Watching the implementation of "full spectrum dominance"
By F. William Engdahl
December 1, 2011
Most in the civilized world are blissfully unaware that we are
marching ineluctably towards an increasingly likely pre-emptive nuclear war.
No, it’s not at all about Iran and Israel. It’s about the decision of
Washington and the Pentagon to push Moscow up against the wall with what is
euphemistically called Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD
On November 23, a
normally low-keyed Russian President Dmitry Medvedev told the world in clear
terms that Russia was prepared to deploy its missiles on the border to the EU
between Poland and Lithuania, and possibly in the south near Georgia and NATO
member Turkey to counter the advanced construction process of the US ballistic
missile defense shield: "The Russian Federation will deploy in the west
and the south of the country modern weapons systems that could be used to
destroy the European component of the US missile defense," he announced on
Russian television.
Those would be theatre
ballistic missile systems. The latest version of Iskander, the Iskander-K,
whose details remain top secret, reportedly has a range up to 2000 km and
carries cruise missiles and a target accuracy to 7 meters or less.
Russia put in exploitation a new alert
radar against missiles at Kaliningrad.
Medvedev declared he has
ordered the Russian defense ministry to "immediately" put radar
systems in Kaliningrad that warn of incoming missile attacks on a state of
combat readiness. He called for extending the targeting range of Russia’s
strategic nuclear missile forces and re-equipping Russia’s nuclear arsenal with
new warheads capable of piercing the US/NATO defense shield due to become
operational in six years, by 2018.
Medvedev also threatened to
pull Russia out of the New START missile reduction treaty if the United States
moves as announced. Medvedev then correctly pointed to the inevitable link
between “defensive” missiles and “offensive” missiles: “Given the intrinsic
link between strategic offensive and defensive arms, conditions for our
withdrawal from the New Start treaty could also arise,” he said. [2]
The Russian President
didn’t mince words: “I have ordered the armed forces to develop measures to
ensure, if necessary, that we can destroy the command and control systems” of
the US shield, Medvedev said. “These measures are appropriate, effective and
low-cost.”
Russia has repeatedly
warned that the US BMD global shield is designed to destabilize the nuclear
balance and risks provoking a new arms race. The Russian President said that
rather than take the Russian concerns seriously, Washington has instead been
“accelerating” its BMD development. [3]
It was not the first time
Medvedev threatened to take countermeasures to the increasing Pentagon military
encirclement pressure on Russia. Back in November 2008 as the US BMD threat was
first made known to the world, Medvedev made a televised address to the Russian
people in which he declared,
“I would add something about what we have had to face in recent years: what is it? It is the construction of a global missile defense system, the installation of military bases around Russia, the unbridled expansion of NATO and other similar ‘presents’ for Russia ~ we therefore have every reason to believe that they are simply testing our strength.” [4]
That threat was dropped
some months later when the Obama Administration offered the now-clearly
deceptive olive branch of reversing the BMD decision to deploy in Poland and
the Czech Republic.
Russia is threatening to deploy its
Iskander anti-BMD missiles in Kaliningrad.
This time around
Washington lost no time signaling it was in the developing game of
thermonuclear chicken to stay. No more pretty words about “reset” in US-Russia
relations. A spokesman for the Obama National Security Council declared,
“we will not in any way limit or change our deployment plans for Europe."
The US Administration
continues to insist on the implausible argument that the missile defense
installations are aimed at a threat from a possible Iranian nuclear launch,
something hardly credible. The real risk of Iranian nuclear missile attack on
Europe given the reality of the global US as well as Israeli BMD installations
and the reality of Iran’s nuclear delivery capabilities, is by best impartial
accounts, near zero.
Two days earlier on
November 21, Washington had thrown a small carrot to Moscow. US Undersecretary
of State for Arms Control Ellen Tauscher said that Washington was ready to
provide information about the missile’s speed after it uses up all of its fuel.
This information, referred to as burnout velocity (VBO), helps to determine how
to target it. [5]
That clearly was not seen
as a serious concession by Moscow, which demands a full hands-on partnership
with the US/NATO missile deployment to insure it will never be used against
Russia.
After all, given Washington’s track record of lies and broken promises, there is no guarantee the speeds would even be true.
After the early October
Brussels NATO defense ministers meeting, NATO head Anders Fogh Rasmussen said
in regard to the nominally NATO European Missile Defense Program, “We would
expect it to be fully operational in 2018."
Spain just announced it
plans to join the US-controlled missile program, joining Romania, Poland, the
Netherlands and Turkey, which have already agreed to deploy key components of
the future missile defense network on their territories. [6]
The concerns of Russia
are caused by the dramatic improvement of an entire system of missile defense
by Washington, which is taking the form of a global BMD system encircling
Russia on all sides.
The mindset behind "full spectrum dominance"
FULL SPECTRUM DOMINANCE…
The last time Washington’s
Missile Defense "Shield" made headlines was in September 2009 early
in the Obama Administration when the US President offered to downgrade the
provocative stationing of US special radar and anti-missile missiles in Poland
and the Czech Republic. That was a clear tactic to prepare the way for what
Hillary Clinton ludicrously called the "reset" in US-Russian
relations from the tense Bush-Putin days.
However the strategic
goal of encircling the one nuclear potential opponent in the world with credible
missile defense remained US strategy.
Barack Obama announced
back then that the US was altering Bush Administration plans to station US
anti-ballistic missiles in Poland and sophisticated radar in the Czech
Republic. The news was greeted in Moscow as an important concession. [7]
Subsequent developments
clearly show that far from ditching its plans for a missile shield that could
cripple any potential Russian nuclear launch, the US was merely opting for a
more effective global system, whose feasibility had been proven in the
meantime.
To assuage the Poles, the
Obama Administration also agreed to provide Poland with US Patriot missiles.
Poland’s Foreign Minister then and now is Radek Sikorski. From 2002 to 2005 he
was in Washington as a resident fellow of the American Enterprise Institute, a
noted neo-conservative hawkish think-tank, and executive director of the New
Atlantic Initiative, a project to bring as many former communist countries of
eastern Europe into NATO as possible. Little wonder Moscow did not view US
missiles in Poland as friendly, nor does it today.
In May 2011 the Obama
Administration announced that the missiles it would now give Poland consisted
of new Raytheon (RTN) SM-3 missile defense systems at the Redzikowo military
base in Poland (see map), roughly 50 miles from the Russian enclave of
Kaliningrad, a unique piece of Russian real estate not connected to mainland
Russia, but adjacent to the Baltic Sea and Lithuania. That puts US missiles
closer to Russia than during the 1961 Cuba Missile Crisis when Washington
placed ICBM’s at sites in Turkey aimed at key Soviet nuclear sites. [8]
The new Raytheon SM-3
missile is part of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System that will be
aimed at intercepting short to intermediate range ballistic missiles. The SM-3
Kinetic Warhead intercepts incoming ballistic missiles outside the earth’s
atmosphere. Lockheed Martin Maritime Systems and Sensors developed the Aegis
BMD Weapon System. The SM-3 comes from Raytheon Missile Systems.
The Polish SM-3 missile
deployment is but one part of a global web encircling Russia’s nuclear
capacities.
One should not forget that official Pentagon military strategy is called Full Spectrum Dominance ~ control of pretty much the entire universe.
This past September the
US and Romania, another new NATO member, signed an agreement to deploy a
US-controlled Missile Defense System on the Deveselu Air Base in Romania using
the SM-3 missiles.
As well Washington has
signed an agreement with NATO member Turkey to place a sophisticated missile
tracking radar atop a high mountain in the Kuluncak district of Malatya
province in south-eastern Turkey. Though the Pentagon insists its radar is
pointed at Iran, a look at a map reveals how easily the focal direction could
cover key Russian nuclear sites such as Stevastopol where the bulk of the
Russian Navy’s Black Sea Fleet is stationed or to the vital Russian Krasnodar
radar installation. [9]
The Malataya radar will
send data to US ships equipped with the Aegis combat system that will intercept
“Iranian” ballistic missiles. According to Russian military experts, one of the
main aims of that radar, which targets at a range up to 2000 kilometers, will
also be the surveillance and control of the air space of the South Caucasus,
part of Central Asia as well as the south of Russia, in particular tracking the
experimental launches of the Russian missiles at their test ranges. [10]
Further, the
US-controlled BMD deployment now also includes sea-based “Aegis” systems in the
Black Sea near Russia’s Sevastopol Naval Base, as well as possible deployment
of intermediate range missiles in Black Sea and Caspian region. [11]
But the European BMS
deployments of the US Pentagon are but a part of a huge global web. At the Fort
Greeley Alaska Missile Field the US has installed BMD ground-based missile
interceptors, as well as at the Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. And
the Pentagon just opened two missile sites at the Pacific Missile Range
Facility in Hawaii. To add to it, the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force has
joined formally with the US Missile Defense Agency to develop a system of
so-called Aegis BMD deploying the SM-3 Raytheon missiles on Japanese naval
ships. [12]
That gives the US a
Pacific platform from which it can hit both China and Russia’s Far East as well
as the Korean Peninsula. These are all a pretty long and curious way to reach
any Iranian threat.
ORIGINS
OF US MISSILE DEFENSE
The US program to build a
global network of ‘defense’ against possible enemy ballistic missile attacks
began back in March 23, 1983 when then-President Ronald Reagan proposed the
program popularly known as Star Wars, formally called then the Strategic
Defense Initiative.
In 1994 at a private
dinner discussion with this author in Moscow, the former head of economic
studies for the Soviet Union’s Institute of World Economy & International
Relations, IMEMO, declared that it had been the huge financial demands required
by Russia to keep pace with the multi-billion dollar US Star Wars effort that
finally led to the economic collapse of the Warsaw Pact and to German
reunification in 1990.
With a losing war in
Afghanistan, collapsing oil revenues caused by a 1986 US policy of flooding the
world market with Saudi oil, the military economy of the USSR was unable to
keep pace, short of risking massive civilian unrest across the Warsaw Pact
nations. [13]
This time around the US
BMD deployment is designed to bring Russia to her knees as well, only in the
context of a US creation of what military strategists call “Nuclear Primacy.”
NUCLEAR
PRIMACY: THINKING THE UNTHINKABLE
While the Soviet era
armed forces have undergone a drastic shrinking down since the collapse of the
USSR in 1991, Russia has tenaciously held on to the core of its strategic
nuclear deterrent. That is something that gives Washington pause when
considering how to deal with Russia.
The potential for Russia
to deepen its military and economic cooperation with its Central Asian partners
in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, above all with China, is something
Washington has gone to great lengths to frustrate. Such a strategic cooperation
is becoming increasingly a matter of life-or-death for both China and Russia.
China’s nuclear arsenal is not yet strategic as is Russia’s.
What the Pentagon is
going for is what it has dreamed of since the Soviets developed
intercontinental ballistic missiles during the 1950’s. Weapons professionals
term it Nuclear Primacy.
Translated into layman’s
language, Nuclear Primacy means that if one of two evenly-matched nuclear foes
is able to deploy even a crude anti-ballistic missile defense system that can
seriously damage the nuclear strike capacity of the other, while he launches a
full-scale nuclear barrage against that foe, he has won the nuclear war.
The darker side of that
military-strategic Nuclear Primacy coin is that the side without adequate
offsetting BMD anti-missile defenses, as he watches his national security
vanish with each new BMD missile and radar installation, is under growing
pressure to launch a pre-emptive nuclear or other devastating strike before the
window closes.
That in simple words
means that far from being “defensive” as Washington claims, BMD is offensive
and destabilizing in the extreme. Moreover, those nations blissfully deluding
themselves that by granting the Pentagon rights to install BMS infrastructure,
that they are buying the security umbrella of the mighty United States Armed
Forces, find that they have allowed their territory to become a potential
nuclear field of battle in an ever more likely confrontation between Washington
and Moscow.
Dr. Robert Bowman is also a prominent
figure in the 9/11 Truth Movement.
Dr. Robert Bowman, a
retired Lieutenant Colonel of the US Air Force and former head of President
Reagan’s BMD effort of the 1980’s, then dubbed derisively “Star Wars,” noted
the true nature of Washington’s current ballistic missile “defense” under what
is today called the Department of Defense Missile Defense Agency:
Under Reagan and Bush I, it was the Strategic Defense Initiative Organization (SDIO). Under Clinton, it became the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO). Now Bush II has made it the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) and given it the freedom from oversight and audit previously enjoyed only by the black programs. If Congress doesn’t act soon, this new independent agency may take their essentially unlimited budget and spend it outside of public and Congressional scrutiny on weapons that we won’t know anything about until they’re in space. In theory, then, the space warriors would rule the world, able to destroy any target on earth without warning. Will these new super weapons bring the American people security? Hardly. [14]
During the Cold War, the
ability of both sides ~ the Warsaw Pact and NATO ~ to mutually annihilate one
another, had led to a nuclear stalemate dubbed by military strategists, MAD ~ Mutually
Assured Destruction.
It was scary but, in a
bizarre sense, more stable than what Washington now pursues relentlessly with
its Ballistic Missile Defense in Europe, Asia and globally in unilateral
pursuit of US nuclear primacy.
MAD was based on the prospect of mutual nuclear annihilation with no decisive advantage for either side; it led to a world in which nuclear war had been ‘unthinkable.’Now, the US was pursuing the possibility of nuclear war as ‘thinkable.’
Lt. Colonel Bowman, in a
telephone interview with this author called missile defense, “the missing link
to a First Strike.” [15]
The fact is that
Washington hides behind a NATO facade with its deployment of the European BMD,
while keeping absolute US control over it. Russia’s NATO envoy Dmitry Rogozin
recently called the European portion of the US BMD:
a fig leaf for "a missile defense umbrella that says ’Made in USA. European NATO members will have neither a button to push nor a finger to push it with.” [16]
That’s clearly why Russia
continues to insist on guarantees ~ from the United States ~ that the shield is
not directed against Russia.
Worryingly enough, to
date Washington has categorically refused that. Could it be that the dear souls
in Washington entrusted with maintaining world peace have gone bonkers?
In any case the fact that Washington continues to tear up solemn international arms treaties and illegally proceed to install its global missile shield is basis enough for those in Moscow, Beijing or elsewhere to regard US promises, even treaties as not worth the paper they were written on.
[1] David M. Herszenhorn,
"Russia
Elevates Warning About U.S. Missile-Defense Plan in Europe," The
New York Times, November 23, 2011.
[4] Misha, "Medvedev: Russia will Deploy Iskanders in Kaliningrad to
Neutralize New US Missile Threat," Misha’s
Russian Blog, December 30, 2008.
[5] RIA Novosti,
"US ready to provide
Russia with missile shield details," Moscow, November
21, 2011.
[6] RIA Novosti,
"NATO’s missile defense
program to be fully operational in 2018 – Rasmussen,"
5 October, 2011.
[8] Kenneth Repoza, "Obama’s Cold War? Raytheon Missiles On Russia’s Border By
2018," Forbes, September 15, 2011.
[10] Sergey Sargsyan, "Turkey
in the US Missile Defense System: Primary Assessment and Possible Prospects,"
Center for Political Studies, “Noravank” Foundation, 13 October, 2011.
[13] F. William Engdahl, Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in
the New World Order, Wiesbaden, 2010,
edition.engdahl, p. 145.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.