“supremacy was brewed into our souls; we gazed at the world through racist, chauvinistic binoculars. And we felt no shame about it either” (p. 2).
“I somehow already yearned to become a Goy or at least to be surrounded by Goyim” (p. 7).
“regard themselves as human beings that happen to be of Jewish origin.”
“those who put their Jewish-ness over and above all other traits” (p. 16).
A Jew brought up among Germans may assume German customs, German words. He may be wholly imbued with that German fluid but the nucleus of his spiritual structure will always remain Jewish because his blood, his body, his physical racial type are Jewish.
“Separation is a strategy of ghetto-building, and Zionists have followed this strategy since the late nineteenth century” (p. 41).
“Zionism would return Jews ‘back into the position they enjoyed before the nineteenth century ~ politically autonomous, culturally whole, and racially pure’” (Ibid, p. 158).
“The neocons transform the American army into an Israeli mission force” (p. 70). Paul Wolfowitz (a central focus of Atzmon’s ire) as a Sayan.
“Zionism is maintained by anti-Semitism” (p. 33).The perception of anti-Semitism creates a bunker mentality that justifies everything.
“live in a dual, deceptive mode, if not practically in a state of schizophrenia. … He must have realized that universalism and tribalism are opposing categories. … This solution led to false and deceptive behaviour. … This behavioural code, though very pragmatic, happens to be non-ethical by definition. It is based on deception ~ both self-deception and deceiving the other” (pp. 55, 57).
Rather than understanding who you are, one invests some effort in differentiating oneself from the other and from the universal.Rather than listening to one’s conscience and engage in an authentic ethical judgment, the negating subject sets his or her relationships with his or her surrounding environment, based on pragmatic and practical decision-making and exchange.
“always present a seemingly ‘ethical’ argument. They employ what looks like a moral excuse in order to introduce a pretext for a war. … Clearly the Palestinians and the Iraqis are paying a heavy price as victims of the politics of negation, politics that convey a deceitful image of righteousness” (p. 64).
The reality is that the Jewish left has been the most important force in the dissolution of the West as an ethno-cultural entity while tenaciously holding onto its own ethno-culture.The Jewish left has been the backbone of the left throughout the West since early in the 20th century, and it has been by far the most important component of the Jewish Diaspora community in Western nations throughout the 20th century into the 21st century.Prior to WWII, the Jewish left used its influence to support international socialism and the USSR where Jews had become a dominant elite, and since WWII it has had a critical influence promoting massive non-White immigration, multiculturalism, and the displacement of the traditional people and culture of the West.
“while he seems to overflow with ‘enlightenment,’ ‘progress,’ ‘freedom,’ ‘humanity,’ etc., he himself practices the severest segregation of his race ” (see here, p. 150).
“emancipated Jews insist on celebrating the fruits of enlightenment; they celebrate their right to determine who they are. On the other hand, Jewish politics is tribal, it is intolerant of Jewish dissidence or any form of self-determination that may oppose what it regards as Jewish political or tribal interests” (p. 105).
“to justify the Jewish right to self-determination and the destruction of Arab regional power and Islam. For the Matzpenist, to liberate Arabs is to turn them into Bolsheviks; the neocon is actually slightly more modest ~ all he wants is for Arabs to drink their Coca-Cola in a Westernised democratic society. Both Judeocentric philosophies were doomed to failure, because the notion of self-determination is overwhelmingly Eurocentric” (p. 109.; italics in text).
Throughout history, Jews have always been an elite, typically making alliances with non-Jewish elites and often collaborating in oppression of the peoples dominated by the elites.
“whatever is good for Jews is simply good” (p. 164).
Donations to political parties,establishing think tanks,and controlling media outlets.
Jews have always had strong international connections and interests that transcended where they happened to live. Perhaps the most historically important example of this was the worldwide campaign of the organized Jewish community against the Russian government from the late 19th century up to the Bolshevik Revolution ~ a campaign that at times opposed the national interests of the countries where they lived (see here, p. 67ff).
Dead people can’t be marriage partners; they can’t pollute the gene pool.
“When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to possess and drives out before you many nations … you must destroy them totally. Make no treaty with them, and show them no mercy.”
“You shall not make marriages with them, giving your daughters to their sons or taking their daughters for your sons” (Deut. 7:3).
There is a deep concern with intermarriage in multiple passages in many books of the Old Testament, all with the drumbeat that intermarriage is the ultimate form of Jewish apostasy.
“Many Jews, even secular ones, continue to regard mixed marriage as the ultimate threat.”
“The well-established Judeo-centric tendency to interpret almost any political and ideological criticism as a declaration of impending Judeocide is a severe form of collective Pre-TSS” (p. 131).
It has priests (e.g., Simon Wiesenthal, Elie Wiesel, Deborah Lipstadt) and prophets (… those who warn of the Iranian Judeocide to come). It has commandments and dogmas (‘Never Again’) and rituals (memorial days, pilgrimage to Auschwitz, etc).It has an established, esoteric symbolic order (kapos, gas chambers, chimneys…). It also has a temple, Yad Vashem, and shrines ~ Holocaust museums in capital cities worldwide.The Holocaust religion is also financed by a massive global financial network …. This new religion is coherent enough to define its ‘antichrists’ (Holocaust deniers) and powerful enough to persecute them (through Holocaust-denial and hate-speech laws). (pp. 148–149)
“not simply one example of genocide but a near successful attempt on the life of God’s chosen children and, thus, on God himself.”
“was indeed bad and tragic, but not that different from the fate of millions of Ukrainians, on learning the real meaning of communism. … [Her fate] was not so different from hundreds of thousands of German civilians who died in deliberate, indiscriminate bombing, just because they were Germans” (p. 175).
I think that 65 years after the liberation of Auschwitz, we must be entitled to start asking questions [to ask the necessary questions].We should ask for [some conclusive] historical evidence and arguments rather than follow a religious narrative that is sustained by political pressure and laws.We should strip the Holocaust [holocaust] of its Judeo-centric exceptional status and treat it as an historical chapter that belongs to a certain time and place.
Why were the Jews hated?Why did European people stand up against their neighbors?Why are the Jews hated in the Middle East, surely they had a chance to open a new page in their troubled history. …Why did America tighten its immigration laws amid the growing danger to European Jews?We should also ask what purpose Holocaust denial laws serve?What is the Holocaust religion there to conceal?As long as we fail to ask questions, we will be subjected to Zionist lobbies and their plots. We will continue killing in the name of Jewish suffering. (pp. 175–176)
“Can Israeli behavior throw light on the events that led to the Holocaust, or other instances of persecution of Jews?” (p. 182).
In later decades Jewish groups would aggressively campaign for massive non-White immigration and they would aggressively establish alliances with non-White ethnic groups, both actions that will ultimately dispossess the traditional people and culture of America and force White Americans to confront a hostile non-White majority, doubtless dominated by the organized Jewish community.