Two airlines face a $2.8 billion suit over what the leaseholders of the Twin Towers claim was lax security.
How many ways can you spell GREED?!
UNMITIGATED ZIONIST GREED?!
When one considers the role of Israel in this horrendous crime against humanity, the word chutzpah is not even close to describing these insatiable creatures. Might I add, NEVER EVER believe a Jew when he says it is not about the money!
The judge had no common sense as shown by his acceptance of the lawsuit. .Going by the name, he might even be Jewish which explains why this ridiculous suit is even being considered.
September 6, 2012
American Airlines and United Continental must
face trial over a lawsuit in which the lease holders of the World Trade Centre
allege that lax security allowed hijackers to destroy the Twin Towers on
September 11, 2001.
Federal Judge Alvin Hellerstein in New York
this week rejected a motion by American and United to have World Trade Centre
Properties' suit seeking compensation thrown out.
The "defendants' motion is denied,"
the judge ruled, court papers show. "The overlap between WTCP's insurance
recovery and its potential tort recovery presents issues of fact requiring
trial."
Al-Qaeda terrorists in hijacked planes from
the two airlines smashed into the World Trade Centre's biggest skyscrapers on
September 11, 2001, demolishing both in a fiery collapse that killed almost
3000 people.
The owners had paid $US2.805 billion ($2.75
billion) for the lease to the World Trade Centre only two months before.
WTCP says that the airlines' poor security at
the time was to blame for their losses.
"But for the Aviation Defendant's
negligence, the terrorists could not have boarded and hijacked the aircraft and
flown them into the Twin Towers," the plaintiff alleges.
In his ruling, Hellerstein imposed a limit on
what WTCP can seek of $US2.805 billion - the value of the lease - rather than
the plaintiff's original sum of $US8.4 billion ($8.25 billion), which it said
would amount to a replacement for the lost towers.
The airlines had argued that WTCP had no right
to seek further compensation as it has already received $US4.091 billion ($4
billion) in insurance money.
Surely Silverstein is suing the wrong companies? Shouldn't it be the Israeli company ICTS which was responsible for airport security at the airports where all four planes were "hijacked"? It doesn't surprise me though that the Zionists profit from the suffering they inflict on others. There is a wealth of evidence that Israel did 911 yet the USA still does its bidding; blindly supporting it financially, politically and militarily. Suckers.
ReplyDeleteI don't see this as all bad. what if?
ReplyDeleteWhat if this law suit actually caused the insurance agencies to force some sort of real investigation? What if that investigation found something that points to some other culprit or made connections from the "hijackers" to those who really did this via demolition?
What if Americans got word of it and started to really question and insist that the truth be known?
Yeah, not much of a chance, but this could bring additional light on the subject (like is being done in Colorado, or wherever it is that the PBS station is airing the A&Efor911Truth video).
Guess who was responsible for airport security on 911?
ReplyDeletehttp://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/ICTS.html
That crowd sticks together only when it suits them. They never have any compulsion about ripping each other off if there is money involved.
ReplyDelete