracy is a place where numerous
elections are held at great cost without issues and with interchangeable
candidates.” For Vidal, the USA does not have two, but only one political
party, “with two right wings,” which campaigns for the interests of major
corporations. He considered the media to be instruments of propaganda for the
preservation of social power relations.
.
.
One might dismiss Gore
Vidal’s view as the literary embellishment of a writer, but the transferability
of his assessment of American politics to the looming German national election
is confirmed by journalist Heribert Prantl in the Süddeutsche Zeitung,
“The campaign of the political camps is an electoral campaign that actually no longer exists… a campaign of the political camps is an inappropriate term … There [once] were opposing positions on basic policy issues: foreign, economic, energy and immigration policies… The fundamental differences between the parties (with the exception of Die Linke) have disappeared.”
The Americanization of German
politics has undoubtedly led to the fact that today, even in Germany, we have a
one-party system with four wings - to
stay with Gore Vidal’s image. The wings call themselves the CDU/CSU, SPD, FDP
or the Greens, and they campaign, sometimes more, sometimes less, in the
interests of banks and major corporations – as the tax policies of recent years
and the many bank rescue packages demonstrate. They endorse without any
reservations an economic system which results in an unequal distribution of
prosperity, wealth and power; a system that allows a minority to have the
majority work for it and then withhold from this majority the fully entitled
proceeds of their labour, in the form of wages and employee shares.
.
.
In contrast to the German Unity Party, Die Linke
believes property should only be the result of one’s effort; it should result
from one’s own labour and not from the fact that someone has appropriated the
labour of others. So long as great fortunes and the accompanying social power
structures are created in such a way that a minority “exploits” the labour of
the majority, the interests of the majority cannot logically prevail. In other
words, a democracy; that is to say, a social order in which the interests of
the majority are asserted, flounders upon the power structure reinforced by
the German Unity Party.
.
.
So long as this remains
unaffected phony struggles will be waged and fierce conflicts can be conducted
on peripheral battlefields. The less that fundamental political positions
differ from one another, the louder the shouting must be to maintain the
appearance of a contest between the political camps. As Heribert Prantl once
more points out, “There probably are, despite the fuss that is made about
retirement policies, only one thousand people in Germany, who could spell out
the difference between the CDU/CSU and the SPD. It’s the same with other issues.”
Even the Frankfurter Allgemeine
Zeitung talks about a “phoney” campaign between the political
camps.
.
.
Neoliberalism,
German Style
Nor should we let ourselves
be blinded by the SPD-Green “plagiarism scandal.” With great effort the Social
Democrats and the Greens have copied and modified policy proposals from Die
Linke in order to make us forget the social dislocations caused by their
coalition policies - precarious working
conditions, low wages, seniors living in poverty, and the destruction of the social
security system.
.
.
This applies also to other
policies: a minimum wage, modest improvements to pensions, an increase in Hartz
IV benefits, medical fees, tuition fees, temporary work, work contracts, top
tax rates, a wealth tax, a withholding tax, a financial transaction tax, rent
control, energy price limits, a cap on interest rates for consumer credit,
Eurobonds, the revocation of bank licenses, the abetting of tax evasion,
separation of commercial and investment banking, limits to execute salaries, creditor
liability, and debt haircuts, to name but a few examples.
.
.
This theft of ideas cannot
hide the fact that when it matters the SPD and Greens, as well as the CDU/CSU
and FDP, show themselves to be loyal fractions of the German Unity Party. The unanimous
approval for the balanced budget amendment to the constitution, for the
European fiscal compact, and for the various rescue packages, shows that the
“left camp,” consisting of the SPD and Greens, have not detached themselves
from their Hartz
IV and Agenda
2010 policies. The fiscal compact represents the
consolidation of these brutal austerity policies for all of Europe. The only
reason the SPD and Greens have the chutzpah to call themselves European parties
is because they have internalized a Europe of free markets and corporations as
the only possibility.
.
.
If we measure social reality
according to declared political objectives, it is then not too harsh a
judgement to describe both ‘left-wing’ protagonists of the forthcoming ‘battle
of the political camps’ as European flops. With the participation of the then
SPD-Green chancellor Gerhard Schröder, the European Council resolved in Lisbon in December
2000 to make the EU, “the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy
in the world, capable of sustainable economic growth with more and better jobs
and greater social cohesion.” That was the noble goal. But what does the
reality look it?
.
.
When young Europeans – who
are becoming unemployed en masse – read this today, they are fully justified in
being dubious about the powers of judgment of these state leaders. When will
the politicians of the German
Unity Party grasp that an economic system, which has profit and
wealth maximization for a minority as its goal, inevitably produces conditions
such as we now observe in Europe?
.
.
Against this background it is
a bad joke when the CDU/CSU, SPD, FDP and Greens wish to place social justice
at the center of their “battle of the political camps.”
.
.
Because it’s inherent to the
system, it is also logical that both ‘camps’ have chosen so-called wars for
human rights as the central instruments of their foreign policies. In
inimitable fashion Prince Harry captured the quintessence of the new era of
German foreign policy on the front page of the Bild newspaper with his comment, “Take a life to save a
life. That’s what we revolve around, I suppose.” It is telling in this regard
that politicians from the SPD and Greens strongly criticized Merkel and
Westerwelle for not letting Germany participate in NATO’s war on Libya.
.
.
Die Linke – and this is
understood by the vast majority of its followers and members – has a right to
exist, and can be successful in the elections only if it does not become
another wing of the German Unity
Party. Die Linke’s unique characteristic is its advocacy of an economic
system, in which everyone receives the full proceeds of their labour. Such an
economic system leads to democratic enterprises run by workers and not
authoritarian economic structures with temporary work, contract work, low wages
and mini-jobs. It leads to a peaceful foreign policy, which secures raw
materials through negotiations and not with wars for human rights.
.
.
With this in mind it is clear
why the SPD and the Greens have for years now rebuffed offers of cooperation by
Die Linke. The politicians of the German
Unity Party stick together. They reject structural reforms that
would alter the ever-increasing unequal distribution of affluence and
opportunities in Germany. The electoral programs of the SPD and Greens, in
which the proposals of Die Linke have been adopted in whole or in watered-down
form, serve only as a disguise. Voters are not to know that behind the
proclamations no actual intent for their realization exists. Yet as Franz
Müntefering, the onetime great master of social democratic campaigns said: It’s
unfair to judge political parties after the election according to their
campaign promises.
.
.
The fabricated battle of the
political camps is a farce. Voters will have a déjà vu experience.
After the election things will be the same in Germany as before the election,
regardless which politicians or fractions of the German Unity Party form the government. Astonishingly,
representatives of German business are quietly indicating a preference for an
SPD-Green coalition government. The former head of the Federation of German
Industry (BDI), Hans-Peter Keitel, recently said, “When a country needs to make
political-economic reforms, it is better if the government does not have a
political color that makes it suspicious of favoring business.”
.
.
This
article originally appeared in Junge
Welt on March 21, 2013. Translation by Sam Putinja.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.