Surely this arrogant creature gets a crick in his neck from looking down on the world!
G. J. Vibes
Activist Post
January 11, 2012
As NATO and other Western nations are staging war games right off the shores of Iran, the mainstream media is waging
an extensive propaganda campaign
back home. Excuse after excuse has been handed down to us in the past few
months, but is there really any justification in the world for the West to
bring the same death and destruction to Iran
that they have brought to Iraq?
Is there any captured spy, or weapons program, or crazed
dictator that is worth the creation of another human rights nightmare and money pit like we have seen in
Iraq and Afghanistan?
I won’t argue that Ahmadinejad has a few screws loose, and I’ll
agree that he is a tyrant who runs a brutal theocracy. However, is that
any reason to put the lives of millions of innocent people in danger and to
destroy the infrastructure of a thriving civilization, whose only crime is that
they are subservient to an oppressive dictator?
Isn’t every country on the planet guilty of that same offense?
Should we be judged individually for the actions of Bush?
Or the actions of Obama?
Are you guilty of the horrors committed by these people simply
because half of your paycheck was forcibly taken from you to fund all of this?
What if a powerful group of nations wanted to invade America
tomorrow because of decisions that were made by Bush, Obama or whomever.
If a full-scale invasion were launched by a more powerful foe,
most average Americans would run a very high risk of being displaced from their
home, having their whole life disrupted and possibly losing many loved
ones.
In fact, there is a good chance they wouldn’t even make it
through this altercation because civilian casualties are extremely high in wars
of aggression.
So even if you weren’t being directly blamed for the crimes of
your oppressor, you would still be punished as a result.
There is no doubt that these kind of fears are deep in the
hearts of millions of innocent, peaceful and oppressed people in Iran.
Killing the innocent and oppressed people in a particular
country and disrupting their lives with violence does not seem like a good way of
dealing with the madman who has held them captive.
Let’s put this situation into context. Imagine the year is
1800 and there is an especially vicious slave master in the state of
Alabama. His plantation was coincidentally sitting on a stockpile of iron
and mineral deposits, which made all of the other slave owners covet his
land.
For the sake of this conversation, let’s say he calls himself
Crazy Jack. Let’s imagine that this guy treated his slaves a bit worse
than the other masters treated theirs and that he was using them to construct
weapons of war.
A few plantation owners over in Georgia got together and gave
their slaves guns, and marched their slaves to Alabama with intent of
overthrowing Crazy Jack and taking his land. Now, if thousands of slaves on
both sides get murdered in the process and the whole plantation is destroyed,
aren’t all of the slave owners guilty of murder? And hasn’t an
intolerable injustice occurred?
How is today’s situation with Iran any different than this
hypothetical scenario? We have a whole bunch of psychopathic aristocrats
fighting over land, resources and global dominance and each of them are willing
to risk millions of lives in these turf wars.
Is the head of one tyrant worth the lives of millions and the
pain of billions? Sadly, throughout the most of history people have been
convinced that this is a fair trade, and that the ends somehow justify the
means.
Maybe some oil companies get some contracts, some arms
manufacturers get some sales and some governments pick up some land, but
nothing is ever really accomplished in war.
A war with Iran is no different, it will do nothing but bring
more pain to the innocent people of this world and ensure that the United States will repeat the same fate
suffered by the ancient Roman Empire.
ED: At this point,
the United States will not repeat this fate because it is already in the throes
of death by such a means, the over extension and leeching of an empire’s power.
Who profits when
this happens? Did this not also happen to Great Britain as well? In BOTH cases
this overextension has been under the control of the Jewish elements in
government and banking. And guess who profited most in the long run?
I listened to an
interview with Sheik Imran Hosein last night in which he states his belief that
Iran, Israel and Saudi Arabia are in collusion to bring down the States. When he explains his logic this appears to be a very possible thing, and his logic is almost always failproof even off in regards to minor details.
Please go HERE for this most
illuminating interview. If I can ever figure out how to repost these podcasts
here at S & S I will do so but ever since Mark Glenn changed formats I have
not been able to figure it out. But the
conversation is truly worth a listen; the Sheik is an amazing mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.