Iranian drill in
Strait of Hormuz (Photo: MCT)
Washington
reportedly sends Tehran indirect message saying it will not back Israeli strike
on nuclear facilities as long as Iran refrains from attacking American
facilities in Persian Gulf
By Shimon Shiffer
September 3, 2012
The United States has indirectly informed Iran, via two European nations, that it would not
back an Israeli strike against the country's nuclear facilities, as long as Tehran
refrains from attacking American interests in the Persian Gulf, Yedioth Ahronoth reported Monday.
According to the report, Washington used
covert back-channels in Europe to clarify that the US does not intend to back Israel in a strike that may spark a regional
conflict.
In return, Washington reportedly expects Iran
to steer clear of strategic American assets in the Persian Gulf, such as
military bases and aircraft carriers.
Israeli officials reported an unprecedented
low in the two nations' defense ties, which stems from the Obama administration's
desire to warn Israel against mounting an uncoordinated attack on Iran.
The New York Times reported Monday that US President
Barack Obama is promoting a series of steps meant to curb
an Israeli offensive against Iran, while forcing the Islamic Republic to take
the nuclear negotiations more seriously.
ED: Er, how about ISRAEL taking things a
little more common sense seriously? Perhaps allow investigation of their own
nuclear stocks? To stop shrieking endlessly about the horrors of a country it perceives
~ or wants the world to perceive ~ as the horror of horrors.
One of the steps considered is "an
official declaration by Obama about what might bring about American military
action, as well as covert activities that have been previously considered and
rejected," the report said.
Several of Obama's top advisors believe that
Jerusalem is seeking an unequivocal American statement regarding a US strike on
Iran ~ should it actively pursue a nuclear bomb.
Israel hopes such a statement is made during
Obama's address before the UN General Assembly on September 25.
Others in the White House said Israel is
trying to drag the US into an unnecessary conflict in the Gulf.
White House spokesman Jay Carney said Monday
that "There is absolutely no daylight between the United States and Israel
when it comes to preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon."
Carney said that all options remain on the
table for Iran. He said the "window for diplomacy remains open,"
adding that the diplomatic process remains the best way to deal with the
Islamic Republic, though "that window will not remain open
indefinitely."
According to the New York Times, Washington has also sent Iran a back-channel deal suggesting they curb their nuclear ambitions, but Tehran rejected the deal, saying no agreement is possible sans lifting all West-imposed sanctions.
According to the report, the Obama
administration is exploring the possibility of mounting a covert operation, as
well as waging a "quiet" cyber war against Iran.
President Obama had previously rejected the
notion, fearing such cyber assaults would wreak havoc on Iranian civilian life.
ED: Where to begin? Sanctions are already
wreaking havoc on civilian life in Iran. And, have not at least two identified
cyber attacks on Iran been recorded so far? And, of course, then there is the
MEK to be considered, but that is another story.
Later in September, the United States and more
than 25 other nations will hold the largest-ever minesweeping exercise in the Persian Gulf, in
what military officials say is a demonstration of unity and a defensive step to
prevent Iran from attempting to block oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz.
In fact, the United States and Iran have each
announced what amounted to dueling defensive exercises to be conducted this
fall, each intended to dissuade the other from attack.
This is a lot more interesting story than you'd thinkon a first readin. Something big is going on in WDC.
ReplyDeleteMaybe all those calls I've made are finally starting to have their desired effect! LOL!