Saturday 30 January 2010


It looks to me as if that Jewish hubris and prone to bullying and bragging as well becoming careless due to boundless ego and self confidence is threatening the Zionist take over plans in Great Britain. Looks good on you fellows! Keep it! Keep bragging pleasssse! We want to know every one of your successes, we really are fascinated. Just keep getting careless so more and more eyes open up to who and what you really are!

The UK Jewish Chronicle is apparently stupid enough to unveil the ferocity of Zionist lobbying within the British Government and its corridors of power. The Jewish weekly is happy to outline the relentless measures that are being taken by Jewish lobbyists in order to Zionise the British legal system and its value system.

As one may assume the supporters of Israel in Britain are far from happy about Britain’s magistrates being able to implement ‘universal jurisdiction’ laws, laws that allow local magistrates to issue arrest warrants for high profile foreign visitors accused of war crimes.

So, waving the red flag of denial gets them so hot they make mistakes. Good to know. The "raging bull" syndrome.

The rabid Zionist Jewish Chronicle is obviously outraged because universal jurisdiction puts most of the Israeli political and military echelon at a severe risk. Last month ex Israeli Foreign minister Mrs. Tzipi Livini canceled her visit to Britain over fears that arrest warrants would be issued in connection with accusations of war crimes under laws of universal jurisdiction.

Damn Tzipi, do the crime, pay the time! Isn't that a good idea? The problem is, you don't even think you did anything wrong! I imagine you are becoming thirsty for a little Palestinian blood soon hmmm? Been just over a year now!

Surely universal jurisdiction is not a bad thing. It is actually an ethically orientated idea that is there to prevent world leaders from abusing their powers and committing crimes against humanity. It is also there to chase war criminals and to stop them from celebrating their freedom.

Heck this does not apply to ZIONIST leaders does it? I thought it was only for the really bad guys who they don't like or have no use for any longer.

Yet, it is not very surprising that the only political lobby in Britain that acts against such a set of universal laws is the Zionist lobby.

While in the past Zionist activists tried to hide their conspiratorial actions, JC political editor Martin Bright and Chief editor Stephen Pollard are providing us with a glimpse into the Jewish relentless political activity here. “Will the government ever act?” they whine in their latest editorial as if the British government has to act in order to satisfy the Zionist will.

Well, doesn't it? The Brits have always been quite manageable so far!

Interestingly enough,

the JC editors do not offer

a single ideological, ethical or legal argument

suggesting what is wrong

with laws of universal jurisdiction

except suggesting that

it is not good for the Jews or Israel.

That should be all that is necessary. Nothing else counts in the Zionist mind. ONLY the Jew and their Illegal territories count. You have read the Talmud... Nothing that is not Jewish matters, all belong the the self ordained "masters of the universe".

Justice Secretary Jack Straw

The JC is rather outraged with Justice Secretary Jack Straw who apparently fails to bow to Israeli pressure. Considering Jack Straw is of Jewish descent, the JC must believe that it is entitled to use some measures to put him in the line of fire. In spite of the fact that Straw is known in Britain for his notorious call for Muslim women to remove their veils and also as a backer of the illegal invasion of Iraq.

The JC blames Straw for being too friendly with Muslims. “Mr Straw is known to be highly sensitive to the views of his Muslim constituents in Blackburn and is close to the Muslim Council of Britain, which opposes a change to the law.”

Oh dear! He has his own thoughts that do not coordinate with those of the Jewish masters! Draw and quarter him lads. They want to tell him with whom to associate as well as to have no moral or ethical standards.

The JC should have also accepted the fact that, bearing in mind Straw’s Jewish origin, it is just natural for him to be reluctant to put a change into British law that is there to solely to serve Israeli interests and stands in total opposition to every universal and ethical value.

According to the JC, the Jews of Britain should not be too worried. The Shadow Middle East minister David Lidington is already in their pockets. ”This has to be sorted and quickly”, says the shadow man. “It is very clear to me that this issue is doing serious damage to relations with Israel”.

At this point I am so sick of Zionist belly aching I am tempted to just put in a "blah blah blah blah". It is always SO about them and how important they are.

The JC also assures its Zionist readers that they have a man within the government who is working hard serving their interests willingly and even enthusiastically. David Miliband, the British foreign minister who is also listed as an “Israeli Propaganda (Hasbara) author’ on an Israeli official Hasbara site already announced his intention to change the law late last year.

How does a man with a clear agenda to help take a country down gain PUBLIC posting like this little lickspittle?

According to the JC he is “pushing hard within Whitehall for a solution”. Earlier this month, says the JC “the Foreign Office briefed that an announcement of the law change was imminent”. I wouldn’t except less from a listed ‘Hasbara author’

Milibrand, despite his boyish sneer (smile) still emotes the vicious opportunism of a hunting weasel, one of the few wild animals who will kill everything in sight just for pleasure.

But the JC is taking it even further. In its JC Opinion editorial it says it is “Crystal clear who is to blame” referring to Justice Secretary Straw and PM Brown

“The time for excuses is over”, says the paper. “For weeks the government has been giving every possible off-the-record promise that it would change the law on universal jurisdiction. No longer would unsuitable magistrates be able to issue warrants for the arrest of some of our closest allies”.

One may wonder why exactly ‘on the record’ genocidal murderers such as Livni, Barak or Olmert should be considered as ‘Britain closest allies’. In fact these people are primary enemies of humanity and as such they are also the enemy of Britain and any other nation.

Seemingly, the JC, doesn’t just talk on behalf of its editors. For some reason it prefers to talk in the name of the ‘Jewish community’. “Mr Straw must take the Jewish community for mugs if he thinks his behaviour is not transparent”. The only possible interpretation of this statement is that British Jewry wants Britain to give up on universal Jurisdiction just to appease its Zionists.

Such an obnoxious approach too, to assume what another is thinking and of course turn it so they are once again, victims. That is what they intimate here.

I am sure there are many British Jews outraged that this rag has the chutzpah to claim it speaks on THEIR behalf. Perhaps they should get out more often carrying signs of NOT IN MY NAME.

Brits regain your pride of self and boot the blighters out.

In case PM Brown is slightly confused and doesn’t know how to react, the JC is there to tell him how he should run Britain just to keep the Jewish community happy. “As for the Prime Minister: all he has ever needed to do is make clear that he backs Mr Miliband, and the issue would have been over”.

Considering Miliband is listed as an ‘Israeli Propaganda author’ the message here is clear. Britain better start to work for Israel and even change its laws accordingly so it can easily comply with Israeli unethical conduct.

Britain is heading towards election, and the JC is advising (THREATENING)PM Brown that he is about to pay the ultimate political price for his unwillingness to succumb to the Zionist will. “That he (PM Brown) has done precisely nothing since promising action speaks volumes about his own bona fides. If ~ and now it looks like when ~ the deadline for action passes and nothing is done, it will be crystal clear who is to blame.”

Threaten. Just what these bullies do best. Then lay the blame on the "victim". "You forced me to do it! So it is all your own responsibility!"

In plain language the JC is suggesting that PM Brown as far as the Jews are concerned, is basically finished. I wonder how long it will take for British people to wake up and say enough is enough.

How long will it take before they say NO to Israeli and Zionist infiltration into their politics, laws and value system.

Chances are, as David Icke once ruefully said,

"They won't catch on until the prison door slams shut behind them."

I don't know but they own the papers and have enough clout that they got their patsy in here in Canada by distracting public interest during the running in trivial matters and at the last minute turned up the heat, ripped the opponents apart, and praised the scumbag. I mean all of them are Zionist patsies, but it was very obvious how they cemented the election for Harper. They could do it there too.


Such scenes posted around the world do not endear Israel to the rest of the world.

"I write for a very selfish reason. When one day, Israelis stand trial for the occupation and the war crimes against the Palestinian people, I would like to be counted as someone who spoke up. I was brought up on stories of the Holocaust. I was told that even more despicable than the Nazis themselves were all those who knew what was happening and allowed it to happen. Jews have always felt abandoned by a world full of bystanders. Being a bystander doesn’t mean doing nothing. It means collaborating. And I don’t want to be a collaborator. "~ Avigail Abarbanel

This Jewish psychologist makes some excellent points about the people of Israel. In my opinion, in many ways she is an innocent who seems to be unaware of the ultimate Zionist goals for humanity. Despite my Western and rather jaded gentile take on all things Zionist, I appreciate fully her analyses of various unpleasant aspects of Jewish behaviour. This piece I picked up after the next piece titled ISRAEL'S GROWING INSANITY. Both articles are well worth reading.

14th January 2009

By Avignail Abarbanel

Resposted January 30, 2010

This piece appeared on Electronic Intifada on 18th January 2009. Here is a link to it:

This piece has been translated into French and republished on the Info Palestine site. The translation is at:

In late 2002 Yonatan Shapira, a former Israeli Black Hawk helicopter pilot and a few of his fellow pilots published the Pilots’ Letter in which they said:

“We, veteran pilots and active pilots together, who served and still serve the State of Israel during long weeks each year, object to perform illegal and immoral orders of attacks that the State of Israel performs in the territories.

“We, who were raised to love the State of Israel and to contribute to the Zionist enterprise, refuse to take part in the attacks of the air force in concentrations of civilian population.

“We, for whom the IDF and the air force are inseparable parts of us, refuse to continue and harm innocent civilians.

“These actions are illegal and immoral and are a direct result of the ongoing occupation, which corrupts Israeli society as a whole.

“The continuation of the occupation delivers a mortal blow to the security of the State of Israel and to her moral strength.”

This letter came after a series of attacks on the densely populated enclave of Gaza. For Shapira and his fellow pilots the last straw came following a mission in which “a one-ton bomb was dropped (equal to a hundred suicide bombs) on a house in the Al-Deredg quarter in Gaza, one of the most crowded neighborhoods in Gaza, indeed in the whole world.”

Shapira described how he and other pilots couldn’t sleep at night after and during these operations. This was despite a briefing by Dan Halutz Head of the Air Force at the time who said, “… everything taking place before the mission is justified according to my moral compass …” and his reassuring words: “Sleep well tonight … you executed this mission perfectly.”

Two days ago, on the 11th of January, Shapira participated in a program on Israeli radio in which he was confronted with a Lieutenant Colonel in the Israeli Air Force, pilot Ye’ohar Gal. Here is what Gal had to say:

Dresden after America and Britain dropped 14 000 tons of bombs over a solid 24 hour period.

“I think we should go at it more strongly. Dresden, Dresden. Devastate a city. At the end of the day we‘re told that war has changed. It is no longer tanks roaring ahead, we no longer face regular rank-and-file armies. Missiles are targeting population centers.The remains of Dresden after the Americans and British have dropped literally hundreds of thouands of pounds on it.

It did not start today, nor yesterday. It has been the state of affairs for over a decade now. The Arab states have realized that it is very difficult, rather impossible to defeat us on the battlefield, so they have changed their warfare.

The battle is now waged between the old lady in Jabalya and the old lady in Sderot or Ashdod. The entire people, from the old lady down to the child, are an army. An army that fights. I call them (Palestinians) a people ~ although I do not see them as such. A people is fighting another people. Civilians are fighting civilians.

I tell you that we, as sons of Holocaust survivors, must know that this is the essence of our lives, coming from there: no one throws a stone at us. I'm not talking about missiles. No one will throw a stone at us for being Jews.

Yonatan (Shapira) is one of the people who have lost their survival instinct. As simple as that. He does not understand that a war of cultures is being waged here between the likes of him and the likes of myself. He is fighting for peace.

“I want peace too, like Yonatan…

“I want the Arabs of Gaza to flee to Egypt.

That’s what I want.

I want to destroy the city.

Not necessarily the people in it.

“Make it crystal clear: no one is going to fire at us.

Not a bullet from Gilo to Jerusalem,

not a missile from Gaza to Sderot.

One of hundreds of mountains of bodies after the shelling of Dresden, AFTER the war had been legally ended.

I will not agree to a single bullet shot at us by the enemy. As soon as the enemy opens fire on me my survival instinct tells me to destroy the enemy. To defeat the enemy. If we do not defeat the Hamas ~ our deterrent force vis-a-vis the Arab states, who are also aspiring to destroy us one way or another ~ woe to us if we do not maintain this gap between us and them.” (Transcript Eyal Niv; Translation Tal Haran).

Gal sounds like he was enjoying the massacre of Gaza just winding up at the time. He makes no sense in some ways yet in others all too much. He says he does not see the Palestinians as people. He says he wants to erase their cities like the British and Americans did Dresden but not the people who he wants gone somewhere else. He sounds totally paranoid with unreasonable reason.

I have often written about Jewish trauma and its effects on Israeli outlook on life in general and on the way it treats the Palestinians in particular. I get the impression that people are not so interested in my psychological take on the conflict. The mainstream media seem to prefer purely political or economic analyses, and that’s what I read in most newspapers and see on TV channels like the BBC or the Australian ABC or SBS.
But Gal’s sentiments, which I know are widely echoed in the Israeli media and public ~ I listen to Israeli radio, read the newspapers and blogs, and correspond with Israelis ~ prove once more that we are not dealing simply with politics here
but with psychology and more specifically, the psychology of Jewish trauma. This trauma pre-dates the Holocaust and goes right back to early Jewish narrative about Jewish identity, right back to the stories of the Old Testament.

Gal says that Shapira lost his ‘survival instinct’ but what he calls survival instinct I call trauma-induced Jewish paranoia.

Both Shapira and I have both lost our Jewish paranoia alongside a growing number of Jewish peace activists inside and outside Israel. And thank goodness we have, because it means that we have healed from Jewish trauma. As a result we are healthier more peaceful people, who do not see the world exclusively in adversarial terms.

We no longer think about everything in terms of whether ‘it’s good for the Jews or not’, we do not believe that our life’s purpose is to preserve the Jewish people, and we can work as equals alongside non-Jewish people to promote peace.

We no longer spend every waking moment worrying about anti-Semitism, as we were taught to do. We know it exists as do other forms of racism, but we do not allow it to define who we are, what we do, or what we think and feel about ourselves and about others.

Being free from Jewish trauma means

being free from fear of anti-Semitism.

Zionist Jews think I have gone insane because I don’t fear anti-Semitism and refuse to focus on it, but I think I have gone sane. I once received an email from an Israeli who said to me: ‘You are naïve and stupid but regardless, when they finally come to get you, you will run to us and we will still accept you with open arms.’ I responded,

'Thanks but I had my time in Israel and I’d rather take my chances elsewhere’. Trying to convince him that no one is coming to get me, was pointless.

These are not just the ramblings of one man. This echoes the feelings of the majority of Israeli Jews and most Zionist Jews. Even very educated people feel this way. ‘Because we were victims of anti-Semitism we can never relax and must always be vigilant in case a new enemy of the Jews will come to destroy us.’

Living with trauma is a terrible thing and it leads to precisely the sort of views and sentiments expressed by Gal, and the kind of crimes committed by Israel right now. Trauma that is a product of past hurts can make you believe that everyone hates you and wants to destroy you ~ now, always, not just in the past. Some people respond to trauma by becoming aggressive and frightening, to make sure it doesn’t happen to them again. Just like Gal says, ‘No one will throw a stone at us for being Jews’."

You have not begun to appreciate the depth of our guilt.

We are intruders.

We are subverters.

We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them.

We have been at the bottom of not merely the latest great war, but of every other major revolution in your history.

We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life.

We are still doing it.

No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it.

Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone."

~ Marclis Eli Ravage, Century Magazine February, 1926

My first thought here was of the beautiful land of North America, once pristine and full of nature and glory, now stripped of its wealth through activities like blasting, or the Tar Sands, which leave death and pollution in their wake. There is such utter truth and blatant hatred in this statement. Such obscene activities can only be the political outcome of a paranoid, self delusional, aggrandized people. This author does not seem to be aware of this part of history or has chosen to omit it for now.

This is a human reaction to victimhood and as a psychotherapist I can understand it. Anyone can understand the desire to not be hurt again but the question is at what cost to oneself and to others?

Together with the fierce determination to not be hurt again comes a perception of oneself as righteous and ‘better than’. Moreover, the former victim will hold survival as the highest value, above everything else.

I am sad to say that

the identity of the Jewish people

is based entirely on survival.

At least three important Jewish festivals are based on a story of a bloody victory over an enemy that sought to destroy the Jews, Passover, Purim and Hanukah. I stopped celebrating these festivals years ago because I find their real meaning offensive.

If life is only about survival

it does not leave much energy for anything else.

From what we know about the human brain we know that living with the belief that one is under constant existential threat can lead to tunnel vision, to short-term thinking, to lack of empathy, to constant stress.

This ultimately leads to an isolationist mentality and an inability to see the humanity of others. This is Israel in 2009.

This is the country that is walling the Palestinians in and then walling themselves in from the world. These are the people who starve their neighbours, force them to live in squalor, and refuse them even the basics of survival, is hell bent on genocide.

Note that Gal says, ‘for being Jews’. And this is another problem with trauma. It leads to blindness. Israelis don’t accept that their problem with the Palestinians was caused by the occupation. They really believe that it is because they are Jewish that the Palestinians are angry and attack them.

This is why the great over reaction to the primarily grade school Hamas missles by using thousands of tons of bombs in retaliation.This image by Carlos Latuff may seem "funny" to us, and true, but to the Israelis it is how things are.

Most Israelis do not even know that Israel committed ethnic cleansing in 1948.

Ah the glory of Bolshevik education, history rewritten. Today they deny the existence of Nakba. To publically speak of the Nakhba is a crime now. It is as if it never happened they try to convince the world. Yet the rest of the world is to never ever forget the Holocaust ONLY of the Jews in WW2.

The fact that, since Israel Day is the same day as Nakba, it infuriates them and is taken as a personal attack. However they insist on celebrating their day on the same day as when they began the expulsion of so many Palestinians. It certainly proves that the winner rewrites history to his own advantage and glory.

Most Israelis are convinced to the core that Israel is the ‘good guy’ in this story who has done no wrong, the small weak David standing in front of a giant anti-Semitic Goliath. To many Israelis the Palestinians are not the same as the Nazis but are the Nazis, the powerful, non-human, faceless, single-minded psychopathic murderers who were determined to exterminate the Jews for being Jews.

This takes some stretch of the imagination. The Palestinians were a people of the land, olive growers, fruit growers, farmers. They never had guns or weapons and fled their homes to avoid war, not realizing it was forever.

When Israelis kill Palestinians they are killing Pharaoh and his army (Passover), Hamman and his 10 sons (Purim) and the Greek occupying army (Hanukah) over and over again. The Palestinians are the recipients of 2000 years of unresolved rage that has more to do with the past than the present.

In therapy we call this ‘misplaced anger’. But I guess it is more comfortable for Israelis to blame Palestinian anger on anti-Semitism than to take responsibility for their real history.

The implications of seeing the conflict from within the lens of Jewish trauma are very serious. Can we really negotiate with this?

Can we explain to Israelis that their perspective on life and on the conflict is seriously flawed?

If we tried will they listen, and do the Palestinians have time to wait until they do?

I know from the personal experience

of having been born and raised in Israel,

in a Jewish family,

that this psychology is very powerful

and very deeply embedded in one’s identity.

To give up on it means to question everything one stands for, and that’s painful. It was very painful to me. But the cost of not doing it, we are seeing right now in Gaza and the Palestinians have experienced for a very long time usually away from the watchful eyes of the world.

This is why we, who sympathize with and support the Palestinian cause should not hesitate to acknowledge this human sacrifice from its participants. Here I especially refer to the teenaged Shministim who refuse to serve at great personal cost that will follow them for the rest of their lives.

Most are jailed again and again for 65 day periods and put into isolation for refusing to go against a defenseless population whom they do not see as an enemy. And it is THESE young people who let us know that there IS hope for Israel! Mass indoctrination does not always overcome common human decency.

Many of these young people are homeless because they were cast out. Israel insists on service from every young person upon graduation from Gr.12 which also unites the citizens and often sets their careers in place. By this refusal, they are giving up opportunities for the future and refusing to become "true Israelis" as one with their compatriots.

What Avignail is describing from the view of a Jewess is breaking free of the matrix, eating the red pill, shedding the illusions and delusions of a lifetime ~ of beginning to SEE the truth, not what you have been told is the truth.

We can all relate to how truly painful it can be as we shed, often in isolation almost everything that defined us and yet kept us in unity with those around us. She speaks of beginning to become isolated from her countrymen, something we Truthers and revisionists have been experiencing for a long time now. Daring to break free is equally frightening for those around us whether Gentile or Jew.

It doesn’t help that Israel has a powerful friend in the US, a country whose collective mindset is very similar to that of Israel’s. As long as the US enables Israel’s blindness by vetoing any decision against it in the UN Security Council, by supporting Israel financially and militarily, there will be no reason for Israeli leaders to question their perception of reality.

Israel needs real friends who with ‘tough love’ can save it from itself, who can help it see what it is unable to see. Indulging Israel’s trauma and blindness is costing the lives and wellbeing of Palestinians, and it is inexcusable.

Gal thinks that Shapira has no survival instinct but he is wrong. Shapira and others are doing what they are doing because they know that Israel’s survival is threatened by its very own actions, its own psychology, not by the Palestinians or anyone else.

They are not worried that Israel will be attacked or that the Israelis ‘will be thrown into the sea’.

They are worried about the social, emotional and spiritual cost to a society that has become one of the worst perpetrators of ethnic cleansing in modern history.

Israel is falling apart from within, losing its humanity, its dignity and its identity, and they know it.

Gideon Levy a Ha’aretz newspaper reporter recently asked:

“If Israelis were so sure of the rightness of their cause, why the violent intolerance they display toward everyone who tries to make a different case?”

Friday 29 January 2010


Father and son, Benzion Netanyahu and Benjamin Netanyahu

"The sublimated Zionist desire to be hated is the fuel of Israel’s unity and self-righteousness.

This self-destructive nature, concealed as a desire for self-defense, comes from deep and ancient forces of which Zionism is merely a symptom and a hint.

Despite its military might, Israel is a weak and dying state that desires to destroy itself.

The most powerful nations in the world assist this suicidal process and this fact calls for urgent contemplation." ~ Oren Ben Dor

This article is ideally read in conjunction with the previous piece, SURVIVAL INSTINCT OR JEWISH PARANOIA.


By Avigail Abarbanel

reposted January 28, 2010

I wrote this on 9th February 2009, the day before Israel’s election, after seeing an interview with Benjamin Netanyahu’s father on Israeli TV. Benjamin Netanyahu’s father ~ described as “sharp as a razor” at the ripe old age of 99 ~ gave a rare interview to Amit Segel of Israel’s Channel 2 to support his son’s election campaign (Channel 2 website. 7 Feb. 2009).

At some point in the interview Professor Ben-Zion Netanyahu said, “Today we are facing plain and simple, a danger of annihilation. This is not only the ongoing existential danger to Israel, but a real danger of complete annihilation. People think that the Shoah (Holocaust) is over ~ but it is not, it is continuing all the time” (My translation from the Hebrew).

"The Jews are more subject to diseases of the nervous system than the other races and peoples among which they dwell. Hysteria and neurasthenia appear to be most frequent. Some physicians of large experience among the Jews have even gone so far as to state that most of them are neurasthenic and hysterical." (The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. IX, (1905), p. 225).

And then you have great Jews such as Avraham Burg, once considered for leadership of Israel, writing books with titles such as "The Holocaust is Over. It is Time to Rise up From the Ashes". This man speaks great sense.

The views of Netanyahu Senior do not represent a lunatic fringe, but the Israeli mainstream. When I was growing up in Israel, things were much the same. I and everyone I knew believed in earnest that we were always at risk of annihilation. Fear of annihilation is at the heart of Jewish, not just Israeli culture and it pre-dates the Holocaust.

One of the ways that the Rabbis and the darker Jews have controlled the populace is through fear tactics. The outer world hates them so it is best to remain together in the ghettos for example. They feared that they would lose adherents to reality should they find out the truth. It is common knowledge that many of the desecrations and hate crimes against Jews were instigated by Jews.

Go here to watch a short YouTube of an American Jewess who was caught victimizing herself in her university.

That they have many Jews believing that they are the 'chosen' people.'

Jews were chosen for destruction after their leaders caused Jesus to be executed.

All Jews have suffered since.

A large part of the so-called persecution is artificially created to keep Jews scared and to stimulate cash contributions.

Hundreds of millions of dollars have been extracted from them in the past 25 years."

~ Henry H. Kelin, Jewish Leaders Are Crazy for Power.

But the climate in Israel today is far more extreme than it was in my time, as Israel on the whole moves further and further to an irrational fanatic position.

“It is essential that the sufferings of Jews become worse this will assist in realization of our plans. I have an excellent idea. I shall induce anti-Semites to liquidate Jewish wealth. The anti-Semites will assist us thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews. The anti-Semites shall be our best friends” ~ Theodor Herzl, Founder of Zionism in 1897

When a person’s perception of reality is completely out of touch with reality itself, we begin to get an uneasy feeling that something might be wrong with his or her mind. Where is the evidence that the Jews, right now are facing a “real danger of complete annihilation”?

Where is the evidence that the Holocaust, a systematic and deliberate plan to eliminate all Jews during the Second World War, is still being carried out?

The author seems to not be aware of the policy of fear mentioned above.

"The Israelite nation is today no longer anything but a shapeless mass of corruption, of oppression, and of injustice. It has become probable that ours will be the last Zionist generation. There will remain a Jewish State ~ but an unrecognizable, detestable state. After our two thousand years of fighting for survival, our reality is a colonialist state under the yoke of a corrupt clique, a state that makes a mockery of legality and of civic morality. A state run in contempt of justice loses the strength to survive. The countdown for Israeli society is underway." ~ Former Israeli Cabinet Minister Avraham Burg, 2002

Our politics and our economics are both a product of our psychology, not something separate. We make political and economic choices based on who we are and what we feel and believe. Many rational people search for a rational analysis ~ often political or economic ~ for what is happening in Israel-Palestine. But the only way to interpret Israel’s behaviour during the past 61 years is through understanding the psychology of its society and its leaders.

To ignore Israel’s psychology is dangerous because it means that any intervention based only on political considerations, will miss the mark and risk being irrelevant. Indeed if you look at the history of diplomacy and `peace negotiations’ in the region, it is quite obvious that they have achieved nothing at all. Things seem to be progressing on a trajectory determined by something that to someone in my profession, looks more like a mental illness than a political plan, bearing no relation to any rational diplomatic efforts, `roadmaps’, peace plans or truces.

Israel’s behaviour is a direct product of its psychological struggle with the implications of Jewish identity, which in turn determines Israel’s very reason for existence. In his book Alternative to a Psychotic State Akiva Orr asks if Israel is a `Jewish state’ or a `state for the Jews’. Since it is clearly not a Jewish state ~ Israeli state law is different to religious law ~ then it must be a state for the Jews.

This begs the question of

`who or what is a Jew’,

and to that there has never

been a satisfactory legal answer.

Israel has no constitution precisely because it cannot resolve the question of whom or what it wants to be. The de-facto, modern secular Zionist definition of a Jew is someone who would have been considered a Jew by Hitler. Effectively Jews are allowing themselves to be defined by those who hated them and sought their annihilation. In other words, this identity was formed as a reaction to a particular set of circumstances.

But what happens if the circumstances change?

What does that do to this identity?

In other words, if the world is now safe for Jews

and is no longer what Jewish people thought it was,

then Jewish people no longer know who they are,

in which case either Jewish identity needs to change,

or you make sure that the world is back

to what it was when the Jews were persecuted.

That way there is no need to go through the difficult process

of self-examination or live in a world

that doesn’t make sense.

The reason for the existence of the state of Israel is a direct result of Jewish self-perception as victims of persecution.

Israel was created to offer a safe haven for Jews from persecution. I could be wrong, I might be naïve, but I don’t believe that Israeli leaders are conscious that they are now hyping up more traditional forms of anti-Semitism ~ that is to say, I don’t think that they are consciously plotting to do it.

"The Jews are more subject to diseases of the nervous system than the other races and peoples among which they dwell. Hysteria and neurasthenia appear to be most frequent. Some physicians of large experience among the Jews have even gone so far as to state that most of them are neurasthenic and hysterical."
~ The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. IX, (1905), p. 225).

They are operating without awareness and they probably believe in their own explanations for what they are doing, for example that they attacked Gaza to weaken Hamas. But we must look at the real consequences of Israel’s actions in Gaza and three years ago in Lebanon for example, to understand Israel’s real motivation.

If Israel’s actions lead to an increase in fanaticism

and in anti-Jewish sentiment,

this is because this is what

Israel wants to achieve, albeit unconsciously.

But why does Israel need more fanaticism and antisemitism?

An increase in real anti-Semitism and attacks on Jews would bring current reality into line with the outdated imaginary reality, and would help keep Jewish identity unchanged. The reality is that Jews have not been victims, certainly not of a genocidal regime for over sixty years ~ the Holocaust is not happening now and there is no attempt by anyone to annihilate the Jews.

The fact that Jews live in safety everywhere and are not persecuted makes Israel uncomfortable. If the Jews are doing well everywhere, then Jewish identity is being put to question, and so is the very reason for the existence of Israel.

The very state that was created to save the Jews from persecution now needs them to be persecuted again so that it can continue to exist.

Escalating the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians is one of the means to achieving this end.

The Palestinians, who are desperately trying to understand what has been happening to them, are caught in this madness and are the victims of it.

It’s not because of whom they are or something they did, that they are suffering. It’s because they had the misfortune of living on the land that a neurotic Zionist movement was determined to take for itself regardless of cost.

I think many Palestinians are beginning to recognize this but the world leaders still believe Israel’s racist propaganda, which says that there is something inherent in the Palestinian people that mean that they deserve what they get.

This is why it is essential that the world intervene decisively.

I do not trust Israel to suddenly develop sufficient self-awareness to understand what it’s doing and put a stop to it.

Israel’s growing delinquency demonstrates the exact opposite.

The Palestinians do not have any more time to spare.

These are not just the ramblings of one man. This echoes the feelings of the majority of Israeli Jews and most Zionist Jews. Even very educated people feel this way. ‘Because we were victims of anti-Semitism we can never relax and must always be vigilant in case a new enemy of the Jews will come to destroy us.’


Avigail Abarbanel

Born in Israel in 1964 and grew up in Bat Yam. In 1982 Avigail served her compulsory two years in the Israeli army, where she first trained as a platoon commander and later worked as a draftsperson in the army’s central headquarters in Tel Aviv. She finished with the rank of Staff Sergeant. Her army experience has turned her into a pacifist.

She studied two years at Bar Ilan University in the combined program in the social sciences. This program combined majors in sociology, political science and economics. She chose Bar Ilan because it required students to take units in Jewish studies in addition to their major subjects.

She wanted to know and understand more about her culture and history. Growing up in a secular family meant that she knew very little about Jewish religion and law. She has a Bachelor of Arts (Honours), Macquarie University, Sydney, 1995, Graduate Diploma in Individual Psychotherapy and Relationship Therapy, Jansen-Newman Institute, Sydney, 1999. Certificate in Gestalt Counseling, Illawarra Gestalt Centre, Wollongong, 2000.

Since July 1999 Abigail has her own private practice in Fully Human Psychotherapy and Counseling Services which has been running successfully ever since. She is Canberra director of Deir Yassin Remembered.


Haiti's Earthquake: Natural or Engineered

By Stephen Lendman
January 27, 2010

Human activity can cause destructive harm. Columbia University geophysical hazards research scientist, Christian Klose, studies how, including from mining. In a recent paper, he said:

"mining activities disturb the in-situ stress in the upper continental crust and can trigger earthquakes (human-triggered seismicity)."

Past examples are numerous:

~ from potash and other mining in Germany since the 19th century;

~ potash mining in Bulgaria;

~ copper mining in Silesia;

~ ore mining in Russia;

~ coal and other mining in various parts of America, including New York state, Pennsylvania, and Wyoming; and

~ coal and other mining in China and throughout the world.

Klose also says geophysical data suggest that the Zipingpu Dam, a few kilometers from the epicenter of China's 7.9 magnitude 2008 earthquake, likely triggered it. In a December 2008 presentation at the American Geophysical Union, he explained:
"Several geophysical observations suggest this (quake) was triggered by local and abnormal mass imbalances on the surface of the Earth's crust. These observations include (1) elastostatic response of the crust to the mass changes, (2) slip distribution of the main rupture, and (3) aftershock distribution."
A follow-up issue of Science magazine explained further stating:
"the added weight both eased the squeeze on the fault, weakening it, and increased the stress tending to rupture (it). The effect was 25 times that of a year's worth of natural stress loading from tectonic motions. When the fault did finally rupture, it moved just the way the reservoir loading had encouraged it to...."
Klose also says that two centuries of coal mining triggered the 1989 Newcastle, Australia quake, killing 13 and causing billions of dollars in damage. Data show that increased post-WW II production "dramatic(ally increased) the stress change in the crust," setting it off and raising questions about how mining operates.

"You have two chances to avoid this, whether you reduce the hazard or reduce the vulnerability ~ so whether you mine in a more sustainable way or have urban planning in other areas away from the mining regions."

In addition, Klose estimates that human activity caused one-fourth of Britain's quakes, not just from mining. An Andrew Alden article headlined, "Earthquakes in a Nutshell" says:
"Earthquakes are natural ground motions caused as the Earth releases energy. The science of earthquakes is seismology (the study of shaking). Earthquake energy comes from the stresses of plate tectonics. As plates move, the rocks on their edges deform and take up strain until the weakest point, a fault, ruptures and releases the strain."
Five major types of human activity cause them:

(1) Damn construction

Since water is heavier than air, the crust beneath it is greatly stressed, easily setting off shocks that mostly are moderate. University of Alaska seismologist Larry Gedney explained:

"Since the (Hoover Dam) reached its peak of 475 feet in 1939, the level of seismicity has fluctuated in direct response to water level. None of the shocks have been particularly damaging ~ the largest was about magnitude 5 ~ but the area had no record of being seismically active."

Klose says dams cause about one-third of human-caused quakes. No wonder given their global proliferation, 845,000 according to Discover magazine, including 80,000 in America. Hoover Dam is the largest, storing 1.2 trillion cubic feet of water.

China's Three Gorges Dam is the world's largest, holding back 1.4 trillion cubic feet. In 1967, a human-triggered 7.0 magnitude western India quake may have been caused by the Koyna Dam. If so, damns in seismically active areas may be more destructive than believed.

(2) Liquid injection into the ground

In 1951, the US Army constructed Basin F at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal to handle 243 million gallons of contaminated liquid chemical wastes in about a 93 acre area. In 1961, another way was chosen ~ by drilling a 12,000-foot deep well in the Rocky Mountains to inject napalm toxic waste into the earth's crust. From 1962 ~ 1966, 165 million gallons went in, likely triggering regional quakes and getting the Army to shut it down.

According to seismologist Dave Wolney:

"If you are doing deep well injection, you are altering the stress on the underlying rocks and at some point, (it) will be relieved by generating an earthquake."
Klose also worries about carbon dioxide sequestration, a process of compressing CO2 from coal plants and injecting it into underground deposits. They, too, can generate quakes close to cities, as that's where facilities are located.

(3) Coal mining

Coal provides over half of America's electricity and an even larger percentage in China. Mines produce millions of tons annually, extract up to a dozen times as much water as coal, and cause huge regional mass changes. They, in turn, increase stress that can cause quakes as explained above. According to Klose, mining produces over half of recorded ones.

(4) Oil and gas drilling

A June 23, 2009 New York Times article headlined, "Deep in Bedrock, Clean Energy and Quake Fears," explaining that former oil man, Markus O. Haring, drilled a hole three miles deep in Basel, Switzerland prospecting for clean, renewable energy deep within the earth's bedrock. On December 8, 2006, an earthquake terrified residents who remembered the devastating one striking the city 650 years earlier.

Haring terminated his project, but a US start-up company, AltaRock Energy, will use the same technology to drill deep into quake-prone areas two hours' drive north of San Francisco for geothermal energy. The Energy Department backs it with more than $36 million, and several large venture capital firms are involved, despite the risk.

According the The Times:
"The California project is the first of dozens that could be operating in the United States in the next several years, driven by a push to cut emissions of heat-trapping gases and the Obama administration's support for renewable energy. Using the Basel method, it's hoped a breakthrough can be achieved, even though it's known that large quakes occur at great depths."
Three of the largest human-caused ones happened near an Uzbekistan natural gas field, the result of liquid extraction and injection changing its tectonic action. The most severe one registered 7.3, and according to Russian scientists:
"Few will deny that there is a relationship between hydrocarbon recovery and seismic activity, but exactly how strong a relationship exists has yet to be determined."
In regions with high tectonic activity, like northern California near San Francisco or Haiti around Port-au-Prince, extraction could trigger severe quakes. It's believed Haiti has significant oil, gas, and other mineral deposits, including gold, copper, and coal. Perhaps drilling around Port-au-Prince bay, the Gulf of La Gonave, and the Island of La Gonave set off the quake, why US occupation and human neglect are related to it, and why America, France, Canada and other nations seek to profit from disaster.

(5) Large building construction

On December 2, 2005 Kate Ravilious' UK Guardian article headlined, "Skyscraper that may cause earthquakes." It referred to Taipei 101 in Taiwan, the world's tallest building at 1,667 feet, weighing 700,000 tons. According to National Taiwan Normal University geologist Cheng Horng Lin, the building's stress may have reopened an ancient fault.

Before its construction, the Taipei basin was very stable with no surface ones. Thereafter, "The number of earthquakes increased to around two micro-earthquakes per year during the construction period (1997 ~ 2003). After completion, two larger quakes were registered, strong enough to feel at magnitudes 3.8 and 3.2."

Lin believes that "the considerable stress might be transferred into the upper crust due to the extremely soft sedimentary rocks beneath the Taipei basin. Deeper down this may have reopened an old earthquake fault."

Other experts are more cautious. UCLA quake expert John Vidale says "A building will change the stress on the ground under the building, but this probably won't reach down to around 10km, the level where earthquakes occur." Compared with dams, coal mining, oil drilling, and underground waste deposits, skyscrapers cause minor stress to the earth's surface. Klose shares that view.

Other Earthquake Causes

A January 23, 2010 Pravda online article headlined, "US weapon test aimed at Iran caused Haiti quake," stating:
"An unconfirmed report by the Russian Northern Fleets says the Haiti earthquake was caused by a flawed US Navy 'earthquake weapons' test before (they) could be utilized against Iran. (Something) went 'horribly wrong' and caused the catastrophic quake in the Caribbean, the website of Venezuela's ViVe TV recently reported, citing the Russian report."
After its release, Hugo Chavez called it a drill, preparing to cause an earthquake in Iran. Russia Today said Moscow has the same weapons. The unconfirmed Russian report said America carried out a similar test in the Pacific Ocean, causing a 6.5 magnitude quake near Eureka, CA. No deaths or injuries were reported, but many buildings were damaged.

ViVe said the US Navy may have had "full knowledge" of the test's damage potential, and speculated it was why Deputy Southern Command General PK Keen was in Haiti when the quake struck, preparing to act in case of a disaster, perhaps an engineered one. In his January 21 Global Research article, Michel Chossudovsky said:
"A Haiti disaster relief scenario had been envisaged at the headquarters of US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) in Miami one day prior to the earthquake (since) pre-disaster simulations pertain(ing) to the impacts of a hurricane in Haiti" were conducted.
A "communication-information tool" called the Transnational Information Sharing Cooperation project (TISC) "links non-government organizations with the United States (government and military) and other nations for tracking, coordinating and organizing relief efforts."

When the quake struck, TISC was in "an advanced stage of readiness." The next day, SOUTHCOM implemented the system. "The (DOD's) Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA)" set up a relief effort among "a range of Defense units and various" NGOs and aid groups operating "as part of a carefully planned military operation." Did DOD have advance knowledge of the quake so could act immediately when it struck?

Was the drill's timing a coincidence or something more sinister?

On the morning of September 11, 2001, the CIA was running "a pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would be created if a plane were to strike a building." Held at the Agency's Chantilly, Virginia Reconnaissance Office, it simulated a small jet hitting one of its four towers after supposedly experiencing mechanical failure.

The media ignored it the way it's suppressing the January 11 drill. It raises serious questions and great suspicions.

Earlier in October 2000, the Defense Protective Services Police and Pentagon's Command Emergency Response Team conducted another exercise, simulating a plane striking the Pentagon ~ called "the Pentagon Mass Casualty Exercise."

Coincidence again, or were these drills
part of readiness planning for 9/11,
with advance knowledge of what was coming?

Was similar Haiti planning also preparatory
to the Pentagon's militarized takeover?

Was the catastrophe natural or engineered,
and is there another way to trigger it?

HAARP Technology ~ High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program

HAARP manipulates the atmosphere, climate, and weather for military purposes. Based in Gokona, Alaska, it's a jointly managed US Air Force/Navy weather warfare program, operating since 1992, yet the HAARP web site explains its purpose as follows:
"HAARP is a scientific endeavor aimed at studying the properties and behavior of the ionosphere (the atmosphere's upper layer), with particular emphasis on being able to understand and use it to enhance communications and surveillance systems for both civilian and defense purposes.

It will be used)to induce a small, localized change in ionospheric temperature so that resulting reactions can be studied by other instruments located either at or close to the HAARP site."
According to Rosalie Bertell, a distinguished scientific expert and president of the International Institute of Concern for Public Health:
HAARP functions as "a gigantic heater that can cause major disruptions in the ionosphere, creating not just holes, but long incisions in the protective layer that keeps deadly radiation from bombarding the planet."
Writing in Earthpulse Press on November 5, 1996, Bertell explained that:

"Military interest in space became intense during and after World War II because of the introduction of rocket science, the companion of nuclear technology....During this time of intensive atmospheric nuclear testing, explosions at various levels above and below the surface of the earth were tried. Some of the now familiar descriptions of the earth's protective atmosphere....were based on information gained through stratospheric and ionospheric experimentation."

Numerous projects preceded HAARP, including:

~ Project Argus in 1958 "to assess the impact of high altitude nuclear explosions on radio transmission and radar operations," and learn more about the geomagnetic field;

~ Project Starfish in 1962, using nuclear detonations to disrupt the ionosphere and assess the effects on the earth's magnetic field;

~ SPS: Solar Power Satellite Project in 1968, using Solar Powered Satellites in geostationary orbit 40,000 km above the earth to intercept solar radiation with solar cells that potentially could be environmentally destructive;

~ Poker Flat Rocket Launch from 1968 to the present to "understand chemical reactions in the atmosphere associated with global climate change;" perhaps more to influence climate for military purposes;

~ Saturn V Rocket in 1975 ~ due to a malfunction, it burned unusually high in the atmosphere (above 300 km) producing a "large ionospheric hole," resulting in over a 60% reduction in "total electron content" over a 1,000 km area lasting several hours; all telecommunications over the Atlantic Ocean were disrupted;

~ SPS Military Implications in 1978 to develop a satellite-based beam weapon for anti-ballistic missile (ABM) use; also as a mind-control/anti-personnel weapon by affecting the human brain;

~ Orbit Maneuvering System in 1981 to study the effect of Shuttle injected gases on the ionosphere; it was learned they could induce holes;

~ Innovative Shuttle Experiments in 1985 using gases to create ionospheric holes;

~ Mighty Oaks in 1986 to develop x-ray and particle beam weapons;

~ Desert Storm in 1991, during which the US deployed an electromagnetic pulse weapon, designed to mimic the electricity flash of a nuclear detonation; and

~ HAARP since 1992

Bertell says its:
"related to fifty years of intensive and increasingly destructive programs to understand and control the upper atmosphere. (It's) an integral part of a long history of space research and development of a deliberate military nature. (Their) implications (are) alarming. Basic to this project is control of communications, both (their) disruption and reliability in hostile environments. The power wielded by such control is obvious."
"The ability of the HAARP/Spacelab/rocket combination to deliver very large amounts of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth via laser and particle beams, are frightening."
Yet the public is told it's
"a space shield against incoming weapons
(or) a devise for repairing the ozone layer."

By modifying the ionosphere, HAARP can be hugely destructive. Potentially, it can trigger floods, droughts, hurricanes, tsunamis, forest fires, and power blackouts over entire regions. It can disrupt radar, other communications, agriculture, ecology, and financial and other markets. It can use weather to wage war, and perhaps cause earthquakes like the one that struck Haiti.

The UN Convention on the Prohibition
of Military or Any Other Hostile Use
of Environmental Modification Techniques (1977)

Its Article I states that:

"Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to engage in military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party."

Article II refers to "environmental modification (ENMOD) techniques (as) any technique for changing ~ through the deliberate manipulation of natural processes ~ the dynamics, composition or structure of the Earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere, or of outer space."

Citing Ecology News, defines environmental warfare as:

"(1) the intentional modification of a system of the natural ecology, such as climate and weather, earth systems such as the ionosphere, magnetosphere, tectonic plate system, and/or the triggering of seismic events (earthquakes);

(2) to cause intentional physical, economic, psycho-social, and physical destruction to an intended target geophysical or population location;" and

"(3) as part of strategic or tactical war.

Environmental war weapons systems can include chemtrails, chemical weapons systems (climate and weather modification) and electromagnetic weapons systems (climate and weather modification; seismic warfare)."

Other definitions are broader, including the use of depleted uranium and other environmentally destructive weapons, practices and techniques.

International standards on environmental protections during armed conflict date back as early as the 1868 Declaration of St. Petersburg. It stated that "the only legitimate object which States should endeavour to accomplish during war is to weaken the military forces of the enemy."

The 1907 Hague Regulations stressed restraint, saying "The right of belligerents to adopt means of injuring the enemy is not unlimited," and the Geneva Conventions (including Protocol I and Common Article 3) defined the principles of international humanitarian law.

In 1973, the US Senate adopted a resolution calling for an international agreement "prohibiting the use of any environmental or geophysical modification activity as a weapon of war...." President Nixon ordered the Defense Department to review the military aspects of weather and other ENMOD techniques.

During the July 1974 summit meeting in Moscow, Nixon and General Secretary Brezhnev agreed to hold bilateral talks to achieve "the most effective measures possible to overcome the dangers of the use of environmental modification techniques for military purposes."

Discussions continued in 1974 and 1975, resulting in an agreement on a common approach and language. The 1977 UN Convention followed, ratified 98 - 0 by the Senate on November 28, 1979. It took effect on January 17, 1980, but was violated thereafter by both sides.

Human environmental modification techniques (ENMOD) can cause irreversible damage. Yet international standards haven't stopped their development.

Stephen Lendman is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization. He lives in Chicago and can be reached at

Also visit his blog site at and listen to the Lendman News Hour on Monday - Friday at 10AM US Central time for cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on world and national issues. All programs are archived for easy listening.