9/11,
THE JFK ASSASSINATION,
AND THE OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING
AS A STRATEGY OF TENSION1
By Prof Peter Dale Scott
September 24, 2012
INTRODUCTION:
STRUCTURAL DEEP EVENTS AND THE STRATEGY OF
TENSION IN ITALY
From an American standpoint, it is easy to see clearly how Italian history was systematically destabilized in the second half of the 20th century, by a series of what I call structural deep events. I have defined these as “events, like the JFK assassination, the Watergate break-in, or 9/11, which violate the … social structure, have a major impact on … society, repeatedly involve law-breaking or violence, and in many cases proceed from an unknown dark force.”2
The examples in Italy, well known to Italians, include the Piazza Fontana bombing of 1969, the Piazza della Loggia bombing of 1974, and the Bologna railway bombing of 1980.
These bombings, in which over one hundred
civilians were killed and many more wounded, were attributed at the time to
marginal left-wing elements of society. However, thanks chiefly to a series of
investigations and judicial proceedings, it is now clearly established that the
bombings were the work of right-wing elements in collusion with Italian
military intelligence, as part of an on-going “strategy of tension” to
discredit the Italian left, encourage support for a corrupt status quo, and
perhaps move beyond democracy altogether.3
.
As one of the conspirators, Vincenzo Vinciguerra, later stated, “The December 1969 explosion was supposed to be the detonator which would have convinced the political and military authorities to declare a state of emergency.”4
.
Piazza Fontana Bombing
As one of the conspirators, Vincenzo Vinciguerra, later stated, “The December 1969 explosion was supposed to be the detonator which would have convinced the political and military authorities to declare a state of emergency.”4
Vinciguerra also revealed that he and others
had also been members of a paramilitary “stay-behind” network originally
organized at the end of World War II by the CIA and NATO as “Operation Gladio.”
In 1984, questioned by judges about the 1980 Bologna station bombing, Vinciguerra said: “With the massacre of Peteano, and with all those that have followed, the knowledge should by now be clear that there existed a real live structure, occult and hidden, with the capacity of giving a strategic direction to the outrages…[it] lies within the state itself…There exists in Italy a secret force parallel to the armed forces, composed of civilians and military men, in an anti-Soviet capacity that is, to organize a resistance on Italian soil against a Russian army…A secret organization, a super-organization with a network of communications, arms and explosives, and men trained to use them…
A super-organization which, lacking a Soviet military invasion which might not happen, took up the task, on Nato’s behalf, of preventing a slip to the left in the political balance of the country. This they did, with the assistance of the official secret services and the political and military forces.5
Gladio connections to sustained false-flag
violence, again involving NATO and the CIA, were subsequently revealed in other
countries, notably Belgium and Turkey.6
.
.
Bologna bombing
The original purpose of Gladio was to
consolidate resistance in the event of a Soviet takeover. But many of the senior
Italians involved in the bombings implicated the CIA and NATO in them as well:
General Vito Miceli, the Italian head of military intelligence, after his arrest in 1974 on a charge of conspiring to overthrow the government, testified “that the incriminated organization, … was formed under a secret agreement with the United States and within the framework of NATO.”
Former Italian defense minister Paulo Taviani told Magistrate Casson during a 1990 investigation “that during his time in office (1955-58), the Italian secret services were bossed and financed by ‘the boys in Via Veneto’ ~ i.e. the CIA agents in the U.S. Embassy in the heart of Rome.”In 2000 “an Italian secret service general [Giandelio Maletti] said . . . that the CIA gave its tacit approval to a series of bombings in Italy in the 1970s to sow instability and keep communists from taking power. .‘The CIA wanted, through the birth of an extreme nationalism and the contribution of the far right, particularly Ordine Nuovo, to stop (Italy) sliding to the left,’ he said.”7
Another conspirator, Carlo Digilio, “described
how he passed on details of planned bomb attacks to his CIA contact, Captain
David Carret, who had told him that the bombing campaign was part of a US plan
to create a state of emergency.”8
Daniele Ganser, in his important book Nato’s Secret Armies, has endorsed a
Spanish report that in 1990 NATO Secretary General Manfred Wörner (a German politician and diplomat) secretly confirmed that NATO’s
headquarters, SHAPE, was indeed responsible:
The Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE), directing organ of NATO’s military apparatus, coordinated the actions of Gladio, according to the revelations of Gladio Secretary-General Manfred Wörner during a reunion with the NATO ambassadors of the 16 allied nations.9
Extrapolating from such testimony, Ola
Tunander has compared the strategy of tension in Italy, with its false-flag
bombing attacks, to “what the Turkish military elite might describe as the
correction of the course of democracy by the ‘deep state’ [a Turkish term].”10
.
.
Strategy of Tension
But I believe it would be too simplistic an analysis to blame the Italian strategy of tension exclusively on Vinciguerra’s “super-organisation which… took up the task [of false-flag bombings], on Nato’s behalf.” There appear to have been other directing forces besides NATO and those elements Vinciguerra was aware of through Italian military intelligence (the SID, later SISMI). It is important to recall that the Italian trials of those convicted for the 1980 Bologna bombing implicated not only Vinciguerra, SISMI, and Gladio, but also elements of the Italian mafia (the Banda della Magliana) and the Italian Masonic Lodge Propaganda-Due (P-2), with links to criminal bankers and the Vatican.11
In short, if we suggest that something like
the Turkish deep state was involved in the Italian strategy of tension, this
does not suggest a solution to the Italian mystery, so much as a zone, or
interlocking network, for further research.
HAS A STRATEGY OF
TENSION BEEN EXERCISED IN AMERICA?
Gladio connections to sustained false-flag
violence, again involving NATO and the CIA, were subsequently established in
other countries, notably Belgium and Turkey.12
I wish to propose that America, as well as
Europe, has also suffered from a similar series of false-flag structural deep
events, including bombings, that have, in conformity with the same strategy of
tension, systematically moved America into its current condition, a state of
emergency.
.
.
Nato headquarters
Among the false flag structural deep events I
wish to consider today are
The John F. Kennedy assassination of 1963, or 11/22, which led to the CIA’s Operation Chaos against the anti-Vietnam War movement. (11/22 was clearly a deep event: many documents in the area of Lee Harvey Oswald’s relations to CIA operations are still being withheld, despite statutory and court orders to release them.13The Robert Kennedy assassination of 1968, followed immediately by emergency legislation which led to state-sponsored violence at the 1968 Democratic Party Convention.The 1993 first World Trade Center bombing and the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, which led to the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.9/11 and the subsequent false flag anthrax attacks of 2001, which led to the imposition of Continuity of Government (COG) measures, the Patriot Act, and the proclamation, on September 14, 2001, of a State of Emergency which remains in effect. (In September 2012 it was once again renewed for another year).14
These structural deep events have had a common
and cumulative result: the erosion of public or constitutional power, and its
progressive replacement by unconstrained repressive force. I have argued
elsewhere that:
1)As in Italy, all of these events were blamed on marginal left-wing elements, but in fact involved elements inside America’s covert intelligence agencies, along with their shadowy underworld connections.2)Some of these structural deep events bore a relationship to the ongoing secret planning – known in the Pentagon as the Doomsday Project – for Continuity of Government (or COG) in an emergency, which entailed its own secret communications network, and arrangements for what (in the Oliver North Hearings) was called “suspension of the American Constitution.”3)In every case, the official response to the deep event was a set of new repressive measures, usually in the form of legislation.4)Cumulatively, these events suggest the on-going presence in America of what I have called a “dark force” or “deep state,” analogous to what Vinciguerra described in Italy as a “secret force…occult and hidden, with the capacity of giving a strategic direction to the [successive] outrages.”15
THE OKLAHOMA CITY
BOMBING (4/19) AND 9/11
Recently I viewed for a film, “A Noble Lie,”
about the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.16
This gave me a chance, for the first time, to
test these hypotheses against the case of Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995, or
what I shall call 4/19. More than I could have anticipated, 4/19 fit into and
strengthened this analysis.
.
The film “A Noble Lie,” itself points to some
striking similarities between the events of 1995 and of 2001. The most obvious
is the alleged destruction of a steel-reinforced building by external forces (a
truck bomb in the case of the Murrah Building in 1995, flying debris in the
case of Building Seven in 2001). Experts in both cases have asserted that the
buildings in fact could only have been brought down by cutting charges placed
directly against the sustaining columns inside the building. Here for example
is a report to Congress from General Benton K. Partin, a retired U.S. Air Force
Brigadier General and expert on non-nuclear weapons devices:
When I first saw the pictures of the truck-bomb’s asymmetrical damage to the Federal Building, my immediate reaction was that the pattern of damage would have been technically impossible without supplementing demolition charges at some of the reinforcing concrete column bases…. For a simplistic blast truck-bomb, of the size and composition reported, to be able to reach out on the order of 60 feet and collapse a reinforced column base the size of column A-7 is beyond credulity.17
There is now a broad and growing consensus
among architects, engineers, and other experts, that the three buildings which
collapsed on 9/11 in the World Trade Center were also most probably destroyed
by controlled demolition charges.18
Another important similarity was the legal
consequence of most of these events: the response to Oklahoma City was the
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, while the response to
9/11 was the first implementation of COG and the passage (after a false flag
anthrax attack) of the Patriot Act. “A Noble Lie” focuses on the domestic
consequences of the Antiterrorism Act, and indeed it did, like the Patriot Act
after it, provide for significant restrictions on the right of habeas corpus as
the courts had interpreted it.
In other words, both acts provided pretexts for implementation of the proposals for warrantless detention that had been a central focus of COG planning in the 1980s with Oliver North. This fit into a larger ongoing pattern of the progressive restriction of our constitutional rights by unrestrained coercive power — a pattern that I will trace back to the assassination of John F. Kennedy in 1963.
In other words, both acts provided pretexts for implementation of the proposals for warrantless detention that had been a central focus of COG planning in the 1980s with Oliver North. This fit into a larger ongoing pattern of the progressive restriction of our constitutional rights by unrestrained coercive power — a pattern that I will trace back to the assassination of John F. Kennedy in 1963.
But there were important foreign consequences
of the 1996 Antiterrorism Act as well, in particular Section 328, which amended
the Foreign Assistance Act to bolster assistance in the form of arms and
ammunition to certain specific countries, for the purpose of fighting
terrorism.19
This in turn led in 1997 to the creation of
secret “Eyes Only” liaison agreement between the CIA’s Counter-Terrorism Center
(CTC) and Saudi Arabia, followed by a subsequent CIA agreement in 1999 with
Uzbekistan (i.e. two of the most secretive and repressive regimes in the world
today).20
I have argued that these secret liaison
agreements – with Saudi Arabia and Uzbekistan – may have provided the cover for
secret CIA withholding of information before 9/11 about the designated 9/11
culprits al-Hazmi and al-Mihdhar.21
Thus, if my analysis of the CIA’s withholding
in 2000-2001 is accurate, then 4/19 in 1995 did not just exhibit similarities
to 9/11: it was a significant part of the build-up which allowed this
withholding to occur, and also 9/11 itself.
INCREASES IN REPRESSIVE POWER AFTER DEEP
EVENTS
That 4/19 in 1995 had repressive legal
consequences links it both to 9/11 in 2001 and also to 11/22 in 1963, after
which the Warren Commission used the JFK assassination to increase CIA
surveillance of Americans. As I wrote in Deep
Politics,
this was the result of the Warren Commission’s controversial recommendations that the Secret Service’s domestic surveillance responsibilities be increased (WR 25-26). Somewhat illogically, the Warren Report concluded both that Oswald acted alone (WR 22), . . . and also that the Secret Service, FBI, CIA, should coordinate more closely the surveillance of organized groups (WR 463). In particular, it recommended that the Secret Service acquire a computerized data bank compatible with that already developed by the CIA.22
In the ensuing Vietnam War this involvement of
the CIA in domestic surveillance led to the CIA’s Operation Chaos, an
investigation of the antiwar movement in which the CIA, despite its Charter’s
restrictions on domestic spying,
amassed thousands of files on Americans, indexed hundreds of thousands of Americans into its computer records, and disseminated thousands of reports about Americans to the FBI and other government offices. Some of the information concerned the domestic activity of those Americans.23
The pattern of increased repression would
repeat itself four years later in 1968 after the assassination of Martin Luther
King, in response to which two US Army brigades were (until 1971) stationed on
permanent standby in the United States, as part of Operation GARDEN PLOT to
deal with domestic unrest.24
The pattern was repeated again
with the assassination of Robert Kennedy. In the twenty-four hours between Bobby’s shooting and his death, Congress hurriedly passed a statute ~ drafted well in advance (like the Tonkin Gulf Resolution of 1964 and the Patriot Act of 2001) ~ that still further augmented the secret powers given to the Secret Service in the name of protecting presidential candidates.25This was not a trivial or benign change: from this swiftly considered act, passed under Johnson, flowed some of the worst excesses of the Nixon presidency.26The change also contributed to the chaos and violence at the Chicago Democratic Convention of 1968. Army intelligence surveillance agents, seconded to the Secret Service, were present both inside and outside the convention hall. Some of them equipped the so-called “Legion of Justice thugs whom the Chicago Red Squad turned loose on local anti-war groups.”27
OTHER SIMILARITIES BETWEEN DALLAS IN 1963 AND
OKLAHOMA CITY IN 1995
The repressive consequences after 11/22 in
1963, and after 4/19 in 1995, are linked to other shared features between the
two events. Almost immediately after 11/22 there were reports from both inside
and outside government, suggesting that Oswald had killed the president as part
of an international Communist conspiracy.
In Deep
Politics and the Death of JFK, I called these “Phase-One” reports,
part of a two-fold process. Phase One put forward the phantom of an international plot, linking Oswald to the USSR, to Cuba, or to both countries together. This phantom was used to invoke the danger of a possible nuclear confrontation, which induced Chief Justice Earl Warren and other political notables to accept Phase Two, the equally false (but less dangerous) hypothesis that Oswald killed the President all by himself. ….[T]he Phase-One story… was first promoted and then defused by the CIA. Michael Beschloss has revealed that, at 9:20 AM on the morning of November 23, CIA Director John McCone briefed the new President. In Beschloss’ words: “The CIA had information on foreign connections to the alleged assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, which suggested to LBJ that Kennedy may have been murdered by an international conspiracy.”28
To this day both Phase-One and Phase-Two
stories have dominated the treatment of 11/22 in the governing media, to the
virtual exclusion of non-establishment analyses treating 11/22 as a deep event.
Many have forgotten that there was a Phase
One-Phase Two process with respect to 4/19 as well. Both immediately and
thereafter there were a number of reports linking McVeigh and Nichols to Iraqis
and other Middle Easterners, including Ramzi Yousef, the fugitive bomber in the
1993 World Trade Center bombing (which also used an ammonium nitrate (ANFO)
bomb in a Ryder rental truck.)29
Both Clinton and his Counterterrorism
Coordinator, Richard Clarke, have confirmed that some of these stories were
discussed at a meeting of the Counterterrorism Security Group on the day of
4/19.30
Both men also claim to have dismissed them in
favor of a low-grade Phase Two local conspiracy led by the two designated
culprits: Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols. But reports of Middle Eastern
involvement, sometimes attributed to sources inside government, continued to
appear in the governing media, including CBS, NBC, and the New York Times.31
.
First World Trade
Center bombing of 1993
Meanwhile, signs of a local Iraqi conspiracy
were industriously pursued by an Oklahoma City NBC reporter, Jayna Davis, and
collected in her book The Third
Terrorist. Her Phase-One evidence was centered on an all-points-bulletin
initial search, quickly suppressed, for an unnamed John Doe #2. Her research
was subsequently endorsed in a Congressional Report by Republican Congressman
Dana Rohrabacher.32
Moreover Richard Clarke has written that the
Oklahoma City bombing was followed by a spate of new internal Presidential
Decision Directives or PDDs (in addition to the Antiterrorism Act), which were
drafted by himself. One of these addressed a security problem in response to
the Oklahoma City bombing, and another conferred new counterterrorism powers on
himself, including his new title as National Coordinator for Security,
Infrastructure Protection, and Counter-terrorism. Two (PDD 62 and especially
PDD 67) dealt with what he calls a more “robust system of command and control”
for “our Continuity of Government program,” which in his words “had been
allowed to fall apart when the threat of a Soviet nuclear attack had gone
away.”33
These words recall Tim Weiner’s report of
April 1994 in the New York Times that
in the post-Soviet Clinton era, “the Doomsday Project, as it was known” was
scheduled to be scaled way back, because “the nuclear tensions” of the Soviet
era had faded away.34
In other words Clinton had planned to scale back the Doomsday Project (which was governed by a secret extra-governmental committee including Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, then both not in government); but Richard Clarke used Oklahoma City to save the Doomsday Project, make it more robust and place it under his own control.
In other words Clinton had planned to scale back the Doomsday Project (which was governed by a secret extra-governmental committee including Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, then both not in government); but Richard Clarke used Oklahoma City to save the Doomsday Project, make it more robust and place it under his own control.
According to author Andrew Cockburn, a new
target was found:
Although the exercises continued, still budgeted at over $200 million a year in the Clinton era, the vanished Soviets were now replaced by terrorists. . .
There were other changes, too. In earlier times the specialists selected to run the “shadow government” had been drawn from across the political spectrum, Democrats and Republicans alike. But now, down in the bunkers, Rumsfeld [and Cheney] found [themselves] in politically congenial company, the players’ roster being filled almost exclusively with Republican hawks.It was one way for these people to stay in touch. They’d meet, do the exercise, but also sit around and castigate the Clinton administration in the most extreme way,” a former Pentagon official with direct knowledge of the phenomenon told me. “You could say this was a secret government-in-waiting.”35
Of course the fact that 4/19 was followed by a strengthening of COG
does not of itself corroborate my thesis that COG planning has been a
significant factor in the planning
and execution of America’s structural deep events. 36
However there were other recurring features in
the picture I have presented of America’s structural deep events, and we do
find these in the Oklahoma City story.
Of these the most prominent is the importance
in the official story of designated culprits who were very possibly government
informants or double agents.37
Perhaps the best documented recent example is
the US Government’s use and protection of the senior al-Qaeda operative Ali
Mohamed as a double agent inside al Qaeda; this protection allowed him to train
some of the participants of the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993, and
later help organize the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombing in Kenya.38
In my 2008 book The War Conspiracy I discussed the possibility that both Lee
Harvey Oswald and some of the Arabs designated in 9/11 (Ali Mohamed, al-Hazmi,
al-Mihdhar) may in fact have been double agents working with a US Government
agency, such as the FBI or Army Intelligence.39
Others have suggested that at the very least
Oswald was an FBI informant; and Lawrence Wright wrote in The New Yorker that, in withholding
the names of al-Hazmi and al-Mihdhar from the FBI, “The CIA may also have been
protecting an overseas operation and was afraid that the F.B.I. would expose
it.”40
In this context I noted with great interest
the contention in “A Noble Lie” that Timothy McVeigh, the prime designated
culprit in 4/19, may also have been an informant or double agent working for
the U.S. Army.41
Of course this contention remains unproven,
but the film provides some corroborative evidence.
THE OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING AND OPERATION PATCON
What is certain is that McVeigh, like Oswald,
al-Hazmi, and al-Mihdhar, was in a milieu of known informants and or double
agents, who were part of an important secret operation. In the case of Oswald
and the two Saudis, this suggests reasons for the U.S. Government’s on-going
suppression of important facts about them, both before the crimes they are
alleged to have committed, and ever since to the present day.42
In 2005 John M. Berger, an excellent
researcher, discovered that in the 1990s the FBI, in a major
counterintelligence operation, codenamed PATCON for “Patriot-conspiracy,” had
been investigating McVeigh’s milieu of armed right-wingers ~ or what Berger
called
a wildly diverse collection of racist, ultra-libertarian, right-wing and/or pro-gun activists and extremists who, over the years, have found common cause in their suspicion and fear of the federal government. The undercover agents met some of the most infamous names in the movement, but their work never led to a single arrest. When McVeigh walked through the middle of the investigation in 1993, he went unnoticed.43
PATCON was particularly focused on a former
asset of Oliver North’s illegal network to supply arms to the Nicaragua
Contras: Tom Posey and his paramilitary group Civilian Material Assistance
(CMA). In the 1980s, according to Paul de Armond, CMA had begun as “as an
adjunct to the Alabama Ku Klux Klan.”44
Enrolled in the Contra supply effort by first
the Defense Intelligence Agency and then Oliver North, CMA’s “volunteer” work
in patrolling the Arizona border against incoming aliens persuaded
then-Congressman John McCain to serve on its board.45
But in PATCON’s eyes in the Post-Reagan era,
“Posey was a notorious black market arms dealer, suspected of having contraband
sources on more than one U.S. military base.”46
In both JFK and 9/11 it seems clear to me that
the subsequent cover-ups derive from the fact that the respective plots were
skillfully designed to piggy-back on authorized covert operations, in such a
way as to ensure a subsequent cover-up. Berger’s important essay in Foreign Policy on PATCON does not
suggest a connection between McVeigh’s plot and the FBI operation. However he
notes deep in the essay that Dennis Mahon, an associate of McVeigh and another
important target of PATCON,
would go on to be a well-known figure in white supremacist circles and was convicted in February for the 2004 mail bombing of a state diversity official in Arizona. After his arrest in 2009, Mahon told his cellmate that he was “the number three anonymous person in the Oklahoma City bombing investigation.”
In other words, Mahon identified himself as
John Doe #2.
Berger, on his own Website Intelwire, has
written that “Mahon has spoken of knowing McVeigh in the past,” and has
concluded that, “Based on those comments and other information, it is at least
plausible that Mahon was involved in the [Oklahoma City] bombing.47
Berger’s “other evidence” is the testimony of
ATF informant Carol Howe, transmitted first by Jayna Davis and then by
Congressman Rohrabacher, that before
4/19 “Mahon talked about targeting federal buildings for bombings.
…[and] took three trips [with McVeigh's contact Andre Strassmeir] to Oklahoma
City.”48
Mahon has been characterized as a
self-aggrandizing loose talker. However, it seems safe to say that we better
understand the context of Oklahoma City after considering the new evidence
relating to PATCON, a secret FBI operation from 1991 to 1993 then known only to
insiders.
WAS OKLAHOMA CITY “A STING GONE WRONG”?
Although PATCON itself was officially
terminated in 1993, we learn from its files that there were in fact a number of
ongoing informants at Elohim City, Oklahoma very likely including not only Howe
but also Strassmeir.49
The Government’s lack of response to the
reports they received of an intended bombing strengthens the hypothesis, voiced
in the film “A Noble Lie,” that the 4/19 plot was initially intended as a
sting, the lethal result of which represented “a sting gone wrong.”
If so, this would increase the similarity
between 4/19 and the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993. According to the
official account, this was also a conspiracy penetrated by the FBI, also
involving an ANFO bomb on a Ryder rental truck that was also later identified
by its vehicle identification number (VIN) on a metal fragment.50
In the 1993 bombing the New York Times later reported from
tapes of interviews of the FBI’s informant with his FBI handler:
Law-enforcement officials were told that terrorists were building a bomb that was eventually used to blow up the World Trade Center, and they planned to thwart the plotters by secretly substituting harmless powder for the explosives, an informer said after the blast.The informer was to have helped the plotters build the bomb and supply the fake powder, but the plan was called off by an F.B.I. supervisor who had other ideas about how the informer, Emad A. Salem, should be used, the informer said..51
This Times
story of the 2003 WTC bombing clearly describes a conspiracy that had been
effectively penetrated by the FBI, which nonetheless, for whatever reason,
reached its lethal conclusion. One such case of a penetrated operation “gone
wrong” in 1993 might be attributed to confusion, bureaucratic incompetence, or
the problems of determining when sufficient evidence had been gathered to
justify arrests. A repeated catastrophe two years later raises the question
whether the lethal outcome was not intended.
Together with the example of inaction on the
CIA’s prior knowledge of the alleged 9/11 hijackers, the three mass murders
strengthen the claim to the International Criminal Court of Judge Ferdinando
Imposimato, the Honorary President of Italy’s Supreme Court: that 9/11 was “a
repeat of the CIA’s ‘strategy of tension’ carried out in Italy” from the 1960s
to the 1980s.52
I appreciate that it will be difficult as well
as painful for most Americans to contemplate that America’s own history, like
that of Italy a half century ago, could have been systemically manipulated and
destabilized by unknown forces. But the more research I do, the more I am
convinced that something like Judge Imposimato’s verdict must be considered.
Moreover, if the Italian analogy is applicable
to the United States, then the judgment that “9/11 was “a repeat of the CIA’s
‘strategy of tension’ carried out in Italy” raises a larger question about all
the structural deep events we have considered, especially the bombings of 1993
and 1995.
Were these all part of a single sustained
strategy of tension? It is too early to tell. But at the very least the WTC
bombings of 1993 and 2001 show suggestive signs of common origins – both
outside government (the plotters Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and the informant Ali
Mohammed) and possibly inside (as indicated by the overlapping, ongoing
cover-ups of both).53
In contrast, all of the structural deep events
I have been discussing are predictably treated by the governing media as the
work of marginal outsiders – by a “lone nut” like Oswald, or a “lone wolf” like
Timothy McVeigh. The commonalities between these events I have presented
suggest a different analysis: that insiders, including intelligence officials
and other government officers, as well as outsiders, including government
agents and double agents, must be held responsible for repeatedly designing
plots that, because of their interface with sanctioned intelligence operations,
will not be revealed by government.
My own analysis identifies these insiders as
part of an on-going milieu, admittedly amorphous and unstructured, linking the
secret networks in government to other powerful forces in our society, For want
of a better phrase, I have labeled this milieu, reluctantly, as the “deep
state.”54
But as I remarked earlier with respect to
Italy, the term “deep state” is not offered as a solution to these unsolved
crimes, but as a focus for further research.
AN ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS OF DEEP EVENTS: STATE
CRIMES AGAINST DEMOCRACY
Let me contrast my own analysis with those of
two others. The first is the notion of a “secret government” put forward in an
important PBS program in 1987 by Bill Moyers.55
It rightly points to the dangerous rise of covert
agencies, and above all the CIA, inside government since the National Security
Act of 1947. And it analyzes the crimes of Iran-Contra in particular as an
example of secret government escaping from the jurisdiction of the law and
other restraints of the Constitution and public state.
In the words of the Moyers show
The Secret Government is an interlocking network of official functionaries, spies, mercenaries, ex-generals, profiteers and super-patriots, who, for a variety of motives, operate outside the legitimate institutions of government.
In other words, the show was pointing to the
“Enterprise” used by North and his allies inside and outside the Executive
Office Building to implement Iran-Contra and other policies that violated law
and/or the directives of Congress. As I have shown elsewhere, North,
implementing these policies, availed himself of the emergency antiterrorist
network, codenamed Flashboard, that had been put together, at immense cost, by
the Doomsday Project.56
In so doing, he was “piggy-backing:” using the
authorized secret network for an illicit, criminal program, outside of the
network’s designated purpose.
Such an analysis could be screened on PBS in
1987 because one part of the U.S. government at that time was at war with
another ~ a war which set Casey at odds not only with Congress but even with
senior officers in his own agency the CIA.57
One can locate Moyers’ show as part of a
series of insider leaks and governing media exposés of Oliver North’s
off-the-books “Enterprise,” which North (and behind him CIA director Casey) had
used to violate official policies and laws.58
In short Moyers’ challenge to Casey’s and
North’s “warriors” suited the aims of the traditional CIA (and their usual
backers, the “traders” on Wall Street).59
Thus we should not be surprised that it had
nothing to say about the role of North’s superior, Vice-President Bush, or
about the stake of corporate interests in promoting CIA covert operations
around the world (such as the much larger 1980s CIA operation in Afghanistan).
Above all, it had not a word about North’s Doomsday Project planning to
“suspend the U.S. Constitution,” even though this did surface for an instant in
the Iran-Contra Hearings.60
By its silence about the Doomsday Project, the
show failed to address the ongoing planning which, I believe, allowed for the
fruition of COG plans in 9/11 and the Patriot Act. To sum up, the Moyers attack
on the secret government was largely confined to what was already in the public
record. It did not venture into deep politics.
More recently the concept of State Crimes
Against Democracy, or SCADs, has been proposed by Prof. Lance deHaven-Smith,
and endorsed by some of my friends in the 9/11 Truth community, including Peter
Phillips and Mickey Huff. By SCADs, Prof. deHaven-Smith means “concerted
actions or inactions by government insiders intended to manipulate democratic
processes and undermine popular sovereignty.”61
One great advantage of the SCAD hypothesis is
that, unlike my own work, it has been discussed in academic journals, thus
breaking a kind of sound barrier. But I have problems with the term “State
Crimes.” On the one hand I would claim that the State, or some segments of the
state, is often the victim of deep events, as in 4/19. On the other I see the
State as primarily a guarantor of democracy, not simply an enemy of it.
I agree that some government insiders play an
important role in these events; indeed, I have documented some of these in the
preceding pages. But I find it misleading to pin the blame for the crime on the
State alone. After all, if a bank insider opens the door to a group of bank
robbers, what ensues (even if you choose to call it an “inside job”) is
unmistakably a robbery of the
bank, not by it.
SCAD analysis is far more useful and
sophisticated than I can present it here, and I expect to continue to learn
from those who pursue it. But it is not deep political analysis.
DeHaven-Smith’s list of SCADs includes “the secret wars in Laos and Cambodia,”
two relevant policy decisions (rather than events) that we know came from the
Oval Office; although covert at the time, and very arguably illegal, they were
when exposed not at all mysterious and thus essentially not very deep.
By positing SCADs as a struggle between the
State on the one hand and democracy on the other, I believe this analysis
oversimplifies both concepts, and underestimates (as Moyers did not) the
internal contradictions within each. Democracy is after all a form of the state
in which the people’s freedom and power is constitutionally guaranteed by the
state (or what I call the public state). And at least one of deHaven-Smith’s
SCADs ~ the JFK assassination ~ might more logically be considered a crime against the state, rather than by it.
Phillips and Hoff seem to recognize this
difficulty: they drop the JFK assassination from their own list of SCADs.62
But this artificially segregates the JFK
assassination from other deep events, such as the Martin Luther King and Robert
Kennedy assassinations, which I believe are parts of a common syndrome.
In short I believe in the crucial importance
of a distinction that SCAD analysis does not make – between the public state
that is ostensibly dedicated to fostering the welfare, rights and upward power
of the people, and that residue of unofficial powers inside and outside
government, or what I have awkwardly called the deep state, that for a half
century has been progressively eroding that upward or persuasive power, and
replacing it with unrestricted, unconstitutional power (or violence) of its
own.
My final objection to SCAD analysis is
practical. If the state is the author of these crimes, then the work of critics
must be to mobilize public opinion against the state. This fits the libertarian
politics of those who (like Alex Jones and other lovers of the Second
Amendment) profoundly distrust the public US state in its entirety, and not
just its covert agencies.
Prof. DeHaven-Smith’s own analysis implicates not
just covert intelligence agencies of the US Government but the government as a
whole, and perhaps particularly the courts. (In support of this indictment, he
is able to point to the Supreme Court’s unusual action, in 2000, of itself
electing George W. Bush as president, by a vote of five to four.)
But a strategy of attacking the state as a
whole seems to me an example of defeatist politics. Here again we can be
enlightened by the Italian strategy of tension, which is a tale of
indiscriminate terror with a happier ending. The terror bombings ended after
Bologna in 1980, thanks to a series of vigorous and courageous investigations
by first journalists, then parliamentary commissions, and finally the courts
(not least the court of Judge Imposimato himself, which investigated the murder
of Italian premier Aldo Moro and the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul
II).
The victory of truth over violence did not come easily: journalists,
parliamentarians, and at least one judge were themselves killed. And it was
clearly a victory against one part of the state, which was achieved through the
countervailing forces of other parts.
The Italian example proves that the forces
behind a strategy of tension are not invincible. They also suggest that, if the
dark forces of the deep state are to be defeated, this will take the combined
resources, not just of the people, but of those elements in government that
can, eventually, be aroused in search of the truth.
If this essay contributes to this purpose, it
will be because others take up the line of inquiry I have indicated. I myself
do not claim to understand the inner truth about these structural deep events.
But I hope I have successfully indicated some of the directions which future
investigations should pursue.
Peter Dale Scott, a
former Canadian diplomat and English Professor at the University of California,
Berkeley, is the author of Drugs Oil and War,
The Road to 9/11,
and The War Conspiracy: JFK, 9/11, and the Deep
Politics of War. His most recent book is American War Machine: Deep Politics, the CIA Global
Drug Connection and the Road to Afghanistan.
His website, which contains a wealth of his writings, is here.
Recommended
citation: Peter Dale Scott, “Systemic Destabilization in Recent American
History: 9/11, the JFK Assassination, and the Oklahoma City Bombing,” The
Asia-Pacific Journal, Vol 10 Issue 39, No. 2, September 24, 2012.
ARTICLES ON RELATED SUBJECTS
• Peter Dale Scott, Why Americans Must End America’s Self-Generating Wars• Peter Dale Scott, The NATO Afghanistan War and US-Russian Relations: Drugs, Oil, and War• Peter Dale Scott, The Doomsday Project and Deep Events: JFK, Watergate, Iran-Contra, and 9/11• Peter Dale Scott, Norway’s Terror as Systemic Destabilization: Breivik, the Arms-for-Drugs Milieu, and Global Shadow Elites• Tim Shorrock, Reading the Egyptian Revolution Through the Lens of US Policy in South Korea Circa 1980: Revelations in US Declassified Documents
NOTES:
1 This essay is adapted from a talk I presented
at the 2012 Oakland 9/11 Film Festival presented by the Northern CA 9/11 Truth
Alliance.
2 Peter
Dale Scott, “The Doomsday Project and Deep Events: JFK, Watergate, Iran-Contra,
and 9/11,” The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, November 21, 2011,
3 Daniele Ganser, Nato’s Secret Armies: Operation Gladio and
Terrorism in Western Europe (New York: Routledge, 2005); Philip Willan, Puppetmasters: The Political Use of
Terrorism in Italy (London: Constable, 1991).
4 Vincenzo Vinciguerra, in
“Strage di Piazza Fontana spunta un agente USA,” La Repubblica, February 11, 1998, here.
5 “Secret agents,
freemasons, fascists . . . and a top-level campaign of political ‘destabilization,’”
The Guardian, December 5, 1990,
here; quoted in Daniele Ganser, NATO’s Secret Armies: Operation Gladio and
Terrorism in Western Europe (London: Frank Cass, 2005), 7.
6 Ganser, NATO’s Secret Armies, 125-47, 224-44.
7 Peter Dale Scott, The Road to 9/11 (Berkeley:
University of California Press, 2007), 181. Cf. Ganser, NATO’s Secret Armies, 6.
8 Ola Tunander, “The War on
Terror and the Pax Americana, ” in David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals
Speak Out (Northampton, MA: Olive Branch Press, 2007), I, 164.
9 Ganser, Nato’s Secret Armies, 26; citing El Pais, November 26, 1990.
10 Tunander, “The War on
Terror,” 164.
11 Cf. Peter Dale Scott, American War Machine (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield,
2010), 30: “In February 1989 Italian Special Prosecutor Domenico Sica asserted
that responsibility for at least some of the terror bombings during the past decade lay also with the
Mafia—that is, what I am referring to as the global drug connection.”
12 Ganser, NATO’s Secret Armies, 125-47, 224-44.
13 Scott Shane, “C.I.A. Is
Still Cagey About Oswald Mystery,” New
York Times, October 16, 2009, here. For my analysis of deep similarities between
11/22 and 9/11, see Peter Dale Scott, The War Conspiracy: JFK,
9/11, and the Deep Politics of War
(Ipswich, MA: The Mary Ferrell Foundation, 2008), 341-96.
14 See White House, “Message
from the President Regarding the Continuation of the National Emergency with
Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks,” September 11, 2012, here.
15 For my ambivalent use of
the term “deep state,” see Scott, American
War Machine, 20-23.
16 For an introduction to
the film, see “A Noble Lie: Oklahoma City 1995 with James Lane and Chris
Emery,” Alex Jones Channel, December 16, 2011,
17 General Benton K. Partin,
letter to members of Congress, May 17, 1995; in David Hoffman, The Oklahoma City Bombing and the Politics
of Terror (Los Angeles: Feral House, 1998); on line at here. Another explosives
expert, Samuel Cohen, wrote to a Congressman that “It would have been
absolutely impossible and against the laws of nature for a truck full of
fertilizer and fuel oil… no matter how much was used… to bring the building
down” (ibid.).
Anton Breivik’s ammonium nitrate car bomb in front of the Norwegian Prime Minister’s office would seem to corroborate Partin and Cohen: Breivik’s bomb shattered windows but caused no structural damage whatever to the building.
Anton Breivik’s ammonium nitrate car bomb in front of the Norwegian Prime Minister’s office would seem to corroborate Partin and Cohen: Breivik’s bomb shattered windows but caused no structural damage whatever to the building.
18 “9/11: Explosive Evidence
~ Experts Speak Out,” a film prepared by AE911Truth, PBS, September 16, 2012;
viewable on line at here. Cf. Bill Christison (a former senior
official of the CIA), “Stop Belittling the Theories About September 11,”
Dissident Voice, August 14, 2006, here. www.dissidentvoice.org: The WTC buildings “were
most probably destroyed by controlled demolition charges placed in the
buildings.”
19 Charles Doyle,
“Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996: A Summary,” Federation
of American Scientists, June 3, 1996, here. In a December 2000 memo, Richard Clarke
confirmed that this assistance was being supplied “through the CIA’s
Counter-terrorism Center (CTC) and State’s Anti-Terrorism Program (ATA)”
20 Scott, “Launching the
U.S. Terror War,” The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, here; citing Anthony Summers and Robbyn Swan, The Eleventh Day (New York:
Ballantine Books, c2011), 396.
21 Scott, “Launching the
U.S. Terror War.” This withholding of information is a significant parallel
with the CIA’s withholding of significant information about Lee Harvey Oswald
from the FBI in 1963, in the weeks just before the 11/22 JFK assassination.
22 Peter Dale Scott, Deep Politics and the Death of JFK,
280; quoted in Scott, “Doomsday Project.”
23 Church Committee, Report, Book III ~ Supplementary Detailed
Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans,
682.
24 Nate Jones, “Document
Friday: ‘Garden Plot:’ The Army’s Emergency Plan to Restore “Law and Order” to
America.” National Security Archive, August 11, 2011, here.
25 Public Law 90-331 (18
U.S.C. 3056); discussion in Peter Dale Scott, Paul L. Hoch, and Russell
Stetler, The Assassinations: Dallas
and Beyond (New York: Random House, 1976), 443-46; quoted in Scott,
“Doomsday Project.”
26 Army intelligence agents
were seconded to the Secret Service, and at this time there was a great
increase in their number. The Washington
Star later explained that “the big build-up in [Army] information gathering…did
not come until after the shooting of the Rev. Martin Luther King” (Washington Star, December 6, 1970;
reprinted in Federal Data Banks
Hearings, p. 1728); quoted in Scott, “Doomsday Project.”
27 George
O’Toole, The Private Sector
(New York: Norton, 1978), 145, quoted in Scott, Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, 278-79, also Scott,
“Doomsday Project.”
28 Peter Dale Scott,
“Overview: The CIA, the Drug Traffic, and Oswald in Mexico,” History Matters, here; citing Michael Beschloss, ed., Taking Charge: The Johnson White House
Tapes, 1963-1964 (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1997), 22. “Phase-One”
stories, followed by “Phase-Two” media rebuttals, have continued ever since,
most recently in 2012 with the publication by former CIA officer Brian Latell
of an informant’s claim that Castro had prior knowledge of what would happen in
Dallas (Brian Latell, Castro’s
Secrets: The CIA and Cuba’s Intelligence Machine [New York: Palgrave Macmillan,
2012]).
29 Wall
Street Journal, September 5, 2002, here; “Take AIM: Jayna Davis on OKC Third
Terrorist,” AIM.org, here. Cf. Dana Rohrabacher, Chairman, Oversight
and Investigations Subcommittee of the House International Relations Committee,
“The Oklahoma City Bombing: Was There A Foreign Connection?” Report, December
26, 2006, here.
30 Richard Clarke, Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on
Terror (New York: Free Press, 2004), 97-99.
31 Jim Naureckas , “The
Oklahoma City Bombing: The Jihad That Wasn’t,” Extra! (Fair), July/August 1995,
here.
32 Jayna Davis, The Third Terrorist: The Middle East
Connection to the Oklahoma City Bombing (Nashville TN: Thomas Nelson,
2004); Dana Rohrabacher, Chairman’s Report, Oversight and Investigations
Subcommittee of the House International Relations Committee, Oklahoma City
Bombing Investigation.
33 Clarke, Against All Enemies, 167.
34 Tim Weiner, “Pentagon
Book for Doomsday Is to Be Closed,” New
York Times, April 17, 1994: quoted in Scott, Road to 9/11, 186.
35 Andrew Cockburn, Rumsfeld: His Rise, Fall, and Catastrophic Legacy
(New York: Scribner, 2007), 88; quoted in Scott, Road to 9/11, 187.
36 Scott, “The Doomsday
Project and Deep Events.”
37 Over and over the daily
news provides instances of new deep events that involve informants. As I write,
the headlines report widespread Muslim violence throughout the world, in
response to a despicable anti-Muslim film one of whose promoters admitted to be
a deliberate provocation (Sheila Musaji, “The Tragic Consequences of
Extremism,” The American Muslim,
September 14, 2012, here).
I was not surprised to read later that one of
the men responsible for the film, Nakoula Nakoula, was also a federal informant
(“Producer of Anti-Islam Film Was Fed Snitch,” The Smoking Gun, September 14,
2012, here). As I wrote on my Facebook page,
“I don’t think anyone should leap to sweeping conclusions from this revelation that one of the film’s makers, Nakoula Nakoula, was a government informant. But this fact so complicates the background of this allegedly “amateurish” film that I feel justified in my original assumption: that we might be facing here another deep event (as defined in my book American War Machine).”
38 Scott, Road to 9/11, 151-60.
39 Scott, War Conspiracy, 355-56, 357-63 (“The
Role of Double Agents”); Cf. Scott, Deep
Politics and the Death of JFK, 247-53, 257-60.
40 See Anthony Summers, Official and Confidential: The Secret Life
of J. Edgar Hoover (New York: PocketBooks, 1994), ch.29, n4; Harrison E.
Livingstone, The Radical Right and the
Murder of John F. Kennedy (Bloomington, IN: Trafford, 2006), 131 (Oswald); Lawrence Wright, “The
Agent,” New Yorker, July 10 and
17, 2006, 68; cf. Wright, Looming
Tower, 339-44 (al-Hazmi and al-Mihdhar).
41 This is in line with
other features he exhibited in conformity with those I had previously pointed
to in the designated culprit stereotype. One is the absurd ease and speed with
which he was soon arrested for driving without license plates. In 2008 I
compared Oswald with the alleged 9/11 hijackers under the heading “Instant
Identification of the Culprits” (Scott, War
Conspiracy, 347-49).
David Hammer, who was on Death Row with McVeigh,
has written that McVeigh confided to him at length how in fact he was a federal
undercover agent in a sting operation targeting right-wing extremists. See
David Paul Hammer, Deadly Secrets:
Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City Bombing (B.oomington, IN:
AuthorHouse, 2010).
42 Jefferson Morley and
Michael Scott, Our Man in Mexico:
Winston Scott and the Hidden History of the CIA (Lawrence, Kansas:
University of Kansas Press, 2008) [11/22]; Kevin Fenton, Disconnecting the Dots
(Walterville, OR: Trine Day, 2011) [9/11].
43 J.M. Berger, “Patriot
Games: How the FBI spent a decade hunting white supremacists and missed Timothy
McVeigh,” Foreign Policy, April
18, 2012, here.
44 “First organized by Tom
Posey as part of his Civilian Military Assistance (CMA) organization, the CMA
operated as a shadow wing of the Reagan administrations illegal Contra network.
Posey and the CMA began as an adjunct to the Alabama Ku Klux Klan. They were
first active in smuggling weapons to Central America with the assistance of a
Defense Intelligence Agency operation called “Yellow Fruit” and later absorbed
into Oliver North’s Contra re-supply operation.
Posey was later indicted for violations of the
Neutrality Act for his gunrunning activities. North and Reagan administration
officials intervened in the trial and the charges were dismissed under the
curious grounds that the Neutrality Act only applied during peacetime and the
Contra operation was the equivalent of a formal state of war” (Paul de Armond,
“Racist Origins of Border Militias”).
45 “John McCain has worked
with white racists before,” Daily Kos, October 12, 2008, here. I have not been able to determine whether
this is the Tom Posey whom David Koch named to be Treasurer of his Citizens for
a Sound Economy. Cf. “Tom-Posey, KKK, Koch Brothers, CSE,” here.
46 Berger, “Patriot Games.”
47 John Berger, “Witness
Mahon Claimed He Was Third Man in Oklahoma City Bombing,” Intelwire, January
10, 2012, here.
48 Dana Rohrabacher,
Chairman’s Report, Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee of the House
International Relations Committee, Oklahoma City Bombing Investigation.
49 For Strassmeir as an
intelligence agent, see e.g. Investigative Report prepared for Oklahoma
Representative Charles Key, in Oklahoma Bombing Investigation Committee, Final Report, 460-62; David Hoffman, The Oklahoma City Bombing and the Politics
of Terror (Venice City, CA: Feral House, 1998), 121-47.
50 Athan G. Theoharis, The FBI: A Comprehensive Reference Guide (Phoenix,
Ariz.: Oryx Press, 1999), 94.
51 Ralph Blumenthal, “Tapes
Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast,” New York Times, October 28, 1993, here.
52 “Top Italian Judge Refers
9/11 to International Criminal Court,” Aangirfan, September 11, 2012, here.
53 Scott, Road to 9/11, 151-61. Both before and
after 1993, and again before and after 2001, a key role in the cover-up was
played by U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald. See Scott, Road to 9/11, 152, 155-59; Peter Lance, Triple Cross (New York: Regan/HarperCollins, 2006), 219-23,
274-79, 298-301, 317-18, 358-64, etc.
54 Scott, American War Machine, 20-23.
55 Bill Moyers, The Secret
Government, PBS 1987; here.
56 Peter Dale Scott,
“Northwards without North,” Social
Justice (Summer 1989); revised as “North, Iran-Contra, and the Doomsday
Project: The Original Congressional Cover Up of Continuity-of-Government
Planning,” Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, February 21, 2011, here.
57 See
e.g. Tim Weiner, Legacy of Ashes
(New York: Doubleday, 2007), 396-404; Scott and Marshall, Cocaine Politics, 125-64. (Posey),
58 North’s ventures into
illegality eventually involved the mobilization of known drug-traffickers in
support of the Contras. One of his more dubious assets was the patriot
paramilitary group Civilian Military Assistance of Tom Posey, which eventually
became a prime target of PATCON (Berger, “Patriot Games).
59 For the
distinction between traders and warriors or “Prussians,” see Michael Klare,
“Beyond the “Vietnam Syndrome” (Washington, D.C.: Institute for Policy Studies,
1981); Peter Dale Scott, “Korea (1950), the Tonkin Gulf Incident, and 9/11:
Deep Events in Recent American History,” The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus,
June 22, 2008, here.
60 A personal note: when I
was at a think tank in Washington dealing with Iran-Contra, I was videotaped at
length by the two producers of Moyers’ show. One week before the show aired on
PBS, they assured me that I would be in it. But in the end, all that remained
of me in the show was my forearm, in an unexplained group shot of the think
tank sitting around a conference table. At the time my research focused on the
activities of Bush and North (including North’s alleged plans for “suspension
of the constitution”) that the Committees, like the Moyers program, did not
pursue. See Scott, “North, Iran-Contra, and the Doomsday Project.”
61 Lance deHaven-Smith, “Beyond
Conspiracy Theory: Patterns of High Crime in American Government,” American Behavioral Scientist, 53,
796; citing Lance deHaven-Smith, “When political crimes are inside jobs:
Detecting state crimes against democracy. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 28(3).
62 Peter Phillips and Mickey
Huff, “State Crimes Against Democracy,” Media Freedom International, Mar 2,
2010, here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.