OPTOR instructions for gear from Kiev and Tahrir Square.
.
February 24,
2014
.
In Ukraine,
US-backed rebels seize weapons from a military depot and
begin firing on police ~ killing at least ten. The rebel groups occupy and
torch government buildings, trade union headquarters, the central post office,
and political party headquarters. They occupy local government facilities in
other cities and physically attack local authorities. Their goal is to
overthrow the elected government.
.
Reports of rebel
reinforcements arriving, with “bulky backpacks near the scene of the latest
protests,” are suspiciously reminiscent of the “Internet in a Suitcase” project funded by
the US government to provide tools for “activists” in regime-change candidate
countries. The US has similarly trained and equipped the Syrian rebels.
.
US-backed
rebels are photographed all over Ukraine with weapons, sometimes photographed shooting at police. In Syria, the US
covertly provided the weapons and approved Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other
“friends of Syria” to provide even more. A Russian official has accused the US of arming the Ukrainian
opposition.
.
As in Syria,
where US Ambassador Robert Ford adopted the rebels from the beginning of the
insurrection, US officials have beat a steady path to the Ukrainian rebels to
offer their support and assistance. Senator John McCain has even dined with Svoboda Party president Oleh
Tyahnybok, shown here in a rather different pose. US
Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland was recorded plotting the
overthrow and replacement of the Ukrainian government with the US Ambassador to
Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt.
.
Pyatt, a man
surely devoid of any sense of self-reflection, boldly proclaimed that his
recorded plotting to overthrow of the Ukrainian government was merely “helping
to build bridges between the government and the opposition.” Of course in a
strict sense that is true: he is actively engaged in building a bridge to
government power for the Ukrainian opposition.
.
The Syrian
rebels are presented as a moderate group of would-be democrats seeking
political reform; Ukrainian rebels are presented as a bunch of pro-Western,
pro-EU “peaceful demonstrators.” In both cases the real power on the streets
has been radical extremists with whom US officials have had considerable contact.
.
In Syria,
President Assad responded early on to the unrest with offers of compromise,
including agreeing to hold a constitutional referendum which put an end
to generations of one-party rule.
.
In Ukraine,
President Yanukovich granted amnesty to violent protesters, rescinded
legislation seen as inhibiting protest, fired his government at the request of
the opposition and even offered to name opposition leaders to a new interim
government.
Each move toward compromise and appeasement of the opposition was met with increased violence and escalating demands on the part of the rebels, most recently in Ukraine after opposition leaders met with US and EU officials at a security conference in Munich.
President
Obama sternly warns the Ukrainian government
against restoring order:
“We expect the Ukrainian government to show restraint, to not resort to violence in dealing with peaceful protesters.”
He
cryptically hinted at possible US escalation, stating:
“We’ll be monitoring very carefully the situation, recognizing that, along with our European partners and the international community, there will be consequences if people step over the line.”
He similarly
warned Syrian president Assad against taking action to defend the country
against armed rebels fighting for its overthrow.
.
Another
red line drawn? This time on Russia’s doorstep?
.
Here again
is the million dollar question:
What would Washington do if rebels intent on overthrowing the Obama regime raided military weapons depots, killed at least ten police officers and wounded dozens of others, set Washington D.C. on fire, occupied key government buildings including the US Capitol complex, and demanded a change in the Constitution favoring their ascendance to power?
Obama warned
the Ukraine government to make sure the “Ukrainian military does not step in to
resolve issues that could be resolved by civilians.” The US military was called in to quell a far less significant
protest in Seattle over the World Trade Organization meeting there in 1999.
.
The US
Capitol area has been on “lockdown” innumerable times over such “threats” as a
mentally disturbed woman driving erratically ~ who was unarmed and shot dead by
police.
.
One need not
side with either opposing group in Ukraine to point out the choking hypocrisy
of the US position.
.
But what is
truly remarkable are the many similarities between what has been happening in
Syria and what is now happening in Ukraine. It almost seems as if the same hand
with the same playbook is plotting both regime change
operations.
News to me they are US Backed rebels. All Ive seen the past month were Ukrainians fighting a corrupt Government that wants to be in Putin's pocket where the People want to be a Part of Europe.
ReplyDeleteStop riling People with Bull crap. This is what happens when you attack,shot & kill a People. they take revenge & attack back......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kT7B7IUaEGQ........
Every war, every revolution is sparked by and profits only the PTB. The international bank cabal funds both sides of their manipulated dialectical disturbances.
ReplyDeleteThis book is a treasure of information on that hidden history:
http://www.amazon.com/Pawns-The-Game-William-Carr/dp/1939438039/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1393472756&sr=8-1&keywords=book+pawns+in+the+game
See also:
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/allwarsarebankerwars.php