Friday 3 February 2012

WILL CANADA’S SOCIAL-DEMOCRATIC PARTY BE ABLE TO PREVENT A ZIONIST LEADERSHIP COUP?

 
Thomas Mulcair, Zionist.
By Greg Felton | February 1, 2012
On March 24,
Canada’s New Democratic Party
will do more than elect a new leader;
it will face a test of character.

As it stands, the NDP is the only major national party not led by an avowed zionist.

Stephen Harper leads a cabal of governing “Likudniks,” who value subservience to Israel above all else, and the interim leader of the “Labour-Zionist” Liberals Bob Rae, is on the board of the Jewish National Fund, an organization so criminal that it has been condemned in Israel as racist.

The NDP, therefore, is the only apparently Canadian governing choice that voters have, but even this modest fig leaf will be blown away if the blatant Israel-firster Thomas Mulcair becomes party leader. On May 1, 2008, he told Canadian Jewish News
“I am an ardent supporter of Israel in all situations and in all circumstances.” [my emphasis]
Does Mulcair mean to say that he “ardently supports” Israel’s collective punishment of Palestinians, which includes torturing children, bulldozing homes, and keeping Palestinians near starvation levels as a matter of national policy?

Do these constitute morally defensible “situations and circumstances?”

Based on his abject endorsement of Israel, the answer is clearly, “yes.” The fact that all of the preceding are contrary to Canadian and international law, to say nothing of basic humanity, doesn’t faze Mulcair one bit. What a mensch!

How this walking advertisement for sedition found a home in a left-of-centre, social-democratic party is bizarre. The NDP, after all, still cleaves to the quaint notions that the federal government should defend the Constitution, uphold the rule of law, oppose military aggression, stand up for victims of human rights abuses, and generally serve the public good.

Such high-minded ethical standards clearly distinguish it from both “Likud” and “Labour,” which are financially and politically indentured to the Israel Lobby.

SO, WHY WOULD THE NDP EVEN ALLOW SOMEONE LIKE MULCAIR IN THE FRONT DOOR?

This question takes on added significance when we recall that Mulcair had first considered joining Harper’s Likudniks, and was even said to have been tempted by a cabinet appointment. That would at least have made sense. When questioned last July about the earlier offer, though, the NDP’s newly minted interim leader Nycole Turmel seemed curiously unconcerned: “[Mulcair] was contacted by a number of people, a number of political parties and he chose to come work with us. He chose the NDP and I’m proud of that. He’s a great candidate.”

When looked at a bit more closely, however, Turmel’s praise for this crypto-Likudnik comes across more as a perfunctory platitude than a genuine endorsement; in this case the riding, not the MP, is the prize.

Mulcair represents Outremont, a small, wealthy riding on the Island of Montreal, which he won in a 2007 by-election, thus making him the NDP’s (ta-da!) first MP from Quebec. Outremont has a substantial Jewish population, more than 20%; in the larger Labour riding of Mount Royal just to the south, represented by Israel-firster extraordinaire Irwin Cotler, it is 36%.

If the NDP expects to make inroads into Quebec it is logical for it to compete for the Jewish vote, but how far is the NDP prepared to go to mortgage its principles for electoral advantage? 

Avignor Lieberman. Could these two be identical twins separated at birth?

As party leader, Mulcair would be expected to protect his caucus colleagues from harassment and abuse from other parties, but in 2010 he sided with Labour and Likud to call for the resignation of fellow MP Libby Davies as NDP House Leader. Davies’s “crime” was to state that Israel’s occupation of Palestine began in 1948, not 1967. Her statement is a fact supported by historical documents that include admissions from leading political and military Israelis like David Ben Gurion and Gen. Moshe Dayan.
Mulcair’s contemptible attack on Davies’s basic freedom of expression, to say nothing of historical honesty, showed Mulcair’s true allegiance, and the threat he poses to this country.
It doesn’t matter if he believes the zionist bilge he spews or whether he’s merely pandering to the Jewish community. By rights, he should have been expelled from the party for his misconduct.

If you are reading this and are a member of the federal NDP who plans to cast a vote at the leadership convention, ask yourself these questions before you vote:
1) Can Mulcair be trusted to put loyalty to Canada and the NDP ahead of his loyalty to Israel?

2) Would Mulcair stifle his MPs’ freedom of expression in the name of being an “ardent supporter”of Israel?

3) Would Mulcair’s overt zionism irreparably debase the NDP’s reputation as a party of law and justice?
If you answered 1) no; 2) yes; and 3) yes, then you can proudly claim to be a member in good standing of a national, Canadian political party.

You know what not to do on March 24.

No matter how much you may like Mulcair’s position on the environment or any other issue, anyone who bullies his own people, betrays his party’s principles, and sells out his country is unfit to lead the NDP, much less sit in the House of Commons.

As I said earlier, the NDP appears to many voters to be the only viable Canadian governing option left in this country. Don’t force them into a no-win scenario among Likud, Labour and Meretz!

2 comments:

  1. Fugu is fish that has spikes which contain tetrodotoxin, 1200 times more lethal poison than cyanide, each blowfish has enough to kill 30 people.

    Must be how Jews think they were killed in non-existent death camps in WWII, which all of them survived to collect their own death benefits as hoaxacaust survivors. 6,000,000 divided by 30 = 200,000 puffer fish.

    Must be they really ate Fugu Sashimi while waiting for their friend Adolph Hitler to take them to Palestine to invade and occupy Palestine.

    I speak with sarcastic humor, but for reason – they want people to swallow whatever they say and not even to think. We have to think and see through things.

    miko's blog: ... Fugu fish

    Your blog always makes us think.

    Domo arigatou gozaimasu, Noor san.

    Yumiko

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh I am aware of Fugu and had no desire to eat it! Although I am told it is delicious.

    Grin, Maybe those who ran the camps just hired uncertified food preparers as a cost saving mechanism? Of course, hard to hire the best when your countries are at war, non?

    And ty for the compliment about thinking! I never think... LOL. It gives me a headache.

    ReplyDelete

If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.