By
Richard Walker
October
14, 2011
A leading Japanese
journalist recently made two incredible claims about the Fukushima power plant
that suffered a nuclear meltdown in March 2011, sending shock-waves around the
world.
First, the former editor of a national newspaper in Japan says the U.S. and Israel knew Fukushima had weapons-grade uranium and plutonium that were exposed to the atmosphere after a massive tsunami wave hit the reactor.Second, he contends that Israeli intelligence sabotaged the reactor in retaliation for Japan’s support of an independent Palestinian state.
According to Yoishi
Shimatsu, a former editor of Japan Times Weekly, these nuclear materials
were shipped to the plant in 2007 on the orders of Dick Cheney and George W.
Bush, with the connivance of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert.
The shipment was in the
form of warhead cores secretly removed from the U.S. nuclear warheads facility
BWXT Plantex near Amarillo, Texas. While acting as the middleman, Israel
transported warheads from the port of Houston, and in the process kept the best
ones while giving the Japanese older warhead cores that had to be further
enriched at Fukushima.
Shimatsu credits retired
CIA agent and mercenary Roland Vincent Carnaby with learning the warheads were
being transported from Houston.
In a strange twist,
Carnaby was mysteriously shot dead less than a year later by Houston police at
a traffic stop. He was shot once in the back and once in the chest. He did not
have a weapon in his hands. Intelligence sources said he had been tracking a
Mossad unit that was smuggling U.S. plutonium out of Houston docks for an
Israeli nuclear reactor.
ED: I would say, under these
circumstances, not such “a strange twist” after all!
In an even more explosive charge, the journalist says that 20 minutes before the Fukushima plant’s nuclear meltdown, Israel was so upset with Japanese support for a Palestinian declaration of statehood that it double-crossed Japan by unleashing the Stuxnet virus on the plant’s computers.The virus hampered the shutdown, leading to fallout from a section of the plant housing uranium and plutonium retrieved from the warheads supplied in 2007.
While it is impossible to
verify some of Shimatsu’s claims, there was a massive cover-up at the time of
the Fukushima disaster in March. Explosions at the site were immediately
downplayed.
While it was subsequently
reported that three reactors suffered meltdowns, Japanese authorities tried to
rate the disaster as a Level 4 on the International Nuclear and Radiological
Event Scale, although outside experts declared it a 7, which is the highest
level.
Something worth noting is how in 2009, two years after Shimatsu says the warheads were secretly moved to Japan, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) issued a veiled warning to Japan not to abandon its anti-nuclear weapons policy.
The IAEA had to know,
however, that Japan has long retained the potential to build nuclear weapons.
That was made clear as far back as 1996 when a leaked Ministry of Foreign
Affairs document exposed how Japan had been promoting a dual strategy in
respect to nuclear weapons since the mid-1960s.
It would often publicly
profess a non-nuclear policy while maintaining the ability to build a nuclear
arsenal. The Liberal Democratic Party, which has dominated Japanese politics,
has always said there is no constitutional impediment to nukes.
A factor that undoubtedly would have encouraged the Bush-Cheney White House to provide Japan with the means to secretly build nukes was the growing power of China.
Cheney and Bush sought to
arm Japan and India with nuclear weapons as a means of curbing China.
This report is from jimstonefreelance.com posted on 13 June 2011
ReplyDeleteJoyang
Did the Dimona Dozen murder the Fukushima 50?
Fukushima may in fact have been caused by an act of war under the cover of an environmental disaster.
The following article about what really happened at Fukushima got me into a LOT of trouble. That can only mean I NAILED IT.
Archive and POST!
Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist, Updated Monday, June 13, 2011
seismic charts which prove there was no 9.0 and therefore the very real tsunami could not have been natural. The fact that what happened in Japan did not occur naturally has been very well documented by a skilled investigator, who spent hundreds of hours getting to the bottom of this story.
NEW INFO: Japan offered to enrich uranium for IRAN!
AND FOUR MONTHS LATER, THE DIMONA DOZEN SHOWED UP WITH A REALLY FANCY CAMERA!!
Oh yes I agree, Joe. I have posted to this before because there was a fair bit of buzz going on there. I have also posted about the Indonesian Tsunami as well. The whole thing stunk of sabotage and act of war. As with Haiti and a few others there have been similarities regarding the suddenness of the disturbance and how swiftly things died down... no seismic build up, nothing.
ReplyDeleteFew people carry it to Israel because they are afraid to admit the hideousness of it. However, if these folks are ready to throw us into an international nuclear war, this Fukushima situation is very possible... as with BP and the GOM.
I just post these bits and pieces as I find them hoping to chip away slowly at folks enough that they begin to consider the truth, the horrid truth of it all.
TY for stopping by ....