When the White Empire's most powerful army in history started dropping thousands of bombs full of depleted uranium on innocent Libyan civilians, HRW remained totally silent. Instead of reporting about the ongoing Crimes Against Humanity being carried out by its masters and funders, it shifted the public opinion's focus on Syria in order to demonize Bashar Al Assad's government by providing, once again, fake information.
1. Well, this simple extract is enough for HRW to wipe away NTC's accountability in this mass killing. But wait… I thought the Misrata fighters were controlled by the NTC… Yes, so NTC is accountable for these executions. Well, they apparently aren't anymore… So, some random fighters from Misrata, nobody knows who they are, are to be blamed and punished for it… What a great example of JUSTICE!2. Why didn't HRW call on Gaddafi to conduct an immediate and transparent investigation into the apparent killing of civilians and to bring those responsible to justice? Instead of calling for a UN resolution that led to the NATO intervention? Well, if we cannot hold NTC accountable for hideous mass killings from its own "freedom fighters" especially with blatant proof, then why could we hold Gaddafi accountable? Especially without any proof…3. On top of that, by focusing on these 53 "loyalists" (peace be upon them) HRW is covering up a much more important killing, we can even call it a Crime Against Humanity. The one carried out by NATO.If HRW found those 53 corpses in Sirte, how couldn't it see the civilian corpses laying all over the city. And all over the country? Couldn't HRW see the massive destruction of civilian infrastructure, residential areas, schools, water pipes, electricity plants in the very same city? Are they blind? No, they aren't. And they did see the chaos that NATO brought about. And they very well know that thousands of civilians must have died since NATO's primary targets turned out to be civilian infrastructures.4. Why didn't HRW expose that each Tomahawk, like the ones dropped on Libya, contains 300Kgs of depleted uranium?
Why didn't it exposes the use of cluster bombs?
Why don't they focus on estimating the civilian deaths brought about by NATO?
Especially when estimations from independent sources are about 60,000 dead innocents.
Maybe because those sources in their eyes are not reliable enough… but those claiming that Gaddafi sent his Air Force to bomb his population were apparently more reliable…
Please watch the next video, Russia Intel satellite shows Gaddafi did not attack his people:
5. Why didn't HRW exposed NATO members providing heavy weapons and artillery to the rebels in complete breach of UN resolution?6. Why didn't HRW expose the fact that the ones who mainstream media and Western leaders now call "Rebels" or "Freedom Fighters", were once called Al Qaeda terrorists?