The
whole world isn't watching. Why not?
The
Magazine
Nov 24, 2008, Vol. 14, No. 10 •
Reposted: January
26, 2012
Bangkok
The jeepney driver sizes us up the minute we climb in. My research assistant is a healthy, young Israeli dude, so I must be the one with the money. He addresses his broken English to me: "Girl?"
The jeepney driver sizes us up the minute we climb in. My research assistant is a healthy, young Israeli dude, so I must be the one with the money. He addresses his broken English to me: "Girl?"
No. No girls. Take
us to the . . .
"Ladyboy?
Kickboxer?"
No. No ladyboy, no
kickboxer, thanks. I may be a paunchy, sweaty, middle-aged white guy, but I'm
here to ~ well, actually, I am on my way to meet a Chinese woman in a back
alley. She is going to tell me intimate stories of humiliation, torture, and
abuse. And the truly shameful part is that after 50 or so interviews with
refugees from Chinese labor camps, I won't even be listening that closely.
I'm in Bangkok
because practitioners of Falun Gong, the Buddhist revival movement outlawed by
Beijing, tend to head south when they escape from China. Those without
passports make their way through Burma on motorcycles and back roads. Some have
been questioned by U.N. case workers, but few have been interviewed by the
press, even though, emerging from Chinese labor camps, they are eager, even
desperate, to tell their stories.
With the back-alley
Chinese woman, I intend to direct my questions away from what she'll want to
talk about ~ persecution and spirituality ~ to something she will barely
remember, a seemingly innocuous part of her experience: a needle jab, some
poking around the abdomen, an X-ray, a urine sample ~ medical tests consistent
with assessment of prisoners for organ harvesting.
My line of inquiry
began in a Montreal community center over a year ago, listening to a heavy-set
middle-aged Chinese man named Wang Xiaohua, a soft-spoken ordinary guy except
for the purple discoloration that extends down his forehead.
He recalled a
scene: About 20 male Falun Gong practitioners were standing before the empty
winter fields, flanked by two armed escorts. Instead of leading them out to dig
up rocks and spread fertilizer, the police had rounded them up for some sort of
excursion.
It almost felt like
a holiday. Wang had never seen most of the prisoners' faces before. Here in
Yunnan Forced Labor Camp No. 2, Falun Gong detainees were carefully kept to a
minority in each cell so that the hardened criminals could work them over.
Practitioners of
Falun Gong were forbidden to communicate openly. Yet as the guards motioned for
them to begin walking, Wang felt the group fall into step like a gentle
migrating herd. He looked down at the red earth, streaked with straw and human
waste, to the barren mountains on the horizon. Whatever lay ahead, Wang knew
they were not afraid.
After 20 minutes,
he saw a large gleaming structure in the distance ~ maybe it was a hospital,
Wang thought. The summer of 2001 had been brutal in South China. After he'd
worked for months in the burning sun, Wang's shaved head had become deeply
infected. Perhaps it was getting a little better. Or perhaps he had just become
used to it; lately he only noticed the warm, rancid stench of his rotting scalp
when he woke up.
Wang broke the
silence, asking one of the police guards if that was the camp hospital ahead.
The guard responded evenly:
"You know, we care so much about you. So we are taking you to get a physical. Look how well the party treats you. Normally, this kind of thing never happens in a labor camp."
Inside the
facility, the practitioners lined up and, one by one, had a large blood sample
drawn. Then a urine sample, electrocardiogram, abdominal X-ray, and eye exam.
When Wang pointed to his head, the doctor mumbled something about it being
normal and motioned for the next patient. Walking back to camp, the prisoners
felt relieved, even a tad cocky, about the whole thing. In spite of all the
torture they had endured and the brutal conditions, even the government would
be forced to see that practitioners of Falun Gong were healthy.
They never did
learn the results of any of those medical tests, Wang says, a little smile
suddenly breaking through. He can't help it. He survived.
I spoke with Wang
in 2007, just one out of over 100 interviews for a book on the clash between
Falun Gong and the Chinese state. Wang's story is not new. Two prominent
Canadian human rights attorneys, David Kilgour and David Matas, outlined his
case and many others in their "Report
into Allegations of Organ Harvesting of Falun Gong Practitioners in China," published and posted on the web in 2006.
By interviewing
Wang, I was tipping my hat to the extensive research already done by others. I
was not expecting to see Wang's pattern repeated as my interviews progressed,
nor did I expect to find that organ harvesting had spread beyond Falun Gong. I
was wrong.
Falun Gong became
wildly popular in China during the late 1990s. For various reasons ~ perhaps
because the membership of this movement was larger than that of the Chinese
Communist party (and intersected with it), or because the legacy of Tiananmen
was unresolved, or because 70 million people suddenly seemed to be looking for
a way into heaven (other than money) ~ the party decided to eliminate it.
In 1998, the party
quietly canceled the business licenses of people who practiced Falun Gong. In
1999 came mass arrests, seizure of assets, and torture. Then, starting in 2000,
as the movement responded by becoming more openly activist, demonstrating at
Tiananmen and hijacking television signals on the mainland, the death toll
started to climb, reaching approximately 3,000 confirmed deaths by torture,
execution, and neglect by 2005.
At any given time,
100,000 Falun Gong practitioners were said to be somewhere in the Chinese penal
system. Like most numbers coming out of China, these were crude estimates,
further rendered unreliable by the chatter of claim and counterclaim.
But one point is
beyond dispute: The repression of Falun Gong spun out of control. Arrests,
sentencing, and whatever took place in the detention centers, psychiatric
institutions, and labor camps were not following any established legal
procedure or restraint.
As an act of
passive resistance, or simply to avoid trouble for their families, many Falun
Gong began withholding their names from the police, identifying themselves
simply as "practitioner" or "Dafa disciple." When asked for
their home province, they would say "the universe." For these, the
nameless ones, whose families had no way of tracing them or agitating on their
behalf, there may be no records at all.
In early 2006, the
first charges of large-scale harvesting ~ surgical removal of organs while the
prisoners were still alive, though of course the procedure killed them ~ of
Falun Gong emerged from Northeast China. The charges set off a quiet storm in
the human rights community. Yet the charge was not far-fetched.
Harry Wu, a Chinese
dissident who established the Laogai Foundation, had already produced reams of
evidence that the state, after executing criminals formally sentenced to death,
was selling their kidneys, livers, corneas, and other body parts to Chinese and
foreigners, anyone who could pay the price.
The practice
started in the mid-1980s. By the mid-1990s, with the use of
anti-tissue-rejection drugs pioneered by China, the business had progressed.
Mobile organ-harvesting vans run by the armed services were routinely parked
just outside the killing grounds to ensure that the military hospitals got
first pick.
This wasn't top
secret.
I spoke with a
former Chinese police officer, a simple man from the countryside, who said
that, as a favor to a condemned man's friend, he had popped open the back of
such a van and unzipped the body bag. The corpse's chest had been picked clean.
Taiwanese doctors
who arranged for patients to receive transplants on the mainland claim that
there was no oversight of the system, no central Chinese database of organs and
medical histories of donors, no red tape to diminish medical profits. So the
real question was, at $62,000 for a fresh kidney, why would Chinese hospitals
waste any body they could get their hands on?
Yet what initially
drew most fire from skeptics was the claim that organs were being harvested
from people before they died. For all the Falun Gong theatrics, this claim was
not so outlandish either. Any medical expert knows that a recipient is far less
likely to reject a live organ; and any transplant dealer will confirm that
buyers will pay more for one.
Until recently,
high volume Chinese transplant centers openly advertised the use of live donors
on their websites.
It helps that brain
death is not legally recognized in China; only when the heart stops beating is
the patient actually considered dead. That means doctors can shoot a prisoner
in the head, as it were, surgically, then remove the organs before the heart
stops beating.
Or they can
administer anesthesia, remove the organs, and when the operation is nearing
completion introduce a heart-stopping drug ~ the latest method.
Either way, the
prisoner has been executed, and harvesting is just fun along the way. In fact,
according to doctors I have spoken to recently, all well versed in current
mainland practices, live-organ harvesting of death-row prisoners in the course
of execution is routine.
The real problem
was that the charges came from Falun Gong ~ always the unplanned child of the
dissident community. Unlike the Tiananmen student leaders and other Chinese
prisoners of conscience who had settled into Western exile, Falun Gong marched
to a distinctly Chinese drum.
With its roots in a
spiritual tradition from the Chinese heartland, Falun Gong would never have
built a version of the Statue of Liberty and paraded it around for CNN. Indeed,
to Western observers, Falun Gong public relations carried some of the
uncouthness of Communist party culture: a perception that practitioners tended
to exaggerate, to create torture tableaux straight out of a Cultural Revolution
opera, to spout slogans rather than facts.
For various
reasons, some valid, some shameful, the credibility of persecuted refugees has
often been doubted in the West. In 1939, a British Foreign Office official,
politely speaking for the majority, described the Jews as not, perhaps, entirely
reliable witnesses. During the Great Leap Forward, emaciated refugees from the
mainland poured into Hong Kong, yammering about deserted villages and
cannibalism. Sober Western journalists ignored these accounts as subjective and
biased.
The yammering of a
spiritual revivalist apparently counts for even less than the testimony of a
peasant or a Jew. Thus, when Falun Gong unveiled a doctor's wife who claimed
that her husband, a surgeon, had removed thousands of corneas from
practitioners in a Northeastern Chinese hospital named Sujiatun, the charge met
with guarded skepticism from the dissident community and almost complete
silence from the Western press (with the exception of this magazine and
National Review).
As Falun Gong
committees kicked into full investigative mode, the Canadian lawyers Kilgour
and Matas compiled the accumulating evidence in their report. It included
transcripts of recorded phone calls in which Chinese doctors confirmed that
their organ donors were young, healthy, and practiced Falun Gong; written
testimony from the mainland of practitioners' experiences in detention; an
explosion in organ transplant activity coinciding with a rise in the Falun Gong
incarceration rate, with international customers waiting as little as a week
for a tissue match (in most countries, patients waited over a year).
Finally, Kilgour
and Matas compared the execution rate in China (essentially constant, according
to Amnesty International) and the number of transplants. It left a discrepancy
of 41,500 unexplained cases over a five-year span.
This report has
never been refuted point by point, yet the vast majority of human rights
activists have kept their distance. Since Falun Gong's claims were suspect,
their allies' assertions were suspect.
Transplant doctors
who claimed to have Falun Gong organ donors in the basement? They were just
saying what potential organ recipients wanted to hear.
Written testimony
from practitioners? They'd been prepped by activists.
The rise in organ
transplant activity? Maybe just better reporting.
The discrepancy
between executions and transplants?
As a respected
human rights scholar asked me, why did Kilgour and Matas use Amnesty
International's estimate of the number of executions in China to suggest the
execution rate had stayed constant for 10 years?
Even Amnesty
acknowledges their numbers might represent a gross understatement. There might
be no discrepancy at all.
Finally, why had no
real witness, a doctor or nurse who had actually operated on Falun Gong
practitioners, come forward? Without such proof (although such an individual's
credibility can always be savaged, even with supporting documents), human
rights advocates argued there was no reason to take the story seriously. There
certainly were not sufficient grounds for President Bush to mention organ
harvesting in his human rights speech on the eve of the Beijing Olympics.
The critics had
hinted at legitimate points of discussion. But so had the Chinese government:
Fresh off the confession in 2005 that organs were being harvested from ordinary
death-row prisoners, and after issuing their predictable denials of harvesting
organs from Falun Gong, Beijing suddenly passed a law in July 2006 forbidding
the sale of organs without the consent of the donor.
Three things
happened.
The organ supply
tightened.
Prices doubled.
And transplants
continued.
So unless there has
been a dramatic cultural shift since 2004, when a Chinese report found that
only 1.5 percent of transplanted kidneys were donated by relatives, the organs
being sold must still come from somewhere.
Let's assume it's
prisoners ~ that's what Taiwanese doctors think--and theorize that the new law
was a signal: Get your consent forms and stop harvesting from Falun Gong. For
now.
And the critics had
one thing exactly right: Precision is an illusion. No taped conversation with a
mainland doctor is unimpeachable. All witnesses from China have mixed motives,
always. And, again, no numbers from China, even the one in the last paragraph,
can be considered definitive.
Indeed, the entire
investigation must be understood to be still at an early, even primitive,
stage. We do not really know the scale of what is happening yet.
Think of 1820, when
a handful of doctors, scientists, and amateur fossil hunters were trying to
make sense of scattered suggestive evidence and a disjointed pile of bones.
Twenty-two years would pass before an English paleontologist so much as coined
the term "dinosaur" ~ "terrible lizard" ~ and the modern
study of these extinct creatures got seriously under way.
Those of us
researching the harvesting of organs from involuntary donors in China are like
the early dinosaur hunters. We don't work in close consultation with each
other. We are still waiting for even one doctor who has harvested organs from
living prisoners of conscience to emerge from the mainland. Until that happens,
it is true, we don't even have dinosaur bones. But we do have tracks.
Here are some that
I've found.
Qu Yangyao, an
articulate Chinese professional, holds three master's degrees. She is also the
earliest refugee to describe an "organs only" medical examination. Qu
escaped to Sydney last year. While a prisoner in China in June 2000, she
refused to "transform" ~ to sign a statement rejecting Falun Gong ~ and
was eventually transferred to a labor camp. Qu's health was fairly good, though
she had lost some weight from hunger strikes. Given Qu's status and education,
there were reasons to keep her healthy. The Chinese police wanted to avoid
deaths in custody ~ less paperwork, fewer questions. At least, so Qu assumed.
Qu was 35 years old
when the police escorted her and two other practitioners into a hospital. Qu
distinctly remembers the drawing of a large volume of blood, then a chest
X-ray, and probing.
"I wasn't sure
what it was about. They just touch you in different places . . . abdomen,
liver." She doesn't remember giving a urine sample at that time, but the
doctor did shine a light in her eyes, examining her corneas.
Did the doctor then
ask her to trace the movement of his light with her eyes, or check her
peripheral vision? No. He just checked her corneas, skipping any test involving
brain function. And that was it: no hammer on the knee, no feeling for lymph
nodes, no examination of ears or mouth or genitals ~ the doctor checked her
retail organs and nothing else.
I may have felt a
silent chill run up my spine at points in our interview, but Qu, like many
educated subjects, seemed initially unaware of the potential implications of
what she was telling me. Many prisoners preserve a kind of "it can't
happen here" sensibility.
"I'm too
important to be wiped out" is the survivor's mantra. In the majority of
the interviews presented here, my subjects, though aware of the organ
harvesting issue, had no clear idea of my line of questioning or the
"right" answers.
Falun Gong
practitioners are forbidden to lie. That doesn't mean they never do. In the
course of my interviews I've heard a few distortions. Not because people have been
"prepped," but because they've suffered trauma. Deliberate
distortions, though, are exceedingly rare. The best way to guard against false
testimony is to rely on extended sit-down interviews.
In all, I
interviewed 15 Falun Gong refugees from labor camps or extended detention who
had experienced something inexplicable in a medical setting. My research
assistant, Leeshai Lemish, interviewed Dai Ying in Norway, bringing our total
to 16.
If that number
seems low, consider the difficulty of survival and escape. Even so, just over
half of the subjects can be ruled out as serious candidates for organ
harvesting: too old, too physically damaged from hard labor, or too emaciated
from hunger strikes. Some were simply too shaky in their recall of specific
procedures to be much help to us. Some were the subjects of drug tests. Some
received seemingly normal, comprehensive physicals, though even such people
sometimes offered valuable clues.
For example, Lin
Jie, a woman in her early 60s living in Sydney, reported that in May 2001,
while she was incarcerated in the Chongqing Yong Chaun Women's Jail, over 100
Falun Gong women were examined "all over the body, very detailed. And they
asked about our medical history." Fine. Yet Lin found herself wondering
why "one police per practitioner" escorted the women through the
physical, as if they were dangerous criminals. Practitioners of Falun Gong are
many things ~ intense, moralistic, single-minded ~ but they are strictly
nonviolent. Clearly someone in the Chinese security system was nervous.
Or take Jing Tian,
a female refugee in her 40s, now in Bangkok. In March 2002, the Shenyang
Detention Center gave a comprehensive physical to all the practitioners. Jing
watched the procedure carefully and saw nothing unusual. Then, in September,
the authorities started expensive blood tests (these would cost about $300 per
subject in the West). Jing observed that they were drawing enough blood to fill
up eight test tubes per practitioner, enough for advanced diagnostics or tissue
matching. Jia Xiarong, a middle-aged female prisoner who came from a family of
well-connected officials, told Jing outright:
"They are doing this because some aging official needs an
organ."
But Jing sensed
something else in the air that fall, something more substantial: Prisoners were
arriving in the middle of the night and disappearing before dawn. There were
transports to "hospital civil defense structures" with names like
Sujiatun and Yida, and practitioners with no names, only numbers.
It was not a good
time to be an angry young practitioner, according to a refugee in her 30s
recently arrived in Hong Kong. She has family in China, so let's call her
Jiansheng Chen. Back in 2002, Chen noticed another pattern. When the blood
tests started, she said, "before signing a statement [renouncing Falun
Gong] the practitioners were all given physicals. After they signed, they
wouldn't get a physical again."
Chen was a
"nontransformable" ~ with an edge. Not only did she refuse to
renounce Falun Gong, but she shouted down anyone who did. Chen was getting
medication three times a day (possibly sedatives), so drug-testing can't be
ruled out.
Yet as her resistance dragged on, the police said: "If you don't transform, we'll send you away. The path you have chosen is the path of death."
For eight days
efforts were made to persuade Chen to renounce Falun Gong or gain her
submission by torture. Suddenly the guards ordered her to write a suicide note.
Chen mocked them:
"I'm not dead. So why should I sign a death certificate?"
The director
brought in a group of military police doctors wearing white uniforms, male and
female. The labor camp police were "very frightened" at this point,
according to Chen.
They kept repeating: "If you still won't transform, what waits for you is a path to death."
Chen was
blindfolded. Then she heard a familiar policewoman's voice asking the doctors
to leave for a minute. When they were alone, the policewoman began pleading
with her:
"Chen, your life is going to be taken away. I'm not kidding you. We've been here together all this time, we've made at least some sort of connection by now. I can't bear to see this ~ a living person in front of my eyes about to be wiped out."
Chen stayed silent.
She didn't trust the policewoman ~ why should she? In the last eight days, she
had been hung from the ceiling. She had been burned with electric batons. She
had drunk her own urine. So, the latest nice-nice trick was unconvincing. Then
Chen noticed something dripping on her hand ~ the policewoman's tears. Chen
allowed that she would think about transforming. "That's all I need,"
the policewoman said. After a protracted argument with the doctors, the police
left.
Practitioners like
to talk about altering the behavior of police and security personnel through
the power of their own belief. It's a favorite trope. Just as a prisoner of war
is duty bound to attempt escape, a Falun Gong practitioner is required by his
moral code to try to save sentient beings.
In this spiritual
calculus, the policeman who uses torture destroys himself, not the
practitioner. If the practitioner can alter the policeman's behavior, by moral
example or supernatural means, there's some natural pride, even if the
practitioner still gets tortured.
But practitioners
vary. Chen did not tell her story with composure. She screamed it out
cathartically, in a single note of abrasive, consuming fury. It's also relevant
that Chen is not just stubborn, impossible, and a little mad, but young,
attractive, and charismatic. She gave her account of the policewoman without
braggadocio, only abject, shrieking shame at having finally signed a
transformation statement. The policewoman had met a fellow warrior ~ her tears
are plausible.
Dai Ying is a
50-year-old female refugee living in Sweden. As 2003 began, 180 Falun Gong were
tested in Sanshui labor camp. The usual our-party-especially-cares-for-you
speech was followed by X-rays, the drawing of massive blood samples,
cardiograms, urine tests, and then probes: "They had us lie on [our]
stomachs and examined our kidneys. They tapped on them and ask[ed] us if that
hurt."
And that was it ~
organs only, hold the corneas ~ a fact that Dai, almost blind from torture at
the time, remembers vividly. Corneas are relatively small-ticket items, worth
perhaps $30,000 each. By 2003, Chinese doctors had mastered the liver
transplant, worth about $115,000 from a foreign customer.
To meet the demand,
a new source of supply was needed. Fang Siyi is a 40-year-old female refugee in
Bangkok. Incarcerated from 2002 to 2005, Fang was examined repeatedly and then,
in 2003, picked out for special testing in the Jilin detention center in
Northeast China.
Fang had never seen
the doctors before: "Upon arriving here, they changed into labor camp
uniforms. But what struck me is that they seemed to be military doctors."
Twelve prisoners
had been selected. Fang estimates that eight were Falun Gong. How did she know?
"For Falun Gong, they called them, Little Faluns." Who were the other
four? "[The staff] would say, Here comes another one of those Eastern Lightning."
Eastern Lightning
are Christians ~ fringy, out-there Chinese Christians to us, incurable,
nontransformable deviants to the party. Jing, too, remembers Eastern Lightning
being given blood tests in 2002, but Fang remembers the Jilin exam as far more
focused: "The additional examinations would just be blood tests,
electro-cardiograms, and X-rays, nothing else. It was Falun Gong practitioners
and Christians."
Compassion fatigue
seeping in? I'll keep this short.
"Masanjia
Confidential" has family in China, so prudence dictates mentioning only
that she's about 40 and is in Bangkok. Her experience takes us into what I call
the "Late Harvest Era" of 2005, when many practitioners seem to have
been whisked off to wham-bam organ exams and then promptly disappeared.
When I asked her if
anyone in Masanjia Labor Camp actually received medical treatment, she
responded without missing a beat:
"If people came in on a stretcher, they were given cursory treatment. In good health, a comprehensive exam. . . . They needed healthy people, young people. If you were an auntie in your 60s or 70s they wouldn't pay attention to you."
Were there military
personnel present at the physicals? "They didn't need them. Masanjia is
very close to Sujiatun [hospital] ~ a pretty quick drive. If they needed
someone they could just tie them up and send them over. . . . Usually they were taken at
night."
In 2007, Yu Xinhui,
free after five years in Guangdong prison, signed himself, his wife, and their
infant son up for a foreign trip with a Chinese tour group. Upon arriving in
Bangkok, they fled to the YMCA and applied for U.N. refugee status. Yu is in
his 30s, the picture of robust health. While in prison, he was tested
repeatedly, finally graduating to an "organs-only" exam under military
supervision in 2005.
Yu makes a good
show of indulging my questions, but to him it was never a big mystery:
"There was common knowledge of organ harvesting in the prison.. Even before you die, your organs are already reserved."
Criminal prisoners
would taunt the practitioners: "If you don't do what we say we'll torture
you to death and sell your organs."
That sounds like a
stupid game, but everyone knew there was a real list: Prisoners and
practitioners alike would be taken away on an annual schedule. Yu knew which
month the buses would arrive and where they would park in the courtyard. He
gave me a tour of the exact spot on Google Earth.
When Falun Gong's
claims about organ harvesting surfaced in March 2006, Yu still languished in
prison, incommunicado. So it's all the more interesting that he vividly
remembers a large, panicky deportation of prisoners (perhaps 400 people,
including practitioners) in May 2006.
"It was
terrifying," Yu says. "Even I was terrified."
The timing is
consistent: With all the bad publicity, mainland doctors were hinting at a
close-of-business sale on organs at exactly this time.
By 2007, the
consensus was that the Chinese government had shut down Falun Gong harvesting
to avoid any embarrassing new disclosures before the Olympics. So my final case
must be viewed as borderline, a comprehensive medical exam followed by . . . well, judge for yourself.
Liu Guifu is a
48-year-old woman recently arrived in Bangkok. She got a soup-to-nuts physical--really
a series of them ~ in Beijing Women's Labor Camp in 2007. She was also
diagnosed as schizophrenic and possibly given drugs.
But she remembers
her exams pretty well. She was given three urine tests in a single month. She
was told to drink fluids and refrain from urinating until she got to the
hospital. Was this testing for diabetes or drugs?
It can't be ruled out. But
neither can kidney-function assessment. And three major blood samples were
drawn in the same month, at a cost of about $1,000.
Was the labor camp
concerned about Liu's health? Or the health of a particular organ? Perhaps an
organ that was being tissue-matched with a high-ranking cadre or a rich foreign
customer?
The critical fact
is that Liu was both a member of a nontransformed Falun Gong brigade with a
history of being used for organs and was considered mentally ill. She was
useless, the closest approximation we have to a nameless practitioner, one of
the ones who never gave their names or provinces to the authorities and so lost
their meager social protections.
There were
certainly hundreds, perhaps thousands, of practitioners identified by numbers
only. I've heard that number two hundred and something was a talented young
female artist with nice skin, but I don't really know. None of them made it out
of China alive.
None of them likely
will. Tibetan sources estimate that 5,000 protesters disappeared in this year's
crackdown. Many have been sent to Qinghai, a potential center of organ
harvesting. But that's speculative.
Both the Taiwanese doctors who investigate organ
harvesting and those who arrange transplants for their Taiwanese patients agree
on one point: The closing ceremony of the Olympics made it once again open
season for harvesting.
Some in the human
rights community will read that last assertion with skepticism. Until there is
countervailing evidence, however, I'll bet on bargain-basement prices for
organs in China. I confess, I feel a touch of burnout myself at this thought.
It's an occupational hazard.
It's why I told
that one-night-in-Bangkok joke to get you to read beyond the first paragraph.
Yet what's really laughable is the foot-dragging, formalistic, faintly
embarrassed response of so many to the murder of prisoners of conscience for
the purpose of harvesting their organs. That's an evil crime.
Washington faces
its own imperatives: The riptide of Chinese financial power is strong. Those in
government do not want to hear about Falun Gong and genocide at a time of
financial crisis, with China holding large numbers of U.S. bonds. So the story
continues to founder under the lead weight of American political and
journalistic apathy. At least the Europeans have given it some air. They can
afford to. They aren't the leader of the free world.
It will be argued ~
quietly, of course ~ that America has no point of easy leverage, no ability to
undo what has been done, no silver bullet that can change the Chinese regime.
Perhaps not, but we could ban Americans from getting organ transplants in
China.
We could boycott
Chinese medical conferences. Sever medical ties. Embargo surgical equipment.
And refuse to hold any diplomatic summits until the Chinese put in place an
explicit, comprehensive database of every organ donor in China.
We may have to live
with the Chinese Communist party, for now. For that matter, we can console
ourselves that there are no bones, for now. There will be none until the party
falls and the Chinese people begin to sift through the graves and ashes.
We are all allowed
a touch of compassion fatigue ~ it's understandable. But make no mistake: There
are terrible lizards. And now that the Olympic Games are over, and the cameras
have turned away, they roam the earth again.
This post and many others of the thoughtful and revealing posts you make show the callous attitude being promulgated throughout the world by media and politicians and the like.
ReplyDeleteThe attitude is being forcefully put upon us by the same diabolic spirits that try to make us call ourselves gods. We are emphatically not gods.
The Apocalypse, the Book of the Revelation: 9.
21 Neither did they penance from their murders nor from their sorceries nor from their fornication nor from their thefts. … Scripture reference – Rev.: 2:21; 16:11
(DRV)
What is needed is repentance and social action.
This...
ReplyDeleteSyria: Rense: Jews And White Slavery - and further articles
leads to this...
CHINA'S GRUESOME ORGAN HARVEST http://snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.com/2012/01/chinas-gruesome-organ-harvest.html