RUSSIA, CHINA VETO UN SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION ON SYRIA

Ah! Regime change! Syria under the guns just as PNAC scheduled.

In 1996, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith and David Wurmser, joined in a report to the newly elected Likud government in Israel calling for "a clean break" with the policies of negotiating with the Palestinians and trading land for peace. They said "Israel can shape its strategic environment…by weakening, containing and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq…Iraq's future could affect the strategic balance in the Middle East profoundly." They called for "reestablishing the principle of preemption."

In June 2002, Michael Kelly wrote that a democratic Iraq and Palestine "will revolutionize the power dynamic in the Middle East…A majority of Arabs will come to see America as the essential ally."

"Change toward democratic regimes in Tehran and Baghdad would unleash a tsunami across the Islamic world," claimed Joshua Muravchik in August of that year. Michael Ledeen on September 4, 2002, called for the US to launch "a vast democratic revolution to liberate all the peoples of the Middle East…It is impossible to imagine that the Iranian people would tolerate tyranny in their own country once freedom had come to Iraq. Syria would follow in short order."

Now they begin to ratchet up the international tensions between East and West, Syria and its difficulties (primarily manufactured by the West which is under the Zionist spell) being the bone of contention.  For the first time, more or less, we are beginning to see major cracks regarding international diplomacy appear and the public vilification of China and Russia by the Zionist led media, the reactions of the Zionist pawns, are finally showing.

The Christian leaders in Syria have serious concerns at this time. The Zionist and US efforts to destabilize this previously stable country are costing hundreds of innocent lives. The government of the Syrian Arab Republic is far from perfect, but does it honestly look as though the situation following the removal of US supported leaders is better in Iraq, Egypt and Libya? 

The government of the Syrian Arab Republic has kept the peace there for decades. In particular, minorities such as Christian and Alawite, are safe in the street. They have not bowed to the almighty dollar, and the US cannot understand them. 

Mrs Clinton has said she wants other countries to stop supporting Syria, so that she can have her beloved 'regime change'. Perhaps if the US stopped its total subsidy of the state of Israel her words might be a little more credible.

RT

February 4, 2012

Russia and China have vetoed the latest UN Security Council resolution on the ongoing violence in Syria because it leaves out sanctions on the opposition alongside those on the Assad government, and leaves out Russian proposals.

Moscow says it had no other option but use its veto right, claiming the draft didn't realistically reflect the situation in Syria, and a result could have sent an unbalanced signal to all sides of the conflict.

“The Russian delegation was forced to vote against this draft resolution. We seriously regret this outcome of our joint work,” stated Russian UN Ambassador Vitaly Churkin.

Russia and China were the only voting members to oppose the draft. And as permanent members of the UNSC, they had the option to use veto power to block the draft's passage.

Beijing and Moscow have both taken issue with the draft's vague wording, which they say leaves the door open for possible international military intervention in Syria and creates a picture of the current situation that favors opposition forces over the Assad government.

American Ambassador Susan Rice told the Security Council following the vote that the US was “disgusted” at Russia and China’s decision to go against the resolution. 

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton also warned that more blood would be shed in Syria if a resolution was not reached soon. 

Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin said that resolution's Western co-sponsors had not included key proposals such as isolating the Syrian opposition from violent extremist groups or a call to arms for other states to use their influence to prevent such alliances

“Unfortunately, some of our colleagues choose to make rather bizarre interpretations of the Russian proposals,” the Russian UN Ambassador said.

Churkin said the Russian delegation has been accused of rewriting the Arab League texts adopted months ago in the Security Council.

“Indeed, they were adopted months ago and since that time the situation has evolved,” he said, pointing out that Syrian rebels used previous withdrawals of the Syrian troops to their benefit, occupying cities during cease-fires.

“There is no rule that the Security Council should repeat verbatim all resolutions adopted by the original organizations. They are neither Koran nor Bible, and we can express our own views on texts adopted month ago.”

Russia and China reminded others that it was not their place to intervene in another country's domestic affairs. 

The news follows days of heated political debate in the UNSC, with many members supporting a Western-backed draft calling for foreign nations to put an end to what some called the “Syrian killing machine.” And in a statement to the UN, US President Barack Obama urged the international community to protect the Syrian people from “abhorrent brutality.”

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told an audience at the Munich Security Conference that there are too few demands being placed on Syria's armed opposition, and that the resolution could affect the outcome of political dialogue between the conflicting sides. Lavrov is set to visit the Syrian capital next Tuesday to conduct talks with President Bashar al-Assad.

Meanwhile, Syria Tribune editor Ali Mohamad told RT that he doesn't believe the Western backers of a UN Security Council resolution on Syria "are working for the best interests of the Syrian people.”

Mohamad says “there was a very good chance this week to find a draft that could satisfy all sides – but it was not supported by Western countries.” 

”The Arab league initiative, supported by the Security Council, wants to portray an image where the problem is between Assad and the Syrian people, but this is not the reality.”

Instead, Mohamad says, the problem lies between opposing parts of Syrian society ~ and has nothing to do with Assad's removal.

The vote came after the latest reports of government crackdowns on the western city of Homs on Friday in which an estimated 200 hundred people were killed, with eyewitness testimony of tanks and heavy artillery. The Syrian government denied involvement, dismissing the claims as an attempt to drum up international support for the draft resolution.