The Israelis can claim to have made Palestine bloom, a blatant lie, however, Qaddafi, (a man murdered because of his great visions and capability of bringing them to fruition) was well along to making the Sahara bloom with full capability of turning it green permanently. NATO bombed it all to sand, and not by accident.
With
an Introduction by Cynthia McKinney
By
Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya
URL
of this article: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=27327
October
27, 2011
FOURTH
OF FOUR INSTALLMENTS ON LIBYA:
WHO IS STEALING THE WEALTH?
Once
again, Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya peels away the veneer of legitimacy and
deception enveloping the U.S./NATO genocide currently taking place in Libya. In
his first article, Nazemroaya makes it clear that there never was any evidence
given to the United Nations or the International Criminal Court to warrant or
justify United Nations Resolutions 1970 and 1973 or current U.S./NATO
operations inside Libya.
In
his second article detailing this very sad story, Nazemroaya exposes the
relationships between the major Libyan protagonists/NATO collaborators and the
U.S. Congress-funded National Endowment for Democracy. Incredibly, when leading
Members of Congress publicly proclaimed repeatedly that they did not know who
the Libyan "rebel" NATO collaborators were, select so-called rebel
leaders were political intimates with stakeholders at the National Endowment
for Democracy. Nazemroaya also exposes that,
despite its Global War on Terror, the U.S. government actually financed Libyan
terrorists and criminals wanted by INTERPOL.
In
his third installment, Nazemroaya removes the U.S./NATO fig leaf that attempts
to cover the cynical machinations of the pro-Israel Lobby and its objective of Balkanizing
African and Asian states, especially those whose populations are largely
Muslim. Nazemroaya makes the essential
point:
"An attempt to separate the merging point of an Arab and African identity is underway."
The
Voice of America has exposed the psychological aspects of its brutal
intervention and hints at the mindset of the U.S./NATO Libyan pawns; several
stories suggest that the "new" Libya will turn more toward its Arab
identity than its African identity.
While Muammar Qaddafi drove home to all Libyans that Libya, as its geography dictates, is an African country, Nazemroaya shows how this fact is not a policy objective shared by the U.S., NATO, Israel, or their Libyan allies.
Finally,
in this last of the four-part series, Nazemroaya shows the ultimate perfidy of
the U.S./NATO Libyan allies, especially Mahmoud Jibril, in the pre-emptive
strike against the Jamahirya Wealth Redistribution Project.
The
Libyan people are now fighting the world's most powerful militaries to save
their Jamahirya.
No matter how many times NATO-inspired media lie to their publics, the lies will never become the truth.Hauntingly, Nazemroaya ends by telling us that the Libyan National Transitional Council has already recognized the Syrian National Council (SNC) as the legitimate government of Syria.Meanwhile, Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri, now reputed to be the leader of Al Qaeda and reportedly rewarded with U.S. citizenship after fighting for the C.I.A. in Bosnia, just called for the people of Algeria to oust their President.
President
Obama's policy of flying drones and dropping bombs over Africa, and invading
the Continent with US troops, means that any country that resists an AFRICOM
base, as Colonel Qaddafi's wife tells us he did, or expects to exercise its
right of self-determination, can expect the kind of treatment we are witnessing
now in Libya. We, in the U.S., must resist these policies for ourselves and and
on behalf of the Africans who deserve
better than this from the United States of America.
Cynthia
McKinney, 25 October 2011.
Cynthia McKinney is a former U.S. Congresswoman who served in two different Georgia federal dictricts in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1993 to 2003 and from 2005 to 2007 as a member of the U.S. Democratic Party. She was also the U.S. Green Party presidential candidate in 2008. While in the U.S. Congress she served in the U.S. Banking and Finance Committee, the U.S. National Security Committee (later renamed the U.S. Armed Services Committee), and the U.S. Foreign Affairs Committee (later renamed the U.S. International Relations Committee). She also served in the U.S. International Relations subcommittee on International Operations and Human Rights. McKinney has conducted two fact-finding missions in Libya and also recently finished a nationwide speaking tour in the United States sponsored by the ANSWER Coalition about the NATO bombing campaign in Libya.
****************************
By Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya ~ 2011-09-29The war against Libya is built on fraud. The UN Security Council passed two resolutions against Libya on the basis of unproven claims that Qaddafi was killing his own people in Benghazi...
By Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya, ~ 2011-10-06Terrorists not only fight for Washington on the ground, they also act as front men for regime change through so-called human rights organizations that promote democracy.
Introduction by Cynthia McKinneyBy Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya ~ 2011-10-11"An attempt to separate the merging point of an Arab and African identity is underway."
WHO WAS MUAMMAR QADDAFI?
LIBYA'S WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION PROJECT
By
Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya
Colonel
Muammar Qaddafi symbolizes many things to many different people around the
world.
Love or hate the Libyan leader, under his rule
Libya transformed from one of the poorest countries on the face of the planet
into the country with the highest standard of living in Africa. In the words of
Professor Henri Habibi:
When Libya was granted its independence by the United Nations on December 24, 1951, it was described as one of the poorest and most backward nations of the world. The population at the time was not more than 1.5 million, was over 90% illiterate, and had no political experience or knowhow. There were no universities, and only a limited number of high schools which had been established seven years before independence. [1]
Qaddafi
had many grand plans. He wanted to create a South Atlantic Treaty Organization
to protect Africa and Latin America. He advocated for a gold dinar standard as
the currency of Muslim countries. Many of his plans were also of a pan-African
nature. This included the formation of a United States of Africa.
QADDAFI’S
PAN-AFRICAN PROJECTS
Colonel
Qaddafi started the Great Man-Made River,
which consisted in a massive project to transform the Sahara Desert and reverse the desertification of Africa.The Great Man-Made River with its irrigation plans was also intended to support the agricultural sector in other parts of Africa.This project was a military target of NATO bombings. Without just cause, NATO’s bombing campaign was intent upon destroying the Great Man-Made River.
Qaddafi
also envisioned independent pan-African financial institutions.
The Libyan Investment Authority and the Libyan Foreign Bank were important players in setting up these institutions.
Qaddafi,
through the Libyan Foreign Bank and the Libyan Investment Authority, was
instrumental in setting up Africa’s first satellite network,
the Regional African Satellite Communication Organization (RASCOM), to reduce African dependence on external powers. [2]
His
crowning achievement would have been the creation of the United States of
Africa.
The supranational entity would have been created through the African Investment Bank, the African Monetary Fund, and finally the African Central Bank. These institutions were all viewed with animosity by the European Union, United States, International Monetary Fund (IMF), and World Bank.
QADDAFI’S
WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION PROJECT
Qaddafi
had a wealth redistribution project inside Libya. U.S. Congressional sources in
a report to the U.S. Congress even acknowledge this. On February 18, 2011 one
report states:
In March 2008, [Colonel Qaddafi] announced his intention to dissolve most government administrative bodies and institute a Wealth Distribution Program whereby state oil revenues would be distributed to citizens on a monthly basis for them to administer personally, in cooperation, and via local committees.Citing popular criticism of government performance in a long, wide ranging speech, [he] repeatedly stated that the traditional state would soon be “dead” in Libya and that direct rule by citizens would be accomplished through the distribution of oil revenues.[The military], foreign affairs, security, and oil production arrangements reportedly would remain national government responsibilities, while other bodies would be phased out.In early 2009, Libya’s Basic People’s Congresses considered variations of the proposals, and the General People’s Congress voted to delay implementation. [3]
Qaddafi
wanted all the people of Libya to have direct access to the nation’s wealth. He
was also aware of the deep rooted corruption that plagued the ranks of the
Libyan government. This was one of the reasons why he wanted to apply a model
of political anarchy in Libya through progressive steps. He was talking about
both these project for a few years.
On
the other hand, the Wealth Redistribution Project, along with the establishment
of an anarchist political system, was viewed as a very serious threat by the
U.S., the E.U., and a group of corrupt Libyan officials.
If successful, the reforms could have created political unrest amongst many domestic populations around the world.Internally, many Libyan officials were working to delay the project. This included reaching out to external powers to intervene in Libya to stop Qaddafi and his projects.
WHY
MAHMOUD JIBRIL JOINED THE TRANSITIONAL COUNCIL
Amongst
the Libyan officials that were heavily opposed to this project and viewed it
with horror was Mahmoud Jibril. Jibril was put into place by Saif Al-Islam
Qaddafi. Because of strong influence and advice from the U.S. and the E.U.,
Saif Al-Islam selected Jibril to transform the Libyan economy and impose a wave
of neo-liberal economic reforms that would open the Libyan market.
Jibril
became the head of two bodies in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, the National Planning
Council of Libya and National Economic Development Board of Libya. While the
National Economic Development Board was a regular ministry, the National
Planning Council would actually put Jibril in a government position above that
of the Office of the General-Secretary of the People’s Committee of Libya
(which is the equivalent of the post of a prime minister).
Jibril
actually became one of the forces that opened the doors of privatization and
poverty in Libya.
About
six months before the conflict erupted in Libya, Mahmoud Jibiril actually met with (ED: Extremely fanatic French Zionist) Bernard-Henri Lévy in Australia to discuss forming the
Transitional Council and deposing Colonel Qaddafi. [4]
He
described Qaddafi’s Wealth Redistribution Project as “crazy” in minutes and
documents from the National Economic Development Board of the Libyan Arab
Jamahiriya. [5]
Jibril
strongly believed that the Libyan masses were not fit to govern themselves and
that an elite should always control the fate and wealth of any nation. What
Jibril wanted to do is downsize the Libyan government and layoff a large
segment of the public sector, but in exchange increase government regulations
in Libya. He would also always cite Singapore as the perfect example of a
neo-liberal state.
While
in Singapore, which he regularly visited, it is likely that he also meet with
Bernard-Henri Lévy.
When
the problems erupted in Benghazi, Mahmoud Jibril immediately went to Cairo,
Egypt. He told his colleagues that he would be back in Tripoli soon, but he had
no intention of returning. In reality, he went to Cairo to meet the leaders of
the Syrian National Council and Lévy.
They were all waiting for him inside Cairo to coordinate the events in Libya and Syria. This is one of the reasons that the Transitional Council has recognized the Syrian National Council as the legitimate government of Syria.
DO
NOT PITY THE DEAD, PITY THE LIVING!
Muammar
Qaddafi is now dead.
He
was murdered in his hometown of Sirte.
He
stood his ground until the end like he said he would.
The
Transitional Council, which vowed to take him to court had him murdered.
He
even reminded the men who beat him, anally raped him, mocked him, and finally
murdered him that they were not following the laws of Islam about respectful
treatment of prisoners. NATO played a central role and oversaw the whole event.
The
murder was systematic, because after Qaddafi was murdered; his son and several
other Libyan leaders were killed too.
Colonel
Qaddafi’s death marks a historic milestone for Libya. An old era has ended in
Libya and a new chapter begins.
Libya
will not become a new paradise like the Transitional Council says.
In
many cases the living will envy the dead, because of men like Mahmoud Jibril,
Ali Tarhouni, and Sliman Bouchuiguir.
Mahmoud
Jibril is a mere opportunist. The man had no problems being a government
official under the late Qaddafi. He never complained about human rights or a
lack of democracy. He was the prime minister of the Transitional Council of
Libya until a few days after the savage murder of Colonel Qaddafi.
The
opposition of Jibril to the late Qaddafi’s Wealth Redistribution Project and
his elitist attitude are amongst the reasons he conspired against Qaddafi and
helped form the Transitional Council.
Is
this ex-regime official, who has always been an open supporter of the Arab
dictators in the Persian Gulf, really a representative and champion of the
people?
How
about his colleagues in the Transitional Council who negotiated oil contracts
with NATO member states, even before they held any so-called government
positions in the Transitional Council?
Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya is a Sociologist and Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Montréal. He specializes on the Middle East and Central Asia. He was on the ground in Libya for over two months and was also a Special Correspondent for Flashpoints, which is an investigative news program carried on numerous stations in the United States and based in Berkeley, California. Nazemroaya has been releasing these articles about Libya in conjunction with aired discussions (now archived) with Cynthia McKinney on Freedom Now, a show aired on Saturdays on KPFK, Los Angeles, California.
NOTES:
[1] Henri Pierre Habib, Politics and Government of Revolutionary
Libya (Montmagny, Québec: Le Cercle de Livre de France Ltée, 1975), p.1.
[2] Regional African Satellite Communication Organization,
“Launch of the Pan African Satellite,” July 26, 2010:
[3] Christopher M. Blanchard and James Zanotti, “Libya
Christopher M. Blanchard and James Zanotti, “Libya: Background and U.S.
Relations,” Congressional Research Service, February 18, 2011, p.22.
[4] Private discussions with Mahmoud Jiribil’s co-workers
inside and outside of Libya.
[5] Internal private documents from the National Economic
Development Board of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.