According to two Merck scientists who filed a False Claims Act complaint in 2010 ~ a complaint which has just now been unsealed ~ vaccine manufacturer Merck knowingly falsified its mumps vaccine test data, spiked blood samples with animal antibodies, sold a vaccine that actually promoted mumps and measles outbreaks, and ripped off governments and consumers who bought the vaccine thinking it was "95% effective." Now mainstream reports on this fraud seem to be disappearing from the public forum, in this case the Wall Street Journal.
By Dr. Mercola
July 18, 2012
It was big news when court documents were unsealed revealing a whistleblower lawsuit accusing drug giant Merck of fraud and lying about the true efficacy of its mumps vaccine. Just about every media, large and small, picked it up and the world was abuzz about the hundreds of millions of dollars the lawsuit claimed Merck had defrauded from the U.S. government.
The Wall Street Journal published the story in the form of a
Dow Jones news release written by Jon Kamp on June 22, 2012, and links to
the story began popping up on social media like Facebook.
Then, suddenly, the link to the story no longer worked, and
if anyone clicked on the link in social media, it would show up “page not
found.” Apparently the story had been pulled, and when search engines and
Internet archives wouldn’t even show it, it looked as if it had never been
published on the Journal’s site at all. It was erased nearly clean ~ except for
a small stock-watcher’s website, 4Traders.com, which did a good job of erasing
it from its main site but didn’t catch it in the cache.
The question is, why did the WSJ pull the story and try to erase as if it never existed when there were actual court documents for evidence?
Is it possible that an event that occurred on June 251 ~ three days after the story broke ~ could
have influenced the story being pulled?
On that day, the Wall Street Journal’s “elite” network of
CFOs from the world’s top corporations met at the WSJ2.
Merck is on that executive council3.
I contacted Paul Gigot, the editorial page editor at the
Wall Street Journal on July 13 for an explanation for the removal of the story.
As of the publication of this article, no reply has been received so we have no
official word from the WSJ to explain their behavior.
MERCK ACCUSED OF
FALSIFYING EFFICACY STUDIES AND LYING ABOUT EFFECTIVENESS OF MUMPS VACCINE
Merck has actually been slapped with two class-action lawsuits over their mumps vaccine (which is part of the trivalent measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine). The first, which was initially filed in 2010, was unsealed late last month.Two former Merck virologists, Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, claim they witnessed first-hand the improper testing and falsification of data that was done to hide the fact that the vaccine has significantly declined in effectiveness4.
“Merck has known for a decade that its mumps vaccine is “far less effective” than it tells the government, and it falsified test results and sold millions of doses of “questionable efficacy,” flooding and monopolizing the market… Chatom says in its antitrust complaint that Merck falsely claims its mumps vaccine is 95 percent effective. That claim “deterred and excluded competing manufacturers,” who would enter the risky and expensive vaccine market only if they believed they could craft a better product…Merck is the only manufacturer licensed by the FDA to sell the mumps vaccine in United States, and if it could not show that the vaccine was 95 percent effective, it risked losing its lucrative monopoly…That’s why Merck found it critically important to keep claiming such a high efficacy rate, the complaint states. And, Chatom claims, that’s why Merck went to great lengths, including “manipulating its test procedures and falsifying the test results,” to prop up the bogus figure, though it knew that the attenuated virus from which it created the vaccine had been altered over the years during the manufacturing process, and that the quality of the vaccine had degraded as a result.”
HOW MERCK FAKED AND
MANIPULATED VACCINE TRIALS TO ACHIEVE DESIRED RESULTS
According to these two lawsuits, Merck began a sham testing program in the late 1990′s to hide the declining efficacy of the vaccine. The objective of the fraudulent trials was to “report efficacy of 95 percent or higher regardless of the vaccine’s true efficacy.”
According to Krahling and Wlochowski’s complaint, they were threatened with jail were they to alert the FDA to the fraud being committed. The sham testing program was initially referred to as “Protocol 007,” the Chatom anti-trust claim states. Suzanne Humphries recently wrote an excellent summary for GreenMedInfo.com7, explaining in layman’s terms how the tests were manipulated8.Here’s a brief extract. For more, please refer to the original source article:“For the new testing method, the children’s blood was tested for its ability to neutralize the virus using the vaccine strain virus, instead of the wild type strain that is much more infective, and the one that your children would most likely catch… But still it was not 95% effective. In order to make the blood pass the test, antibodies from rabbits was added. The addition of rabbit antibody increased the efficacy to 100%. But that was not the end, because the test has to be done on pre-vaccine blood and post-vaccine blood. Just the addition of rabbit antibody made the pre-vaccine blood go from 10% positive to 80% positive and that was such an obvious sign of foul play that yet another manipulation had to be made.The desired end result is to have very low pre-vaccine antibody and 95% or more post-vaccine efficacy as measured by antibody neutralization. So, yet one more change in procedure was made: The pre-vaccine tests were all redone… According to the Merck scientists, they did this by fabricating the “plaque” counts on the pre-vaccine blood samples, counting plaques that were not there. What this allowed was a mathematical dilution of the pre-vaccine positive blood counts.”This is a perfect example of how medical research can be manipulated to achieve desired results, and why it may be wise to question vaccine makers’ study results. Clearly, there needs to be a truly independent review in the mix…
As reported by the Courthouse News Service :
“Chatom claims that the falsification of test results occurred” with the knowledge, authority and approval of Merck’s senior management.”
While I do not advocate indiscriminately abstaining from all
vaccines, I strongly encourage you to exercise a major dose of due diligence as
vaccines can cause serious reactions that can have devastating consequences. I
believe in informed consent and the freedom to choose. There can be little doubt
anymore that drug companies are in it for the profits, and virtually no price
seems too high for them when it comes to protecting their profit-making.
WHEN WORDS AND DEEDS
DON’T MATCH, WHICH IS CLOSER TO THE TRUTH?
“Nothing is more important to Merck than the safety and effectiveness of our vaccines and medicines and the people who use them.”
Really?
Then WHY did they heavily promote Vioxx and keep it
on the market until it had killed more than 60,000 people?
I warned my readers that this pain killer might be a real killer for some people, five
years before Merck made its $30
billion recall! Five years they let it go, and they undoubtedly would have kept
it on the market longer had the lethal dangers not become so shockingly obvious
to other scientists.
After Vioxx came the HPV vaccine Gardasil ~ perhaps
the most unnecessary vaccine ever created, and likely one of the most dangerous
to boot. Merck claims their main concern is safety, yet ever since Gardasil’s
approval in 2006, reports of life-altering side effects and sudden deaths of
otherwise healthy teenagers have stacked up into the thousands, and Merck has
steadfastly refused to
acknowledge or address these health risks.
Gardasil appears to have one of the highest risk to benefit
ratios of any vaccine on the market, and India even halted Merck’s
post-licensing trials of the vaccine after four young participants died, yet
Merck has the gall to claim that nothing is more important to them than safety.
Give me a break… Actions speak louder than words, and Merck
has a long paper trail of litigation highlighting the company’s questionable ethics.
MORE CENSORED NEWS: MMR
VACCINE CAUSED AUTISM, ITALIAN COURT RULES
These two lawsuits couldn’t come at a more precarious time for Merck, as the Italian Health Ministry recently conceded the MMR vaccine caused autism in a now nine-year old boy. As a result, a court in Rimini, Italy has awarded the family a 15-year annuity totaling 174,000 Euros (just under $220,000), plus reimbursement for court costs, ruling that the boy “has been damaged by irreversible complications due to vaccination (prophylaxis trivalent MMR).”
“Judge Lucio Ardigo, awarding compensation to the family… said it was ‘conclusively established’ that Valentino had suffered from an ‘autistic disorder associated with medium cognitive delay’ and his illness, as Dr Barboni stated, was linked to receiving the jab. Lawyer Mr Ventaloro explained yesterday: ‘This is very significant for Britain which uses, and has used, an MMR vaccine with the same components as the one given to Valentino.
It is wrong for governments and their health authorities to exert strong pressure on parents to take children for the MMR jab while ignoring that this vaccine can cause autism and linked conditions.’Claudio Simion, a leading member of the lobby group Association for Freedom of Choice in Vaccination (Comilva), adds: ‘The Rimini judgment is vitally important for children everywhere. The numbers with autism are growing. It is a terrible thing that the authorities turn a blind eye to the connection between the MMR vaccination and this illness.’”
This vaccine-news story was not picked up by a single US
media outlet when it happened! Why? Could it be because the US government,
which is brimming with paid-off industry shills, is hell-bent on protecting the
vaccination program? Not because it’s a marvelous panacea that promotes optimal
health and longevity and can be defended with raw facts and first-class
science, but because it’s a major profit center, both for the vaccine makers
and for those whose pockets are lined with Big Pharma bribes.
U.S. VARICELLA
VACCINATION PROGRAM ALSO FOUND TO BE A TOTAL FLOP
In related news, a recent review of the varicella
(chickenpox) vaccination program in the U.S. concluded that the vaccine
efficacy had declined well below 80 percent by of 2002. Furthermore, the
varicella vaccine has:
Not proven to be cost-effectiveIncreased the incidence of shinglesFailed to provide long-term protection from the disease it targets―chicken pox―andIs less effective than the natural immunity that existed in the general population before the vaccine
The damning news was published in May in the journal
The information was gathered from a review of chicken pox
and shingles statistics in the years since the vaccine was introduced. The
researchers point out that although statistics showed shingles rates increased
after the vaccine, “CDC authorities still claimed” that no increase had
occurred.
The authors also state that the CDC not only ignored the
natural boost in immunity to the community that occurred with wild chickenpox,
as opposed to the vaccine, but also ignored the “rare serious events following
varicella vaccination” as well as the increasing rates of shingles among
adults:
“In the prelicensure era, 95% of adults experienced natural chickenpox (usually as children) ~ these cases were usually benign and resulted in long-term immunity. Varicella vaccination is less effective than the natural immunity that existed in prevaccine communities. Universal varicella vaccination has not proven to be cost-effective as increased herpes zoster [shingles] morbidity has disproportionately offset cost savings associated with reductions in varicella disease. Universal varicella vaccination has failed to provide long-term protection from VZV disease.”
GET INFORMED BEFORE YOU VACCINATE YOURSELF OR YOUR FAMILY
Stories such as these underscore the importance to take
control of your own health, and that of your children. It’s simply not wise to
blindly depend on the information coming directly from the vaccine makers’ PR
departments, or from federal health officials and agencies that are mired in
conflicts of interest with industry.
No matter what vaccination choices you make for yourself or
your family, there is a basic human right to be fully informed about all risks
of medical interventions and pharmaceutical products, like vaccines, and have
the freedom to refuse if you conclude the benefits do not outweigh the risks
for you or your child.
Unfortunately, the business partnership between government
health agencies and vaccine manufacturers is too close and is getting out of
hand. There is a lot of discrimination against Americans, who want to be free
to exercise their human right to informed consent when it comes to making
voluntary decisions about which vaccines they and their children use.
We cannot allow that to continue.
It’s vitally important to know and exercise your legal
rights and to understand your options when it comes to using vaccines and
prescription drugs. For example, your doctor is legally obligated to provide
you with the CDC Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) sheet and discuss the
potential symptoms of side effects of the vaccination(s) you or your child
receive BEFORE vaccination takes place. If someone giving a vaccine does not do
this, it is a violation of federal law.
Furthermore, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 also requires
doctors and other vaccine providers to:
~ Keep a permanent record of all vaccines given and the manufacturer’s name and lot number~ Write down serious health problems, hospitalizations, injuries and deaths that occur after vaccination in the patient’s permanent medical record~ File an official report of all serious health problems, hospitalizations, injuries and deaths following vaccination to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)
If a vaccine provider fails to inform, record or report, it
is a violation of federal law. It’s important to get all the facts before
making your decision about vaccination; and to understand that you have the
legal right to opt out of using
a vaccine that you do not want you or your child to receive.
At present, all 50 states allow a medical exemption to
vaccination (medical exemptions must be approved by an M.D. or D.O.); 48 states
allow a religious exemption to vaccination; and 18 states allow a personal,
philosophical or conscientious belief exemption to vaccination.
However, vaccine exemptions are under attack in a number of
states, and it’s in everyone’s best interest to protect the right to make
informed, voluntary vaccination decisions.
WHAT YOU CAN DO TO MAKE A
DIFFERENCE
While it seems “old-fashioned,” the only truly effective
actions you can take to protect the right to informed consent to vaccination
and expand your rights under the law to make voluntary vaccine choices, is to
get personally involved with your state legislators and the leaders in your
community.
THINK GLOBALLY, ACT LOCALLY.
Mass vaccination policies are made at the federal level but
vaccine laws are made at the state level, and it is at the state level where your
action to protect your vaccine choice rights will have the greatest impact.
Signing up to be a user of NVIC’s free online Advocacy
Portal at www.NVICAdvocacy.org gives you access
to practical, useful information to help you become an effective vaccine choice
advocate in your own community.
You will get real-time Action Alerts about what you can do
if there are threats to vaccine exemptions in your state. With the click of a
mouse or one touch on a Smartphone screen you will be put in touch with YOUR
elected representatives so you can let them know how you feel and what you want
them to do.
Plus, when national vaccine issues come up, you will have
all the information you need to make sure your voice is heard. So please, as
your first step, sign
up for the NVIC Advocacy Portal.
Right now, in California, the personal belief exemption is
under attack by Pharma-funded medical trade organizations and public health
officials trying to get a bill (AB 2109) passed that would require parents to
get a medical doctor’s signature to file an exemption for personal religious
and conscientious beliefs. Watch NVIC’s 90-second public service message and
learn more about what you can do if you are a California resident.
INTERNET RESOURCES
To learn more about vaccines, I encourage you to visit the following web pages on the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) website at www.NVIC.org:View descriptions and photos of children and adults, who have suffered vaccine reactions, injuries and deaths. If you or your child experiences an adverse vaccine event, please consider posting and sharing your story here.Learn how to recognize vaccine reaction symptoms and prevent vaccine injuries.View or post descriptions of harassment by doctors or state officials for making independent vaccine choices.(VIC): Find out just how much aluminum, mercury and other ingredients are in the vaccines your doctor is recommending for you or your child.(VAERS) on MedAlerts. Search the government’s VAERS database to find out what kinds of vaccine reactions, injuries and deaths have been reported by patients and heath care workers giving vaccines.
FIND A DOCTOR WHO WILL
LISTEN TO YOUR CONCERNS
Last but not least, if your pediatrician or doctor refuses
to provide medical care to you or your child unless you agree to get vaccines
you don’t want, I strongly encourage you to have the courage to find another doctor. Harassment,
intimidation, and refusal of medical care is becoming the modus operandi of the
medical establishment in an effort to punish those patients and parents, who
become truly educated about health and vaccination and want to make vaccine
choices instead of being forced to follow risky one-size-fits-all vaccine
policies.
If you are treated with disrespect or are harassed in any
way by a doctor (or government official), do not engage in an unproductive
argument. You may want to contact an attorney, your elected state
representatives or local media, if you or your child are threatened.
That said, there is
hope.
At least 15 percent of young doctors recently polled admit
that they’re starting to adopt a more individualized approach to vaccinations
in direct response to the vaccine safety concerns of parents.
It is good news that there is a growing number of smart
young doctors, who prefer to work as partners with parents in making
personalized vaccine decisions for children, including delaying vaccinations or
giving children fewer vaccines on the same day or continuing to provide medical
care for those families, who decline use of one or more vaccines.
So take the time to locate and connect with a doctor who
treats you with compassion and respect and is willing to work with you to do
what is right for your child, and isn’t just competing for government
incentives designed to increase vaccination rates at any cost.
Via:Mercola
No comments:
Post a Comment
If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.