ORGANIC FARMERS AND SEED SELLERS SUE MONSANTO

TO PROTECT THEMSELVES 

FROM PATENTS ON GENETICALLY MODIFIED SEED

My readers know just how much, like millions of others, I detest the Monsanto company and its philosophy of eugenics and genocide upon humanity, especially the small farmers around the globe who have been at its conscienceless mercy for the past few decades. Just plug "Monsanto" into the seach bar to the right and a long list of articles on this company will pop up. 

The good news here is that, finally, a group of organic farm folk have gotten together and are confronting the beast where it lives, in the court room. They are taking a defensive step to protect themselves. Now this battle is one Monsanto will pull out all the steps to squash in its infancy, corporate bully with a crew of antagonistic aggressive lawyers to do its dirty work. 

These folks need all the support we, the people, can give them. Let other concerned citizens know and, if nothing else, contact them and give them our encouragement and the heartfelt thanks of those of us who eat... I think that means all of us!

 

Mother Earth News

April 30, 2011

Posted: June 2, 2011

ORGANIC FARMERS AND SEED SELLERS SUE MONSANTO TO PROTECT THEMSELVES FROMPATENTS ON GENETICALLY MODIFIED SEED: Preemptive Action Seeks Ruling That Would Prohibit Monsanto from Suing Organic Farmers and Seed Growers If Contaminated By Roundup Ready Seed

On behalf of 60 family farmers, seed businesses and organic agricultural organizations, the Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT) filed suit today 

(http://www.pubpat.org/assets/files/seed/OSGATA-v-Monsanto-Complaint.pdf)

against Monsanto Company to challenge the chemical giant’s patents on genetically modified seed.  The organic plaintiffs were forced to sue preemptively to protect themselves from being accused of patent infringement should they ever become contaminated by Monsanto’s genetically modified seed, something Monsanto has done to others in the past.

The case, Organic Seed Growers & Trade Association, et al. v. Monsanto, was filed in federal district court in Manhattan and assigned to Judge Naomi Buchwald.  Plaintiffs in the suit represent broad array of family farmers, small businesses and organizations from within the organic agriculture community who are increasingly threatened by genetically modified seed contamination despite using their best efforts to avoid it.  The plaintiff organizations have over 270,000 members, including thousands of certified organic family farmers.

Said Dan Ravicher, PUBPAT’s Executive Director and Lecturer of Law at Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law in New York,

“This case asks whether Monsanto has the right to sue organic farmers for patent infringement if Monsanto’s transgenic seed should land on their property. It seems quite perverse that an organic farmer contaminated by transgenic seed could be accused of patent infringement, but Monsanto has made such accusations before and is notorious for having sued hundreds of farmers for patent infringement, so we had to act to protect the interests of our clients.”

Once released into the environment, genetically modified seed contaminates and destroys organic seed for the same crop.  For example, soon after Monsanto introduced genetically modified seed for canola, organic canola became virtually extinct as a result of contamination.

Organic corn, soybeans, cotton, sugar beets and alfalfa now face the same fate, as Monsanto has released genetically modified seed for each of those crops, too.  Monsanto is developing genetically modified seed for many other crops, thus putting the future of all food, and indeed
all agriculture, at stake.

In the case, PUBPAT is asking Judge Buchwald to declare that if organic farmers are ever contaminated by Monsanto’s genetically modified seed, they need not fear also being accused of patent infringement.  One reason justifying this result is that Monsanto’s patents on genetically modified seed are invalid because they don’t meet the “usefulness” requirement of patent law, according to PUBPAT’s Ravicher, plaintiffs’ lead attorney in the case.

Evidence cited by PUBPAT in its opening filing today proves that genetically modified seed has negative economic and health effects, while the promised benefits of genetically modified seed ~ increased production and decreased herbicide use ~ are false.

According to Ravicher,

“Some say transgenic seed can coexist with organic seed, but history tells us that’s not possible, and it’s actually in Monsanto’s financial interest to eliminate organic seed so that they can have a total monopoly over our food supply. Monsanto is the same chemical company that previously brought us Agent Orange, DDT, PCB’s and other toxins, which they said were safe, but we know are not.  Now Monsanto says transgenic seed is safe, but evidence clearly shows it is not.”

 Farmers pick up arms in self defense against Monsanto.

The plaintiffs in the suit represented by PUBPAT are: 

Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association; 

Organic Crop Improvement Association International, Inc.; 

OCIA Research and Education Inc.; 

The Cornucopia Institute; Demeter Association, Inc.; 

Navdanya International; 

Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association; 

Northeast Organic Farming Association/Massachusetts Chapter, Inc.; 

Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont; 

Rural Vermont; 

Ohio Ecological Food & Farm Association; 

Southeast Iowa Organic Association; 

Northern Plains Sustainable Agriculture Society; 

Mendocino Organic Network;

Northeast Organic Dairy Producers Alliance; 

Canadian Organic Growers; 

Family Farmer Seed Cooperative; 

Sustainable Living Systems;

Global Organic Alliance; 

Food Democracy Now!; 

Family Farm Defenders Inc.; 

Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund; 

FEDCO Seeds Inc.; 

Adaptive Seeds, LLC; 

Sow True Seed; 

Southern Exposure Seed Exchange; 

Mumm’s Sprouting Seeds; 

Baker Creek Heirloom Seed Co., LLC; 

Comstock, Ferre & Co., LLC; 

Seed keepers, LLC; 

Siskiyou Seeds;

Countryside Organics; 

Cuatro Puertas; 

Interlake Forage Seeds Ltd.; 

Alba Ranch; 

Wild Plum Farm; 

Gratitude Gardens; 

Richard Everett Farm, LLC; 

Philadelphia Community Farm, Inc; 

Genesis Farm; 

Chispas Farms LLC;

Kirschenmann Family Farms Inc.; 

Midheaven Farms; Koskan Farms; 

California Cloverleaf Farms; 

North Outback Farm; 

Taylor Farms, Inc.; 

Jardin del Alma; 

Ron Gargasz Organic Farms; 

Abundant Acres; 

T & D Willey Farms;

Quinella Ranch;

Nature’s Way Farm Ltd.;

Levke and Peter Eggers Farm; 

Frey Vineyards, Ltd.; 

Bryce Stephens;

Chuck Noble; 

La Rhea Pepper; 

Paul Romero; and, 

Donald Wright Patterson, Jr.

 What is at stake for the rest of us ~ options and health.

MANY OF THE PLAINTIFFS MADE STATEMENTS UPON FILING OF THE SUIT

Jim Gerritsen, a family farmer in Maine who raises organic seed and is President of lead plaintiff Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association based in Montrose, Colorado, said,

“Today is Independence Day for America.  Today we are seeking protection from the Court and putting Monsanto on notice.  Monsanto’s threats and abuse of family farmers stops here.

Monsanto’s genetic contamination of organic seed and organic crops ends now.  

Americans have the right to choice in the marketplace ~ to decide what kind of food they will feed their families ~ and we are taking this action on their behalf to protect that right to choose. 

Organic farmers have the right to raise our organic crops for our families and our customers on our farms without the threat of invasion by Monsanto’s genetic contamination and without harassment by a reckless polluter. Beginning today, America asserts her right to justice and pure food.”

Dr. Carol Goland, Ph.D., Executive Director of plaintiff Ohio Ecological Food & Farm Association (OEFFA) said,

“Consumers indicate, overwhelmingly, that they prefer foods made without genetically modified organisms.  Organic farms, by regulation, may not use GMOs, while other farmers forego using them for other reasons.  

Yet the truth is that we are rapidly approaching the tipping point when we will be unable to avoid GMOs in our fields and on our plates.  That is the inevitable consequence of releasing genetically engineered materials into the environment.  

To add injury to injury, Monsanto has a history of suing farmers whose fields have been contaminated by Monsanto’s GMOs.  On behalf of farmers who must live under this cloud of uncertainty and risk, we are compelled to ask the Court to put an end to this unconscionable business practice.”

Rose Marie Burroughs of plaintiff California Cloverleaf Farms said,

“The devastation caused by GMO contamination is an ecological catastrophe to our world equal to the fall out of nuclear radiation.  Nature, farming and health are all being affected by GMO contamination.  

We must protect our world by protecting our most precious, sacred resource of seed sovereignty.

People must have the right to the resources of the earth for our sustenance.  

We must have the freedom to farm that causes no harm to the environment or to other people.  

We must protect the environment, farmers’ livelihood, public health and people’s right to non GMO food contamination.”

Ed Maltby, Executive Director of plaintiff Northeast Organic Dairy Producers Alliance (NODPA) said,

“It’s outrageous that we find ourselves in a situation where the financial burden of GE contamination will fall on family farmers who have not asked for or contributed to the growth of GE crops.  

Family farmers will face contamination of their crops by GE seed which will threaten their ability to sell crops as organically certified or into the rapidly growing ‘Buy Local’ market where consumers have overwhelmingly declared they do not want any GE crops, and then family farmers may be faced by a lawsuit by Monsanto for patent infringement.

We take this action to protect family farms who once again have to bear the consequences of irresponsible actions by Monsanto.”

David L. Rogers, Policy Advisor for plaintiff NOFA Vermont said,

“Vermont’s farmers have worked hard to meet consumers’ growing demand for certified organic and non-GE food.  It is of great concern to them that Monsanto’s continuing and irresponsible marketing of GE crops that contaminate non-GE plantings will increasingly place their local and regional markets at risk and threaten their livelihoods.”

Dewane Morgan of plaintiff Midheaven Farms in Park Rapids, Minnesota, said,

“For organic certification, farmers are required to have a buffer zone around their perimeter fields. Crops harvested from this buffer zone are not eligible for certification due to potential drift from herbicide and fungicide drift. Buffer zones are useless against pollen drift.  

Organic, biodynamic, and conventional farmers who grow identity-preserved soybeans, wheat and open-pollinated corn often save seed for replanting the next year. It is illogical that these farmers are liable for cross-pollination contamination.”

How terminators "work"

Jill Davies, Director of plaintiff Sustainable Living Systems in Victor, Montana, said,

“The building blocks of life are sacred and should be in the public domain.  

If scientists want to study and manipulate them for some supposed common good, fine.  Then we must remove the profit motive. The private profit motive corrupts pure science and increasingly precludes democratic participation.”

David Murphy, founder and Executive Director of plaintiff Food Democracy Now! said,

“None of Monsanto’s original promises regarding genetically modified seeds have come true after 15 years of wide adoption by commodity farmers. Rather than increased yields or less chemical usage, farmers are facing more crop diseases, an onslaught of herbicide-resistant super weeds, and increased costs from additional herbicide application.

Even more appalling is the fact that Monsanto’s patented genes can blow onto another farmer’s fields and that farmer not only loses significant revenue in the market but is frequently exposed to legal action against them by Monsanto’s team of belligerent lawyers.

Crop biotechnology has been a miserable failure economically and biologically and now threatens to undermine the basic freedoms that farmers and consumers have enjoyed in our constitutional democracy.”

Mark Kastel, Senior Farm Policy Analyst for plaintiff The Cornucopia Institute said,

“Family-scale farmers desperately need the judiciary branch of our government to balance the power Monsanto is able to wield in the marketplace and in the courts.  

Monsanto, and the biotechnology industry, have made great investments in our executive and legislative branches through campaign contributions and powerful lobbyists in Washington.  

We need to court system to offset this power and protect individual farmers from corporate tyranny.  

Farmers have saved seeds since the beginning of agriculture by our species.  It is outrageous that one corporate entity, through the trespass of what they refer to as their ‘technology,’ can intimidate and run roughshod over family farmers in this country.  

It should be the responsibility of Monsanto, and farmers licensing their technology, to ensure that genetically engineered DNA does not trespass onto neighboring farmland.

It is outrageous that through no fault of their own, farmers are being intimidated into not saving seed for fear that they will be doggedly pursued through the court system and potentially bankrupted.”

ABOUT PUBPAT

The Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT) is a not-for-profit legal services organization affiliated with the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. PUBPAT protects freedom in the patent system by representing the public interest against undeserved patents and unsound patent policy.  More information about PUBPAT is available from www.pubpat.org.